logo
Pacers cannot keep relying on crazy comebacks. They must start quicker, finish stronger.

Pacers cannot keep relying on crazy comebacks. They must start quicker, finish stronger.

USA Today6 hours ago

Pacers cannot keep relying on crazy comebacks. They must start quicker, finish stronger.
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Indiana Pacers head coach Rick Carlisle speaks following Game 2 loss
The Indiana Pacers fell to the Oklahoma City Thunder during Game 2 of the NBA Finals on Sunday, June 8, 2025, in Oklahoma City.
OKLAHOMA CITY — Oklahoma City Thunder coach Mark Daigneault called the Indiana Pacers an acquired taste.
'We haven't played them a ton,' Daigneault said. 'They're not in the West obviously. They play a very distinct style on both ends.'
After wasting an opportunity to win Game 1, the Thunder were left with a bitter aftertaste against the never-quite Pacers.
The Thunder devoured the Pacers in Game 2 Sunday, June 8, evening the NBA Finals with a 123-107 victory.
ANALYSIS: Tyrese Haliburton NBA postseason heroics renew debate. Does 'clutch' play exist?
While the Pacers stole home-court advantage, they haven't played great and it's starting to become an issue as the series moves to Indianapolis for Games 3 and 4.
'Another bad first half,' Pacers coach Rick Carlisle said. 'Obviously, it was a big problem, and we just played poorly. A little bit better in the second half but you can't be a team that's reactive and expect to be successful or have consistency.'
At this stage, the Pacers cannot rely on their ability to complete a comeback. They need to start better, and now, it's on Carlisle and his staff to figure that out. Indiana trailed by as many as 23 points, and while the comebacks have been compelling, it's not a recipe for playoff success.
'We're going to have to be a lot better on Wednesday,' Carlisle said.
The Thunder were more physical, dominated the paint for the second consecutive game and limited Tyrese Haliburton to a quiet 17 points, 12 of which came in the fourth quarter when Oklahoma City had control of the game and was not in the mood to blow another double-digit lead.
How did the Pacers handle Oklahoma City's physicality?
'Not well,' Carlisle said.
'They were the best in the league during the year at keeping people out of there (paint). They are great at it. We have to find ways to get the ball in there, and you know, it's just there are so many things that have to go right on a set of two possessions to get the ball into the heart of their defense.'
Throughout the season and especially the playoffs, the Thunder's top-ranked defense finds a way to take away or limit the opponent's strengths. They did it against Denver and Minnesota in the Western conference semifinals and finals.
'Our offense is built from the inside-out, and we have to do a better job getting downhill,' Haliburton said. 'They collapse and make plays from there. I thought we could improve a lot there. But yeah, they are flying around. They have got great point-of-attack defenders and great rim protectors. We can do a better job, watch the film, and see where we can get better going into Game 3.'
What about Haliburton's performance?
'There's a lot more to the game than just scoring. … People shouldn't just look at his points and assists and judge how he played, or judge how any of our guys played just on that,' Carlisle said. 'That's not how our team is built. We are an ecosystem that has to function together. We've got to score enough points to win the game but who gets them and how they get them, not important.'
Pascal Siakam found no consolation in getting a split and grabbing home-court advantage in the series.
'You want to win every game you play, so we are not happy with how the game went today, and that's it,' he said. 'We've just got to turn the page, focus on Game 3. That's the biggest game of the year.'
This series is much closer to being a 2-0 Thunder lead than a 2-0 Pacers lead, and between Game 1 and 2, Carlisle compared a playoff series to a book.
'Each game in this series is going to look different,' he said. 'A playoff series is a series of seven chapters, and each one takes on a different personality.'
If the Pacers don't find a way to start the next chapter better than they have, the book is going to close quickly on their championship aspirations.
Follow NBA columnist Jeff Zillgitt on social media @JeffZillgitt

