logo
What do we know about Israel's own nuclear weapons?

What do we know about Israel's own nuclear weapons?

Middle East Eye5 hours ago

Donald Trump has repeated in recent days, often in capital letters on his Truth Social account, that Iran cannot be allowed to obtain a nuclear weapon.
His view is shared by Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel's prime minister, who has said that Israel's surprise attack on Iran, which has killed hundreds since 13 June, is a pre-emptive measure to stop Iran from creating a nuclear weapon.
Iran denies it is trying to produce nuclear arms, and that its nuclear programme is for civilian purposes.
It is a signatory to the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), which says that states that do not already have nuclear weapons cannot obtain them.
The NPT gives the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) the power to monitor and verify that non-nuclear states are complying.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
Last week, the watchdog said that Iran had breached its obligations - an action Tehran strongly condemned, and claimed provided a pretext for Israel's surprise assault.
But unlike Iran, Israel has not signed the NPT, and is one of only five countries not to be party to the 1968 treaty. This means that the IAEA has no way to monitor or verify Israel's nuclear arsenal.
Little is known about Israel's nuclear programme, which it has a policy of neither confirming nor denying.
However, declassified documents, investigative research and whistleblower revelations from the 1980s have pointed to what it has.
What nuclear weapons does Israel possess?
Israel is one of nine countries that are known to have nuclear weapons, along with the US, Russia, the UK, France, China, India, Pakistan and North Korea.
It is believed to possess around 90 nuclear warheads and enough plutonium to produce around 200 more nuclear weapons, according to the Nuclear Threat Initiative.
Israel has between 750 and 1,110kg of plutonium, which would be enough to build 187 to 277 nuclear weapons.
An Israeli Air Force F-35 Lightning II fighter jet performs during a graduation ceremony of Israeli Air Force pilots on 28 December 2022 (AFP/Jack Guez)
These presumed weapons can be fired from the air, sea and land.
Israel owns US-produced F-15, F-16 and F-35 aircraft, all of which can be modified to hold nuclear bombs. It is also believed to have six Dolphin-class submarines, produced by a German company, which may be capable of launching nuclear cruise missiles.
The land-based Jericho family of ballistic missiles has a range of up to 4,000km. Researchers estimate that around 24 of these can carry nuclear warheads, although the exact number is unclear.
How did Israel's nuclear programme begin?
David Ben Gurion, Israel's first prime minister, launched the nuclear project during the mid to late 1950s. A large complex was built at Dimona, a city in the Negev desert (the site is referred to simply as "Dimona").
It was there that the first batch of plutonium was produced, with help from the French government.
'Most credible accounts point to France's role in the late 1950s,' Shawn Rostker, a research analyst at the Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation, told Middle East Eye.
'It helped build the Dimona reactor, supplied key reactor technology, and backed plutonium reprocessing capabilities, laying the groundwork for Israel's nuclear progress.'
The coordination between Paris and Israel was born out of a shared hostility towards Gamal Abdel Nasser, Egypt's then-president, according to French historians.
French-Israeli cooperation was kept secret: even the US, Israel's closest ally, was initially unaware.
Avner Cohen, an Israeli-American historian and professor, is one of the most prominent researchers on Israel's nuclear history and has written several books on the subject, including Israel and the Bomb.
'About half a century ago Israel acquired nuclear weapons capability, but it has done so in a manner unlike any other nuclear weapons state did, prior or after,' he told Middle East Eye.
His research, which includes analysis of recently declassified US documents, found that Washington during the late 1950s and early 1960s repeatedly questioned Israel about what it was doing at Dimona.
