Chinese polystyrene: NTC imposes 21pc anti-dumping duties
ISLAMABAD: The National Tariff Commission (NTC) has imposed anti-dumping duties of up to 21% on imports of polystyrene from China, a move that has placed importers in a difficult position.
'On the one hand, the government claims it will gradually reduce duties, while on the other, the NTC is creating hurdles for importers and exporters. This contradictory approach risks pushing Pakistan's economy further into distress,' remarked one concerned importer.
Importers have approached to the Ministry of Commerce to immediately withdraw the NTC's notification, issued on June 18, 2025. They have also approached the NTC tribunal and plan to challenge the decision in court.
NTC generates Rs40 billion through anti-dumping duties in 25 years
According to a letter of NTC, it initiated an anti-dumping investigation on May 26, 2024, under Section 23 of the Anti-Dumping Duties Act, 2015 concerning dumping of Polyester Filament Yarn - Drawn Textured Yam ('DIY') from China into Pakistan and consequent material injury caused by such dumped imports to the domestic industry manufacturing DTY.
The application for this investigation was filed by M/s Gatron Industries Limited, Karachi and M/s Rupali Polyester Limited, Lahore. The Applicants are the producers of DTY in Pakistan. The Commission made a preliminary determination in this investigation in terms of Section 37 of the Act on November 15, 2024 and imposed provisional anti-dumping duties for a period of four months.
Subsequently, the Commission has made an affirmative final determination in this investigation in accordance with provisions of the Act and the Anti-Dumping Duties Rules, 2022 as follows: 'product under Investigation The product under investigation is Polyester Filament Yam- DTY imported from China, which is classified under Pakistan Customs Tariff ('PCT') Codes 5402.3300 and 5402.6200,'. The investigated product is generally used as an input for the manufacturing of textile fabrics, hosiery etc.
Period of Investigation (PoI) For determination of dumping and injury, the PoI is as follows: (i) for determination of dumping - from January 01, 2023, to December 31, 2023; and (ii) for determination of injury- from January 01, 2021, to December 31, 2023
On determination of dumping, NTC argued that Individual dumping margins are determined for sampled exporters/foreign producers of the investigated product from China in accordance with Parts III, IV and V of the Act. Normal value and export price of the investigated product for the sampled exporters/producers have been determined on the basis of the information provided by these exporters/producers in response to the Commission's questionnaires, after verification and analysis.
Injury to the domestic industry has been determined in accordance with Part VI of the Act. The Commission has established that the domestic industry has suffered material injury on account of volume of dumped imports, price undercutting, price suppression, production, sales, market share, productivity and wages, capacity utilization, profit and return on investment.
The Commission has also examined factors other than dumped imports under Section 18 of the Act, which could have, at the same time, caused injury to the domestic industry.
The Commission is satisfied that the investigated product has been imported into Pakistan at dumped prices from China, which is causing injury to the domestic industry.
The Commission in terms of Section 50 of the Act, has therefore, decided to impose the definitive anti-dumping duties on dumped imports of the investigated product classified under PCT Codes 5402.3300 and 5402.6200 for a period of five years effective from November 15, 2024.
According to NTC, the definitive anti-dumping duty rates are higher than the rate of provisional antidumping duty. However, the difference between provisional anti-dumping duty rates and definitive duty rates shall not be recovered as provided under section 55(2) of the Act.
