'Unimaginable': Families mourn dead in Air India crash
AHMEDABAD, India: In an echoing hall in India's Ahmedabad, mourning families gave DNA samples on Friday to identify relatives missing after a London-bound passenger jet crashed in a residential area.
At least 265 people on board and on the ground were killed when the Air India 787-8 Dreamliner smashed into a residential area soon after takeoff on Thursday. Just one passenger miraculously survived the giant fireball.
Ashfaque Nanabawa, 40, said he had come to find his cousin Akeel Nanabawa, who had been onboard with his wife and three-year-old daughter.
He said they had spoken as his cousin sat in the plane just before takeoff.
"He called us and he said: 'I am in the plane and I have boarded safely and everything was okay'. That was his last call."
Nanabawa, speaking in the early hours of Friday morning, said he and his family had given DNA samples, but were yet to "identify any of the bodies."
Indian police said at least 265 bodies had been recovered from the smouldering crash site – both from the wreckage of the plane and the medical staff accommodation into which the burning jet crashed.
The toll may rise further as more bodies are located.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi has called the crash "heartbreaking beyond words."
India's Home Minister Amit Shah, who visited the crash site and those injured in hospital on Thursday evening, said forensic laboratories would "complete the DNA testing in the shortest possible time."
Shah said the final official toll would "be declared only after DNA testing is completed."
On a raised platform, a dozen exhausted doctors worked to collect samples for the grim task of trying to identify bodies.
"We have taken samples of babies and those above 80 years old. I don't have words to explain this," said a doctor, on condition of anonymity because they were not authorised to speak to the media.
Air India said there were 169 Indian passengers, 53 British, seven Portuguese, and a Canadian on board the flight bound for London's Gatwick airport, as well as 12 crew members, making 242 onboard.
Only one is confirmed to have survived, a British national.
At least 24 people also died on the ground when the jet hit residential buildings.
"As doctors, you're always prepared for the worst right?" the medic added.
"But this is just overwhelming. Families are crying, looking for answers."
Above, the sounds of planes echoed, with the hall close to another airport.
"One person came to give the sample... his child, wife and mother were on the flight", the doctor added. "What do I even say?"
One woman, too grief-stricken to give her name, said her son-in-law had been killed.
"My daughter doesn't know that he's no more", she said, wiping away tears.
"I can't break the news to her, can someone else do that please?"
Friends also arrived in a desperate search for news.
Premal Mehta, 39, from Ahmedabad, said he did not want to believe his friend Mahesh Jeerawala had been killed.
"I am using everything in my power, political contacts, whatever it is, to find him", he said in desperation, as he supported his friend's brother, who was providing a DNA sample.
Others had flown in seeking news, or to identify the dead.
Ismail Sheikh said he had celebrated only days before with his friend, a London resident who had returned to see family in India.
His friend was onboard with his wife and two children.
Sheikh recalled taking his friend to the airport 15 years ago, when he moved to London with high hopes for the future.
"Now I am here," Sheikh said, his eyes wet with tears. "This is unimaginable." — AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sinar Daily
9 hours ago
- Sinar Daily
Lone India plane crash survivor recounts miracle escape
"Everything was visible in front of my eyes when the crash happened," the victim said. 13 Jun 2025 05:38pm This screengrab of video footage taken and released by the Narendra Modi Youtube Channel on June 13, 2025 shows India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi (L) meeting with Vishwash Kumar Ramesh, sole survivor of the Air India flight 171 crash, at a hospital in Ahmedabad. - (Photo by NARENDRA MODI YOUTUBE CHANNEL / AFP) AHMEDABAD - The lone survivor of 242 people aboard a London-bound passenger plane that crashed in the Indian city of Ahmedabad said Friday how even he was struggling to explain how he miraculously walked out alive from the fireball explosion. "Everything happened in front of me, and even I couldn't believe how I managed to come out alive from that," British citizen Vishwash Kumar Ramesh said from his hospital bed on Friday, speaking in Hindi to national broadcaster DD News. The Air India Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner plane, which was full of fuel as it took off for a long-haul flight to London, exploded into a burst of orange flame on Thursday afternoon just after taking off. Ramesh -- who was in seat 11A according to media reports -- was the only one aboard the plane not to be killed, with at least 24 others killed on the ground. His brother was also on the same flight, his family in Britain told reporters. "Within a minute after takeoff, suddenly... it felt like something got stuck... I realised something had happened, and then suddenly the plane's green and white lights turned on," Ramesh said. "After that, the plane seemed to speed up, heading straight towards what turned out to be a hostel of a hospital. Everything was visible in front of my eyes when the crash happened." Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi paid a visit to Ramesh on Friday at the hospital where he is being treated for burns and other injuries, footage on his YouTube channel showed. - 'About to die' - Ramesh, aged 40, is from the British city of Leicester, according to Britain's Press Association news agency, which spoke with his family at home. The plane smashed into the buildings just outside the perimeter of the airport. "Initially, I too thought that I was about to die, but then I opened my eyes and realised that I was still alive," he said. "I saw the air hostess and aunties and uncles all in front of me," he said, his voice trailing off in emotion, using a term of respect used in India for older people. "I unfastened my seatbelt and tried to escape, and I did," he said. Debris of Air India flight 171 is pictured after it crashed in a residential area near the airport in Ahmedabad on June 13, 2025. - (Photo by PUNIT PARANJPE / AFP) "I think the side I was on was not facing the hostel," he added. "Where I landed was closer to the ground and there was space too - and when my door broke -- I saw that there was space, and I thought I could try to slip out." Videos shared on social media showed Ramesh soon after, dressed in a bloodied t-shirt and limping, but walking towards an ambulance. "My left hand got slightly burnt due to the fire, but an ambulance brought me to the hospital," he said. "The people here are taking good care of me." Air India said there were 169 Indian passengers, 53 British, seven Portuguese, and a Canadian on board the flight bound for London's Gatwick airport, as well as 12 crew members. The death toll currently stands at 265, police said. Authorities have set up DNA testing for relatives of passengers and those killed on the ground to identify the scorched bodies and body parts. - AFP More Like This
Malaysian Reserve
10 hours ago
- Malaysian Reserve
Muslim convert loses appeal to restore birth name on identity card
PUTRAJAYA — A 50-year-old Muslim convert has failed in his appeal to compel the National Registration Department (NRD) to reinstate his birth name on his identity card. The Court of Appeal, in a unanimous decision by a three-member panel comprising Justices Datuk Supang Lian, Datuk Collin Lawrence Sequerah and Datuk Dr Alwi Abdul Wahab, upheld the High Court's dismissal of his judicial review application. Delivering the court's judgment, Justice Sequerah held that Regulation 14(2A) of the National Registration Regulations 1990 does not permit the reversion to the original name once a new name has been lawfully assumed. 'The name change is made because the person making the application has absolutely renounced and abandoned the use of his original name and assumed a new name,' he said, adding that the law envisages a change of name but not a reversion to the original name. He stated that the court was of the view that there are compelling public policy considerations as to why the law permits a change of name but does not contemplate a reversion to the original name once a new name has been lawfully adopted. The 28-page grounds of judgment dated yesterday were uploaded to the judiciary's website today. The man, who embraced Islam in 2005 and adopted a Muslim name following his conversion, claimed he was denied entry into India in 2016 despite travelling with a Malaysian passport bearing his Muslim name. He claimed Indian immigration authorities refused entry on the grounds that he had previously entered the country under his original Hindu name, resulting in his deportation to Malaysia. He then applied for a new passport using his birth name, but the application was rejected by the Immigration Department as his identity card still bore his Muslim name. Subsequently, he applied to have his current name in his identity card changed back to his original name, but the application was rejected by the NRD director-general in December 2021. This led to him filing for a judicial review in the High Court, naming the NRD director-general and the Government of Malaysia as respondents, seeking a mandamus order compelling the NRD to amend and re-register his birth name in his identity card. He argued that he faced complications arising from the presence of two different names in his previous passport, which led to his denial of entry into India. He further submitted that he owns immovable properties abroad registered under his original name, which may give rise to confusion when dealing with foreign authorities due to the inconsistencies between the names in his identity card, passport and other official documents. The NRD director-general maintained that the application could not be approved under Regulation 14(2A) of the National Registration Regulations 1990, which does not permit a reversion to a name that has been lawfully renounced. On Nov 20, 2023, the High Court dismissed the man's judicial review application, upholding the NRD's decision to reject the request for a name amendment. — BERNAMA
Rakyat Post
11 hours ago
- Rakyat Post
Knowing The History Of Israel-Palestine: Zionism And Its Myths
Subscribe to our FREE This article first appeared in The state of Israel founded itself on a secular ideology, Zionism. Zionism, as Ilan Pappe explains in Ten Myths About Israel, was a secular ideology born out of Jewish communities in Central and Eastern Europe in the mid-1800s. It sought to redefine the religion of Judaism into a national movement at a time when new national movements were mushrooming in Europe. Importantly, Zionism was also driven by a search for safety by Jews long persecuted in Europe. The solution: colonise the land of Palestine to return the Jews to where they had been expelled by the Romans in AD 70. Zionism benefited from a few factors that gave it such prominence as to become the foundational ideology of the state of Israel in 1948. Its objective of colonising the land of Palestine coincided with the British strategic imperial impulse to deepen involvement in the 'Holy Land', thus receiving the British government's support. That was no small matter as Britain was the imperial power of the world at the time. That support resulted in the infamous Balfour Declaration of November 1917 to establish in Palestine a national home for the Jewish people. As Rashid Khalidi points out in The Hundred Years' War on Palestine, the soft, deceptive diplomatic language used in the declaration did not even mention explicitly the then 94% Arab Palestinian