Children's Cereals Now Less Healthy Than a Decade Ago: Study
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Children's breakfast cereals have become less nutritious over the past decade, with rising levels of fat, sodium and sugar in newly released offerings as well as declining amounts of protein and fiber, according to a new study.
Why It Matters
Many children and teens in the U.S. rely on cereal to start their day, with data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey showing that more than 30 percent of those aged 2 to 19 ate ready-to-eat cereal for breakfast.
Childhood nutrition plays a critical role in healthy growth and development, while also helping to establish lifelong eating habits that can reduce the risk of chronic diseases. High sodium intake during childhood has been linked to elevated blood pressure and other long-term health concerns, for example. Protein, on the other hand, is essential for children because it supports growth, builds muscles, and helps develop a strong immune system.
What To Know
The study, published in JAMA Network Open, collected data from newly released cereals between 2010 and 2023.
It found that total fat per serving increased 33.6 percent, from an average of 1.13 grams to 1.51 grams. Second to fat, sodium levels also soared a similar percentage, 32 percent, from 156 milligrams to 206 milligrams per serving.
While carbohydrates remained relatively stable, with a slight increase, sugar saw a larger boost, increasing about 11 percent, from 10.28 grams to 11.40 grams per serving.
It also found that good nutrients actually decreased, with fiber declining from 3.82 grams to 2.94 grams. Protein content also fell, decreasing to 1.69 grams per serving.
Outside of their nutritional content, legislators have pushed to remove synthetic dyes from cereals. In March, West Virginia signed a statewide ban on seven dyes.
The cereal aisle in a Carrefour Market in Nice, France is seen in this stock image taken on March 9, 2025.
The cereal aisle in a Carrefour Market in Nice, France is seen in this stock image taken on March 9, 2025.
SYSPEO/SIPA/AP Photo
What People Are Saying
Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said in November 2024: "If you look at a pack of Froot Loops in this country, it's all chemical dyes. Yellow, blue, red dye, which are poison."
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton announced in April his office is investigating Kellogg's, saying: "Artificial food colorings have been shown to have disastrous impacts on health, and in no world should foods that include these dyes be advertised as 'healthy.' There will be accountability for any company, including Kellogg's, that unlawfully makes misrepresentations about its food and contributes to a broken health system that has made Americans less healthy."
Senator Laura Wakim Chapman, a West Virginia Republican, said in March: "No more toxic colors, no more poisoning ourselves and our children. No more unnecessary risks. Our health is not for sale."
What Happens Next
Later today, HHS Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is set to release his Make America Healthy Again report, which is expected to touch on nutrition and dyes.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Texas considers banning products infused with THC derived from hemp, and retailers are worried
AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — Walk into enough gas stations and they're likely easy to find: gummies, drinks and vapes infused with THC, the compound that gives marijuana its psychoactive properties. That's given lawmakers across the U.S. headaches over how to regulate the booming market, and it's a conflict now taking hold in Texas, where a proposed ban passed by the Legislature poses another major battle for the industry. Texas has some of the nation's most restrictive marijuana laws, but thousands of retailers in the state sell THC consumables, underscoring states' struggle to set rules around the products that generate millions in tax revenue. Republican Gov. Greg Abbott has not indicated whether he will sign the ban. Other states, including California, have imposed restrictions in recent years that include banning underage use and limits on the potency of the products, which are often marketed as legal even in states where marijuana is not. 'Governor Abbott will thoughtfully review any legislation sent to his desk,' spokesperson Andrew Mahaleris said when asked for comment on the bill. Texas tries to crack down The Texas bill would make it a misdemeanor to sell, possess or manufacture consumable products with tetrahydrocannabinol, or THC. The proposal shadows several other state efforts to crack down on a market that has exploded since a 2018 federal law allowed states to regulate hemp, which can be synthetically processed to create THC. Hemp is a plant that is grown to make textiles, plastics, food and several other products. It is related to marijuana and must contain less than 0.3% THC to still be classified as hemp under federal law. The proliferating market has given residents in states with strict marijuana laws such as Texas a legal way to access products that can give them a similar high. Nationwide, the substances are often sold through legal loopholes, despite concerns about potential health risks and a lack of oversight of how they're produced. Republican Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick laid out bags of THC snacks on a table in front of a group of reporters last week to reiterate his determination for Texas to ban the products. He said he wasn't worried about Abbott when asked about the possibility of a veto. 