Florida Senate poised to pass legislation to protect state parks. Get it done.
Floridians have spoken.
They've been vocal about protecting their state parks since news leaked last August of a Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) plan to allow golf courses, pickleball courts and swanky hotels to be built amid the tranquil natural wonders of Anastasia, Topsail Hill Preserve and Jonathan Dickinson and six other prominent state parks.
The groundswell of opposition resonated throughout the state, prompting the department to withdraw The Great Outdoor Initiative Plan and Gov. Ron DeSantis to first feign ignorance then blow it all off as a left-wing conspiracy.
Floridians didn't stop there. They also made their intentions known during the Florida State Parks Preservation Opinion Project, a collaboration by 17 Gannett-owned newspapers in the state of Florida to rally support behind Senate Bill 80, legislation to preserve state parks. From Jupiter to Jacksonville, from Pensacola to Panacea, it was clear that the shared outrage at the idea that their state government would so easily commercialize state parks ran wide and deep.
State lawmakers have apparently gotten the memo. Senate Bill 80, along with its House companion, HB 209, have sailed through their respective committee stops, earning bipartisan and unanimous votes along the way.
The Florida House took the final step, approving its version of the legislation earlier this month in a 115-0 floor vote. After sailing through the Senate Fiscal Policy Committee on Tuesday, it's time for the full Senate to follow suit with its own timely floor vote that will reconcile its bill with the House companion and move the legislation to the governor's desk to be signed into law.
While the Senate bill is a good start, the House version has more unambiguous language that makes it clear that no development that threatens Florida's state parks means just that — no. Florida deserves a strongest bill it can get out of the legislature, and state senators should make sure they get it.
Protect Florida state parks: USA Today Network-Florida Opinion campaign to preserve and protect our state parks
For a state agency that is supposed to protect Florida's environment, it seems almost unthinkable that DEP would come up with such an antithetical policy as the Great Outdoors Initiative. Initially, the proposal was scheduled to be aired last August in an hour-long simultaneous statewide public hearing. But, the plan was leaked, resulting in a tidal wave of opposition from the public who feared commercial development would destroy the parks' native habitat.
One person who responded quickly and perhaps most effectively was state Sen. Gayle Harrell, R-Stuart, who soon after the disclosure of the plan promised to file a bill to prevent such development inside of state parks.
SB 80, the State Park Preservation Act, requires public hearings for any land management plan and forces DEP to comply with specified provisions when granting certain privileges, leases, concessions and permits. The bottom line? The bill's the first line of protection against any development proposals done outside of the public's purview that would literally change the face and spoil the beauty of Florida's state parks.
Voices of support for state parks: Do you care about protecting Florida's state parks? Here's what you said. | Letters
The fact that the bill birthed from public outrage made it through the legislative process so quickly is an accomplishment in itself. The bill's supporters saw potential loopholes for development that slowed its momentum in the Senate, and threatened to derail; it altogether. Kudos to Harrell for not backing down. There may be a need for wiggle room for future niche activities in select state parks, but the legislation headed to the Senate floor all but shuts the door on any major developments.
State lawmakers have heard the concerns from millions of their constituents calling for the protection of our beloved state parks, and they've responded, moving a legitimate fix through the what could have been an excruciating process. The priority for the Florida Senate should now be clear. Give their constituents what they want — a strong bill that protects and preserves Florida's state parks.
This article originally appeared on Palm Beach Post: Floridians love their parks. Legislators got the message. | Editorial
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wall Street Journal
11 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
A Small Fiscal Step for the GOP
Republicans in Congress talk a better spending game than they execute, and so far in 2025 they haven't cut a dime. They'll get their first chance when they vote this week on a modest spending-cut package sent by the White House. The House plans to vote this week on legislation to cancel $9.4 billion of discretionary spending. The cuts were proposed by the White House as part of a process known as rescission, which lets the President cancel previously approved funds if a majority of both houses of Congress agree. President Trump submitted the cuts in May, leaving Congress 45 days to vote.
