
The never-used bomb Trump is thinking of dropping on Iran - but which might not work
The never-used bomb Trump is thinking of dropping on Iran - but which might not work
The GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP) is designed to burrow through rock and concrete before exploding
US President Donald Trump is considering using a bomb that has never been dropped in combat
(Image: AFP via Getty Images )
Donald Trump is reportedly weighing the use of a never-used-before 'bunker buster' bomb, capable of penetrating heavily fortified underground facilities, against Iran's nuclear sites. Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One that he was seeking "a real end" to the middle eastern country's nuclear ambitions, which he called "better than a ceasefire."
The weapon in question is the GBU‑57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP), a 15‑ton 'mega bomb' designed to burrow through rock and concrete. The US Air Force is thought to have commissioned 20 of the bombs, which have never been used in combat.
Intelligence reports and Pentagon officials suggest Trump may deploy U.S. B‑2 stealth bombers to drop the bomb over Iran's Fordow enrichment plant—an underground uranium site that is buried deep underground and is thought impervious to conventional munitions .
Iran's most fortified and best-protected nuclear facility, Fordow is buried deep inside a mountain. Only the U.S. has the 30,000-pound bombs — often referred to as bunker busters — that were built to destroy such facilities and can only be delivered by the US air force's B-2 stealth bombers.
President Trump told reporters: "I may do it. I may not do it, I mean, nobody knows what I'm going to do."
Meanwhile, Iran's supreme leader has vowed a 'firm and decisive response' to any attack.
Article continues below
A GBU-57, or the Massive Ordnance Penetrator bomb, at Whiteman Air Base in Missouri
(Image: AP )
The MOP is a 30,000-pound precision-guided "bunker buster" bomb developed for the United States Air Force.
The warhead assembly contains 4,590 pounds, or 2,082 kg of AFX-757 and 752 pounds, or 341 kg, of PBXN-114, for a total explosive payload of 5,342 pounds, or 2,423 kg.
The high-performance explosives are optimised for controlled detonation in confined spaces.
GBU stands for guided bomb unit and it is the 57th GBU bomb that the US has deigned, hence the designation GBU-57. When dropped from a height of 50,000 feet, it can travel faster than the speed of sound and is thought to be able to burrow through 200 feet of bedrock before its explosive charge detonates.
People attend a rally on June 17 in New York calling for the Trump administration not to go to war with Iran
(Image: Getty Images )
Ryan Brobst, a munitions expert at the Foundation for Defence of Democracies told NPR: "What actually differentiates them from other weapons is their hardened steel casing.
"They actually often have a smaller explosive payload than other weapons, but it's the casing that allows them to dig into the ground, kind of like a drill, and then destroy these targets.
"So if one weapon wasn't able to penetrate it, what would have to happen is that another weapon would need to be dropped in essentially exactly the same drill hole as the one previous, then drill down further and then explode."
Yet there is no certainty that the MOP bomb would work because of the Fordow fuel enrichment plant is so deeply buried in a granite mountain and protected by reinforced concrete.
Fordow is Iran's most advanced nuclear enrichment site and lies 18 miles northeast of the city of Qom. An international report found it had the ability to enrich enough uranium for a nuclear warhead in a matter of days. It's buried under 260 to 300 feet of mountainside reinforced with concrete and surrounded by air defence systems.
It is thought to have been designed and built after Israel bombed nuclear facilities in Iraq and Syria to prevent them developing nuclear weapons.
Some military sources in the US have said that only a nuclear warhead, delivered after the site has been hit by conventional weapons to break up the ground, would be certain to destroy the site.
There is a risk that the MOP bomb may only be successful at burying the plant under rubble and mean that Iran's uranium enrichment programme would only be set back
And Ali Vaez, director of the International Crisis Group's Iran Project, questioned whether a successful attack would stop the threat for good.
