
Architects warn post-Brexit visa rules hindering recruitment
Architect firms are calling on the home secretary, Yvette Cooper, to urgently review the post-Brexit visa salary rules, claiming they are choking an industry that is trying to help meet Labour's housing targets.
They say there were hit by a double recruitment whammy when the rules changed last April with architecture removed from the shortage occupation list and the minimum salary to get a visa increased from just over £26,000 to £45,900.
The changes in visa rules flow from a policy decision made by Boris Johnson's government to end what it saw as the use of cheap EU labour in factories, farms, warehouses, hotels and restaurants by introducing an Australian points-based immigration system involving thresholds on English-language understanding, salaries and skills.
The law firm Kingsley Napley, which is acting on behalf of several big London practices including Zaha Hadid Architects, Make Architects and HTA Design, said it had had no reply to a letter sent to Cooper in December.
It is now urging her to give an answer, reduce the salary threshold and return the profession to the shortage occupation list, now known as the immigration salary list.
Caroline Dove, a partner at HTA Design, which specialises in housing, said the increase in the salary threshold was counterproductive given Labour had set out a target of building 1.5m more homes.
Her firm employs about 240 people but she said it could not afford to hold on to graduates from overseas who come to London to train. Instead of offering them full-time jobs it is now having to let them go.
Dove said: 'The senior ones are not a problem at that new threshold. People come here to be trained because it's a great place to learn. There are great schools of architecture, and we are very thorough in what people need to know to be an architect. We train them in things they need to know so they've got the standards and the legal context to operate, and yet we can't afford to hold on to them.
'There is an urgent need for skilled multi-disciplinary teams to design and deliver them. There are simply not enough architects and landscape architects to do this vital work. It extraordinary that we should be excluding international architectural graduates and qualified professionals, who have studied here and been trained in UK standards, because the salary threshold has suddenly been raised so high.'
Before the salary changes last April, architectural firms were able to recruit architects from the EU at ease as the profession was on the shortage occupation list – a list that also covered NHS workers.
Camilla Rich, a HR manager at Make Architects, said the change had had a significant impact on the business.
'It's not just the increase in salary but also the knock-on effect it has on other visa costs, sponsoring qualifications, and ensuring fair pay across all our salary bands,' she said. 'All of this means recruiting from overseas has become much more difficult, restricting our ability to hire the best talent for the job, particularly at graduate level.'
Marcia Longdon, an immigration partner at Kingsley Napley, said the changes were having a knock-on effect on firms' ability to staff projects and progress work, with clients reporting the salary threshold was 'simply too high for this sector'.
Mouzhan Majidi, the chief executive of Zaha Hadid Architects, which has designed projects from the stingray-shaped swimming pool building in London's Olympic Park to BMW's headquarters in Leipzig, said the global success of the sector in the UK depended on the ability to recruit architects.
Kingsley Napley is also calling on the government to commission the Migration Advisory Committee to undertake a full review of the industry to provide further evidence that the changes were warranted.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
17 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Passengers travelling to Europe could take cabin bag on board for FREE - as new rules will ban airlines from charging extra
Holidaymakers may soon avoid the frustration of paying extra fees for carry-on luggage at the boarding gate - thanks to proposed changes in EU airline rules. The EU Parliament transport committee has approved new regulations that would grant all passengers the right to carry a handbag or small suitcase weighing up to 7kg at no extra cost. Under the amendment, passengers would be allowed one cabin bag with dimensions measuring up to 100cm, in addition to a smaller personal item that fits under the seat. This proposal could significantly impact budget airlines such as Ryanair, easyJet, and Wizz Air, which currently charge extra for larger cabin baggage. If implemented, the rule would apply not only to domestic EU flights but also to international flights connecting the EU with non-member countries, including the UK. For the proposal to become law, it still requires approval from at least 55 per cent of EU member states, representing 65 cent of the total EU population. However, this process could take time and prompt pushback from national governments and airline lobbies. Spain has already expressed its approval for the proposed changes - but not everyone is on board. Airlines for Europe, representing major carriers, warn that the new rules could disrupt operations and ultimately lead to increased ticket prices for passengers - even for those not carrying extra luggage. Managing director Ourania Georgoutsakou told Politico that the European Parliament should 'let travellers decide what services they want, what services they pay for and, importantly, what services they don't.' Ahead of Tuesday's vote, the group contacted EU transport committee members, stressing practical and logistical challenges airlines would face. They pointed out that although many aircraft carry up to 180 passengers, the overhead compartments can only accommodate about 90 trolley-sized bags. The industry body argues that requiring free carry-on luggage could cause boarding delays and overcrowding, and that travellers should retain the flexibility to select and pay for only the services they require.