'This is serious business,' Patrick said. If enacted into law, Texas would have one of the most restrictive bans in the country, according to Katharine Neil Harris, a researcher in drug policy at the Baker Institute for Public Policy at Rice University. 'I'm not aware of any other states without recreational marijuana markets that also prohibit consumable hemp products from having any THC,' Harris said. A jumbled legal landscape States that prohibit recreational marijuana have also made efforts to regulate the THC market, including Alabama, Kentucky and Tennessee. In Florida, Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis vetoed a bill last year that would have put in place age restrictions and banned marketing directed toward children, stating that it would hurt small businesses. 'There's such a variety in how states have responded to this," Harris said. Texas has one of the most restrictive medical marijuana programs in the country, only allowing three licensed dispensaries to operate in the state to sell low-potency marijuana to residents with PTSD, cancer or other conditions. Proposals to expand the state's medical program are a sticking point for some Republican lawmakers. A total of 38 states and the District of Columbia have laws that allow the medical use of marijuana. About 6 in 10 voters across the country said they favor legalizing recreational use nationwide, according to AP VoteCast, in a 2024 survey of more than 120,000 U.S. voters. Retailers push back on ban Kyle Bingham, a farmer in the Texas Panhandle, said he doesn't plan on growing hemp anymore if there's a ban. He has grown the plant on a family farm with his dad for four years and said it is one of many crops they grow, including cotton. 'We've never planted more than 5% of our acres in hemp, and that's part of the business plan," said Bingham, who is also vice president of the National Hemp Growers Association. 'So for us, it's definitely hard to walk away from as an investment.' Because of a lack of federal oversight into manufacturing processes and a lack of uniform labeling requirements, it's hard to know what exactly is in THC products sold in stores. Many dispensaries, worried about their future, have urged the governor to veto the legislation. They have defended their industry as providing medical relief to people who cannot access medical marijuana through the state's restrictive program. 'It's absurd they think they can sign away 50,000 jobs,' Savannah Gavlik, an employee at Austin-based dispensary Dope Daughters, said. The store will likely have to close if the ban takes place, but the anxiety has not yet set in, she said. 'One of the biggest things we provide is self care,' Gavlik said. 'It's people genuinely wanting medical relief.' ___ Lathan is a corps member for the Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on undercovered issues.
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
FDA To Review Safety Of Abortion Pill After Junk Science Report Paved The Way
Republican Sen. Josh Hawley's quest to legitimize a junk science report undermining the safety of a widely used abortion pill was fully realized this week. Food and Drug Administration Commissioner Martin Makary confirmed in a Monday letter to the Missouri senator that the agency will conduct a safety review of the abortion pill mifepristone. Makary's letter is in response to an April request from Hawley for the department to review mifepristone following a new report published by the Ethics and Public Policy Center, an anti-abortion conservative think tank and advisory board member of Project 2025. 'As with all drugs, FDA continues to closely monitor the postmarketing safety data on mifepristone for the medical termination of early pregnancy,' Makary wrote in his letter. 'As the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, I am committed to conducting a review of mifepristone and working with the professional career scientists at the Agency who review this data.' The FDA and the Department of Health and Human Services did not immediately respond to HuffPost's request for comment. Although Makary does not mention the EPPC report, Hawley's entire argument for reviewing mifepristone relies on the junk science paper. The EPPC report claims it's the 'largest-known study of the abortion pill' and that nearly 11% of women 'experience sepsis, infection, hemorrhaging, or another serious adverse event within 45 days following a mifepristone abortion.' But data scientists voiced serious concerns about the validity of the report, pointing out that it's not peer-reviewed and the report's recommendations do not line up with the data they analyzed. 'It is highly concerning that the FDA is committed to a new review of mifepristone, given the massive amount of evidence on its safety and efficacy,' said Dr. Angel Foster, co-founder of the Massachusetts Medication Abortion Access Project, a shield law practice that provides telehealth abortion care to people in all 50 states. 'This is purely politically motivated and not rooted in science,' Foster said. 