
If Not To The U.S., Where Will International Students Go?
International students at Harvard and at universities across the country have grown unnerved by the ... More Trump's administration's volatile visa policies. Whether they continue to come to the U.S., or decide to go elsewhere to study, remains to be seen.
For decades, the U.S. has been the top destination for international students. Globally-ranked universities, post-graduate work schemes and research opportunities are the reasons why a record-high 1.12 million international students are in the U.S., contributing over $50 billion to the country's economy.
However, after weeks of volatile visa policies, capped with the Trump administration's move last week to terminate Harvard University's ability to enroll international students, the appeal of the U.S. as a host country is in flux. While a judge has temporarily blocked the government's latest action, the destabilized higher education landscape in the U.S. could be enough to keep international students away, no matter how the situation shakes out.
In addition, Harvard—along with a number of other research universities—have lost billions of dollars in research funding, which translates into fewer research possibilities for international graduate students. Rising tuition costs, too, have pushed the 'all-in' cost of at least one school to rise over $100,000, another factor that has international students—who largely pay full fare—wondering whether an investment in a U.S. degree is a wise one.
Staying in their home countries may become an increasingly popular alternative to earning a degree overseas. But some countries, like India, do not have enough university seats to meet the demand for higher education, and even with a growing number of higher education institutions, the quality remains inconsistent. Additionally, other countries have low-quality universities that fail to produce graduates with the skills necessary to compete in today's workforce.
International students may opt for other major Anglophone host countries, such as the U.K., Canada and Australia, which offer globally-recognized degree programs and post-study work pathways. However, immigration policies in those countries are also constricting after a significant influx of international students in recent years has caused public attitudes towards immigration to sour.
In the U.K., there is a proposal to reduce the country's post-study work scheme from two years to 18 months for undergraduate and graduate students. Earlier, the country disallowed most international graduate students from bringing dependents with them on their UK student visas, a move that concerned a sector already in financial turmoil.
Canada, traditionally known for its welcoming stance toward international students, has capped international enrollments for at least two years. Previously, the number of international students was so big, the cohort made up 2.5% of the country's population. Australia, where international students have reached 27.1 percent of the overall university student population, has set a limit on international student enrollments as well, and also raised student visa application fees.
While efforts to curb net migration may dampen student interest in some countries, those disruptions pale in comparison to the volatility in the United States. But against this increasingly unwelcoming backdrop, international students may look to countries that have more recently emerged as viable destinations for study.
A growing number of countries are actively seeking international students, largely in response to declining birth rates. With fewer children being born, there are fewer high school graduates, which leads to lower university enrollment and, eventually, a smaller workforce. To offset this trend, governments are turning to international students to help fill their campuses and close workforce gaps as their domestic populations fall.
Japan—where the number of 18-year-olds has nearly halved in 30 years—has an ambitious target of recruiting 400,000 international students by 2033. South Korea, where one in five people is 65 or older, is aiming to draw 300,000 international students by 2027, and Hong Kong, Taiwan and Malaysia have announced similar goals. Singapore, meanwhile, recently relaxed rules for international students to apply for permanent residency.
Even India, which now sends more students abroad than China, wants to attract 500,000 international students to its own universities by 2047.
Many countries in Europe, too, are ageing and seeking international students to bolster their ranks. Germany recently hit a record-high number of international students at its universities, as has Spain.
While programs taught in English at universities in these countries may be limited, the tuition tends to much more affordable. For example, yearly tuition in Japan is about $4,000, so a student can earn a four-year degree at a Japanese university for a fraction of the cost of only one year's tuition at a private U.S. university.
While the countries where international students have traditionally gone to pursue university degrees are undergoing policy shifts, global study options have increased. In addition, U.S. universities have launched branch campuses overseas, which allows both schools and students to circumvent visa issues.
And, as a result of Trump's latest move against international students, some countries have come forth to potentially scoop up global talent—the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology has announced it will offer a place to any international student at Harvard who is forced to leave, as well as those with confirmed offers.
'The university will provide unconditional offers, streamlined admission procedures, and academic support to facilitate a seamless transition for interested students,' the university said on its website.
