logo
Police Had Early Doubts About Terrorist Link to Explosive Caravan, Inquiry Reveals

Police Had Early Doubts About Terrorist Link to Explosive Caravan, Inquiry Reveals

Epoch Times07-05-2025

Senior New South Wales (NSW) police officers suspected early on that a caravan loaded with explosives and anti-Semitic materials, discovered in January on the outskirts of Sydney, was unlikely to be the work of terrorists.
NSW Police Deputy Commissioner Dave Hudson, who oversees counter-terrorism operations, told a parliamentary inquiry he had voiced these doubts in initial briefings with government officials.
'I expressed my suspicion over the motivation behind it from very early on,' Hudson said.
Despite those reservations, the Australian Federal Police (AFP) determined that a counter-terrorism investigation was warranted, and the matter remained under intense scrutiny.
The caravan was ultimately revealed to be part of a false flag operation devised by organised criminals aiming to manipulate law enforcement and incite fear for personal gain.
Initial Alarm and Discovery
Found in Dural on Jan. 19, the caravan contained improvised explosives, anti-Semitic literature, and a list of addresses linked to Jewish individuals and institutions—prompting fears of a potential mass-casualty event.
It referenced the Great Synagogue in Sydney's CBD, heightening alarm among authorities.
Related Stories
3/11/2025
3/10/2025
After news of the discovery leaked to the media the following week, NSW Premier Chris Minns said police may have 'prevented a mass casualty event.'
However, on March 10, AFP Deputy Commissioner for National Security Krissy Barrett publicly confirmed that the caravan posed no real terror threat.
'Today, I can reveal the caravan was never going to cause a mass casualty event,' Barrett told reporters. 'It was concocted by criminals who wanted to cause fear for personal benefit.'
Police Maintained Skepticism
Hudson rejected suggestions that NSW Police had been deceived.
'I don't think the NSW Police were conned,' he said.
Both Hudson and NSW Police Commissioner Karen Webb confirmed that terrorism charges were considered, even though police had internal doubts about the authenticity of the threat.
'In our briefings ... we talked about our concerns about this investigation but reiterated we had to take it at its highest,' Webb said.
She later added that she did inform state ministers about her fears of the incident being a hoax.
'I directly recall relaying to the premier and the [police] minister our concerns that we weren't able to test the veracity of the information,' she said.
Questions Arise Over Law Timing
Senior police are now being grilled by a parliamentary inquiry about 'who knew what and when' after crossbench MPs raised concerns that the government may have used the incident to support the passage of new hate crime legislation.
Defending his stance, Minns said, 'I introduced those laws because there had been a summer of racism in NSW, separate and aside to the caravan out in Dural.'
Opposition Leader Peter Dutton has since called for an independent inquiry into the apparent briefing delay to the prime minister.
Albanese declined to specify when he was informed.
'We don't discuss those details, because it's an ongoing investigation,' he said in Parliament.
AFP Commissioner Reece Kershaw also refused to disclose briefing timelines, citing operational sensitivity during a Senate inquiry.
Link to Other Anti-Semitic Incidents
The caravan incident coincided with a series of anti-Semitic attacks in Sydney—including arson and graffiti targeting a synagogue and the former home of a Jewish community leader.
Authorities now believe these incidents were linked to the same false flag operation.
Investigators allege that individuals were paid to carry out the acts to heighten fear and reinforce the caravan's false narrative.
Barrett explained why doubts emerged quickly.
'This was because of the information they already had, how easily the caravan was found, and how visible the explosives were in the caravan. Also, there was no detonator,' she said.
Political Fallout and Accusations
In response to Dutton's criticism, Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke accused the opposition of politicising the issue.
'If you don't care about the facts, if you don't care about inflicting unwarranted fear and blame on our community, you can't be trusted with national security.'
The Dural caravan plot has shifted from a security scare to a political flashpoint—fueling debate over transparency, intelligence handling, and the use of fear in policymaking.
AAP contributed to this article.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Israel's attack on Iran was years in the making. How did they get here?
Israel's attack on Iran was years in the making. How did they get here?

