Orlando Plastic Surgeon Outlines Most Popular Liposuction Treatment Areas
Dr. Jon Paul Trevisani, a top-rated Board-Certified Plastic Surgeon in Orlando, highlights the most popular regions for selective fat removal via liposuction.
ORLANDO, FL, UNITED STATES, March 12, 2025 / EINPresswire.com / -- As cosmetic surgery continues to grow in demand, liposuction has emerged as one of the most frequently performed procedures in the country — even overtaking breast augmentation as the most popular plastic surgery for three years in a row, according to the 2023 Plastic Surgery Statistics Report released by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This method of isolated fat removal is considered long-lasting, predictable, and less invasive than comparable body sculpting procedures. One of the primary benefits of liposuction is its versatility and ability to treat virtually any region of the body with natural-looking results.
Some of the most popular treatment sites for liposuction include areas like the neck, abdomen, upper arms, inner thighs, hips, flanks, and mid-back. The region around the neck and chin (often called the submental area) is particularly popular for fat reduction, effectively slimming the appearance of the face and eliminating a 'double chin.' Liposuction to the abdomen and midsection is also a common goal, especially for patients who have had children and want to restore a flatter belly. Dr. Jon Paul Trevisani, founder and lead plastic surgeon at Orlando-based The Aesthetic Surgery Centre, also highlights the upper arms and hips as areas prone to localized fat buildup as the result of aging and pregnancy. Many patients also enlist surgery to smooth common bulges like 'love handles,' 'muffin tops,' or a 'bra bulge.'
Whether you're interested in liposuction to resculpt the face or body, Dr. Jon Paul Trevisani advises scheduling an initial consultation with a board-certified plastic surgeon to learn the full scope of what's possible with selective fat removal. Liposuction can provide powerful results but may not be right for everyone, so it's important to speak with a cosmetic surgeon about your concerns and expectations for the final results.
About Jon Paul Trevisani, MD, FACS
Dr. Jon Paul Trevisani is an aesthetic plastic surgeon who specializes in cosmetic procedures like breast augmentation, tummy tuck surgery, and mastopexy, among other treatment options. Based in the Orlando and Maitland area, Dr. Jon Paul Trevisani has been in practice for 30 years and is featured in several different publications and media outlets, including his distinction as one of 'America's Top Physicians in Plastic Surgery' in the Guide to America's Top Physicians. He is also a Fellow of the American College of Surgeons and an active member of numerous regional and national professional organizations, such as the American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS), the Florida Medical Association, and The Aesthetic Society (ASAPS). Dr. Jon Paul Trevisani is available for interview upon request.
###
The Aesthetic Surgery Centre
413 Lake Howell Rd.
Maitland, FL 32751
(407) 677-8999
Rosemont Media
Katie Nagel
email us here
Legal Disclaimer:
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Hospice charity submits plans for care facility
A hospice charity has submitted plans to develop an end-of-life care facility in a coastal town 18 years after fundraising began. Yare Hospice Care launched in 2007, changing its name to East Coast Hospice two years later. In 2023 the charity merged with St Elizabeth Hospice, based in Ipswich. The charity says it wants to build a community hospice with 16 beds on its site at Sidegate Lane in Gorleston near Great Yarmouth. Judi Newman, chief executive of St Elizabeth Hospice, said: "We are delighted to submit this planning application and share our full plans with the wider community." Plans to build a hospice between Lowestoft and Great Yarmouth have stalled for almost two decades as rival charities competed over plans, sites and funding. The community was split over supporting the James Paget University Hospital wanting to build a hospice at the Louise Hamilton Cancer Centre, within its site or the independent East Coast Hospice, which had land and won planning consent for a 10-bed unit. After the NHS withdrew its plans, East Coast Hospice merged with St Elizabeth which immediately conducted a feasibility study which found a hospice was needed to help patients in Great Yarmouth and Waveney. It said the previous plans were not suitable to the needs identified in its report, and it appointed Norwich-based LSI Architects. The proposed unit would feature 16 inpatient beds, an outpatient and community hub for day care and therapies as well as a community café. Roberta Lovick, ambassador for the Louise Hamilton Trust, said: "The strength of our partnership will help us achieve our vision of bringing greater parity to end-of-life care in Great Yarmouth and Waveney. "When my daughter Louise died in 1998, I vowed to dedicate my life to improving end-of-life care in this community and across the country, and this project, alongside St Elizabeth Hospice, is a significant step toward that goal. "This is something we know the community wants and needs. This community hospice building will make a drastic difference to so many people, improving local end-of-life care, giving people more options and support during their precious remaining time with loved ones." Ms Newman added: "We are delighted to submit this planning application and share our full plans with the wider community. "With the invaluable support of Roberta Lovick and the Louise Hamilton Trust, we are in a strong position to develop the community hospice sustainably in a single phase." Ed Garratt, chief executive at Norfolk and Waveney ICB (N&W ICB), said: "This is a hugely welcome development, which aligns with our ambitions to enhance palliative and end-of-life care in our region. "I wholeheartedly support this shared commitment from the voluntary sector, NHS and community in working together to improve services for the local population." Follow Norfolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X. New hospice needed in East Anglia, charity says Hospital pulls out of hospice plan
