Vet who 'permanently injured' dog by leaving surgical instrument in its body after op is allowed to keep working - as campaigners say complaints are ignored
A vet who 'permanently injured' a beloved dog by leaving a surgical instrument in its body after an operation has been allowed to continue working - as campaigners accuse industry bodies of ignoring their complaints.
Trace Brown, from East Lothian, took her dog Honey to the vets for an operation - but Honey was left seriously ill after she was closed up with the instrument inside her.
The mistake meant Honey ended up losing 16 inches of her intestine.
Ms Brown had to pay £12,000 for corrective treatment for Honey, but no action has been taken against the vet in question, while she has been offered just £120 in compensation.
It comes as an investigation by Which? has revealed pet owners are frequently dismissed or ignored when they complain about a vet, and that the industry complaints system is 'not fit for purpose'.
According to government research, the vet market has the third lowest rate of positive resolutions to 'detrimental' experiences, with just 31 percent of people receiving what they asked for or more.
This is compared to 52 percent across all sectors.
Ms Brown took Honey's case to the Veterinary Client Mediation Service (VCMS) and the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons (RCVS), but received the offer of just £120 and her complaint remained unresolved.
It is one of multiple cases flagged by Which? in which a pet owner complained with a legitimate grievance but was not offered appropriate help.
The College also dismissed a complaint by Steph Drew, from Lincoln, after a vet operated on the wrong leg of her dog Daisy.
After a lengthy appeals process lasting three years, the vet in question was eventually struck off after it was found they had 'failed to provide adequate care' to 18 animals in total.
The report comes as the Competition and Markets Authority is already investigating the vet industry amid concerns that just six national operators - of which three are equity firms - own most of Britain's practices.
Which? surveyed around 1,000 pet owners who had had an issue with care from their vet in the past two years.
Some 53 percent of those surveyed complained over an 'excessive' price, compared to 23 percent over the quality of care or treatment.
Pet owners usually have to make an initial complaint to the veterinary practice itself, a practice which makes the process 'awkward at best', according to Which?.
If not satisfied with the outcome, an owner can escalate the complaint, such as by referring it to an independent mediator - but the is a voluntary scheme which not all practices are members of.
They can also complain to the Royal College, but the body has a very high threshold for investigating and progressing a complaint.
This leaves owners feeling dismissed or that the process is biased towards vets, the consumer body found.
Wherever owners may turn, the stats are not in their favour - in 2022, some 99 percent of professional misconduct complaints were not upheld.
Which? has made a number of recommendations to improve the process for owners, including asking the government to ensure the regulator for vet services is 'sufficiently equipped to independently enforce consumer law as it relates to the provision of veterinary services'.
It added: 'The government needs to update the regulatory framework to allow regulation at a practice level rather than solely at individual professional level.'
The body also said practices should be required to have a written complaint process 'based on specified criteria to ensure consistency in how complaints are defined, handled and signposted'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
28 minutes ago
- The Sun
HAIR THIS I'm ‘obsessed' with an £8 Amazon buy for hair growth – it reversed my post-partum hair loss in weeks
SHOPPERS are raving about an £8 Amazon buy for hair growth which could help reverse post-partum hair loss. While postpartum hair loss is a common side effect of pregnancy, it makes many women feel insecure. Four to five months after giving birth, the hair will shed at an alarming rate, and it can be worrying. Our hair grows in cycles: a growing phase, a resting phase, and a shedding phase that continues to repeat. But during pregnancy, most of the hair stays in the growth phase due to those big changes in your body's hormones. Once your baby arrives and your hormones begin to change again, the level of estrogen falls, causing your thick head of pregnancy hair to begin the shedding phase. Because so much of your hair sheds all at once, the volume of hair loss seems far more substantial. But customers are hailing a "miracle" oil, which can fit into any haircare routine - applied daily or as a luxurious mask before wash day. Some shoppers have claimed it could reverse their postpartum hair loss in weeks. Mielle's original Rosemary Mint Scalp & Hair Strengthening Oil can be added to your Amazon basket for just £7.33. It promotes "amazing moisture and shine" and supports "longer, healthier hair". The product is infused with the vitamin biotin, which is also beneficial for nails and skin. There are no parabens, sulfates, paraffins, mineral oil, or DEA, and it's not tested on animals. "Mielle aims to empower women of all hair types and styles with powerful products and gentle, organic ingredients that amplify your natural beauty and are the 'root to results' that leave you looking and feeling your best," said the company. Shoppers have been raving about the hair oil, and even claimed it helped them with post-partum hair loss. "This oil has been a true saviour for me after experiencing postpartum hair loss, which left me with noticeable bald spots around my hairline," penned one. "Having used this consistently for a year, I am thrilled with the results." Another added: "This stuff is a miracle worker! Even the hairdressers at my salon noticed my hair growth and asked what have I been using! Bonus point- it's helped my nails grow as well." A third agreed: "This product has been remarkable. My hair fall have reduced significantly after the last use. Definitely recommended." This comes as a radio presenter has revealed that she suffered severe hair loss after having her second child, but a 59p buy has got it looking thick and healthy again. Meanwhile, another woman shared how she grew her hair thicker using this simple £2 remedy from Asda. She told how she took her hair from the size of a pinky in a ponytail to long and luscious using this one clever hack. Elsewhere, this is a £6 shampoo shoppers are going wild for, which makes your hair grow quickly, but it won't be in the beauty aisle. Hair loss tips We can lose between 50 and 100 hairs a day, according to the NHS. It is not usually something to worry about, but occasional it can be a sign of a medical concern. These include illness, stress, cancer treatment, weight loss and iron deficiency. The NHS advises to book an appointment with your GP to see if you can get to the cause of it. Experts at American Academy of Dermatology Association also recommend to eat healthy, limit curling irons and only use them for special occasions. They also recommend using a gentle shampoo, and make use of leave-in conditioners.
