
Trump deports 238 ‘gang members' to El Salvador: What's the controversy?
President Donald Trump's administration deported alleged members of the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua from the United States to El Salvador on Sunday, despite a court order prohibiting their expulsion from the country.
The move is the latest in a series of steps by the Trump administration to expel foreign nationals — some accused of being in the US without documentation, others targeted over campus protests.
Here is what happened, and whether it violated the court order.
What happened?
El Salvador President Nayib Bukele said on Sunday that his country had received 238 members of the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua and an additional 23 members of the Salvadoran gang MS-13 from the US.
Bukele had agreed to jail members of these groups on behalf of the US in a meeting with Secretary of State Marco Rubio last month.
He added that these deportees were in the custody of the Central American country's Centre for the Confinement of Terrorism (CECOT) for a one-year period that could be extended.
During Trump's inauguration speech, he said he would invoke the 1798 Alien Enemies Act. On Saturday, Trump signed a proclamation invoking that 227-year-old law. The proclamation claims that Tren de Aragua is 'perpetrating, attempting, and threatening an invasion or predatory incursion' against US territory. It adds that all Venezuelan citizens aged 14 or older 'who are members of' the gang and are not naturalised or lawful permanent US citizens are liable to be restrained and removed as 'Alien Enemies'.
After Trump's order, federal judge James Boasberg, the chief judge of the District Court for the District of Columbia, issued a temporary restraining order to block Trump's ability to exercise wartime powers to carry out deportations. This was during a hearing on Saturday sought by the American Civil Liberties Union.
But hours later, Bukele confirmed that the Trump administration had nevertheless gone ahead with the deportations. He shared a snippet of a news article about the judge's ruling, captioning it: 'Oopsie … Too late', with a crying-with-laughter emoji.
What is the Alien Enemies Act and how does it work?
The Alien Enemies Act allows the US president to detain or deport non-citizens during wartime conditions. In 1798, the US was preparing for what it believed was a war with France. The law was introduced to prevent immigrants from sympathising with the French.
The law allows the president to carry out these deportations without a hearing and based only on citizenship.
The Act has been invoked only three times before, during the War of 1812, World War I and World War II.
Why is this controversial?
While Trump and his allies have argued that the US is at threat of 'invasion' of undocumented immigrants, critics say the president is wrongly invoking the wartime law.
An explainer published by the Brennan Center for Justice last year says invoking the Act 'in peacetime to bypass conventional immigration law would be a staggering abuse'.
'The courts should strike down any attempted peacetime use of the Alien Enemies Act,' it adds.
The Fifth Amendment of the US Constitution protects the right to a grand jury. 'No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury,' it states, adding that wartime is one of the few exceptions to this.
The fact that the Trump administration possibly defied a judge's order further exacerbates this controversy.
The White House's action was in 'open defiance' of Judge Boasberg's order, Patrick Eddington, a homeland security and civil liberties legal expert at the Washington, DC-based Cato Institute, told the Reuters news agency.
'This is beyond the pale and certainly unprecedented,' Eddington said.
But White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt has pushed back against the criticism.
'A single judge in a single city cannot direct the movements of an aircraft … full of foreign alien terrorists who were physically expelled from US soil,' Leavitt said in a statement posted on her X account on Sunday. She added that 'federal courts generally have no jurisdiction over the President's conduct of foreign affairs'.
Bruce Fein, an American lawyer specialising in constitutional and international law, disagreed.
'The President is not a king. January 20, 2025, was not a coronation. The President is not Napoleon … Federal courts have jurisdiction over the President,' Fein told Al Jazeera. 'The probability that Trump flouted Judge James Boasberg's order is high, but we need to await more due process,' he added.
Leavitt argued that by the time the court order was issued, the deportees had been removed from the US. The exact timings of the deportation flight are unclear.
Steve Vladeck, a professor at Georgetown University's Law Center, posted on Bluesky that 'a federal court's jurisdiction does *not* stop at the water's edge.' In other words, according to Vladeck, those deportees ought to be brought back to the US even if they had left the US airspace by the time the judge passed his order.