As traditional destinations tighten their borders and rethink their international student policies, the global education landscape is becoming more diverse. For students, the decision of where to study is becoming less defined by tradition and more about where they can find value as well as stability.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Washington Post
19 minutes ago
- Washington Post
‘We have to fight': WorldPride attendees on why they're still celebrating
As WorldPride in Washington winds to its official close on Sunday, The Washington Post spoke with visitors about why they decided to attend the festival and what it meant to be a part of it. In the interviews below, visitors from near and far told us they were participating in WorldPride this year not just to celebrate the LGBTQ+ community, but to stand defiantly in a time of political backlash and rising threats to hard-won rights. Whether honoring decades of struggle, protecting their families, or simply claiming space, they spoke of resilience, resistance, and a commitment to being seen and heard.


Forbes
19 minutes ago
- Forbes
‘The Girls Are Fighting'— Trump Vs. Musk Feud Goes Viral
President Donald Trump and Elon Musk are in the midst of an extremely online feud. (Photo by) Getty Images President Donald Trump and Elon Musk's relationship has deteriorated into a bitter feud, lighting up Musk's social media platform X, the site formerly known as Twitter. Trump is no longer quite as online as he used to be (in his peak, the man was an extremely dedicated Twitter poster who regularly went viral), but Musk's timeline is as active as ever. Musk seemed to lay the groundwork for the feud by retweeting several old tweets from Trump in an attempt to portray the president as a hypocrite. From there, the feud only escalated, much to the delight of X's inhabitants. Musk recently left the White House, seemingly on good terms, but in exceptionally strange circumstances. Musk appeared on camera with a black eye and a 'Dogefather' t-shirt, before he was given a symbolic golden key to the White House, engraved with the Reddit logo. The world's richest man certainly succeeded in introducing stale meme culture to the highest office in the land, but the political alliance unraveled a few days later, as Musk began to criticize Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' for raising the debt ceiling. Trump responded, suggesting that Musk was beginning to suffer from 'Trump derangement syndrome' and claimed that this was a common ailment for those who left his inner circle. Trump also said that Musk was upset that the electric vehicle tax credit was removed, and that Musk was otherwise supportive of the bill. Musk's tone began to grow more aggressive on X, as he wrote: 'False, this bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!' Musk then claimed that Trump would have lost the election without his help, and accused Trump of showing 'ingratitude.' Trump began to respond on Truth Social, his own social media platform, writing that the easiest way to save money in the budget would be to 'terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts.' Trump continued, writing that Musk was 'wearing thin' at the White House and claiming that Musk 'just went CRAZY!' when the EV tax credit was removed from his bill. Musk responded on X, describing Trump's post as an 'obvious lie,' and then went nuclear, alleging that Trump was 'in the Epstein files.' Musk described his own post as the 'really big bomb' and even took the time to tag Trump's official X account. The site's users took great joy in watching the feud in real time, responding to the showdown between the president and the world's wealthiest man with jokes and memes. Several comparisons were made to the Kendrick vs. Drake feud. Others compared the feud to a divorce, and resurrected the weird J.D. Vance memes, framing the vice president as the troubled child of bickering parents. Kanye West tweeted as though he was that child, pleading with the two to stop fighting. Most viewed the Trump vs. Musk feud as one of the greatest days in Twitter history, cracking jokes about how difficult it was to stay on top of the flood of memes. Many X inhabitants mocked the users that migrated to rival platform, Bluesky, noting that the toxicity and melodrama was an integral part of the X experience. Spectators were so keen to catch Trump's response on Truth Social that they temporarily crashed the site. Not content with the president's silence, some passed the time by posting fake responses from Trump. Many joked that Tesla was now going to face hostility from all sides of the political spectrum. Some users claimed that they always knew the feud was coming—the burning Tesla CyberTruck outside of the Trump hotel that marked the beginning of this year was viewed as an omen. When Rep. Alexandria Ocasio Cortez (AOC) was asked her opinion of the feud, she responded with, 'The girls are fighting, aren't they?' AOC went on to describe the feud as 'a long time coming. We were saying that these two huge egos were not long for being together in this world as friends.' Azealia Banks, who first popularized the phrase 'the girls are fighting,' was shocked that AOC was familiar with her meme, writing 'in what world is AOC fluent in Azealia Banksism's?' For now, Trump and Musk appear to have put down their phones, marking something of a ceasefire. The internet awaits the next round with baited breath—the two powerful, mercurial men both surely want to have the last word.