Eventually, under US pressure, Ben Gurion told the Knesset in December 1960 that the Dimona reactor was 'a research reactor' which would serve 'industry, agriculture, health and science'.
Thus began an elaborate and long-running deception, as US officials inspected the site on eight occasions between 1961 and 1969.
During these visits, an underground separation plant, essential for the production of weapons-grade plutonium, was concealed. Other parts of the site were camouflaged to disguise the purpose of the complex.
Israel was making significant progress between the visits.
It is believed to have completed its secret underground separation plant by 1965; to have begun producing weapons-grade plutonium by 1966; and to have assembled a nuclear weapon before June 1967 and the start of the Middle East war.
What was the 1969 Nixon-Meir deal?
By the end of the 1960s, the US had finally learnt the true purpose of Dimona. According to Cohen, a secret deal was struck, still in place, that Washington would not ask questions if Israel kept quiet.
'In 1969, the US accepted the Israeli exceptionalist nuclear status, as long as Israel was committed to keeping its presence invisible and opaque. This is known as the 1969 Nixon-Meir nuclear deal,' Cohen told MEE, referring to then-leaders Richard Nixon and Golda Meir.
Israeli Prime Minister Golda Meir listens to American President Richard Nixon at the White House in Washington on 1 March 1973 (AFP)
Since then, Israel has kept to its side and operated a policy of deliberate obscurity, with officials neither acknowledging nor denying the existence of a nuclear arsenal.
The US has gone along with it, even reportedly been threats of disciplinary action against any US official who publicly acknowledges the programme.
In 2009, US President Barack Obama was asked whether any countries in the Middle East had nuclear weapons. He replied that he would not speculate.
Has Israel tested nuclear weapons?
Of the nine nuclear powers, Israel is the only one not to have openly conducted a nuclear test.
The closest evidence has been what is known as the 'Vela incident' in September 1979, when Israel and apartheid era-South Africa may have conducted a joint nuclear test on an island where the South Atlantic meets the Indian Ocean.
US satellites at the time detected an unexplained double flash of light, usually a tell-tale sign of a nuclear blast.
'Israel is a sovereign country and will make decisions based on its own security and interests'
Shawn Rostker, research analyst
South Africa's apartheid government developed weapons of mass destruction for five decades, but ended its nuclear programme in 1989. It is the only country to have achieved nuclear weapon capability but relinquished it voluntarily.
Jimmy Carter, who was US president at the time of the incident, said he believed the Vela incident to have been an Israeli nuclear test.
'We have a growing belief among our scientists that the Israelis did indeed conduct a nuclear test explosion in the ocean near the southern end of South Africa,' he wrote in White House Diary, an annotated version of a journal kept during his presidency and which was published in 2010.
When did Israel's nuclear weapons become widely known?
Israel's nuclear programme finally hit the headlines in October 1986, when former nuclear technician Mordechai Vanunu revealed details about Dimona to the Sunday Times.
Vanunu, who had worked at the site for nine years, said it was capable of producing 1.2kg of plutonium a week, which would be enough for around 12 nuclear warheads a year.
He said that during the US visits in the 1960s, American officials had been tricked by false walls and concealed elevators, and that they were unaware that there were a further six floors hidden underground.
Former Israeli nuclear technician Mordechai Vanunu walks free out of the high security prison of Shikma in Askelon, southern Israel, on 21 April 2004 (AFP/Menahem Kahana)
Vanunu took 60 pictures of Dimona, several of which were published by the British newspaper.
In the years running up to leaking the information, Vanunu had become disillusioned with Israel's actions, opposing its invasion of Lebanon in 1982 and calling for equal rights for Palestinians.
