logo
Protests over ‘please walk on me' flag artwork prompt its removal from gallery

Protests over ‘please walk on me' flag artwork prompt its removal from gallery

Yahooa day ago

A New Zealand flag printed with the words 'please walk on me' and placed on the floor of an art gallery has once again been packed away following a public outcry, 30 years after protests forced the removal of the same artwork.
The Suter Art Gallery in the city of Nelson said it had taken down the work by Maori artist Diane Prince due to escalating tensions and safety fears.
The episode mirrored an Auckland gallery's removal of the work amid a public backlash in 1995.
This time, the flag was meant to remain on display for five months. Instead, it lasted just 19 days, reigniting long-running debates in New Zealand over artistic expression, national symbols and the country's colonial history.
Police told the Associated Press that officers were investigating 'several' complaints about the exhibition.
The piece, titled Flagging The Future, is a cloth New Zealand flag displayed on the floor with the words 'please walk on me' stencilled across it.
The work was part of an exhibition, Diane Prince: Activist Artist, and was meant to provoke reflection on the Maori experience since New Zealand's colonisation by Britain in the 19th century.
Ms Prince created the piece in 1995 in response to a government policy that limited compensation to Maori tribes for historical land theft.
'I have no attachment to the New Zealand flag,' she told Radio New Zealand in 2024. 'I don't call myself a New Zealander. I call myself a Maori.'
New Zealand's reckoning with its colonial past has gathered pace in recent decades. But there has been little appetite among successive governments to sever the country's remaining constitutional ties to Britain or change the flag's design.
New Zealand is among countries where desecrating the national flag is considered taboo and prohibited by law. Damaging a flag in public with intent to dishonour it is punishable by a fine of up to 5,000 New Zealand dollars, but prosecutions are fleetingly rare.
As in the United States and elsewhere, the country's flag is synonymous for some with military service. But for others, particularly some Maori, it is a reminder of land dispossession, and loss of culture and identity.
Protests against the artwork in the city of Nelson, which has a population 55,000, included videos posted to social media by a local woman, Ruth Tipu, whose grandfather served in the army's Maori Battalion during the Second World War.
In one clip, she is seen lifting the flag from the floor and draping it over another artwork, an action Ms Tipu said she would repeat daily.
A veterans' group also denounced the piece as 'shameful' and 'offensive'. City council member Tim Skinner said he was 'horrified' by the work's inclusion.
But others welcomed it. Nelson's deputy mayor, Rohan O'Neill-Stevens, posted on social media 'in strong defence of artistic expression and the right for us all to be challenged and confronted by art'.
The work was perhaps expected to provoke controversy and in the exhibition's opening days, the Suter Gallery defended its inclusion. But a statement on its Facebook page late Thursday said a 'sharp escalation in the tone and nature of the discourse, moving well beyond the bounds of respectful debate' had prompted the flag's removal.
'This should not be interpreted as a judgment on the artwork or the artist's intent,' the statement said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

New lawsuits accuse insurance companies of secret scheme to drive up prices for homeowners: 'Conspiracy and collusion'
New lawsuits accuse insurance companies of secret scheme to drive up prices for homeowners: 'Conspiracy and collusion'

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

New lawsuits accuse insurance companies of secret scheme to drive up prices for homeowners: 'Conspiracy and collusion'

Two lawsuits filed in Los Angeles say insurance companies colluded to force homeowners in high-risk wildfire areas onto California's FAIR insurance plans. According to the Associated Press, the lawsuits want to hold 25 major insurance companies responsible for the "illegal scheme" that has limited coverage for homeowners. The filings say their practices are "in violation of California's unfair competition and antitrust laws." The lawsuits allege that the insurance companies, including State Farm, worked together in 2023 to deny high-risk policies, making the FAIR Plan many homeowners' only option. The FAIR Plan is California's insurer of last resort. It's a program that gives high-risk homeowners access to insurance policies if they're denied through traditional avenues. These high-premium policies offer basic and limited coverage capped at $3 million. These policies are not enough to cover damage caused by severe disasters. And disaster struck in January, with extreme wildfires that destroyed almost 17,000 structures. Countless homeowners were left underinsured on the FAIR Plan. Many people can't get a traditional policy because the insurance companies don't want to be financially responsible for these natural disasters. Wildfires, droughts, floods, and other extreme weather events are becoming more frequent. By denying coverage in areas prone to climate instability, they're prioritizing profits. Furthermore, over $500 billion of U.S. insurance companies' investments are in the oil and gas industry, per the Center for International Environmental Law. Burning oil and gas creates harmful emissions that destabilize climate conditions. This leads to extreme weather events that destroy homes and leave people in financial ruin. Michael J. Bidart, who represents the homeowners, said in a statement, per AP: The insurance companies "have reaped the benefits of high premiums while depriving homeowners of coverage that they were ready, willing, and able to purchase to ensure that they could recover after a disaster like January's wildfires." Insurance companies are denying coverage to boost profits while making money off the very practices that are causing climate instability. Do you think America is in a housing crisis? Definitely Not sure No way Only in some cities Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. Bankrate advises homeowners to save claims for major losses, check dwelling coverage, and be proactive about caring for their property. But people are hopeful these lawsuits will help reinstate fair premiums and policies. According to Bankrate, Stephen G. Larson, another lawyer representing the homeowners, said: "California's antitrust and unfair competition laws exist to address the very kind of conspiracy and collusion that the complaints allege the defendants engaged in." Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store