'The court's jurisdiction turns on the presence of the defendant in the United States, not the plaintiffs,' Fein explained, adding that Trump, the defendant in this case, is in the US. 'He could be ordered to return deportees who had been illegally deported to the United States.'
Why were these migrants sent to El Salvador?
Bukele is detaining the deportees under a deal where the US would compensate El Salvador to hold them, Bukele wrote in an X post. The Trump administration will pay approximately $6m to El Salvador for detaining about 300 alleged Tren de Aragua members from Venezuela for a year.
The Salvadorian president also shared a video on his account showing the handcuffed deportees being dragged and having their heads and faces shaved by masked El Salvador police officers.
'The United States will pay a very low fee for them, but a high one for us.'
Venezuela has typically not accepted deportees from the US. The Trump administration has sent Venezuelan deportees to third countries in Central America 'because the US does not have decent relations with Venezuela', Clive Stafford Smith, a human rights lawyer, told Al Jazeera earlier.
Over the past month, Venezuela has accepted some 350 deportees, including about 180 detained at the Guantanamo Bay US naval base in Cuba, for 16 days. As of 2022, there were 275,000 unauthorised Venezuelan immigrants in the US, according to estimates by the Pew Research Center.
What is the CECOT?
The Centro de Confinamiento del Terrorismo, which means the Centre for the Confinement of Terrorism, is a 40,000-capacity maximum-security prison in El Salvador. That is where the alleged gang members deported by the US are now being held.
The mega-prison prohibits visitation, education and recreation. Inmates are not allowed to go outdoors.
CECOT opened in January 2023, within a year of Bukele ordering the construction. It is located in Tecoluca, 72km (45 miles) east of the Salvadorian capital, San Salvador.
What is the Tren de Aragua?
Tren de Aragua, which is Spanish for 'the train of Aragua', is designated to be a 'foreign terrorist organization' (FTO) by the US.
While information about the group is sparse, media reports have previously suggested that the group was formed in 2014 by Hector 'El Nino' Guerrero and two other men who were imprisoned in Tocoron prison in the Venezuelan state of Aragua. The gang largely controlled the prison, ordering robberies, murders and kidnappings from behind bars.
The gang is alleged to be behind the 2024 murder of former Venezuelan army officer Ronald Ojeda, who conspired against President Nicolas Maduro. In January, Maduro was sworn in for his third six-year term after a contentious election.
A proclamation published by the White House alleges that Tren de Aragua 'operates in conjunction with Cartel de los Soles, the Nicolas Maduro regime-sponsored, narco-terrorism enterprise based in Venezuela'.
What's next?
On Sunday, Trump asked the DC Circuit Court for a stay of Boasberg's order. 'The stay will assuredly be denied within days,' Fein predicted.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Al Jazeera
36 minutes ago
- Al Jazeera
Trump warns Musk of ‘serious consequences' if he funds Democrats
United States President Donald Trump has warned billionaire former ally Elon Musk against funding Democratic candidates in the country's 2026 midterm elections as the pair's volcanic break-up continued to play out on the world stage. 'He'll have to pay very serious consequences if he does that,' Trump told US network NBC News in an interview published Saturday, without spelling out what the repercussions might be for the tech mogul, whose businesses benefit from lucrative US federal contracts. Trump aides, various Republicans, and key wealthy donors to the GOP have urged the two to temper the bitter feud and make peace, fearing irreparable political and economic fallout. But, asked whether he thought his relationship with the Tesla and SpaceX CEO was over, Trump said, 'I would assume so, yeah'. The interview featured Trump's most extensive comments yet on the spectacular bust-up that saw Musk criticising his signature tax and spending bill as an 'abomination', tensions escalating after he went on to highlight one-time links between the president and the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. By Saturday morning, Musk had deleted his 'big bomb' allegation that Trump featured in unreleased government files on former associates of Epstein, who died by suicide in 2019 while facing sex trafficking charges. 'That is the real reason they have not been made public,' he said in Thursday's post on X. The Trump administration has acknowledged it is reviewing tens of thousands of documents, videos, and investigative material that his 'MAGA' movement says will unmask public figures complicit in Epstein's crimes. Trump was named in a trove of deposition and statements linked to Epstein that were unsealed by a New York judge in early 2024. The president has not been accused of any wrongdoing, but he had a long and well-publicised friendship with Epstein. Trump has denied spending time on Little Saint James, the private redoubt in the US Virgin Islands where prosecutors alleged Epstein trafficked underage girls for sex. Just last week, Trump had given Musk a glowing send-off as he left his cost-cutting role at the so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Vice President JD Vance said Musk was making a 'huge mistake' going after Trump, though he also tried to downplay his attacks as the frustrations of an 'emotional guy'. 'I hope that eventually Elon comes back into the fold. Maybe that's not possible now because he's gone so nuclear,' he said in the interview with comedian Theo Von, released Friday. Trump also told NBC that it was the Department of Justice, rather than he, that had decided to return Salvadoran immigrant Kilmar Abrego Garcia to the US, where he faces charges of transporting undocumented migrants inside the country. Trump added that he had not spoken to El Salvador President Nayib Bukele about Abrego Garcia's return.