Article continues below
He told NPR: "The reality is that even if Fordow is fully destroyed, Iran still has the know-how and the capability to reconstitute its nuclear program. So this is not a solution to the nuclear crisis with Iran."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
21 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump tears into ‘biased' Fox News poll over approval rating of his border policies
President Donald Trump lashed out at Fox News Thursday after its most recent survey found his approval rating on one of his favorite issues — the U.S.-Mexico border — slipped slightly and is now hovering at just above 50 percent. Writing on Truth Social, Trump groused about what he called 'the crooked Fox News poll' and said the television network's polling has 'been biased against me for years' after the release of a June survey showing 53 percent of respondents approve of his handling of border security, compared with 46 percent who disapprove. The result is two points lower than an April survey by Fox showing 55 percent approved of his border handling with 40 percent disapproving, and a three-point drop compared to a March survey which revealed that 56 percent approved while 43 percent disapproved. Trump accused the poll, which was conducted as a joint operation of Democratic pollster Beacon Research and GOP pollster Shaw and Company Research, both widely respected survey firms, of being 'always wrong and negative' and suggested that his MAGA movement 'hates Fox News' because the polls aren't favorable enough to him. 'This has gone on for years, but they never change the incompetent polling company that does their work,' he said. He further opined that the 53 percent result showed in the recent survey is 'fake' and should be 'discredited' because 'the Border is miraculously perfect.' 'NOBODY WAS ABLE TO COME IN LAST MONTH. 60,000 people came in with Sleepy Joe in the same month last year. I hate FAKE pollsters, one of the Worst, but Fox will never change their discredited pollster,' he said. The same Fox News poll also shows Trump's approval rating underwater on other key issue areas. On immigration, just 46 percent of the 1,003 respondents contacted by phone or surveyed online said they approve of the president's performance, while 53 percent said they disapproved. Trump's numbers were even worse on foreign policy, showing a 42 percent approval rating versus 57 percent disapproval, and they slipped further on the pocketbook issues that powered his history-making return to the White House in last year's presidential election. When asked how to rate Trump's work on the economy thus far, just 40 percent of voters said they approved, while 58 percent gave him negative marks. Worse yet, just 34 percent said they approved of his performance on reducing inflation, while a whopping 64 percent — nearly two thirds of all U.S. voters — said they disapprove of his inflation handling. The president's 40 percent approval rating on the economy, while higher than the 38 percent rating found by Fox in their April 2025 poll, is still far lower than the ratings voters gave him during his first term in the White House. From 2017 through 2020, respondents in the Fox News poll never gave him an approval rating lower than 44 percent, the nadir of his first term reached in October 2017. By the last survey of his first term, in December 2020, 52 percent of voters approved of his handling of the economy compared with 45 percent who disapproved and four percent who said they did not know either way.


Daily Mail
30 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Trump saves TikTok for third time giving app 90-day lifeline before it faces U.S. ban
President Donald Trump on Thursday signed an executive order to keep TikTok running in the U.S. for another 90 days to give his administration more time to broker a deal to bring the social media platform under American ownership. 'As he has said many times, President Trump does not want TikTok to go dark. This extension will last 90 days, which the administration will spend working to ensure this deal is closed so that the American people can continue to use TikTok with the assurance that their data is safe and secure,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement on Tuesday. Trump disclosed the executive order on the Truth Social platform Thursday morning. It is the third time Trump has extended the deadline. The first one was through an executive order on Jan. 20, his first day in office, after the platform went dark briefly when a national ban - approved by Congress and upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court - took effect. The second was in April when White House officials believed they were nearing a deal to spin off TikTok into a new company with U.S. ownership that fell apart after China backed out following Trump's tariff announcement. It is not clear how many times Trump can - or will - keep extending the ban as the government continues to try to negotiate a deal for TikTok, which is owned by China's ByteDance. While there is no clear legal basis for the extensions, so far there have been no legal challenges to fight them. Trump has amassed more than 15 million followers on TikTok since he joined last year, and he has credited the trendsetting platform with helping him gain traction among young voters. He said in January that he has a 'warm spot for TikTok.' As the extensions continue, it appears less and less likely that TikTok will be banned in the U.S. any time soon. The decision to keep TikTok alive through an executive order has received some scrutiny, but it has not faced a legal challenge in court - unlike many of Trump's other executive orders. Jeremy Goldman, analyst at Emarketer, called TikTok's U.S situation a 'deadline purgatory.' The whole thing 'is starting to feel less like a ticking clock and more like a looped ringtone. This political Groundhog Day is starting to resemble the debt ceiling drama: a recurring threat with no real resolution.' For now, TikTok continues to function for its 170 million users in the U.S., and tech giants Apple, Google and Oracle were persuaded to continue to offer and support the app, on the promise that Trump's Justice Department would not use the law to seek potentially steep fines against them. Americans are even more closely divided on what to do about TikTok than they were two years ago. A recent Pew Research Center survey found that about one-third of Americans said they supported a TikTok ban, down from 50 percent in March 2023. Roughly one-third said they would oppose a ban, and a similar percentage said they weren´t sure. Among those who said they supported banning the social media platform, about 8 in 10 cited concerns over users' data security being at risk as a major factor in their decision, according to the report. Democratic Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia, vice chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said the Trump administration is once again 'flouting the law and ignoring its own national security findings about the risks' posed by a China-controlled TikTok. 'An executive order can't sidestep the law, but that´s exactly what the president is trying to do,' Warner added.