But before his story was even published, Vanunu was abducted by Israeli agents. Staying in London at the expense of The Sunday Times, he was persuaded by a female Mossad agent to go to Rome. There he was, drugged, taken to Israel, found guilty of espionage and served 18 years in prison - more than half in solitary confinement.
Upon his release in 2004, he was banned from travelling or speaking to foreign journalists. Those restrictions remain in place.
What is Israel's strategy for using nuclear weapons?
In 2011, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was asked by Piers Morgan to confirm that Israel doesn't have nuclear weapons. He replied: 'That's our policy. Not to be the first to introduce nuclear weapons into the Middle East.' It's a line that is often repeated by Israeli officials when pressed on the issue.
'Israel never clarified publicly what 'introduction' means,' said Cohen, adding that Israel treated nuclear activities as classified and outside of its defence and foreign policies.
'Hence, Israel has no public strategy involving nuclear use. It is understood that Israel sees no use of nuclear weapons except in the most extreme scenarios of 'last resort'.
'It is understood that Israel sees no use of nuclear weapons except in the most extreme scenarios of "last resort"'
Avner Cohen, Israeli-American historian and professor
'It is also widely understood that as long as Israel maintains its regional benign monopoly, it does not view its capability as weapons.'
The "scenario of last resort" is sometimes referred to as 'the Samson Option', a phrase believed to have been coined by Israeli leaders during the mid-1960s. The principle is that Israel would use nuclear retaliation if it faced an existential threat.
Samson was a biblical Jewish figure who, chained by his enemies, the Philistines, in a temple, used his God-given strength to collapse a pillar, killing himself and his captors.
It is in stark contrast, say analysts, to the doctrine of Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD), where if one nuclear power pre-emptively attacked another, then the targeted nation would still have time to retaliate, ensuring neither would survive.
But in theory, the Samson Option could apply if Israel faces a military defeat that it considers existential, even from a non-nuclear power.
Cohen and several other researchers have said that during the Middle East war of 1973, when Egypt and Syria mounted a surprise attack, Israel considered the option.
But while they have never admitted the existence of nuclear weapons, Israeli leaders have implied that they can be used if necessary.
'Our submarine fleet acts as a deterrent to our enemies,' Netanyahu said in a 2016 speech. 'They need to know that Israel can attack, with great might, anyone who tries to harm it.'
More recently, in November 2023, a government minister publicly suggested that Israel dropping a nuclear bomb on the Gaza Strip was 'an option'.
Amichai Eliyahu, Israel's heritage minister, was briefly suspended from government meetings for the comments, and later took to social media to state that it was meant to be 'metaphorical'.
What's the world said about Israel's nuclear weapons?
Israel is one of only five states that are not party to the NPT, the 1968 treaty which sought to bring nuclear weapons use under international control.
What is Israel building at its Dimona nuclear site?
Richard Silverstein Read More »
India and Pakistan have never signed the treaty. North Korea signed it but withdrew in 2003. South Sudan is the only signatory not to have nuclear weapons.
In December 2014, the UN General Assembly overwhelmingly voted (by 161 votes to five) to approve a resolution urging Israel to renounce the possession of nuclear weapons, accede to the NPT 'without further delay' and place all of its nuclear facilities under the safeguards of the IAEA. The resolution was non-binding. Israel has not complied.
'Israel is a sovereign country and will make decisions based on its own security and interests,' said Rostker.
'That said, a more open approach could help build confidence and reduce nuclear tensions without compromising deterrence.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US Senator Ted Cruz faces backlash for not knowing basic facts about Iran
US Senator Ted Cruz faces backlash for not knowing basic facts about Iran

