
Dynacor Refuses to Call Requisitioned Special Meeting – iolite calls Meeting for April 9, 2025
iolite Capital Management AG, a Switzerland-based investment manager, requisitioned a Special Shareholder Meeting of Dynacor Group Inc. (TSX:DNG, the Company) on January 30 to have Mr. Robert Leitz, elected to the board. Dynacor has failed to call the meeting, as required. Consequently, iolite is now calling the meeting itself, which will be held on April 9, 2025, at 10 am ET. Further details regarding the meeting's location and logistics will be announced shortly.
Dynacor's unnecessary, heavily discounted, and unfair capital raise exposed major governance flaws.
This, along with the board's subsequent actions, raises serious concerns regarding entrenchment and a misalignment with fiduciary duties. Shareholders deserve better representation, communication, and accountability.
iolite, the Company's largest shareholder, seeks to have Mr. Leitz, elected to Dynacor's board to protect value, ensure fair and responsible capital allocation, and drive sustainable earnings-per-share growth. This is in the Company's best interest.
More than 30 days after iolite's requisition, Dynacor has neither convened a meeting nor offered a meaningful proposal to address the situation. Instead, the Company has chosen to ignore iolite's voice, dismiss its rightful call for a special meeting, block a justified board seat request with false arguments, and persist in dilatory tactics - all while a constructive process initiated and maintained by iolite remains active.
Dynacor's lack of M&A and international expansion experience, combined with the CEO's suggestion of further dilutive raises, underscores the need for improved oversight. This is particularly urgent given the Company's significant cash reserves, which are at risk of being mismanaged.
Shareholders should be concerned that 2025 guidance shows severely eroding profitability despite record production volumes and historically high gold prices.
Capital Raise & Capital Allocation Concerns
On January 28 and 29, iolite met with board members in Montreal to discuss the state of matters at Dynacor and Mr. Leitz's potential board appointment, the Company's growth strategy, funding needs, and its persistent undervaluation. The Company had arranged for Mr. Leitz to meet the remaining board members as a final step in a lengthy nomination process. However, on January 30 - while Mr. Leitz was en route to the airport - Dynacor unexpectedly announced an unnecessary and heavily discounted capital raise. This move directly contradicted iolite's indications that such a raise was not in the best interest of Dynacor, especially given the recent record earnings, dividend increase, and share buybacks. Notably, the Company made no mention of exploring alternative financing options, such as factoring or bank debt, despite Mr. Leitz suggesting the day before that cheaper financing solutions were available if ever needed.
The raise immediately and unnecessarily destroyed C$25 million (US$17 million) in shareholder value, a loss likely to compound over time. Many existing shareholders, including iolite, were excluded from participating in this handpicked offering, creating an inherently unfair situation. Subsequent press releases from Dynacor confirmed that the Company had no immediate need for a capital raise - a fact that further frustrated shareholders who already suspected as much.
The Company's 2025 guidance projects positive free cash flow, including growth initiatives, and underscores that Dynacor's balance sheet was and remains overcapitalized. With a growth-adjusted net profit margin projected at 5% - a multi-year low compared to the 8% reported in Q3 2024 - the sharp decline in profitability remains a critical concern, particularly considering record production volumes and record-high gold prices.
Key Financial Metrics
US$ million
FY 23
LTM Sep 24
pre raise
LTM Sep 24
post raise
Guidance 25
LOW
Guidance 25
HIGH
Market cap @ C$ 5.50/share
138
138
160
Net cash
22
42
65
Net working capital
30
19
19
Enterprise value
86
77
76
Sales
250
284
284
345
375
EBITDA
25
31
31
NPAT (net profit) adjusted for growth
15
21
21
14+3
17+3
Margin
6.0%
7.4%
7.4%
4.9%
5.3%
Capex - excl. Senegal
7
4
4
8
5
Capex - Senegal
7
5
FCF (NPAT + D&A - total capex)
13
21
21
6
14
EV/EBITDA
3.4x
2.5x
2.5x
Dividends
3
4
4
Buybacks
3
6
6
Key Questions
iolite's well-founded questions and concerns continue to be disregarded by the Company:
Buyback program: What drove the decision to halt the buyback program on November 8, and why was no public statement issued at the time?
