Surprise rebel alliance could give Sudan's beleaguered RSF a boost
Sudan's paramilitary Rapid Support Forces have signed a charter paving the way for a parallel government with its allies, including a former foe who analysts say could offer crucial territory, fighters and border access.
Since April 2023, a brutal war between the RSF and the regular army -- represented by the internationally recognised government currently based in Port Sudan -- has killed tens of thousands, uprooted 12 million and visited mass human rights violations upon civilians.
Last month, the former US administration declared that the RSF had committed genocide in the western region of Darfur.
Until last week, the lesser-known third party to the war was Abdelaziz al-Hilu, whose faction of the Sudan People's Liberation Movement-North had previously fought both the army and the RSF in the country's south.
In an unexpected turn of events, Hilu appeared in Nairobi last week, and his group was one of the key signatories to an RSF charter for a "government of peace and unity".
If his battle-hardened fighters join forces with the RSF, analysts say it could significantly bolster the weakened paramilitaries, led by Mohamed Hamdan Daglo (widely known as Hemeti).
After weeks of losses as the army charges through the country, the new rebel alliance could also grant key border access to RSF-friendly east African states.
- 'On the back foot' -
The RSF has conquered nearly all of Darfur, but is unable to cement its hold on the region and appears on the verge of losing all of the capital Khartoum to the army.
"Hemeti is on his back foot," Marc Lavergne, a professor at France's University of Tours, told AFP.
"Hilu's professional fighters could give him some very welcome help," said Lavergne, a veteran Sudan expert who has personally known Hilu since he helped broker agreements in the region in the early 2000s.
According to Sudanese journalist and SPLM-N specialist Mostafa Serry, the two groups together command up to "65 percent of Sudan".
Their common interests would be best served by merging "the large military forces and vast areas they control", he told AFP.
Hilu controls much of South Kordofan state from his foothold in the Nuba Mountains, as well as pockets of Blue Nile state bordering Ethiopia.
Together, the two groups have border access to Libya, Chad, the Central African Republic and -- thanks to Hilu -- now South Sudan and Ethiopia.
"All of the countries surrounding Sudan, except Egypt, are in favour of the RSF," Lavergne said, and could serve to bolster the paramilitary group, whose supply lines from Sudan's western border have been compromised in recent months.
- Protector or opportunist? -
Analysts say Hilu, historically no friend of Hemeti's, must have received something in return.
"Presumably Hilu did this, in part, to save areas under his control (from) future violence, to increase aid access to those areas, and to guarantee a future role for himself," Cameron Hudson, senior fellow at the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, told AFP.
Famine was officially declared in parts of the Nuba Mountains in December, months after SPLM-N itself said mass starvation was threatening its people, including the estimated 700,000 who have fled to the mountains since the war began.
Aid access has been negligible, though the group controls parts of the border with its ally South Sudan, and an airport only 125 kilometres (77 miles) away from the border.
Yet news of Hilu in Nairobi "surprised and angered many of his supporters, who have suffered direct attacks and deprivation by the RSF", Hudson told AFP.
An "opportunist", according to Hudson, Hilu is committed only to "power and advancement of his own vision".
Sources in Nairobi told AFP that Hilu's key demand was the charter's pledge for a secular Sudan, after decades of fighting against Arab and Islamic hegemony from Khartoum.
The RSF -- itself notorious for ethnic violence -- has branded itself a champion for Sudan's marginalised communities.
But even if Hilu counts the charter as a win, he is unlikely to be wholly convinced by Hemeti's promises.
"The RSF doesn't have real allies, it has accomplices," Lavergne told AFP, explaining that "Hilu could side with Hemeti, but he will certainly not abide by his every whim".
bur-bha/jsa/fox

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
Trump admin diverted 20,000 anti-drone missiles it promised to Ukraine and sent them to US troops, Zelensky says
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said that the Trump administration diverted 20,000 anti-drone missiles originally meant for Kyiv to American forces in the Middle East. Zelensky revealed Sunday that he had secured a deal for the missiles under the Biden administration to counterattack Moscow's deadly, Iranian-designed Shahed drones, which have been at the center of Russia's mass bombardment campaign. 'We have big problems with Shaheds,' Zelensky told ABC News' 'This Week.' 'We counted on this project — 20,000 missiles. Anti-Shahed missiles. It was not expensive, but it's a special technology.' Advertisement 5 Volodymyr Zelensky said that the Trump administration diverted anti-drone missiles originally meant for Kyiv to American forces in the Middle East. ABC News 5 A firefighter extinguishes a fire at a civilian plant following powerful attacks to Ukrainian city of Kharkiv. AFP via Getty Images The diversion of the weapons was first reported by the Wall Street Journal last week, with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth reportedly issuing an 'urgent' call to redirect the weapons on June 4 away from Ukraine. The missiles were instead sent off to American forces in the Middle East as the US braces for possible conflict with Iran over the stalled nuclear deal, as well as the Houthi rebel group in Yemen, according to the WSJ. Advertisement The order also coincided with Hegseth's absence from the most recent Ukraine Defense Contact Group meeting, which was the first time a DOD chief missed the conference since Russia began its invasion in 2022. Under Hegseth and Trump, the US has not approved any new military aid packages to Ukraine, with the administration previously putting a temporary halt on weapons shipments earlier this year. With Moscow ramping up its drone and missile strikes against Ukraine, Zelensky has called on the US to reaffirm its support for Kyiv and for President Trump to not give up on America's role mediating the strained cease-fire efforts. Advertisement 5 Under President Trump and Pete Hegseth, the US has not approved any new military aid packages to Ukraine. via REUTERS 5 Smoke billows after drone strikes in Kharkiv, northeastern Ukraine, amid the Russian invasion. SERGEY KOZLOV/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock 'I am convinced that the president of the United States has all the powers and enough leverage to step up,' Zelensky said, adding that Ukraine already backs the 30-day cease-fire deal proposed by the US. He also rejected Trump's latest characterization of the war as 'two young children fighting like crazy' in a playground. Advertisement 'We are not kids with Putin at the playground in the park. This is why I am saying he is a murderer who came to this park to kill the kids,' he said. 5 'We are not kids with Putin at the playground in the park. This is why I am saying he is a murderer who came to this park to kill the kids,' Zelensky said. AFP via Getty Images Along with renewed military aid, Ukraine is pushing the US to join the rest of the world in imposing new economic sanctions against Moscow. Zelensky maintains that sanctions from the US will hurt Moscow the hardest as he backed a proposal from Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) to slap 500% tariffs on any nation that buys Russian energy products.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump's new travel ban set to take effect amid escalating tension over immigration enforcement