Politico
17 minutes ago
- Politico
Newsom gains a step in brawl with Trump: ‘It'll help Gavin — especially if he gets arrested'
President Donald Trump has catapulted Gavin Newsom to the front of the Democratic resistance. The California governor had faded from national prominence as public attention shifted to Washington and, in his home state, the deliberations over Kamala Harris' political future. But as Trump and his allies make Newsom their foil in a brawl over immigration unrest in Los Angeles and the president's unilateral deployment of the National Guard and Marines, they are also elevating his stature on the left. No longer is Newsom responding to criticism, often from fellow Democrats, over aligning with Republicans on transgender athletes or proposing to scale back health insurance for undocumented immigrants. Instead, as Trump turns California into a test of his power to impose his will on blue states, Newsom is the Democrat standing in his way. 'We're at an inflection point in the country's history,' said South Carolina state Rep. JA Moore, a lawmaker who has been deeply involved in his state's early presidential primary politics. 'I see in this moment that the governor is fighting like hell, not just for the people of LA or the people of California or even the country. He's fighting for democracy itself.' In the span of several days, Newsom has become a ubiquitous antagonist, excoriating Trump administration officials on social media and on television. He has personalized the conflict by daring the administration to follow through on a threat by Trump's border czar Tom Homan to arrest him. (On Tuesday, House Speaker Mike Johnson said he should be 'tarred and feathered' as an alternative). He is forcing a legal reckoning by suing to block Trump's deployment of the National Guard and Marines. On Tuesday, Newsom's press office mocked Trump with an X post casting Trump as a Star Wars villain. The governor's response to his threatened arrest — 'come and get me, tough guy' — turned into a rallying cry that's getting noticed by Democrats nationally and in states that will be key to his potential 2028 prospects. Democrats have united behind Newsom, with top party officials echoing his warnings that Trump is unnecessarily thrusting the nation into crisis. The party's official social media account posted a glam shot of a stoic-looking Newsom emblazoned with his 'come and get me' quote. Democratic governors began reaching out over the weekend to see how they could assist, according to multiple people with knowledge of the developments granted anonymity to speak about private discussions, producing a statement lambasting the Trump administration. Signatories included Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear, a potential 2028 contender who earlier this year assailed Newsom for hosting Trump counselor Steve Bannon on his podcast. Governors were motivated to act by an 'abuse of power that was much bigger than just one state,' one of the people familiar with the letter's drafting said. It is a perilous issue for Democrats, who have suffered from public sentiment favoring Trump's hardline posture on immigration, and the dynamic cuts both ways. Trump himself mused that 'Gavin loves the publicity' in response to a question about a potential arrest. Nightly images of protesters setting fires or clashing with law enforcement, even as Newsom has condemned demonstrators who destroy property, may play into Trump's argument for federal intervention. But it's an issue — and a governor — Democrats are seizing as they look to regain their political footing in Trump's Washington. And if the feuding is benefiting Trump, it may ultimately improve Newsom's prospects with his own base, too. 'I think this is helping Trump broadly,' said Mike Madrid, a California-based Republican consultant who opposes Trump. 'I also think it'll help Gavin — especially if he gets arrested.' In California, the crisis has led Democrats to close ranks behind Newsom while shifting attention from budget negotiations that alienated some key Newsom allies as he looked to close a massive deficit. Newsom joined other Democrats in demanding the release of David Huerta, a prominent labor leader who was detained during a protest. 'We've been waiting to feel like the governor is standing up and fighting for California and every Californian, and he seems to be doing that,' said California Labor Federation leader Lorena Gonzalez. Even onetime foes, like former Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, gave props for Newsom's pugilistic stance. 'I've criticized him in the past … but I commend him for what he's doing,' Villaraigosa said. 'You stand up to a bully. You don't let a bully take away our First Amendment rights.' The standoff marks a return to the arena for a governor who initially sought to avoid open strife with the president. Newsom worked with the Trump administration to secure wildfire aid and invited MAGA figures like Bannon on his podcast as part of a bid to make inroads with voters who swung away from the party in 2024. But the crisis roiling California's largest city has propelled Newsom back into the familiar role of anti-Trump combatant. This time, it is different from previous legal and policy clashes over matters like climate policy — an explosive showdown about the fundamental balance of power in America. Rather than focus on immigration policies like California's 'sanctuary' limits on cooperation between local law enforcement and the federal government, Newsom has framed the fight as a matter of safeguarding democracy against authoritarianism — a microcosm of Democrats' case against Trump and a key gauge of their ability to stop him. 'If this doesn't become about immigration but becomes about federal deployment of military domestically,' said Rob Stutzman, a California-based Republican consultant who opposes Trump, '(Newsom) may be onto the issue that propels him not just within the party but beyond the party as a bulwark against a potential threat to democracy.' Trump and key policymakers like Stephen Miller, an architect of the White House's immigration agenda, have cast the conflict as part of an existential quest to rescue Democratic cities from unchecked migration, and they have vilified Newsom as the embodiment of Democratic failings. 'This is a result of the Democratic Party's failed policies and failed leadership,' said California Republican Party Chair Corrin Rankin. 'The president took decisive action to restore order, and I think that's something our governor should've done sooner.' Democrats in Los Angeles and beyond, by contrast, see Newsom as a shield against Trump's efforts to intimidate blue jurisdictions into compliance. Courtni Pugh, a Los Angeles based consultant who has worked for Newsom, said she has begun carrying proof of her naturalization with her. 'He is showing up and he's showing up strong,' Pugh said, 'and I think LA needs that kind of unwavering strength in this time of real fear.'
Wall Street Journal
22 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
New York's Assisted-Suicide Mistake
New York's Legislature embraces every progressive cause, and the latest is making it easier for people to kill themselves. The state Senate voted 35-27 Monday to pass the Medical Aid in Dying Act, and let's hope that Gov. Kathy Hochul has the courage to veto it for the sake of society's most vulnerable. One irony is that New York passed the first U.S. law that banned assisting death in 1828. Eight years ago the New York Court of Appeals affirmed the state government 'has an interest in preserving life and preventing suicide.' But times and morals have changed. Life itself is less valued today than a life that is supposedly worth living. For Assemblywoman Amy Paulin this means being allowed to 'end unbearable suffering.' Eleven states and the District of Columbia have legalized assisted suicide since 1997. New York's proposal is for 'mentally competent' adults who have been given prognoses of six months or less to live. This sounds compassionate, but around the world it has proved to be a slippery slope. In Canada the 'medical assistance in dying' program has become at least the fifth-leading cause of death since 2015. The law has shed its original safeguards and in 2027 will be available to those with mental illness alone. It already is in parts of Europe. Oregon mandates a 15-day waiting period between a patient's first and second dying requests. New York's requires no delay, meaning a patient could receive a diagnosis one day and have a lethal cocktail the next if two physicians approve. Doctors needn't refer applicants for mental-health evaluations if they believe patients have the 'decision-making capacity' to make an 'informed decision.' This standard means there will soon be go-to suicide doctors.