Dividend increase vs. dilution: Why did the Company announce a dividend increase on December 19, only to surprise the market with a discounted capital raise on January 30? This dilution more than erases the benefit of the dividend payout - it's highly unusual for a company to raise equity while increasing its dividend.
Disclosure: Given that the Company's growth plans have been known for some time, why was there no communication to public investors about a potential equity raise?
Upsizing the raise: What prompted the decision to increase the size of the capital raise? What necessity did this serve, and what benefits were expected from doing so?
Rights offering: Why wasn't a rights offering conducted, which would have given all shareholders an opportunity to participate?
Discount on the raise: The capital was raised at a 10% discount, despite board members stating on January 28 and 29 that the Company was undervalued. What is the explanation for this apparent contradiction?
'Broad shareholder support': Board members claim 'broad shareholder support' for these decisions. On what basis is this claim made? Which shareholders - by percentage or otherwise - actually supported the raise?
Alternative financing options: Why didn't the Company explore other financing options, such as factoring or debt financing, instead of opting for a deep discount equity offering that destroys value?
Further capital raises: Board members have indicated the need for further capital raises. What justifies this need, especially considering that the Company appears overcapitalized despite its ambitious growth plans?
Board members confirmed that no capital raise was planned as recently as late November. So why the sudden urgency? Dynacor was undervalued with no immediate need for capital? Issuing discounted shares for an undervalued company without pressing capital needs is not responsible. In December, the Company's shares traded at an average daily volume of 40,370 shares (~C$ 242,220 at C$ 6.00/share) - indicative of sufficient liquidity. iolite itself was able to purchase 10% of the Company primarily through open-market transactions.
Governance Concerns
Dynacor urgently needs additional perspective representation aligned with the owners of the Company on its board to protect shareholder value, ensure fair and responsible capital allocation, and drive sustainable earnings-per-share growth. This urgency is heightened by the Company's significant cash reserves, which are at risk of being mismanaged. Dynacor lacks a proven track record in M&A and international expansion, and the CEO has already hinted at further dilutive raises on the horizon.
Over the years, iolite has been a steadfast supporter of Dynacor's vision - even urging the Company to take on more risk by accelerating international expansion. Bringing Mr. Leitz onto the board would infuse the team with highly relevant expertise, a deep understanding of the business, and a true ownership perspective. As one of nine directors bound by fiduciary duties, he would offer essential insights to ensure fair capital allocation, support sustainable EPS growth, and boost corporate credibility. Appointing Mr. Leitz is in the Company's best interest.
Any reasonable leadership team and board would welcome such a major shareholder's representative to help drive a shared vision. Instead, Dynacor has chosen to ignore iolite's voice, dismiss its call for a special meeting, block a justified board seat request with false arguments, and persist in sending threatening letters. Shareholders deserve better.
iolite has repeatedly expressed its wishes to avoid legal battles and public confrontations. Regrettably, the Company has failed to take any meaningful steps toward resolving the situation. Dynacor could have - and still can - recognize the proper exercise of shareholders' rights and engage constructively with a significant shareholder to add a director to the board who can bring not only experience but also a much-needed different perspective in the best interest of the Company. The refusal to either do so or call the special meeting of shareholders does not reflect the standards directors should uphold and gives the impression that the motivation is to entrench existing directors aligned with management.
About iolite
Founded in 2011 by Robert Leitz, iolite Capital is a Switzerland-based investment manager with a focus on hidden champions: good businesses at attractive valuations. iolite serves a select circle of private and institutional clients who share the same entrepreneurial mindset, are willing to invest for the long term, and who would like to have first-hand access to a dedicated portfolio manager with substantial and meaningful skin in the game. Using a private equity approach, iolite conducts deep fundamental research, constructively engages with management, and adopts a long-term investment horizon. For more information on iolite, please visit www.iolitecapital.com.