'Rolling back access to mifepristone would be a disaster, especially for the patients that The MAP serves every day – patients living in states where abortion is banned, who can't afford to pay for a procedure, and for whom neither traveling to another state nor remaining pregnant are options.' Republicans have been laying the groundwork to undermine the safety of mifepristone for months. It makes sense that anti-abortion groups have set their sights on the pill: telehealth abortion care now accounts for 20% of all abortion care since the Supreme Court repealed Roe v. Wade. Democrats have repeatedlygrilled Makary and HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. about their plans for mifepristone. The FDA commissioner's promise to review the abortion pill stands in stark contrast to his past statements that he has 'no plans' to restrict mifepristone. But Makary has repeatedly left the door open, hinting that if there was reason to believe mifepristone was unsafe his agency would review it. Makary has not once stated mifepristone's proven safety record since the FDA approved it in 2000. The medication has been used safely by over 6 million people in the U.S., according to the agency. Major medical groups have repeatedly said mifepristone is safe, pointing to more than 100 studies that have corroborated its safety and effectiveness. During a recent Senate appropriations hearing, Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.) asked Makary about the EPPC report and whether he would use it in his approach to mifepristone. Makary said he would want to see the underlying data of the study, but took issue with Murray's characterization of the EPPC paper as a 'sham study.' 'I have not seen that study, senator, and you have not seen that study,' Makary responded. 'So how can you call it a sham, bogus study? Neither of us have seen the study, the underlying data, or the methodology.' The FDA did not respond to HuffPost when asked if Makary's decision to review mifepristone stemmed from the EPPC report or if he's seen its underlying data. 'Even apart from all the red flags with the data and supposed analysis, the fact where they land in the recommendations — that has nothing to do with the research itself — indicates this was driven more by ideology than by scientific rigor,' Rachel Jones, a principal research scientist at the Guttmacher Institute, said of the EPPC report in April. Jones told HuffPost that she would not call the paper a 'study' since it's impossible for other researchers to fully assess the methodology and integrity of its results without access to the underlying data. 'We've known this moment was coming, and we've been sounding the alarm on Martin Makary since his nomination,' Reproductive Freedom for All President and CEO Mini Timmaraju said in a Tuesday statement. 'After months of signals and dog whistles, it's now in black and white on official FDA letterhead,' she continued. 'This review is not grounded in new data or real safety concerns – it's driven by Project 2025-aligned groups and right-wing politicians who want to ban abortion nationwide. We are now one step closer to the Trump administration's ultimate goal of a national abortion ban.' GOP Lays Groundwork To Restrict Abortion Pill With New Junk Science Report Trump DOJ Just Sided With Biden On Abortion Pill Case – But It's Not What You Think Josh Hawley Introduces Law To Ban Mailing Of Abortion Pills, Citing Junk Science Report
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Georgia state Rep. Derrick Jackson to join 3 other Democrats in run for governor
ATLANTA, Ga. (AP) — Georgia state Rep. Derrick Jackson said Tuesday that he's running for governor next year, joining three other Democrats in a race without a clear frontrunner after two high-profile candidates decided not to run. The metro Atlanta Democrat said he will launch his campaign Friday, emphasizing his work in business and politics and his 22 years of military service. The U.S. Navy veteran was elected to the state House in 2016 and worked as a marketing executive with General Electric. As governor, Jackson said he would 'put Georgia families first," in part by expanding access to medical care and economic opportunities in rural areas. 'My Republican friends love to tout Georgia as the number one state to do business, but I'm going to campaign on making Georgia the number one place to work, to play, to have a family and for young professionals to realize that regardless of which of the 159 counties they live in, there's going to be opportunity there,' Jackson said in an interview with the Associated Press. He plans to push for stricter gun regulations and to repeal Georgia's abortion law, which took effect in 2022 and effectively prohibited abortions beyond about six weeks of pregnancy. Jackson will join former Atlanta Mayor Keisha Lance Bottoms, Atlanta state Sen. Jason Esteves and Atlanta pastor Olu Brown in the Democratic primary. They will compete for the Democratic nomination in the race to replace the state's popular term-limited Republican Gov. Brian Kemp. Democrat Stacey Abrams, who ran and lost to Kemp in 2018 and 2022, has not closed the door on a third run. Jackson finished sixth in the Democratic primary for lieutenant governor in 2022. After losing, he was reelected to the House in 2023 following the death of state Rep. Tish Naghise. He was defeated last year by Rep. Carolyn Hugley after running for House minority leader. Despite past losses, Jackson said his experience campaigning for statewide office will help him pull ahead of his competitors. Inspired by civil rights icon John Lewis, Jackson said he has a 'moral obligation' to run because he saw state and federal policies that were 'not right, not fair, not just.' He wants to help Georgians who could be impacted by President Donald Trump's sweeping bill that Jackson said 'will devastate a lot of families' with provisions such as cuts to Medicaid funds. U.S. Rep. Lucy McBath, once the expected frontrunner known for her gun control advocacy, announced in March she wasn't running because she needed to focus on her husband's health after complications from cancer surgery. Former state Sen. Jason Carter, former President Jimmy Carter's moderate grandson and the Democrats' 2014 nominee for governor, said he would not run because his wife was diagnosed with cancer. ___ Kramon is a corps member for The Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on undercovered issues. Follow Kramon on X: @charlottekramon.
