
2 held for sheltering Pahalgam attackers
The National Investigation Agency (NIA) has arrested two men for allegedly harbouring the terrorists who killed 26 civilians in Pahalgam two months ago, the agency said on Sunday, marking the first set of arrests in connection with the terror attack. ITBP personnel patrol an area at Betaab Valley of Pahalgam ahead of reopening of tourists places in the area, which were closed in view of security considerations after the April 22 Pahalgam attack, in Anantnag district, Sunday (PTI)
In a statement, NIA said that Pahalgam residents Parvaiz Ahmad Jothar and Bashir Ahmad Jothar knew about the terror affiliations of the three gunmen and provided them with shelter, food and logistical support in the days leading up to the April 22 attack.
'Parvaiz and Bashir had knowingly harboured the three armed terrorists at a seasonal dhok (hut) at Hill Park before the attack. The two men had provided food, shelter and logistical support to the terrorists who selectively killed the tourists on the basis of their religious identity,' the anti-terror agency said in a statement and added the two have been charged under the stringent Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act's (UAPA) Section 19 (punishment for harbouring or concealing a terrorist). The agency did not disclose further information about the two men.
Also Read | Pahalgam probe: In hunt for gunmen, 2 possibilities on radar
Since the terror strike, security forces have killed six terrorists in separate encounters across Kashmir, but the Pahalgam attackers remain at large. Authorities detained close to 2,000 people for questioning in the aftermath of the attack.
'The duo has also disclosed the identities of the three armed terrorists involved in the attack, and have also confirmed that they were Pakistani nationals affiliated to the proscribed terrorist outfit Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT),' the anti-terror agency said in the statement.
Also Read | 'Attack on every Indian's soul': PM Modi on Pahalgam terror attack at G7 Summit
Authorities earlier identified the suspected attackers as Hashim Musa, also known as Suleiman, and Ali Bhai, also called Talha Bhai — both Pakistani nationals — and local operative Adil Hussain Thokker. The agency did not clarify on Sunday if the three terrorists alluded to in its statement were same as the ones identified earlier.
NIA, which is formally investigating the case, has questioned hundreds of people over two months, including suspected collaborators, pony operators, vendors and tourism workers. Investigators have also examined videos and photographs taken by families at Baisaran meadow on the day of the attack. HT reported on Sunday that security forces are pursuing two theories about the whereabouts of the terrorists, with officials divided over whether the attackers remain in hiding or have fled to Pakistan.
The Resistance Front, a proxy group for the banned Lashkar-e-Taiba organisation, claimed responsibility for the attack. Indian agencies say the group is a front used by Pakistan to avoid international sanctions.
As first reported by HT on April 24, intelligence agencies traced the attack's digital communications to safe houses in Muzaffarabad and Karachi, establishing Pakistani involvement in what officials described as similar to the control room-operated 2008 Mumbai attacks.
India responded with Operation Sindoor on May 7, bombing nine terrorist camps across Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir in pre-dawn strikes that killed at least 100 militants. The operation sparked four days of cross-border fighting involving fighter jets, missiles and artillery.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
21 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Panchkula: Woman arrested for possessing leopard body parts in Kalka
Jun 23, 2025 08:20 AM IST An investigation into the illegal possession of wildlife parts in the Kalka area led to the arrest of the accused Anguri Devi from Vasudevpura Market on Saturday. Based on this report, an FIR was registered at Pinjore Police Station on May 5, 2025, under Sections 9, 39, and 51 of the Act. (HT Photo for representation) The case dates to May 10, 2024, when the forest department received a confidential tip-off regarding suspected leopard body parts being kept in a slum in Rambagh, Bhairon Colony. Acting swiftly, officials raided Anguri Devi's hut and discovered four boiled leopard paws. Although the accused initially fled the scene, she has now been apprehended. As immediate identification was difficult at the time of the raid, the paws were sent to the Wildlife Institute of India (WII) in Dehradun on May 15, 2024. On April 23, 2025, forensic analysis confirmed that they belonged to a panther (leopard), a highly protected Schedule-I species under the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972. Based on this report, an FIR was registered at Pinjore Police Station on May 5, 2025, under Sections 9, 39, and 51 of the Act. She was produced in court, taken into one-day police remand, and later sent to judicial custody on Sunday.