About Robert Leitz
Robert Leitz brings 25 years of experience in finance and commodities. His expertise in international M&A and distressed debt investing equips him to contribute effectively to the Company's success. iolite holds a diverse portfolio of commodity-related investments across Australia, Canada, Switzerland, and Africa. Before founding iolite, Mr. Leitz held positions at Glencore and several financial institutions, including TPG Credit, Goldman Sachs' European Special Situations Group, and KPMG Corporate Restructuring. He holds a Master of Science in Business Administration and Economics from the University of St. Gallen (HSG), Switzerland, and completed his master's thesis under the guidance of Prof. Eli Noam at Columbia University, New York.
Information in Support of Public Broadcast Solicitation
The information contained in this news release does not and is not meant to constitute a solicitation of a proxy by iolite within the meaning of applicable corporate and securities laws. Although iolite has requisitioned a meeting (the 'Special Meeting') of the shareholders of Dynacor, there is currently no record or meeting date and shareholders are not being asked at this time to execute a proxy in favor of iolite`s nominee or any other resolutions set forth in the requisition. In connection with the Special Meeting, iolite is voluntarily providing the disclosure required under sections 9.2(4) and 9.2(6) of National Instrument 51-102 – Continuous Disclosure Obligations in accordance with corporate and securities laws applicable to public broadcast solicitations.
This news release and any solicitation made by iolite in advance of the Special Meeting is, or will be, as applicable, made by iolite and not by or on behalf of the management of Dynacor.
Shareholders of Dynacor are not being asked at this time to execute proxies in favor of iolite's nominee (in respect of the Special Meeting) or any other resolution that may be set forth in the requisition. iolite intends to make its solicitation primarily by mail, but proxies may also be solicited personally by telephone, email or other electronic means, as well as by newspaper or other media advertising or in person. In addition, iolite may solicit proxies in reliance upon the public broadcast exemption to the solicitation requirements under applicable Canadian corporate and securities laws, by way of public broadcast, including press release, speech or publication, and in any other manner permitted under applicable Canadian laws. Any members, partners, directors, officers or employees of iolite and its affiliates or other persons who solicit proxies on behalf of iolite will do so for no additional compensation. The costs incurred in the preparation and mailing of a circular in connection with the Special Meeting, and the solicitation of proxies by iolite will be borne by iolite, provided that, subject to applicable law, iolite may seek reimbursement from Dynacor of iolite's out-of-pocket expenses, including proxy solicitation expenses and legal fees, incurred in connection with a successful vote at the Special Meeting.
+41 79 227 29 08
SOURCE: iolite Capital Management AG
Copyright Business Wire 2025.
PUB: 03/06/2025 05:32 AM/DISC: 03/06/2025 05:32 AM
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Axios
33 minutes ago
- Axios
Amid backlash, Tesla remained resilient in Texas
Even as Tesla deliveries plunged nationally this year amid Elon Musk's very visible (if short-lived) alliance with President Trump, there was at least one state where Tesla registrations were up: Texas. Why it matters: The registration data, obtained by Axios through public information requests, indicates loyalty to the brand in its home base, including Texas' large urban and suburban counties. The depth of conservatives' enthusiasm for Musk's automobiles now faces a major test amid the absolute meltdown last week between the Tesla CEO and the president. By the numbers: Texans registered 12,918 new Teslas in the first three months of 2025, a period when Musk, who contributed more than $250 million to a pro-Trump super PAC during the 2024 election campaign, was enmeshed in the Trump administration as the overseer of DOGE, the president's cost-cutting initiative. Over the same period in 2024, Texans registered 10,679 Teslas. That's a 21% increase year over year. The intrigue: The spike in Texas registrations came as Tesla was flailing elsewhere. Tesla's vehicle deliveries plunged 13% globally in the first quarter of 2025 (336,681 electric vehicles) compared with Q1 2024 (386,810). Tesla vehicles were torched at showrooms and the brand's reputation cratered. Zoom in: Tesla saw year-over-year improvements in its sales in some of the most populous Texas counties. In Travis County, new Tesla registrations grew from 1,369 in the first quarter of 2024 to 1,424 during the first quarter of 2025. In Harris County, they grew from 1,526 to 1,837 during the same period. Tesla registration grew from 1,316 to 1,546 in Collin County and from 990 to 1,146 in Dallas County. In Bexar County, registrations grew from 631 to 664. What they're saying:"It's homegrown pride," is how Matt Holm, president and founder of the Tesla Owners Club of Austin, explains the car company's resilience to Axios. "And regardless