The Hill

time38 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Israel's attack on Iran was years in the making. How did they get here?

TEL AVIV, Israel (AP) — Israel's massive strike on Iran on Friday morning came after decades of hostilities between the bitter enemies. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has long identified Iran as its greatest threat, citing the country's nuclear program, its hostile rhetoric and support for anti-Israel proxy groups across the region. Iran meanwhile has pointed to Israel's repeated assassination and sabotage attacks targeting it, as well as its devastating war on Hamas in the Gaza Strip, for its enmity. While the two countries have long appeared to be on a collision course, a series of recent developments, including Israeli blows against Iran and its allies and the re-election of President Donald Trump, helped lay the groundwork for Friday's attack. Here's a closer look: Following Iran's 1979 Islamic Revolution, the country's leadership immediately identified the U.S. and Israel as its main enemies. This was connected in large part to American and Israeli ties to Iran's last shah, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, who fled Iran while fatally ill ahead of the revolution and despised by Iran's new leaders. Over the past two decades, Israel has repeatedly accused Iran of developing nuclear weapons. Iran insists it has maintained its nuclear program for peaceful purposes only, but the head of the U.N. atomic watchdog agency has warned that Tehran has enough uranium enriched to near-weapons-grade levels to make 'several' nuclear bombs if it chose to do so. The International Atomic Energy Agency and Western nations assess Iran had an organized nuclear weapons program until 2003. Iran insists its program is peaceful while still enriching uranium to near weapons-grade levels. U.S. intelligence agencies have assessed Iran was not pursuing the bomb. Israel sees a nuclear-armed Iran as an existential threat, and breaking Iran's regional network of militant proxy groups has been a major goal. 'For decades, the tyrants of Tehran have brazenly, openly called for Israel's destruction,' Netanyahu said Friday. 'They backed up their genocidal rhetoric with a program to develop nuclear weapons.' As he has done before, Netanyahu drew comparisons to the Holocaust. 'The Jewish state refuses to be a victim of a nuclear Holocaust perpetrated by the Iranian regime,' he said. Over the past four decades, Iran built up a network of militant proxy groups it called the ' Axis of Resistance.' These groups – Hamas in Gaza, Hezbollah in Lebanon, the Houthis in Yemen and smaller militias in Iraq and Syria — wielded significant power across the region in recent years. But the axis has weakened since Hamas attacked Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, triggering the ongoing war in Gaza and wider fighting across the region. Israel has decimated Iran's strongest proxies, Hamas and Hezbollah. The weakening of Hezbollah contributed to the downfall of Iran's longtime stalwart ally and client in neighboring Syria, President Bashar Assad, last December. After Iran launched a pair of missile attacks on Israel last year, Israel responded with strikes of its own, including an October attack that destroyed Iranian missile sites and weakened its air defenses. The collapse of Iran's proxy network, coupled with Iran's new vulnerability, created an opportunity for Israel to strike. Netanyahu said time was running out to strike Iran, alleging Iran had taken recent steps to weaponize enriched uranium. 'If not stopped, Iran could produce a nuclear weapon within a very short time,' he said. At the same time, the state of nuclear talks between the U.S. and Iran created a window. Those talks have been faltering, but a sixth round was scheduled for Oman on Sunday. An agreement could see the U.S. lift some of its crushing economic sanctions on Iran and make it much harder for Israel to strike. Israeli officials feared the talks were a way for Iran to buy time as it secretly took steps toward a nuclear bomb. On Thursday, for the first time in 20 years, the Board of Governors at the IAEA censured Iran for not working with its inspectors. Iran immediately announced it would establish a third enrichment site and swap out some centrifuges for more advanced ones. By then, Israel apparently had already made up its mind. Trump said he asked Netanyahu not to attack Iran while the negotiations are ongoing. But Trump has a long record of support for Israel, and there appeared to be little immediate blowback.

Israel's attack on Iran was years in the making. How did they get here?
Israel's attack on Iran was years in the making. How did they get here?