Time of India
28 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Bustling with activity': CM Omar Abdullah hails 'revival' of tourism in Pahalgam; April attack had dented visitor flow
NEW DELHI: Jammu and Kashmir chief minister Omar Abdullah on Sunday expressed satisfaction over the revival of tourism in Kashmir, particularly in Pahalgam, which had seen a sharp decline in visitors following the April 22 terror attack at the Baisaran meadow that claimed 26 lives, including 25 tourists and a local pony ride operator. Sharing his observations in a post on X, Abdullah noted a remarkable change in the atmosphere of the popular tourist destination. "The last time I was in Pahalgam I cycled through a market that was all but deserted." he wrote. "Today I came back to a Pahalgam that was bustling with activity. Tourists from various parts of the country competed for space with local picnickers who were enjoying the cool climate & rainy weather.." He credited the visible recovery to the sustained efforts of his administration. " It's very satisfying to see the efforts my colleagues & I have been putting in slowly bearing fruit.," he added. On April 22, brutal terrorist attack in the Baisaran Valley of Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir, claimed the lives of 26 people, including 25 Indian tourists and one Nepali national, marking one of the deadliest assaults in the Valley since the 2019 Pulwama attack. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Scam Exposed: What They Won't Tell You about zero trust! Expertinspector Click Here Undo The attack sparked nationwide outrage and led to a spate of travel cancellations across the Valley, casting fresh doubts on the region's security. The massacre drew strong condemnation from world leaders and reignited concerns over cross-border terrorism. In a swift and strategic response, India launched Operation Sindoor during the night of May 6–7, targeting nine terror hideouts of Lashkar-e-Taiba, Jaish-e-Mohammad, and Hizbul Mujahideen across Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. Though India maintained that its actions were focused and non-escalatory, Pakistan retaliated with drone strikes on Indian cities. In turn, India responded by disabling Pakistan's HQ-9 air defence system. As tensions escalated, border evacuations were initiated. On May 10, following further provocation, India carried out strikes on eleven Pakistani air bases, including Nur Khan, Murid, and Rafiqui. After four intense days of missile and drone exchanges, both nations agreed to a ceasefire, bringing temporary relief amid growing international calls for de-escalation. Operation Sindoor was not just a security measure but also a message of reassurance to the rest of India that Kashmir remains committed to ensuring the safety of its visitors. With improved security, confidence began to return, and the region is now witnessing a gradual but hopeful revival in tourism.


New Indian Express
29 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
BJP leader clarifies saffron flag remark, says it's his personal opinion
PALAKKAD: A day after sparking controversy by suggesting that the saffron flag should replace the tricolour as India's national flag, BJP leader and former national council member N Sivarajan has clarified that his statement was a personal opinion and that the final decision lies with the Central government. Speaking to TNIE, Sivarajan said, 'The saffron flag has a rich history spanning centuries. It is not merely the flag of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS). It symbolises India's culture, heritage and spiritual legacy. From Lord Krishna to Swami Vivekananda and Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj, the saffron flag has long represented Indian identity.' He further noted that requests to make saffron the national flag have been submitted to the Prime Minister's Office multiple times in the past. 'It is now up to the Union government to make an appropriate decision. I believe crores of Indians share the same sentiment,' said the BJP councillor from the Palakkad municipality. On Sunday, the veteran RSS functionary made the remarks during a BJP protest in Palakkad against the LDF and UDF for disrespecting Bharat Mata. Sivarajan's comments drew widespread criticism from political parties. Amid the controversy, Sivarajan reiterated his demand that political parties should be barred from using flags that closely resemble the national tricolour. 'The Indian National Congress, NCP, Tamil Maanila Congress, and several other parties use flags that look like the national flag. This blurs the distinct identity of our national symbol. They should be asked to adopt clearly distinguishable designs,' he said. His remarks come against the backdrop of a row in Kerala over the use of the image of Bharat Mata astride a lion holding a saffron flag -- an image widely associated with the RSS -- for official events at the Raj Bhavan. The portrayal has triggered sharp protests and confrontations between BJP and CPM workers on the streets, further deepening the political divide in the state. As the debate intensifies, political observers view Sivarajan's remarks as part of a larger narrative pushing for ideological symbolism in national identity.