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Missouri continues to lag behind most states in children's health, report finds
(Rebecca Rivas/Missouri Independent). Missouri ranked in the bottom third of all states for children's health, according to a report released Monday — due in part to a high rate of child and teen deaths. The annual Kids Count Data Book from the Annie E. Casey Foundation, which used data from 2023, evaluated all states on four metrics of child well-being: health, economic well-being, education, and family and community. Missouri ranked near the middle of states for overall child well-being, at 27th out of 50, weighed down by poor performance in health and education. Missouri's rankings in the four categories were: 13th in economic well-being, 33rd in education, 35th in health And 25th in family & community. 'Children's health remains an area of concern,' noted a press release Monday from Family and Community Trust, the Missouri-based nonprofit partner to Kids Count. Only nine states had higher rates of child and teen deaths in 2023 than Missouri, one of the factors considered in the health ranking. (Those were: Mississippi, Louisiana, New Mexico, Alabama, Tennessee, Arkansas, Alaska, Oklahoma and Montana.) Missouri generally ranks among the states with the highest rate of firearm deaths for kids. Firearms became the leading cause of kids' deaths in the United States in 2020, surpassing car accidents. While the national average in 2023 was 29 child and teen deaths per 100,000, that number was 37 deaths per 100,000 in Missouri. The national average rose overall in 2023. The report notes that while covid deaths contributed to the increase, the rise was largely due to rising firearm deaths and drug overdoses, particularly among teens ages 15 to 19. Also bringing Missouri's health ranking down: Missouri's rate of low-birth weight babies increased in 2023 from 2019 and is above the national average. Other factors helped Missouri's score. For one, Missouri has seen major improvements in children's insurance coverage since the state implemented Medicaid expansion in 2021. The rate of uninsured kids fell from 7% in 2019 to 5% in 2023, which is now on par with the national average. Nationally, Missouri saw among the sharpest declines in uninsured people overall from 2019 to 2023 with the expansion of Medicaid. Those gains could be threatened by Congress' budget proposal to reduce Medicaid spending in part by imposing more barriers to care. Teen births in the state have gone down, in line with national trends — though the state's average is still above the national one. The rate of overweight or obese kids has also improved in Missouri and is down to 31% of kids in 2023, on par with the national average. The rate of kids in poverty declined to 14% in the state in 2023, below the 16% national average. Missouri's education ranking slipped in recent years. In 2023, 77% of Missouri eighth graders were not proficient at math, according to the report, which is nearly 10 percentage points worse than 2019 and is worse than the national average. The press release from Family and Community Trust said the data show a 'continuing need to invest in education in Missouri.' SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Canadian doctor after devastating Sudan assignment: 'The worst humanitarian crisis in the world'
Sudan is facing an emergency of staggering proportions, one that has displaced over 12 million people and decimated the nation's healthcare system. But unlike other global crises, this one seems to be happening almost entirely in silence. 'This is not just a war between two parties,' says Sana Bég, executive director of Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) Canada. 'It's a war on the people of Sudan.' What began as a power struggle between the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) and the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) in April 2023 has spiralled into what aid workers now describe as the world's largest displacement crisis. According to the World Health Organization, 70 to 80 per cent of the country's healthcare facilities are either nonfunctional or overwhelmed. In parts of Darfur, even the UN is absent, leaving MSF — also known as Doctors Without Borders — as the only international organization delivering aid on the ground. 'Having to choose between one life-saving activity for another are the kinds of decisions our teams are left to make because of this increasingly isolated environment where we're the only ones being relied on to carry out an entire scope of what should be an ecosystem of aid,' Bég says. This is not just a war between two parties. It's a war on the people of Sudan. For Dr. Reza Eshaghian, a Vancouver-based physician who recently returned from Darfur, the devastation is unlike anything he has seen before. 