Hamilton Spectator

timean hour ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Israel's attack on Iran was years in the making. How did they get here?

TEL AVIV, Israel (AP) — Israel's massive strike on Iran on Friday morning came after decades of hostilities between the bitter enemies. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has long identified Iran as its greatest threat, citing the country's nuclear program, its hostile rhetoric and support for anti-Israel proxy groups across the region. Iran meanwhile has pointed to Israel's repeated assassination and sabotage attacks targeting it, as well as its devastating war on Hamas in the Gaza Strip, for its enmity. While the two countries have long appeared to be on a collision course, a series of recent developments, including Israeli blows against Iran and its allies and the re-election of President Donald Trump, helped lay the groundwork for Friday's attack. Here's a closer look: Why are Israel and Iran enemies? Following Iran's 1979 Islamic Revolution , the country's leadership immediately identified the U.S. and Israel as its main enemies. This was connected in large part to American and Israeli ties to Iran's last shah, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, who fled Iran while fatally ill ahead of the revolution and despised by Iran's new leaders. Over the past two decades, Israel has repeatedly accused Iran of developing nuclear weapons. Iran insists it has maintained its nuclear program for peaceful purposes only, but the head of the U.N. atomic watchdog agency has warned that Tehran has enough uranium enriched to near-weapons-grade levels to make 'several' nuclear bombs if it chose to do so. The International Atomic Energy Agency and Western nations assess Iran had an organized nuclear weapons program until 2003. Iran insists its program is peaceful while still enriching uranium to near weapons-grade levels. U.S. intelligence agencies have assessed Iran was not pursuing the bomb. Israel sees a nuclear-armed Iran as an existential threat, and breaking Iran's regional network of militant proxy groups has been a major goal. 'For decades, the tyrants of Tehran have brazenly, openly called for Israel's destruction,' Netanyahu said Friday. 'They backed up their genocidal rhetoric with a program to develop nuclear weapons.' As he has done before, Netanyahu drew comparisons to the Holocaust. 'The Jewish state refuses to be a victim of a nuclear Holocaust perpetrated by the Iranian regime,' he said. Iran's Axis of Resistance has been weakened Over the past four decades, Iran built up a network of militant proxy groups it called the ' Axis of Resistance .' These groups – Hamas in Gaza, Hezbollah in Lebanon, the Houthis in Yemen and smaller militias in Iraq and Syria — wielded significant power across the region in recent years. But the axis has weakened since Hamas attacked Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, triggering the ongoing war in Gaza and wider fighting across the region. Israel has decimated Iran's strongest proxies, Hamas and Hezbollah. The weakening of Hezbollah contributed to the downfall of Iran's longtime stalwart ally and client in neighboring Syria, President Bashar Assad, last December. After Iran launched a pair of missile attacks on Israel last year, Israel responded with strikes of its own, including an October attack that destroyed Iranian missile sites and weakened its air defenses. The collapse of Iran's proxy network, coupled with Iran's new vulnerability, created an opportunity for Israel to strike. Why did Israel decide to strike now? Netanyahu said time was running out to strike Iran, alleging Iran had taken recent steps to weaponize enriched uranium. 'If not stopped, Iran could produce a nuclear weapon within a very short time,' he said. At the same time, the state of nuclear talks between the U.S. and Iran created a window. Those talks have been faltering, but a sixth round was scheduled for Oman on Sunday. An agreement could see the U.S. lift some of its crushing economic sanctions on Iran and make it much harder for Israel to strike. Israeli officials feared the talks were a way for Iran to buy time as it secretly took steps toward a nuclear bomb. On Thursday, for the first time in 20 years, the Board of Governors at the IAEA censured Iran for not working with its inspectors. Iran immediately announced it would establish a third enrichment site and swap out some centrifuges for more advanced ones. By then, Israel apparently had already made up its mind. Trump said he asked Netanyahu not to attack Iran while the negotiations are ongoing. But Trump has a long record of support for Israel, and there appeared to be little immediate blowback. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store