STV News
20 minutes ago
- STV News
Ministers in talks over welfare concessions to head off growing Labour rebellion
Ministers are discussing the prospect of further concessions to win over a growing list of Labour MPs poised to rebel against planned welfare reforms ahead of a crunch vote next week. Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner said talks between backbenchers and government were 'ongoing' on Wednesday night as Downing Street seeks to head off what would be Sir Keir Starmer's first Commons defeat. It came as six more Labour MPs added their names to an amendment that would halt the legislation in its tracks, arguing disabled people have not been properly consulted and further scrutiny of the changes is needed. The new signatories include the Commons Environmental Audit Select Committee chairman Toby Perkins, Stoke-on-Trent Central MP Gareth Snell, Newcastle upon Tyne MP Mary Glindon and Tamworth MP Sarah Edwards. North Ayrshire and Arran MP Irene Campbell and Colchester MP Pam Cox, both of whom won their seats in the party's 2024 landslide election victory, have also added their names. The new names takes the total number of Labour backbenchers supporting the so-called 'reasoned amendment,' tabled by Treasury Select Committee chairwoman Dame Meg Hiller, to 126. The prime minister has insisted the reforms are set for a Commons vote on Tuesday as planned, but ministers are locked in talks with backbenchers about the possibility of making changes to soften the impact of the Bill as a major revolt looms. Asked what concessions could be offered to convince rebels to back the government, Ms Rayner sought to reassure backbenchers that they would not be expected to betray the party's traditional values. 'I'm not going to get into that on your show tonight,' she said in an interview on ITV's Peston programme. 'Those discussions are ongoing around making sure that the welfare reforms that we're bringing in support people into work who need that, and we're putting a huge amount of investment into doing that, but also protecting the most vulnerable.' She acknowledged that 'a lot of people are very scared about these changes' but added: 'I haven't changed my Labour values and we're not expecting our benches to do anything that isn't in check with them. 'What we want to do is support people, and that is the crucial bit around these reforms of what Labour are trying to achieve, and we're discussing that with our MPs.' The plans restrict eligibility for personal independence payment (Pip), the main disability payment in England, and limit the sickness-related element of universal credit. The government hopes the changes will get more people back into work and save up to £5 billion a year. Existing claimants will be given a 13-week phase-out period of financial support, a move seen as a bid to head off opposition by aiming to soften the impact of the changes. But the fact so many Labour MPs are prepared to put their names to the 'reasoned amendment' calling for a change of course shows how entrenched the opposition remains. According to the government's impact assessment, the welfare reforms as a whole could push an extra 250,000 people, including 50,000 children, into relative poverty. Asked whether she thought there were hundreds of thousands of people claiming disability benefits who were not disabled, Ms Rayner said: 'No, what we're saying though is that the welfare system has to be able to have longevity.' Earlier on Wednesday, Sir Keir defended his leadership against accusations he had misjudged the mood in his party, insisting he is 'comfortable with reading the room'. At a press conference at the Nato summit in The Hague, the prime minister said: 'Is it tough going? Are there plenty of people and noises off? Yes, of course, there always are, there always have been, there always will be. 'But the important thing is to focus on the change that we want to bring about.' Meanwhile, the Tories seem unlikely to lend the government their support, with leader Kemi Badenoch setting out conditions for doing so including a commitment to rule out tax rises in the autumn budget and further cut the benefits bill. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country


Daily Mail
32 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Megapoll finds Labour faces election disaster just a year after landslide: Angela Rayner and Yvette Cooper among hundreds of MPs on track to lose seats - but Reform would need Tories to put Farage in No10
Labour would face disaster if an election was held today - but Reform would need an alliance with the Tories to put Nigel Farage in power. As Keir Starmer prepares to mark a year since his landslide, a huge YouGov poll has underlined his extraordinary fall from grace. From 403 MPs currently it found Labour would be reduced to just 178 if the country went to the polls again today. A large section of the Cabinet would lose their seats - including Deputy PM Angela Rayner, Yvette Cooper, Pat McFadden, Bridget Phillipson, Lisa Nandy and John Healey. Reform would see a stunning rise from five MPs to 271, while the Tories would endure an even worse result to drop to just 46. However, Mr Farage would still be well short of the 326 needed for an outright majority. The most plausible option could be teaming up with the Conservatives, which would mean a combined 317 MPs. That is the same number Theresa May secured in 317, when she clung on in No10 with help from the DUP. The grim findings emerged with Sir Keir poised to make humiliating concessions on benefits reforms today after failing to quell a massive Labour revolt. Ministers have been hinting at a climbdown as they face a disastrous defeat in a crunch Commons vote on the flagship legislation. Despite frantic direct pleas from the PM and Chancellor Rachel Reeves, more MPs have added their names to a fatal amendment overnight. Around 130 have now publicly declared they will oppose the Second Reading of the Bill, easily enough to overturn even Labour's massive majority. The YouGov study was conducted using the so-called MRP method - which profiles the characteristics of voters in constituencies to convert polling into seat-by-seat results. The research - conducted between May 29 and June 18 - found Reform was supported by 26 per cent of Brits. Labour was three points behind on 23 per cent, the Tories on 18 per cent and the Lib Dems on 15 per cent. In terms of seats, the Lib Dems could increase their tally to 81, while the SNP would restore their dominance in Scotland with 43. The Greens were seen as getting seven MPs. YouGov said: 'As well as winning just 224 seats between them in the central projection, the two traditional powerhouse parties of British politics, Labour and the Conservatives, would win a combined vote share of just 41 per cent, down from 59 per cent last year. 'That a clear majority would now vote for someone other than the two established main parties of British politics is a striking marker of just how far the fragmentation of the voting public has gone over the past decade.'