Middle East Eye

time22 minutes ago

  • Middle East Eye

US Senator Ted Cruz faces backlash for not knowing basic facts about Iran

A series of clips from an interview between prominent US conservative broadcaster Tucker Carlson and US Senator Ted Cruz have gone viral, igniting controversy over the senator's foreign policy positions and apparent gaps in basic geopolitical knowledge about Iran. The full conversation, released on Wednesday on The Tucker Carlson Show, showcases rising tensions within Trump's right-wing base over the US role in the Middle East, particularly regarding Israel, Iran, and the possibility of wider war. The rift within Republicans has seen Trump's "Make America Great Again" base, or "America Firsters", generally opposing the US being dragged into another war in the Middle East. The hawks within his base and his administration have been pushing the US into greater involvement in the Israel-Iran conflict. In a striking exchange, Carlson and Cruz engaged in a heated argument over US involvement in the Israel-Iran conflict, with voices raised as they shouted over each other. Carlson pressed Cruz on the population of Iran, asking, New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters 'How many people live in Iran, by the way?' Cruz replied, 'I don't know,' before being interrupted by Carlson: 'You don't know the population of the country you seek to topple?' NEW: Republican Senator Ted Cruz is completely stumped after Tucker Carlson asks him what the population of Iran is. Tucker: How many people live in Iran? Cruz: I don't know the population. Tucker: You don't know the population of the country you seek to topple? Cruz: How… — Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) June 18, 2025 A person on X wrote, 'Tucker Carlson was taken aback by the level of ignorance of Senator Ted Cruz. He is advocating to overturn the regime of a country he knows nothing about??' Another social media user added, 'If you're calling for the bombing of or entry of war, you should at least be informed about the country you're targeting'. Ted Cruz, in the interview with Tucker Carlson, couldn't answer a single basic question about Iran about the population and ethnic composition of the country and admitted that the US is helping Israel bomb Iran. This is an absolutely insane state of the US politicians. Morbid. — Olga Bazova (@OlgaBazova) June 18, 2025 The clips led to a broader discussion about the implications of Cruz's statements. A person on X highlighted the cultural and religious ignorance displayed by Cruz, posting: 'The American establishment that wants regime change in Iran & claim that they care about Iranians actually knew nothing about Iranians, their population or religions or even ethnic groups, Ted Cruz in Tucker Carlson interview thinks that all Iranians are 'Persian Shias' 😂'. Similarly, Donna Miles, a writer and columnist, wrote, 'Tucker Carlson's interview with Ted Cruz is truly eye-opening. This is how the Iraq disaster happened, and the reason why we are here today, on the brink of a major global war.' Tucker Carlson's interview with Ted Cruz is truly eye-opening. This is how the Iraq disaster happened, and the reason why we are here today, on the brink of a major global war. Iran war hawks are ignorant sycophants. They know nothing about Iran, its resilient people and its… — Donna Miles دانا مجاب (@UnPressed) June 18, 2025 Cruz attempted to deflect, stating that he doesn't 'sit around memorising population tables', but this only fuelled further criticism of his readiness to advocate for military intervention. The controversy extended beyond Iran, with another clip drawing attention to Cruz's views on alleged Israeli espionage on the US. @tuckercarlsonnetwork Why is it so hard to say that it's not okay for foreign governments to spy on our president? Watch the full episode tomorrow at 1PM ET ♬ original sound - Tucker Carlson Network Carlson questioned Cruz about reports that Israel spies on American officials, to which Cruz responded, 'They probably spy on us and we spy on them. Friends and allies spy on each other.' Reflecting a sentiment shared by many, a social media user wrote, 'Thanks Tucker for showing the world the real Ted Cruz… It's time that America no longer be controlled by Israel.' Ted Cruz openly admits that Mossad, Netanyahu and Israel spy on our government and even our President. Think about that. Many Trump supporters are okay with Israel starting a war send US Soldiers to fight their battle. Allies do not spy on each other. — Thomas Paine Band (@ThomasPaineBand) June 18, 2025 On TikTok, people pointed to Cruz's financial ties to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, with one asking, 'Why can't a US politician simply admit that it's not in America's best interest to be spied on by Israel? Hint: he has accepted 1.9 million from AIPAC,' with another suggesting he should be asked this question 'after stopping his AIPAC cheque'. Social media reactions have been sharply divided, with some mocking Cruz for his lack of basic knowledge, while others accused him of prioritising foreign interests over those of the United States. The interview's timing is significant, given the escalating conflict between Israel and Iran. On 13 June, Israel launched unprovoked strikes targeting Iran's nuclear programme, military leadership, scientists and residential areas, prompting retaliatory missile attacks from Iran. Publicly, the US has said it is playing a supportive role in the conflict, but Cruz, seemingly mistakenly, admitted that "we" were striking Israel when discussing the strikes with Carlson. After Carlson pushed back, he corrected himself, saying Israel was striking, but that the US was playing a supporting role. President Trump's social media posts, claiming 'complete and total control of the skies over Iran' and demanding 'UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER', have further intensified debates about US involvement. As tensions mount, the interview serves as a flashpoint for discussions about America's role in the region and the accountability of its leaders.