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Through 2 Finals games, it's clear that the moment isn't too big for OKC's Shai Gilgeous-Alexander
Through 2 Finals games, it's clear that the moment isn't too big for OKC's Shai Gilgeous-Alexander

San Francisco Chronicle​

time19 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Through 2 Finals games, it's clear that the moment isn't too big for OKC's Shai Gilgeous-Alexander

The moment is clearly not too big for Shai Gilgeous-Alexander. These are his first NBA Finals. It's hard to remember that sometimes. The Oklahoma City Thunder star — and NBA MVP — just had a pair of debut finals games like nobody in league history, with a combined 72 points in his first two appearances in the title series. That's a record. The previous mark for someone in his first two finals games: 71 by Philadelphia's Allen Iverson in 2001. 'I'm being myself,' Gilgeous-Alexander said. 'I don't think I tried to reinvent the wheel or step up to the plate with a different mindset. Just try to attack the game the right way. I think I've done a pretty good job of that so far.' His next attack chance isn't until Wednesday night, when the series — the Thunder and Indiana Pacers are now tied at a game apiece — shifts to Indianapolis for Game 3. He had 38 points in the Game 1 loss to the Pacers, 34 points in Sunday's Game 2 win. Gilgeous-Alexander has more points in the first two games than any other two players in the series — not just Thunder players, any two players — do combined. Thunder coach Mark Daigneault isn't taking the greatness of the MVP for granted. He's just come to expect it by now. 'Yeah, unsurprising at this point,' Daigneault said. 'It's just kind of what he does. He just continues to progress and improve and rise to every occasion that he puts himself in and that we put ourselves in. I thought his floor game (in Game 2) was really, really in a great rhythm. I thought everyone played better individually, and I thought we played better collectively. I think that was a by-product.' He had eight assists in Game 2, making him the 17th player in NBA history to have that many points and that many assists in a finals game; it has now happened a total of 34 times in the title series. But it wasn't just having assists. It was the type of assists that were key. Of Gilgeous-Alexander's eight on Sunday, six of them set up 3-pointers. Those eight assists were turned into 22 points in all. 'He's MVP for a reason,' Pacers center Myles Turner said. 'He's going to get off, and I think that we accepted that. It's a matter of slowing him down and limiting the role players.' Only seven players in finals history — Jerry West (94 in 1969), LeBron James (83 in 2015 and 80 in 2018), Shaquille O'Neal (83 in 2000, 76 in 2002 and 72 in 2001), John Havlicek (80 in 1969), Michael Jordan (78 in 1992 and 73 in 1993), Cliff Hagan (73 in 1961) and now Gilgeous-Alexander — have scored 72 or more points in the first two games of a title series. 'Shai, you can mark down 34 points before they even get on the plane for the next game,' Pacers coach Rick Carlisle said. 'The guy's going to score. We've got to find ways to make it as tough as possible on him.' In Game 1, the Pacers bottled up Gilgeous-Alexander's supporting cast. In Game 2, they didn't. It's not really simple enough to say that's why the Thunder lost Game 1 and won Game 2, but it is certainly part of the equation. Or maybe it's just as simple as saying the MVP is playing like an MVP. He's the scoring champion as well, leads the playoffs in total points, just became the 12th player in league history to cross the 3,000-point mark for a season (counting regular season and postseason), and just got his first finals win. 'I would trade the points for two Ws, for sure,' Gilgeous-Alexander said. 'But this is where our feet are. This is where we are. You can't go back in the past, you can only make the future better. That's what I'm focused on.'