Al Jazeera
11 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Iran condemns ‘racist mentality' behind US travel ban
Iran has sharply criticised United States President Donald Trump's travel ban on its nationals and those of several countries, calling it 'racist' and a sign of deep-rooted hostility towards Iranians and Muslims. Trump earlier this week signed an executive order that bars and restricts travellers from 19 countries, including several African and Middle Eastern nations. The policy, set to take effect on Monday, echoes measures introduced during Trump's previous term in office from 2017-2021. In the executive order, Trump said he 'must act to protect the national security' of the US. Alireza Hashemi-Raja, who heads the Iranian Ministry of Foreign Affairs' department for Iranians abroad, said on Saturday that the decision reveals 'the dominance of a supremacist and racist mentality among American policymakers'. 'This measure indicates the deep hostility of American decision-makers towards the Iranian and Muslim people,' he said in a statement. The latest restrictions cover nationals from Iran, Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen. A limited ban has also been applied to travellers from seven other countries. Hashemi-Raja argued that the policy breaches international legal norms and denies millions the basic right to travel, based solely on nationality or faith. He said the ban would 'entail international responsibility for the US government', without elaborating. The US and Iran have had no formal diplomatic relations since 1980, following the Islamic Revolution. Despite decades of strained ties, the US remains home to the world's largest Iranian diaspora, with about 1.5 million Iranians living there as of 2020, according to Tehran's Foreign Ministry.


Al Jazeera
a day ago
- Al Jazeera
The magician-in-chief: How Trump makes us miss the real story
Donald Trump is the magician-in-chief. Trump understands better, I reckon, than any US president since Ronald Reagan how to bend and manipulate the squirrel-like attention spans of much of the new and 'legacy' media to his will and advantage. Reagan and his adept advisers relied almost exclusively on choreographing flattering set pieces for television to drive his retrograde plans and stick-handle around a prickly scandal or two. Trump, having established his ubiquitous star via 'reality TV' and countless appearances on ephemeral 'chat' shows, knows full well the ways and means to inculcate himself into the American consciousness courtesy of the 'boob tube'. Still, Trump has skillfully used social media – now mostly Truth Social – to hone his trademark trick: Misdirection. Like any seasoned illusionist, he appreciates how to draw the public's eye and ear away from what demands scrutiny. His aim is twofold: To advance his revolutionary agenda and to obscure the damage that agenda inflicts. When, in early 2020, a new, lethal virus emerged and spread rapidly as the death toll mounted, Trump dismissed the COVID-19 threat, peddled unproven cures such as hydroxychloroquine, and even suggested injecting disinfectant as a possible remedy. Trump's bizarre provocations were deliberate and meant, in large measure, to delay and deflect thorough review of his administration's slow, chaotic response. Trump grasps that in the digital age, outrage is oxygen. By provoking conflict and controversy at a relentless pace, he controls the focus and tempo of public discourse. Armed with a cellphone – likely embossed with the presidential seal – and a glint of inspiration, Trump can instantly shape or reshape the dominant 'news' narrative. He does this by flashing shiny, fleeting baubles that further his parochial interests, while more consequential matters drift by like a passing cloud, unnoticed – leaving the hard, complex stuff to fade into neglect. Trump is the human equivalent of a 24/7 cable news outlet pumping out intriguing content that the real cable news channels are happily addicted to – admitted or not. So, in the disconcerting face of the sudden, caustic split with Elon Musk and a festering revolt in the Senate over his signature 'big, beautiful' budget, Trump pulled out of his top hat a fantastical 'channel-changer' that