CNN
20 minutes ago
- CNN
Analysis: Who holds the cards in Trump vs. Musk? Trump, but …
It remains to be seen whether President Donald Trump and Elon Musk can patch things up after their ugly break-up this week – as many around them are hoping. But as their feud devolved into highly personal attacks on Thursday, one of the most interesting facets was this: Musk leaned in on a potential power struggle. He didn't just criticize Trump or his agenda bill that Republicans are trying to enact; he talked about unseating Republicans who voted for that 'disgusting abomination.' He mused about forming a third party. He suggested Trump needed him – claiming Trump would have lost in 2024 without his support. He repeatedly played up X posts suggesting people would have to choose between him and Trump – and sent a not-subtle warning to those who might choose wrongly. 'Oh and some food for thought as they ponder this question: Trump has 3.5 years left as President, but I will be around for 40+ years,' Musk wrote on his social media platform. In other words: Make sure you think long and hard about what you do next, because you could live to regret it. So assuming for the moment that this feud continues, who holds the cards? There is no question that, if truly forced to choose, the vast majority of Republican powerbrokers would choose Trump. But it's not quite so simple. Vice President JD Vance, after hours of somewhat conspicuous silence Thursday, eventually came down firmly in Trump's corner (in case there was any doubt) – albeit without criticizing Musk. Other Trump allies who aren't fond of Musk and his influence seemed to seize on the opportunity to try and excommunicate him – in Steve Bannon's case, somewhat literally, as he suggested Trump should deport the South African-born Musk, who's now a US citizen. Musk — the wealthiest man in the world — is a relative newcomer to politics, having only really joined the conservative movement less than a year ago (after the assassination attempt against Trump in Butler, Pennsylvania). Trump, by contrast, often seems to have an almost cult-like influence over his side of the political divide, transforming the GOP into one that's much more about loyalty to him than any particular set of ideals or principles. The president often flip-flops – Musk on Thursday noted Trump was once a professed deficit hawk just like him – and the base often flips right alongside him. When Trump says something baseless or false (like that the 2020 election was stolen) much of his party internalizes it and rallies around it. This is Trump's party, full stop. But when it comes to how much this feud could matter, it's not quite as simple as who picks what side. Musk retains real influence, and that's why we're seeing many Republicans resist that binary choice. A persistent rift with Musk would force Republicans to reckon with some uneasy dynamics. Musk's overall popularity has clearly taken a hit as the Department of Government Efficiency has fallen out of favor. And he's definitely not as popular as Trump is on the right. Musk's personal politics and tech-world background always made this a somewhat uneasy marriage with Trump, and the president's agenda bill has unearthed some of those tensions. But Musk has retained significant Republican support even as the DOGE effort has struggled. In fact, his stature eclipses most Republicans not named Trump or Vance. An April Reuters/Ipsos poll, for instance, showed 54% of Republicans had a 'very favorable' opinion of Trump, and 50% said the same of Trump's vice president. But Musk wasn't far behind, at 43%. He was well ahead of other Trump administration figures like Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth (33%) and then-national security adviser Michael Waltz (18%). Similarly, a more recent Marquette University Law School poll showed Musk's 'very favorable' number among all Americans (22%) coming up just shy of Trump (25%) and matching Vance. And that's even after the polling decline of DOGE. Musk's DOGE work has also remained quite popular in GOP circles. An April New York Times/Siena College poll showed 63% of Republicans and 70% of Trump voters said they 'strongly support' the cuts made by Musk and DOGE. The flip side is that even if Republicans really like Musk – in numbers that aren't that far from Trump's own – that doesn't mean their devotion to him is comparable. It's possible to really like two people but clearly like one of them more. And there have been signs that Republicans don't necessarily want more of Musk. Polling from Quinnipiac University in early April, for example, showed while 71% of Republicans said he had about the right amount of power to make decisions in the Trump administration, just 8% thought he had too little. And all of this is before the rift with Trump. Toss on a few days or weeks of potential missives from the president, and it's likely Musk's numbers among Republicans would crater. But that's not the same as saying a rift between these two billionaires wouldn't matter. Musk not only has retained plenty of goodwill from Republicans of late, but he wields immense influence via his personal fortune and ownership of perhaps the preeminent social media platform for politics, X. We've seen before that Musk can drive support for initiatives he likes and torpedo things he doesn't. He has used his control of X's moderation policies and algorithm to boost his own posts and at times silence his critics, as the Washington Post noted Thursday. And he's proven plenty willing and able to seed unsubstantiated theories about his political opponents, as he did Thursday with his posts linking Trump to Jeffrey Epstein. Toss on top of that the wealth that Musk has proven increasingly willing to deploy on politics (i.e. potential primary challengers) and his promise to be a force for decades to come, and it's not an easy call to disown him. We'll see if Musk and Trump intend to force that choice on the Republican Party.