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump's new ban on travel to the U.S. by citizens from 12 mainly African and Middle Eastern countries is set to take effect Monday amid escalating tension over the president's unprecedented campaign of immigration enforcement. The new proclamation, which Trump signed on Wednesday, applies to citizens of Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. It also imposes heightened restrictions on people from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela who are outside the U.S. and don't hold a valid visa. The new ban does not revoke visas previously issued to people from countries on the list, according to guidance issued Friday to all U.S. diplomatic missions. However, unless an applicant meets narrow criteria for an exemption to the ban, his or her application will be rejected starting Monday. Travelers with previously issued visas should still be able to enter the U.S. even after the ban takes effect. Haitian-American Elvanise Louis-Juste, who was at the airport Sunday in Newark, New Jersey, awaiting a flight to her home state of Florida, said many Haitians wanting to come to the U.S. are simply seeking to escape violence and unrest in their country. 'I have family in Haiti, so it's pretty upsetting to see and hear,' Louis-Juste, 23, said of the travel ban. 'I don't think it's a good thing. I think it's very upsetting.' Many immigration experts say the new ban is designed to beat any court challenge by focusing on the visa application process and appears more carefully crafted than a hastily written executive order during Trump's first term that denied entry to citizens of mainly Muslim countries. In a video posted Wednesday on social media, Trump said nationals of countries included in the ban pose 'terrorism-related' and 'public-safety' risks, as well as risks of overstaying their visas. He also said some of these countries had 'deficient' screening and vetting or have historically refused to take back their citizens. His findings rely extensively on an annual Homeland Security report about tourists, businesspeople and students who overstay U.S. visas and arrive by air or sea, singling out countries with high percentages of nationals who remain after their visas expired. Trump also tied the new ban to a terrorist attack in Boulder, Colorado, saying it underscored the dangers posed by some visitors who overstay visas. The man charged in the attack is from Egypt, a country that is not on Trump's restricted list. U.S. officials say he overstayed a tourist visa. The ban was quickly denounced by groups that provide aid and resettlement help to refugees. 'This policy is not about national security — it is about sowing division and vilifying communities that are seeking safety and opportunity in the United States,' said Abby Maxman, president of Oxfam America, a nonprofit international relief organization. Venezuela President Nicolás Maduro's government condemned the travel ban, characterizing it in a statement as a 'stigmatization and criminalization campaign' against Venezuelans.


Chicago Tribune
3 hours ago
- Chicago Tribune
President Donald Trump's new travel ban set to take effect amid escalating tension over immigration enforcement
WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump's new ban on travel to the U.S. by citizens from 12 mainly African and Middle Eastern countries is set to take effect Monday amid escalating tension over the president's unprecedented campaign of immigration enforcement. The new proclamation, which Trump signed on Wednesday, applies to citizens of Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. It also imposes heightened restrictions on people from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela who are outside the U.S. and don't hold a valid visa. The new ban does not revoke visas previously issued to people from countries on the list, according to guidance issued Friday to all U.S. diplomatic missions. However, unless an applicant meets narrow criteria for an exemption to the ban, his or her application will be rejected starting Monday. Travelers with previously issued visas should still be able to enter the U.S. even after the ban takes effect. Haitian-American Elvanise Louis-Juste, who was at the airport Sunday in Newark, New Jersey, awaiting a flight to her home state of Florida, said many Haitians wanting to come to the U.S. are simply seeking to escape violence and unrest in their country. 'I have family in Haiti, so it's pretty upsetting to see and hear,' Louis-Juste, 23, said of the travel ban. 'I don't think it's a good thing. I think it's very upsetting.' Many immigration experts say the new ban is designed to beat any court challenge by focusing on the visa application process and appears more carefully crafted than a hastily written executive order during Trump's first term that denied entry to citizens of mainly Muslim countries. In a video posted Wednesday on social media, Trump said nationals of countries included in the ban pose 'terrorism-related' and 'public-safety' risks, as well as risks of overstaying their visas. He also said some of these countries had 'deficient' screening and vetting or have historically refused to take back their citizens. His findings rely extensively on an annual Homeland Security report about tourists, businesspeople and students who overstay U.S. visas and arrive by air or sea, singling out countries with high percentages of nationals who remain after their visas expired. Trump also tied the new ban to a terrorist attack in Boulder, Colorado, saying it underscored the dangers posed by some visitors who overstay visas. The man charged in the attack is from Egypt, a country that is not on Trump's restricted list. U.S. officials say he overstayed a tourist visa. The ban was quickly denounced by groups that provide aid and resettlement help to refugees. 'This policy is not about national security — it is about sowing division and vilifying communities that are seeking safety and opportunity in the United States,' said Abby Maxman, president of Oxfam America, a nonprofit international relief organization. Venezuela President Nicolás Maduro's government condemned the travel ban, characterizing it in a statement as a 'stigmatization and criminalization campaign' against Venezuelans.