of all the drama going on these days, people can differentiate between the product and everything else going on, and it's just a great product." "Elon has absolutely and irreversibly blown up bridges to some potential customers," says Alexander Edwards, president of California-based research firm Strategic Vision, which has long surveyed the motivations of car buyers. "People who bought Teslas for environmental friendliness, that's pretty much gone," Edwards tells Axios. Yes, but: The company had been enjoying an increasingly positive reputation among more conservative consumers. Musk was viewed favorably by 80% of Texas Republicans polled by the Texas Politics Project in April — and unfavorably by 83% of Democrats. In what now feels like a political lifetime ago, Trump himself even promoted Teslas by promising to buy one in support of Musk earlier this year. "In some pockets, like Austin, you have that tech group that loves what Tesla has to offer, can do some mental gymnastics about Musk, and looks at Rivian and says that's not what I want or might be priced out," Edwards says. Between the lines:"Being in the state of Texas, you're naturally conditioned to think you're better than everyone else in the U.S. And when you buy a Tesla" — a status symbol — "that's what you're saying. It doesn't surprise me that there's an increase in sales" in Texas, Edwards says. Plus: Tesla's resilience in Texas could have practical reasons as well, Edwards says. Texas homes — as opposed to, say, apartments in cities on the East Coast — are more likely to have a garage to charge a car in, he adds. What's next: Musk said late last month that Tesla was experiencing a "major rebound in demand" — without providing specifics. But that was before things went absolutely haywire with Trump and Tesla stock took a bath last week.
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
American Coastal Insurance Corporation (ACIC): A Bull Case Theory
We came across a bullish thesis on American Coastal Insurance Corporation (ACIC) on Miroslav Štěpánek's Substack. In this article, we will summarize the bulls' thesis on ACIC. American Coastal Insurance Corporation (ACIC)'s share was trading at $11.75 as of 4th June. ACIC's trailing P/E was 7.99 according to Yahoo Finance. An insurance agent at their desk consulting a customer about property & casualty insurance. American Coastal is a Florida-based property insurer that stands out in a typically commoditized industry due to its strategic niche, disciplined underwriting, and exposure to a high-premium market shaped by hurricane risk. Despite operating in a state where insurers have frequently gone bankrupt due to underpricing and fraud, American Coastal has maintained resilience through selective client screening and rigorous risk assessment, especially in its focus on residential-commercial properties with gardens. The company's 2022 combined ratio of 86.5%—even after Hurricane Ian—demonstrated its superior underwriting discipline. Trading at a 2024 P/E of 6.9 and boasting a high-teens free cash flow yield, the stock appears significantly undervalued. The company is now well-capitalized post-separation from UPC, with founder Daniel Peed still on the board despite stepping down as CEO. American Coastal is actively returning capital to shareholders via dividends and opportunistic buybacks and has initiated a $0.50/share dividend, reflecting confidence in its financial health. While core insurance operations are mature, modest organic growth is expected from Florida's demographic shifts, and a new MGU business could generate $20 million in annual profits over time. The hurricane risk remains real, but even recent storms like Helene and Milton only caused a modest financial impact, and major hurricanes may sustain high pricing. Investor sentiment remains cautious due to lingering concerns from its UPC past and weather-driven volatility, but those willing to look past episodic turbulence may find compelling upside. A conservative valuation model suggests potential returns of 2–3x over the next few years, making American Coastal a high-yield, asymmetric value play in a misunderstood niche. Previously, we covered a on RLI Corp. (RLI) by Serhio MaxDividends on Substack, operating within the same industry as ACIC, praising its 50-year dividend growth streak, robust underwriting, and strong balance sheet despite a dip in Q1 earnings. Miroslav Štěpánek's thesis on American Coastal Insurance Corporation (ACIC) offers a more contrarian angle, spotlighting a Florida-focused insurer with disciplined underwriting and a high cash flow yield. While RLI offers stability and long-term compounding, ACIC presents an asymmetric value bet with 2–3x upside potential for those willing to brave weather-driven volatility. American Coastal Insurance Corporation (ACIC) is not on our list of the 30 Most Popular Stocks Among Hedge Funds. As per our database, 20 hedge fund portfolios held ACIC at the end of the first quarter which was 18 in the previous quarter. While we acknowledge the risk and potential of ACIC as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 8 Best Wide Moat Stocks to Buy Now and 30 Most Important AI Stocks According to BlackRock. Disclosure: None. This article was originally published at Insider Monkey.