The Commission further stated that definitive anti-dumping duties imposed on dumped imports of the investigated product would be in addition to other taxes and duties leviable on its imports under any other law, the definitive anti-dumping duties shall v of 1969) and be collected in the same manner as customs duty is collected under the Customs Act, 1969 shall be deposited in the National Tariff Commission's non-lapsable PLD Account.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
12 hours ago
- Express Tribune
PPP hardens stance on 'draconian powers' for taxman
The Pakistan Peoples Party has refused to vote in favour of new "draconian" powers for taxman to arrest people in tax fraud cases, resulting in a new round of negotiations between the two key partners of the alliance just hours before the approval of the budget from the National Assembly. On behalf of the government, Deputy Prime Minister Ishaq Dar has reached out to the top PPP leadership who was hopeful to resolve the issue before the approval of the budget. The government was hopeful that after adding some more safeguards, the PPP may vote for the arrest powers amendment in the Finance Bill today (Thursday) The sources told The Express Tribune that the top leadership of the PPP conveyed to the government on Wednesday it would not vote to give arrest powers to the Federal Board of Revenue in spite of inclusion of new safeguards to have a check on these powers. The government cannot get the budget passed from the National Assembly without the support of the PPP. On June 12, the government proposed in the budget that the FBR can arrest people in tax fraud cases. During discussions on the budget in the National as well as Senate standing committees on finance the additional safeguards were introduced to stop the misuse of these powers. These safeguards had been proposed by the PPP. Despite the additional safeguards, the FBR cannot be trusted; a senior PPP negotiator told The Express Tribune on condition of anonymity. The real issue was the trust on the FBR, he added. The development surfaced a day before the approval of the budget by the National Assembly, which is scheduled to approve it on Thursday (today). The sources said that on behalf of the government Deputy Prime Minister Ishaq Dar contacted top PPP leadership. "I am back in Islamabad and we will resolve it soon Insha'Allah," said Ishaq Dar while talking to The Express Tribune. Dar was in the United Arab Emirates where he reached an understanding with the UAE rulers to address the serious issue of denying visas to Pakistani government officials. Dar said that he was in contact with the President Asif Ali Zardari and the other PPP leadership. The matter regarding the arrest powers will be addressed before the approval of the budget, said the Deputy Prime Minister. During deliberations on the budget, the chairman National Assembly Standing Committee on Finance Syed Naveed Qamar had termed the powers to arrest as "draconian". A few members of the committee equated the FBR with the National Accountability Bureau. On the complaints from the businesses, the Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif had also constituted a committee to include checks on these powers. Tax fraud has been defined as: "knowingly, intentionally or dishonestly doing any act or abets any action to cause loss of tax under this Act, including: using or preparing false, forged and fictitious documents including return, statements, annexures and invoices; false claim of input tax credit based on fictitious transactions; issuance of any tax invoice without supply of goods; tampering with or destroying of any material evidence or documents required to be maintained; generating fake input through manipulation of return filing system of the Board and making fake entries in the sales tax returns or in the annexures; and making fictitious compliance of section 73, including routing of payments back to the registered person, or for the benefit of the registered person, through a bank account held by a supplier or a purported supplier." Upon committing any of the above offences, the FBR will have the authority to arrest the individual without first seeking a warrant from any court of law, according to the proposed powers. When contacted, FBR spokesman Dr Najeeb Memon said that the updated bill has already been submitted in the National Assembly by its standing committee on finance and the decision now rests with the assembly. Unlike in the past, when the government would submit the updated bill in the National Assembly, this time the standing committee securitized the budget where FBR also proposed additional revenue measures of Rs36 billion. In the budget, the government had proposed a total Rs435 billion new tax measures, which after the adjustments has now increased to Rs463 billion. The Chairman FBR Rashid Langrial said that describing the Rs36 billion additional measures as mini-budget was not correct since the Parliament has not yet approved the Finance Act. The FBR chairman had told the standing committee last week that the criminality of tax fraud has been divided into two parts. In some cases, court permission will be required before an arrest is made. He explained that crimes such as suppression of taxable supplies under the Sales Tax Act, suppression or nonpayment of withholding tax for more than three months, dealing in goods liable to confiscation and making taxable supplies without registration will require court approval for arrest. According to the proposal, an Inland Revenue officer not below the rank of assistant commissioner — or any officer authorised by the board – may initiate an inquiry upon approval from the commissioner, if there is material evidence pointing to the commission of tax fraud or an offence warranting prosecution under the act. The inquiry officer shall have the powers of a civil court under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, including summoning and enforcing attendance of any person, examining on oath, requiring discovery and production of documents and receiving evidence on affidavits. The inquiry officer must complete the inquiry within six months. During proceedings, the officer must provide the accused with a chance to be heard and confront them with details of the alleged fraud. A final report will then be submitted to the commissioner, who may either approve a full investigation, request further details, or close the matter. Upon approval, the investigation must be completed within three months. The board may authorise a commissioner — through a three-member committee notified by the chairman — to issue an arrest warrant if the tax loss exceeds Rs50 million. Arrests will only be made if the accused fails to respond to three notices, attempts to flee, or is likely to tamper with evidence.