'What's happening in Sudan is the worst humanitarian crisis in the world, full stop,' he says. 'There are bombings, sexual violence, armed robbery. There's a lack of protection and international humanitarian law.' Eshaghian, who began working with MSF in 2014, was stationed in Nyala, a city in South Darfur. He noted that it's not just the violence itself that is killing people: 'So much of the suffering and death is from preventable illness. We saw women dying from eclampsia and postpartum hemorrhage. People are dying of malaria, malnutrition, diarrhea, dehydration, sepsis. These are things we know how to treat, but there's no infrastructure left to do it.' The hospital Eshaghian helped support saw overwhelming gaps in supplies and staffing. Although MSF brings in its own equipment, the logistics are gruelling, and his team saw supply shipments often delayed. There was also never enough. People are dying of malaria, malnutrition, diarrhea, dehydration, sepsis. These are things we know how to treat, but there's no infrastructure left to do it. Despite the danger, MSF has continued to provide help where it can, but the work has come at immense personal cost, especially for local staff. 'Eighty percent of our workforce globally is locally hired,' Bég notes. 'These are people whose homes are war zones. [They] tell us they have a fear of retaliation or repercussions for any actions that could be interpreted as siding with one warring party or the other. Having to live in fear on a regular basis is far different than what some of our teams that have the ability to get on a plane and leave face.' In other words, simply providing medical care can be seen as a political act. But that doesn't make it any more secure. The safety protocols MSF follows — clearly marked medical uniforms, identified facilities — are no longer a guarantee. 'We used to rely on international humanitarian law to protect aid workers and patients,' she says. 'That's not the reality anymore. Not in Sudan. The sad reality now is that we are no longer able to guarantee safety in the countries that we're operating in, so we're taking it day by day.' Among the most at-risk in Sudan, as is often the case in most war zones, are women and children. In one year alone, MSF supported approximately 8,500 births and performed over 1,600 emergency C-sections across Sudan. 'But the numbers don't tell the full story,' Bég says. 'We're talking about women walking 100 kilometres on foot, often pregnant or with sick children, just to reach care.' Eshaghian recalls one such woman who fled violence in Khartoum and arrived in Nyala with her three-year-old daughter — the last surviving member of her family. 'Her child had a fever. We were able to treat her. But the mother had lost her husband and other children along the way. Everything had been taken from them. And there are endless stories like this one." In many cases, the trauma goes even deeper. MSF staff are seeing widespread evidence of sexual violence being used as a weapon of war. 'Women have been raped while fleeing,' Bég says. 'Survivors end up giving birth to babies born out of rape, then they have to deal with the shame and fear of stigma and retaliation.' The scale of the trauma has pushed MSF to adopt community-based care models that, for example, can look like training trusted women in each village to serve as peer counsellors and connectors to formal care. 'We can't be everywhere,' Bég says. 'But we can empower people to help each other.' Both Bég and Eshaghian say that the world's silence on Sudan is not accidental — it's systemic. 'There are no foreign correspondents in Sudan. No international media,' Bég says. 'We are the eyes to the world, and we see that as a responsibility to speak out about what we're seeing and to call for an urgent scaling of aid.' That lack of visibility means less pressure on governments and organizations like the UN to act. 'UNICEF, UNFPA — their response is small and, in the case of Darfur, they're barely present,' Eshaghian says. 'There's clearly a lack of political and diplomatic pressure from governments who have the power to push for the end of this war.' Bég doesn't mince words. She asks, 'Who gets the privilege of our attention? There are certain conflicts that make it to our feeds, to our social media, to the news. There is an inherent inequity and racism in that itself. Where you live shouldn't determine whether you live, and that is what we're seeing in Sudan — willful ignorance.' Where you live shouldn't determine whether you live. Still, there are reasons to keep going — glimpses of joy, even in the bleakest corners. 'When you visit patients in the hospital, especially children who bounce back from illness and are quite resilient, you see their happiness. [We] took a lot of pride in ... being able to support the community, to see the impact,' Eshaghian says. What MSF is now demanding is clear: A significant increase in humanitarian access, stronger diplomatic pressure on Sudan's warring factions, and more support from countries like Canada. 'Our patients have no choice but to wake up with hope every day,' Bég says. 'The least we can do is show up for them and provide care. Hope is not optional, it's our moral imperative. We have to reject apathy.'