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Snaps Clothing Taps The Uptown Agency as Agency of Record
Collaboration to Expand Snaps' Signature Pearl Snap Shirts and Authentic Texas Spirit Across the U.S. DALLAS, June 9, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Snaps Clothing, the Dallas-born innovator redefining menswear through its modernized pearl snap shirts, has selected The Uptown Agency as its Agency of Record. This strategic partnership unites two Texas powerhouses to elevate Snaps' mission of blending tradition with innovation while accelerating its rapid expansion into new markets. "We searched for a partner who could amplify our story and energize our fans across every channel," Snaps co-founder Patrick Lynn said. "The Uptown Agency's blend of creativity, data-driven strategy, and track record of bold brand building made them the obvious choice." A leader in versatile menswear, Snaps has continued to grow since its inception in 2021. This collaboration with The Uptown Agency will leverage data-driven, unique storytelling to amplify the brand's authentic Texas roots and nationwide appeal. Snaps, co-founded by Patrick Lynn and Ed Baronne, combined their love for live music, sports, and Southern culture to create shirts that transition seamlessly from boardrooms to backyard barbecues. Snaps has cultivated a devoted following among professionals, outdoor enthusiasts, and college communities. As Snaps' Agency of Record, The Uptown Agency will deploy a multi-channel strategy to amplify their "everyday adventure" narrative while broadening its demographic reach through brand storytelling, digital media, influencer collaborations, and experiential activations. "Snaps embodies the spirit of Texas - bold, innovative, and unapologetically authentic," said Joseph Alexander, President & CEO of The Uptown Agency. "Our goal is to channel that energy into campaigns that resonate far beyond our roots, positioning Snaps as the go-to shirt for anyone valuing style without sacrifice." With The Uptown Agency's expertise, Snaps aims to capitalize on the $40 billion menswear market by emphasizing its unique value proposition: shirts engineered for "last call to work calls". Upcoming initiatives include expanding the Tailgater Collection to additional NCAA schools and introducing limited-edition designs inspired by Texas music legends. "We're inviting people into a community that celebrates grit, creativity, and the joy of the unplanned," added Lynn. "The Uptown Agency understands how to scale that ethos without losing what makes us distinctly Snaps." As the brand prepares to unveil its Fall 2025 line, this partnership signals a new chapter in Snaps' journey to make the pearl snap shirt a wardrobe staple from coast to coast and beyond. About Snaps Clothing Dallas-based Snaps Clothing Co. is a pioneering menswear brand redefining Western heritage through modernized pearl snap shirts designed for versatility, performance, and everyday adventure. Co-founded by Patrick Lynn and Ed Baronne—two corporate professionals turned disruptors—the brand emerged from a shared passion for live music, Southern culture, and functional style. Snaps merges timeless design with cutting-edge fabric technology, offering shirts engineered to transition seamlessly from boardrooms to backyard barbecues. They feature moisture-wicking CoolMax® blends, wrinkle-resistant twill, and UPF 50+ sun protection. Learn more at About The Uptown Agency The Uptown Agency is an award-winning, full-service marketing and branding partner dedicated to engineering differentiation through creative excellence and data-driven strategy. Recognized as a leader in brand growth, the agency combines industry-leading expertise in brand strategy, creative development, digital marketing, web development, and PR to deliver bespoke solutions that activate audiences and drive measurable results. The Uptown Agency is a true extension of client teams, prioritizing deep business understanding over templated approaches. Their work spans strategic brand overhauls, custom-coded web experiences, and high-impact campaigns that blend cultural relevance with technical precision. Explore their work at View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE The Uptown Agency Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data