The Sun
28 minutes ago
- The Sun
Nigel Farage told me exact moment he decided to run for PM – now he's marching to No 10 but EVERYTHING'S about to change
WHAT a difference a year makes. Just 365 days ago Nigel Farage was all but retired, sitting out the General Election. 2 2 As the BBC put it, he had 'announced that he wouldn't try to win a seat in Parliament. . . prompting a reporter from The Sun to tease him that he was a chicken'. A year ago to the day, he blew all that up. 'I remember it very well,' he told me over the weekend. 'I was sitting at home, I'd been thinking hard for 48 hours about it. I had a group call and I just said, 'F*** it, I'm doing it. Find me a venue for tomorrow, please'.' In an age of backtracks, that might just go down as one of the most important U-turns in British political history. He insists it was more a sense of guilt — 'a feeling I was letting people down' — behind the decision as well as the 'gap in the political market' that saw a dying Tory Party and a uniquely uninspiring Labour who were set to win by default out of pure hatred of the Conservatives. Either way he was right — and eighth time lucky an MP. Fast forward a year and he is edging a double-digit lead in the polls, nudging that crucial 30 per cent of the vote that could, remarkably, see Reform UK form the next government. Farage's keen instinct for the political mood of the country appears to have been spot on. In Scotland, where Farage was forced to hide in a pub 12 years ago from a nationalist mob, Reform look set to push Labour into third place at a by-election this week — to the bewilderment of the cosy Holyrood establishment. We absolutely know that Sir Keir Starmer was in 'serious mode' when he launched his latest salvo against Nigel Farage If you don't believe the numbers, just look at the reaction from his rivals. Struggling Kemi Badenoch's Opposition leadership has never got off the ground due to the massive looming menace on her right flank. Her attempts to mimic Reform have fallen flat, while her attempts to ridicule them just drive ever more disillusioned Tories into their arms. And a Labour PM — who not only inherited the fastest- growing G7 economy and on-target inflation, propped up by a state broadcaster and cheered on by the chattering classes — should still be enjoying a Blair-style honeymoon. But instead, after ten months, Sir Keir Starmer leads the most unpopular government in British polling history. And he's in a right flap, as Reform not so much parks its tanks on Labour's lawn but napalms the entire village. The PM's attempts to paint Farage as a Putin patsy who wants to sell the NHS have flopped, as will attempts to brand him out of touch with working-class voters — who voted Reform in droves just last month. 'I hope nothing changes,' says Farage. 'I hope Kemi stays, I hope Starmer keeps obsessing about me, the poor bloke — he'll have to go see a psychiatrist before too long. 'It has way exceeded in the space of a year even my most optimistic expectations.' Teddy bears' picnic But he would be mad to rest on any laurels yet. Everything IS about to change. The fight is only getting started, and Reform has a very long way to go before asking the people of Britain to hand this untested and unknown political force the keys to No10. There is still a minimum of three years until another election, and in any election contest the last place you want to be is out front early, with a giant target on your back. Old Dominic Cummings warned darkly this week that the deep state is already gearing up to trash Reform and protect the old system of the established parties doing what they are told. Parties, government departments, newsreaders, quangos, think-tanks, unions, charities — you name it — will all line up in an onslaught that will make the battle against Brexit, and latterly Boris Johnson, look like a teddy bears' picnic. And Farage agrees, though he hopes: 'I don't really think those voters that have come to us already actually give a damn about this stuff.' But he needs to win over plenty of waverers, too. So everything possible will be escalated to stop that happening and if the Government and their pliant friends across the establishment get their message right, that poll lead could start to look rather soft. So is it wise of Farage to be giving his opponents ammunition this early in the cycle? I make the arguments I believe in, and when I start they are usually minority arguments but I'm generally good at bringing people with us. Nigel Farage This week, Reform's first foray into detailed policy away from immigration gave their opponents their first real straw to grasp at in months. Some 59 per cent of Reform voters and 42 per cent of Labour voters support keeping the two-child benefits cap for larger families. Labour MPs may want the PM to scrap it, but from what I hear that is still far from a done deal, amid concerns the Government is walking into a trap on increasing benefits for foreigners who tend to have more kids. But punching the bruise of the division in Labour, Farage declared Reform would abolish it, as well as take anyone earning under £20,000 out of paying income tax and reinstate all Winter Fuel Payments. He insists it's about more than just money, boldly claiming he's 'not a populist'. He said: 'I make the arguments I believe in, and when I start they are usually minority arguments but I'm generally good at bringing people with us.' But it was a multi-billion-pound spending pledge made in seconds that has drawn easy comparisons to Liz Truss's relaxed attitude about making the sums add up. Farage insists both parties don't have a leg to stand on when it comes to dodgy maths and more detail is coming on what he would cut — but he has clearly given them both some flesh to target when they were struggling to land blows Harry Cole Right on cue came the Institute for Fiscal Studies, lapped up by the BBC, who Farage accuses of 'now criticising every thing we do'. He added: 'Well, ask the question, who funds them? The Government.' Dodgy maths He's not wrong there, with the apparently independent fiscal think-tank receiving £13million of taxpayer funding over the past five years. But simply saying 'scrapping Net Zero ' will cover the costs of these massive pledges is fag- packet maths and a free gift to his struggling opponents. Farage insists both parties don't have a leg to stand on when it comes to dodgy maths and more detail is coming on what he would cut — but he has clearly given them both some flesh to target when they were struggling to land blows. Which leads me to the other problem Reform faces, relating to numbers and the road to No10. With just five MPs, they can barely fill a taxi let alone a Shadow Cabinet table. Farage plans to step back from much of the day-to-day media, promoting party figures like Richard Tice and Zia Yusuf instead. And the hunt is on for 'high-profile' outsiders to stand for the party as an alternative government at the next election, before they even have a seat in the Commons. Well, why not start that process right now? Solve two numbers problems in one go and appoint a prominent, respected and credible figure to be Reform's Shadow Chancellor.
Daily Mail
29 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Keir Starmer comes under pressure to sack his top legal adviser after he likened Right-wing British politicians to Nazis as minister refuses to say his job is safe
A cabinet minister minister refused to say Lord Hermer was safe in his job yesterday after likening Right-wing British politicians to Nazis. Sir Keir Starmer is under pressure to sack his Attorney General over controversial comments he made in a speech last week that were seen as directed towards the Tories and Reform UK. Asked twice yesterday whether Lord Hermer's job was safe, Defence Secretary John Healey did not directly address the question. 'He's a really good attorney general. He made a mistake. He apologised. We move on,' Mr Healey told Trevor Phillips on Sky News. The Government's legal chief has suffered a backlash for referencing 1930s Germany as he criticised other parties for saying Britain should quit institutions such as the European Convention on Human Rights. He faced calls to quit from opposition parties for his claims that their actions are akin to those of Nazi ideologists who called for state power to trump the law. He also faced criticism from Labour MPs and Cabinet ministers. The Prime Minister's long-time friend and ally was eventually forced to apologise for his 'clumsy' language, though he 'rejected' how it had been portrayed. His remarks are also unhelpful for Labour, which is under pressure from Nigel Farage's Reform after its sweeping gains in the local elections. Ministers are looking to legally constrain judges' interpretation of international law over concerns it prevents foreign criminals and failed asylum seekers – including sex offenders – from deportation. Yesterday, Labour MP and ex-minister Graham Stringer accused the Attorney General of aiding the rise of Reform by ignoring voter concerns about immigration. He told The Mail on Sunday: 'He's convincing Labour voters [that the party] does not understand their legitimate concerns about immigration. 'It is not far-Right and Nazi to raise genuine concerns about the scale of immigration and the cost of housing migrants. He's doing Reform's work for them.' A spokesman insisted Sir Keir has full confidence in Lord Hermer, but it comes after several controversial interventions by the legal chief. He has upset colleagues over his adherence to international agreements and low-risk approach to legal challenges – and has also been accused of leading the 'surrender' of the Chagos Islands to Mauritius under the terms of a questionable deal. Mr Stringer added: 'Lord Hermer should never have been appointed in the first place. It's his ridiculous advice that has led us to spend £30billion to keep a military base we already had.' And Labour peer Lord Glasman, founder of the influential Blue Labour movements, added that the Attorney General's remarks made him 'unfit for government office'. Tory leader Kemi Badenoch, shadow justice secretary Robert Jenrick and Reform deputy Richard Tice have all called for Lord Hermer to go.