Business Recorder
14 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Bank accounts of tax evaders to face 3-day suspension from July 1
ISLAMABAD: In a major development, the bank account of any unregistered sales tax person (tax evader) can only be initially suspended for a period of three days from July 1, 2025. The amended Finance Bill (2025-26) has relaxed sales tax law for suspension of bank accounts of unregistered sales tax persons not ready to come into the sales tax net from July 1, 2025. According to the amended Finance Bill (2025-26), the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has simplified things for barring operations of bank accounts of unregistered sales tax persons. Taxmen get more powers to target unregistered taxpayers Under revised Section 14AC (bar on operations of bank accounts), this section shall apply where the Commissioner has reasons to believe that a person is engaged in supply of taxable goods without having registration under this Act. The Commissioner has provided three consecutive opportunities of being heard to the person to obtain registration under this Act. In case the person failed to obtain registration, notwithstanding anything contained in this Act or any other law for the time being in force, the Commissioner shall have the powers to direct banking companies, scheduled banks and other financial institutions, through an order in writing, to intermittently suspend the operation of the bank account of such any person for three working days. The Commissioner shall repeat suspension specified in sub-section (2), for two more times with an interval of one week between the suspensions, says amended Finance Bill 2025. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
14 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Online payment intermediaries: Penalties revised for tax fraud, non-filing
ISLAMABAD: The amended Finance Bill (2025-26) has revised penalty regime for committing tax fraud and non-filing of monthly statements by intermediaries or courier companies collecting payments from online marketplaces. The amended Finance Bill (2025-26) has proposed many amendments in the Sales Tax Act relating to the penalty regime. The amended Finance Bill (2025-26) has relaxed penalties on the recommendations of the National Assembly and Senate Standing Committees on Finance. FBR redrafts Sec 37A: Amended Finance Bill sets conditions for tax fraud arrests The amended Finance Bill (2025-26) revealed that where any online marketplace, payment intermediary or courier fails to furnish prescribed monthly statement within due date, such person shall be liable to pay penalty of three lac rupees for first default if he fails to furnish the prescribed statement for two consecutive months and penalty of Rs one million for each subsequent default within one year. Where any online marketplace or courier allows use of its services inthe course of e-commerce by unregistered persons. Such person shall be liable to pay penalty of three lac rupees for first default and penalty of one million rupees for each subsequent default. Any person who commits or, causes to commit tax fraud asdefined under sub-clauses (a), (b), (c), (d), (e) and (f) of clause(37) of section person shall be liable, upon conviction by a Special Judge, toimprisonment for a term which may extend upto ten years or withfine which may extend to ten million rupees, or with both. Suchperson shall also be liable to pay the amount equal to the loss of tax caused as confirmed by the Special Judge from such amount reported under sub section (11) of section 37B, including one hundred percent penalty of tax loss and default surcharge under section 34 of the Act. Any person who commits or, causes to commit tax fraud as defined under sub-clauses (g), (h), (i), (j) and (k) of clause (37) of section person shall be liable, upon conviction by a Special Judge, to imprisonment for a term which may extend up to five years or with fine which may extend to five million rupees, or with both. Such person shall also be liable to pay the amount equal to the loss of tax caused as confirmed by the Special Judge from such amount reported under sub section (11) of section 37B, including gone hundred percent penalty of tax loss and default surcharge under section 34 of the Act, revised Finance Bill (2025-26). Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