Leader Live
33 minutes ago
- Leader Live
Donald Trump delays decision on Iran strikes as Keir Starmer calls for restraint
The US president said he was still hopeful of reaching a negotiated solution with Tehran and would decide on military action within two weeks, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters on Thursday. Quoting a message from the president, Ms Leavitt said: 'Based on the fact that there is a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future, I will make my decision on whether or not to go within the next two weeks.' On Wednesday, Mr Trump said he 'may' join Israeli strikes against Iran and its nuclear programme, but added: 'I may not do it. I mean, nobody knows what I'm going to do.' On Thursday, the Prime Minister had urged him to step back from military action, saying there was a 'real risk of escalation'. Sir Keir said there had been 'several rounds of discussions with the US' and 'that, to me, is the way to resolve this issue'. Foreign Secretary David Lammy took the UK's plea for de-escalation to Washington, where he was expected to meet Mr Trump's top diplomat Marco Rubio on Thursday evening. Mr Lammy's meeting comes amid speculation that US involvement could require using the UK-controlled Diego Garcia base in the Chagos Islands. The B-2 stealth bombers based there are capable of carrying specialised 'bunker buster' bombs which could be used against Iran's underground nuclear facility at Fordo. Attorney General Lord Hermer is reported to have raised legal concerns about any British involvement in the conflict beyond defending its allies, which could limit the extent of any support for the US if Mr Trump decides to act militarily. Sir Keir has declined to comment on advice from Lord Hermer, but said the 'principle, the driving intent', was 'de-escalation'. It remains unclear whether the UK would join any US military action. Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch said she would 'in principle' support the US using Diego Garcia to strike Iran, while her shadow foreign secretary Dame Priti Patel said the party would support UK involvement if it was deemed necessary. But Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey called on the Government to publish Lord Hermer's advice, saying: 'The last thing we need is for the UK to be dragged into another illegal war in the Middle East by the US.' Meanwhile, Israel and Iran continued to exchange fire, with the Israeli defence minister directly threatening the Iranian supreme leader after an attack damaged a major hospital in Tel Aviv. Israel Katz said Ayatollah Ali Khamenei 'should not continue to exist' if the military was to 'achieve all of its goals'. Israel also continued to attack Iran, striking the country's Arak heavy water reactor, part of Tehran's nuclear programme. Iran has insisted its nuclear programme is peaceful, but it is the only non-nuclear-armed state to enrich uranium up to 60%, a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels of 90% and far above the levels required for power stations. Amid the conflict, 22,000 tourists are seeking evacuation flights from Israel, according to the country's tourism ministry. The ministry's director-general, Danny Shachar, said the Israeli government was working to co-ordinate flights as part of its 'safe return' programme, originally intended for Israelis returning to the country from elsewhere. The UK Government has not said how many British nationals are in Israel, but has urged those in the country to register their presence with the embassy. Although the Foreign Office advises against all travel to Israel and has evacuated the family members of embassy staff, it has not advised Britons to leave the country.