Through 2 Finals games, it's clear that the moment isn't too big for OKC's Shai Gilgeous-Alexander
Through 2 Finals games, it's clear that the moment isn't too big for OKC's Shai Gilgeous-Alexander

Hamilton Spectator

time22 minutes ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Through 2 Finals games, it's clear that the moment isn't too big for OKC's Shai Gilgeous-Alexander

The moment is clearly not too big for Shai Gilgeous-Alexander. These are his first NBA Finals. It's hard to remember that sometimes. The Oklahoma City Thunder star — and NBA MVP — just had a pair of debut finals games like nobody in league history, with a combined 72 points in his first two appearances in the title series. That's a record. The previous mark for someone in his first two finals games: 71 by Philadelphia's Allen Iverson in 2001. 'I'm being myself,' Gilgeous-Alexander said. 'I don't think I tried to reinvent the wheel or step up to the plate with a different mindset. Just try to attack the game the right way. I think I've done a pretty good job of that so far.' His next attack chance isn't until Wednesday night, when the series — the Thunder and Indiana Pacers are now tied at a game apiece — shifts to Indianapolis for Game 3. He had 38 points in the Game 1 loss to the Pacers, 34 points in Sunday's Game 2 win. Gilgeous-Alexander has more points in the first two games than any other two players in the series — not just Thunder players, any two players — do combined. Thunder coach Mark Daigneault isn't taking the greatness of the MVP for granted. He's just come to expect it by now. 'Yeah, unsurprising at this point,' Daigneault said. 'It's just kind of what he does. He just continues to progress and improve and rise to every occasion that he puts himself in and that we put ourselves in. I thought his floor game (in Game 2) was really, really in a great rhythm. I thought everyone played better individually, and I thought we played better collectively. I think that was a by-product.' He had eight assists in Game 2, making him the 17th player in NBA history to have that many points and that many assists in a finals game; it has now happened a total of 34 times in the title series. But it wasn't just having assists. It was the type of assists that were key. Of Gilgeous-Alexander's eight on Sunday, six of them set up 3-pointers. Those eight assists were turned into 22 points in all. 'He's MVP for a reason,' Pacers center Myles Turner said. 'He's going to get off, and I think that we accepted that. It's a matter of slowing him down and limiting the role players.' Only seven players in finals history — Jerry West (94 in 1969), LeBron James (83 in 2015 and 80 in 2018), Shaquille O'Neal (83 in 2000, 76 in 2002 and 72 in 2001), John Havlicek (80 in 1969), Michael Jordan (78 in 1992 and 73 in 1993), Cliff Hagan (73 in 1961) and now Gilgeous-Alexander — have scored 72 or more points in the first two games of a title series. 'Shai, you can mark down 34 points before they even get on the plane for the next game,' Pacers coach Rick Carlisle said. 'The guy's going to score. We've got to find ways to make it as tough as possible on him.' In Game 1, the Pacers bottled up Gilgeous-Alexander's supporting cast. In Game 2, they didn't. It's not really simple enough to say that's why the Thunder lost Game 1 and won Game 2, but it is certainly part of the equation. Or maybe it's just as simple as saying the MVP is playing like an MVP. He's the scoring champion as well, leads the playoffs in total points, just became the 12th player in league history to cross the 3,000-point mark for a season (counting regular season and postseason), and just got his first finals win. 'I would trade the points for two Ws, for sure,' Gilgeous-Alexander said. 'But this is where our feet are. This is where we are. You can't go back in the past, you can only make the future better. That's what I'm focused on.' ___ AP NBA:

NBA Finals Game 2 winners, losers: Thunder depth stands out, Tyrese Haliburton goes cold
NBA Finals Game 2 winners, losers: Thunder depth stands out, Tyrese Haliburton goes cold

USA Today

time25 minutes ago

  • USA Today

NBA Finals Game 2 winners, losers: Thunder depth stands out, Tyrese Haliburton goes cold