majority, referring only to them as 'non-Jewish'. This tendency to erase and 'unrecognise' the indigenous Palestinians continues to this day. Ominously, the declaration promised only 'civil and religious rights' to the native population but no political or national rights. The die was thus cast – unjustly and inequitably – and we continue to see the consequences today. Britain's imperial role in the genesis of the Israel-Palestine conflict is highly significant. After World War One, Britain was assigned a 'mandate' over Palestine and its charter incorporated wholesale, the 1917 Balfour Declaration. As Pappe observes in Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine, the British Mandate thus embraced 'Britain's promise to the Zionist movement to secure a 'homeland' for the Jews in Palestine'. Zionism's quest to colonise a land also fit into the practice of the day – go forth and colonise if you are of a dominant European power. The idea of Zionist Jews settling in and colonising the land of Palestine thus seemed all of a piece. Importantly too, as Pappe explains in Ten Myths About Israel, Zionism coincided with the view of significant groups of European Christians and Jews that the colonisation of Palestine was an act of return and redemption – part of a divine scheme for the return, resurrection and second coming of the Messiah. The Zionist project also found alignment with Europe's own long history of antisemitism and ideas of transferring Jews from Europe to Palestine. In fact, Pappe also points to the role of an element of Islamophobia in David Lloyd George's preference for a Jewish colony in the Holy Land instead of a Muslim one. This was how George, the UK's Prime Minister from 1916 to 1922, saw the Palestinians. Add to that, the matter of Europe's own need to compensate its Jews for the Nazi Holocaust (a genocide of white Europeans in the heart of Europe), and we have a powerful confluence of factors. These have led to the ongoing Zionist settler-colonialism in Palestine at the expense of native Palestinians. All because of a genocide of Jews in the Holocaust in Europe, which the native Palestinians had nothing to do with. Zionist myths One of the main props to justify the colonisation of Palestine is the myth, strengthened by repetition, that Palestine was effectively empty before the arrival of the Zionist settlers (who thus came and 'made the desert bloom'). Related to this was the idea that Palestinians simply did not exist. This was patently untrue. In fact, Pappe describes how the Zionist leaders knew it was not empty even before the first Zionist settlers arrived in 1882. An early delegation sent to Palestine reported back (in rather patriarchal terms) that 'the bride is beautiful but married to another man'. In fact, there was already a Palestinian existence 'manifested in the customs of the people, their Arabic dialect, and shared history'. There were already a few hundred thousand Muslim, Christian and Jewish Palestinians before the first wave of Zionist Jewish migration beginning in 1882. In his Hundred Years' War, Rashid Khalidi speaks of his family library in Jerusalem. (Joe Biden was photographed walking out of a bookshop on Nantucket Island with a copy of Rashid's book under his arm. To what avail – a dubious question, unfortunately.) The Khalidi Library in the Old City of Jerusalem was founded in 1899 by Rashid's grandfather, with a bequest from Rashid's grandfather's mother. Private libraries were, evidently, a practice among the city's oldest families. The library housed thousands of manuscripts, books and papers. Clearly, Palestine was neither empty nor thinly inhabited by a backward people who had to await the arrival of Zionist settlers to 'make the desert bloom'. And yet, the rallying slogan of Zionism was 'A land without a people for a people without a land'. This was a false statement that helped underpin the idea of 'Eretz Israel' ('Land of Israel'). Given this falsehood, one would ask if it shouldn't instead be 'Ersatz Israel' (substitute or artificial version of Israel)? Pappe's The Idea of Israel relates an interesting story of how Israel's first Prime Minister, David Ben-Gurion, was prepared to manufacture 'truths' out of expediency. In 1937, he asked a leading Zionist historian of the time to produce research to prove continuous Jewish occupation of the region from AD 70 (the time of the Roman exile) to 1882, when the first Zionists arrived. Ben-Gurion, the then leader of the Jewish community, needed the report before the arrival in two weeks of the Britain's Peel Commission, which was charged with finding a solution to the conflict already brewing in Palestine. The Zionist historian said he could, but he would need about a decade to do so. Ben-Gurion told him, 'You do not understand. The Peel Commission is coming in two weeks' time. Reach your conclusion by then, and afterwards you can have a whole decade to prove it!' Through the vagaries of history, people move from place to place. And when, for whatever reason, a people should come to re-inhabit a place where they were, it cannot be right for that to be done by the appropriation, killing and forceful displacement of other people who have also or subsequently inhabited it. Especially not if the appropriating group are a people such as the Jews who have suffered their own long history of persecution and expulsion, and thus know what that is like. Especially not if in the tradition of that people (Judaism), there are powerful tenets exhorting justice, compassion and humanity – which cruel acts of killing and forceful displacement would surely transgress. Such contradictions only 'make sense' when we remember that Zionism, a nationalist political ideology, is not Judaism. (Thus, being critical of Zionism is not being antisemitic, as Zionism does not define Jewishness.) -by By Tong Veng Wye, Aliran member. Read Part 1: Read Part 2: Share your thoughts with us via TRP's . Get more stories like this to your inbox by signing up for our newsletter.