US politicians predict Iran will run out of missiles ‘a lot sooner' than Israel
US politicians predict Iran will run out of missiles ‘a lot sooner' than Israel

The National

timean hour ago

  • The National

US politicians predict Iran will run out of missiles ‘a lot sooner' than Israel

Iran is expected to exhaust its missile supply much sooner than Israel, members of the US Congress told The National on Wednesday, as the Middle East air war entered its sixth day. A long-running shadow war between Israel and Iran erupted into open conflict last week when Israel launched a large‑scale air and covert strike campaign – including Mossad-backed drone operations – against military and nuclear sites in Iran. The attacks killed senior commanders in the country's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and nuclear scientists, and damaged nuclear sites such as Natanz and Isfahan. Israel said its sweeping assault was necessary to prevent Tehran from moving closer to acquiring a nuclear weapon. An Iranian human rights group in Washington said at least 585 people, including 239 civilians, have been killed and more than 1,300 wounded. Iran has fired some 400 missiles and hundreds of drones in retaliatory strikes that have killed at least 24 people in Israel and wounded hundreds. Some have hit apartment buildings in central Israel, causing heavy damage, and air raid sirens have repeatedly forced Israelis to run for shelter. 'It's sort of a war of attrition with missiles for Iran and defence systems for Israel,' said Representative Jimmy Panetta, a Democrat. 'The Iranians are eating up their national resources on impotent responses. Their allies are turning away from them. Russia is not nearly as engaged as it's been in the past. They're alienating individuals in the region who should be their partners and their domestic situation gets worse every day that they drag this out.' 'I don't believe they have the capabilities to continue producing them [missiles] as quickly as they'll need to if they're going to stay in this conflict,' said Mr Panetta. His comments came during a conversation with The National in Abu Dhabi alongside fellow congressmen Brad Schneider, a Democrat, and Republican members Don Bacon and Zach Nunn. All have a military or national security background, with Mr Panetta, Mr Nunn and Mr Bacon having served in the armed forces. 'We saw larger salvos earlier. Now there are only smaller ones, which indicates they're having a hard time getting missiles to the launchers,' said Mr Bacon. 'Some speculate they're also running low, because they're firing far fewer now.' Iran's stockpile of ballistic missiles capable of hitting Israel was estimated to be around 2,000 before Israel launched Operation Rising Lion last Friday, according to Israeli intelligence. US commander General Kenneth McKenzie said in 2022 that Iran had more than 3,000 missiles capable of various ranges. The lawmakers stressed continued US support for Israel's defence and said Iran finds itself today in a "much weaker' position. Potential US involvement Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said on Wednesday that his country 'will not surrender', in response to remarks made by US President Donald Trump. He also warned that any direct American involvement in Israel's war would lead to 'irreparable' consequences for the US. 'The US President threatens us. With his absurd rhetoric, he demands that the Iranian people surrender to him. They should make threats against those who are afraid of being threatened,' he said in a televised speech. Mr Trump had earlier cautioned Iran that any attacks on US interest in the region would be met with 'the full strength and might' of the American military. 'We've made it clear: if there are attacks on American assets – especially the 40,000 troops we have in the region – we will respond in any way necessary to defend ourselves and our men and women in uniform,' said Mr Panetta. Trump limits Senator Tim Kaine of Virginia, a member of the Senate armed services and foreign relations committees, introduced on Monday a bill that would block Mr Trump from using the American military in a conflict against Iran without explicit authorisation from Congress. Mr Nunn has reservations about restricting presidential powers. 'I don't want to put handcuffs on the President when he is trying to be in the best possible position to defend US interests,' he said. 'We're working together with 47 other members on a compendium of maximum pressure sanctions against Iran that the President can leverage immediately with Congress's backing, not only to push Iran to de-escalate but also to apply pressure where necessary.' The members of Congress said diplomacy remains a preferred option, emphasising that there is still a window for a nuclear deal. Since April, the US and Iran have held five rounds of negotiations in Rome and Muscat. The talks aimed to contain Iran's nuclear advances and prevent a regional confrontation, with both sides signalling cautious optimism. A sixth round was scheduled to take place last Sunday. However, two days earlier, Israel launched what it called 'pre-emptive' strikes against Tehran. Mr Trump had given Iran a 60-day deadline to reach a deal or face severe repercussions. Israel's operation began at dawn on day 61. Asked about whether the war amounts to an attempt to force regime change in Tehran, the politicians responded, 'That's going to be up to the people of Iran.' Degraded proxies Although the Iranians are at their weakest point in decades, their nuclear programme is at its strongest in decades, the congressmen said. 'According to the people we've been listening to, they know Khamenei made a decision to develop a nuclear weapon. So the Israelis said, 'We can't wait any longer,'' said Mr Schneider. Last week, the UN nuclear watchdog 's 35-nation board of governors declared Iran in breach of its non-proliferation obligations for the first time in almost 20 years. A central issue was Iran's failure to provide the International Atomic Energy Agency with credible explanations of how uranium traces detected at undeclared sites in Iran came to be there despite the agency having investigated the issue for years. Iran insists its programme is for civilian purposes and that it does not seek a nuclear bomb. Politicians believe that with many of its proxy groups degraded, Iran now sees nuclear weapons as its last reliable deterrent. Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in Gaza have both suffered severe losses in wars with Israel. The Houthis in Yemen have also faced setbacks: US-led strikes have halved their offensive capabilities. The regime of former Syrian president Bashar Al Assad – once a critical partner in Iran's regional axis – was toppled last year. 'Their only deterrent now would be their nukes,' said Mr Panetta. The House members said that Iran's proxies are incapable of offering meaningful defence. 'Whether or not they choose to act is going to be at their own risk – with consequences,' added Mr Panetta. Abraham Accords Mr Schneider said that the 'path to a more secure, prosperous and peaceful Middle East is through the Abraham Accords', referring to a series of normalisation agreements signed in 2020 between Israel and several Arab countries. Before the Gaza war erupted in October 2023, Saudi Arabia was in advanced talks to join the Abraham Accords and normalise relations with Israel, in a deal mediated by the US. However, the war and Israel's military campaign in Gaza halted the momentum, with Riyadh publicly emphasising the need for a credible path towards a Palestinian state before moving forward. 'We're not going to have a decision tomorrow on what happens in Israel, Gaza and the West Bank,' said Mr Nunn. 'But what we do know is there was great economic opportunity and greater security through peaceful relations. There's a mutual threat coming from Iran. And every time Iran fires off a weapon, it goes over Iraq, Jordan, Syria and others, posing a mutual risk.'