NBA Finals Game 2 winners, losers: Thunder depth stands out, Tyrese Haliburton goes cold Show Caption Hide Caption Pacers and Thunder NBA Finals is better than it's 'small-market' billing USA TODAY Sports' Jeff Zillgitt breaks down the star-studded NBA Finals between the Indiana Pacers and Oklahoma City Thunder. Sports Pulse Now that was a lead that was safe. After dropping the first game of the NBA Finals, the Oklahoma City Thunder thoroughly controlled the Indiana Pacers on Sunday, June 8, in Game 2, 123-107. Indiana, which has posted five comebacks this postseason of at least 15 points, could never seriously threaten Oklahoma City, which had five players score at least 15 points. NBA Most Valuable Player Shai Gilgeous-Alexander led all players with yet another 30-point showing, this one an efficient 34-point, eight-assist night on just 21 shot attempts. OPINION: Pacers cannot keep relying on crazy comebacks. They must start quicker, finish stronger. Pacers star Tyrese Haliburton did finish with 17 points, though he had scored just five through three quarters. Here are the winners and losers from Game 2 of the NBA Finals: WINNERS Alex Caruso and Aaron Wiggins It wasn't just his defense, Thunder backup guard Alex Caruso also poured in 20 points — including four drained 3-pointers — in just 27:04 of playing time. He was steady and aggressive on the offensive end, cutting into the lane when gaps opened up. Throw in fellow backup guard Aaron Wiggins, whose 18 points — including 5-of-8 from 3 — in just 20:32 also lifted the Thunder. That Caruso and Wiggins accounted for nearly 65% of Oklahoma City's 14 made 3-pointers, is a testament to the Thunder's depth. Chet Holmgren This was exactly the bounce-back game that the Thunder needed from center Chet Holmgren. Three nights after scoring just six points on 2-of-9 shooting, Holmgren got to work, though most of his production came early. Nine of his 15 points came in the first quarter. The Thunder go big After opting to play mostly small in Game 1, Oklahoma City leaned much more on its double-big lineup with its pair of centers, Chet Holmgren and Isaiah Hartenstein, on the floor at the same time. The result was instant, with the Thunder dominating points in the paint in the first half, 26-12. 'It takes discipline, but we try to really use these early games in the series to learn what are options are and what our tradeoffs are — not assume anything,' Thunder coach Mark Daigneault said after the game. 'That was the intent tonight: just to get a little more information.' LOSERS Tyrese Haliburton waits way too long Through the first three quarters, the most important player of the Pacers had scored just five points on just 2-of-7 shooting. Through the first three and a half minutes of the fourth, Haliburton had scored nine points, making all four of his attempts. While Haliburton's rep as a closer cannot be questioned, his inexplicably slow starts could become costly. The Thunder will clog the paint and gameplan to slow Haliburton's attacks into the paint. He needs to find ways to score regardless. Pacers coach Rick Carlisle downplayed Haliburton's sluggish production, saying that Indiana's team is an "ecosystem" and that it doesn't matter where points come from. 'There's a lot more to the game than just scoring,' he said after the game. 'Everybody's got to do more.' Regardless, Haliburton is the team's most gifted player and the one who can score easiest. The Pacers have no answer for OKC's intensity and physicality After the game, Pacers coach Rick Carlisle was asked his thoughts on how the Pacers responded to Oklahoma City's ramped up defensive intensity. Carlisle answer was curt and straightforward. 'Not well,' he said. The Thunder excel at crowding the paint when opposing players attack, collapsing, swarming and swatting at the ball. That is magnified particularly when Oklahoma City uses its double-big lineup with Holmgren and Hartenstein roaming down low. In the regular season, the Thunder ranked first in opponent points in the paint per game (42.5). Indiana's inability to attack the paint hurt its spacing and hurt its ability to get open looks from 3. 'The paint is our emphasis and the paint is our friend. The more that we're able to attack the paint, usually better things happen for us,' Carlisle said. Key players on Pacers bench no-show Obi Toppin scored 17 points in Game 1. Thomas Bryant had five. Both players combined Sunday night to score 4 on 1-of-9 shooting. Guards T.J. McConnell and Benedict Mathurin did combine for 25, but the Pacers will need much more balance from their contributions. The biggest stories, every morning. Stay up-to-date on all the key sports developments by subscribing to USA TODAY Sports' newsletter.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store