provoked awe and disbelief. According to NBC News, the president of the United States 'reposted a baseless claim on Truth Social that former President Joe Biden was executed in 2020 and replaced with clones or robots'. Given that the president of the United States shared the 'conspiracy theory' with his 10 million followers, and, by extension, the rest of us, an NBC correspondent was required to contact the White House to determine the following: First, whether America's head of state 'believed' that Biden was executed in 2020. Second, why did America's head of state amplify a post claiming an executed Biden had been replaced by a clone? Let me help NBC News and the dozens of reporters who were compelled to ask the White House the same absurd questions in the pursuit of 'clarity'. Despite his, ah, bluster and eccentricities, I can confidently suggest that Trump does not 'believe' that Biden was executed in 2020. Trump trumpeted this nonsense to get NBC News and other scribes fixated on the latest shiny bauble instead of exploring how his 'big, beautiful' bill will strip millions of Americans of their health insurance and dilate the US deficit. To dismiss Trump's expert ability to train the world's gaze where he wants it as a 'distraction' is, I think, too easy and simplistic since, by now, we ought to have become wise to the ruse. What Trump wields is far more practised and pernicious. He doesn't just distract – he rewrites the story in real time, making the serious seem trivial, and the trivial seem epochal. Oh, and he figured out long ago that most political observers are far more captivated by personality than policy. Trump also recognises that the presidency isn't only about power. It's about stagecraft. He is not preoccupied by nuance or accountability. He revels in spectacle. And the spectacle always wins out. As such, Trump continues to beguile and enthral with his studied performances grounded, as they are, in the gravitational pull and intoxicating prestige of occupying the Oval Office. The Beltway press is conditioned to look where the president points – again and again. On reliable cue, Trump announced, by presidential decree, that the White House counsel and attorney general would probe allegations that Biden's aides may have 'covered up' his 'cognitive decline' and used an autopen to sign off on major policies without his knowledge or consent. For his agitated part, Biden issued a statement on Thursday calling Trump's calculated gambit a 'distraction', while insisting that he made the 'decisions during my presidency'. The 'investigation' comes on the convenient heels of a book, co-authored by CNN host Jake Tapper, detailing Biden's alleged waning mental acuity while in office. The book's detractors have accused Tapper of revising the record as a sop to right-wing personalities since, they insist, he and CNN previously poo-pooed reports of Biden's faltering mind and body. Meanwhile, the manufactured brouhaha and deepening, vitriolic rupture of the Trump-Musk bromance, have reduced the resurrection of Trump's racially tinged travel ban to an afterthought. Once the subject of fierce legal and moral opposition, it has returned with barely a whisper of resistance – another example of how Trump's theatrics serve to smother the dangerous intent beneath the enticing din. What to do? A responsible newsroom must avoid as best it can serving as marionettes to Trump's cynical schemes. That translates into ignoring the impulse to treat every incendiary outburst, insult, or incitement as urgent or newsworthy. Editors and producers should ask: Whose interests are being served by this coverage? If the answer is Trump's, pause or take a refreshing pass. Journalists should redirect the lens towards substance, not stunts. That involves patience and the discipline to pose another important question: What is being hidden behind the colourful camouflage? The antidote to manipulation is not detachment – it's sharp, vigilant coverage of the profound, human consequences of the president's actions, not his antics. In its exhausting dance with Donald Trump, the fourth estate can and must stop mistaking the fireworks for the fire. The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera's editorial stance.