'I may do it, I may not': Donald Trump ambiguous over US involvement in strikes on Iran
'I may do it, I may not': Donald Trump ambiguous over US involvement in strikes on Iran

The National

time2 hours ago

  • The National

'I may do it, I may not': Donald Trump ambiguous over US involvement in strikes on Iran

President Donald Trump on Wednesday sounded an ambiguous tone over whether the US would strike Iranian nuclear sites and said Tehran had made contact in a bid to negotiate. His comments come a day after he appeared to be preparing for war and demanded the 'unconditional surrender' of the Iranian government. 'You don't know. I may do it, I may not do it – I mean, nobody knows what I'm going to do,' Mr Trump said at the White House during a ceremony installing a new flagpole. He said Iranian officials wanted to negotiate and had even proposed a meeting in the White House, but that it was 'very late to be talking'. He added: 'There's a big difference between now and a week ago, right? Big difference." Iran's mission to the UN denied having asked for a meeting with the White House. 'No Iranian official has ever asked to grovel at the gates of the White House,' the mission wrote on X. 'Iran does NOT negotiate under duress, shall NOT accept peace under duress, and certainly NOT with a has-been warmonger clinging to relevance.' The escalation comes on the sixth day of the Iran-Israel air war that threatens to destabilise the entire Middle East. Mr Trump, who campaigned on a promise to bring peace to the world, had been in the process of advancing talks with Tehran that were aimed at limiting Iran's nuclear programme. But a sixth round of discussions scheduled for Oman on Sunday were cancelled after Israel launched air strikes on Iran on Friday. On Tuesday, Mr Trump said America's patience was 'wearing thin' and held a meeting with his national security team to discuss options that included joining Israel in striking Iranian nuclear sites. 'Two very simple words: unconditional surrender,' Mr Trump repeated on Wednesday. 'That means I've had it. OK, I've had it, I give up. No more. Then we go blow up all the ... nuclear stuff that's all over the place there.' The possibility of US involvement in yet another potentially prolonged war in the Middle East comes as Mr Trump appears to have quieted the dissenting voices of his staunchly anti-war and isolationist Maga base. Asked whether he had spoken with Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Mr Trump said: 'He's doing a good job, he has been treated very unfairly. There's a wartime president and he's going through this nonsense, ridiculous.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store