logo
Dynacor Refuses to Call Requisitioned Special Meeting – iolite calls Meeting for April 9, 2025

Dynacor Refuses to Call Requisitioned Special Meeting – iolite calls Meeting for April 9, 2025

iolite Capital Management AG, a Switzerland-based investment manager, requisitioned a Special Shareholder Meeting of Dynacor Group Inc. (TSX:DNG, the Company) on January 30 to have Mr. Robert Leitz, elected to the board. Dynacor has failed to call the meeting, as required. Consequently, iolite is now calling the meeting itself, which will be held on April 9, 2025, at 10 am ET. Further details regarding the meeting's location and logistics will be announced shortly.
Dynacor's unnecessary, heavily discounted, and unfair capital raise exposed major governance flaws.
This, along with the board's subsequent actions, raises serious concerns regarding entrenchment and a misalignment with fiduciary duties. Shareholders deserve better representation, communication, and accountability.
iolite, the Company's largest shareholder, seeks to have Mr. Leitz, elected to Dynacor's board to protect value, ensure fair and responsible capital allocation, and drive sustainable earnings-per-share growth. This is in the Company's best interest.
More than 30 days after iolite's requisition, Dynacor has neither convened a meeting nor offered a meaningful proposal to address the situation. Instead, the Company has chosen to ignore iolite's voice, dismiss its rightful call for a special meeting, block a justified board seat request with false arguments, and persist in dilatory tactics - all while a constructive process initiated and maintained by iolite remains active.
Dynacor's lack of M&A and international expansion experience, combined with the CEO's suggestion of further dilutive raises, underscores the need for improved oversight. This is particularly urgent given the Company's significant cash reserves, which are at risk of being mismanaged.
Shareholders should be concerned that 2025 guidance shows severely eroding profitability despite record production volumes and historically high gold prices.
Capital Raise & Capital Allocation Concerns
On January 28 and 29, iolite met with board members in Montreal to discuss the state of matters at Dynacor and Mr. Leitz's potential board appointment, the Company's growth strategy, funding needs, and its persistent undervaluation. The Company had arranged for Mr. Leitz to meet the remaining board members as a final step in a lengthy nomination process. However, on January 30 - while Mr. Leitz was en route to the airport - Dynacor unexpectedly announced an unnecessary and heavily discounted capital raise. This move directly contradicted iolite's indications that such a raise was not in the best interest of Dynacor, especially given the recent record earnings, dividend increase, and share buybacks. Notably, the Company made no mention of exploring alternative financing options, such as factoring or bank debt, despite Mr. Leitz suggesting the day before that cheaper financing solutions were available if ever needed.
The raise immediately and unnecessarily destroyed C$25 million (US$17 million) in shareholder value, a loss likely to compound over time. Many existing shareholders, including iolite, were excluded from participating in this handpicked offering, creating an inherently unfair situation. Subsequent press releases from Dynacor confirmed that the Company had no immediate need for a capital raise - a fact that further frustrated shareholders who already suspected as much.
The Company's 2025 guidance projects positive free cash flow, including growth initiatives, and underscores that Dynacor's balance sheet was and remains overcapitalized. With a growth-adjusted net profit margin projected at 5% - a multi-year low compared to the 8% reported in Q3 2024 - the sharp decline in profitability remains a critical concern, particularly considering record production volumes and record-high gold prices.
Key Financial Metrics
US$ million
FY 23
LTM Sep 24
pre raise
LTM Sep 24
post raise
Guidance 25
LOW
Guidance 25
HIGH
Market cap @ C$ 5.50/share
138
138
160
Net cash
22
42
65
Net working capital
30
19
19
Enterprise value
86
77
76
Sales
250
284
284
345
375
EBITDA
25
31
31
NPAT (net profit) adjusted for growth
15
21
21
14+3
17+3
Margin
6.0%
7.4%
7.4%
4.9%
5.3%
Capex - excl. Senegal
7
4
4
8
5
Capex - Senegal
7
5
FCF (NPAT + D&A - total capex)
13
21
21
6
14
EV/EBITDA
3.4x
2.5x
2.5x
Dividends
3
4
4
Buybacks
3
6
6
Key Questions
iolite's well-founded questions and concerns continue to be disregarded by the Company:
Buyback program: What drove the decision to halt the buyback program on November 8, and why was no public statement issued at the time?
Dividend increase vs. dilution: Why did the Company announce a dividend increase on December 19, only to surprise the market with a discounted capital raise on January 30? This dilution more than erases the benefit of the dividend payout - it's highly unusual for a company to raise equity while increasing its dividend.
Disclosure: Given that the Company's growth plans have been known for some time, why was there no communication to public investors about a potential equity raise?
Upsizing the raise: What prompted the decision to increase the size of the capital raise? What necessity did this serve, and what benefits were expected from doing so?
Rights offering: Why wasn't a rights offering conducted, which would have given all shareholders an opportunity to participate?
Discount on the raise: The capital was raised at a 10% discount, despite board members stating on January 28 and 29 that the Company was undervalued. What is the explanation for this apparent contradiction?
'Broad shareholder support': Board members claim 'broad shareholder support' for these decisions. On what basis is this claim made? Which shareholders - by percentage or otherwise - actually supported the raise?
Alternative financing options: Why didn't the Company explore other financing options, such as factoring or debt financing, instead of opting for a deep discount equity offering that destroys value?
Further capital raises: Board members have indicated the need for further capital raises. What justifies this need, especially considering that the Company appears overcapitalized despite its ambitious growth plans?
Board members confirmed that no capital raise was planned as recently as late November. So why the sudden urgency? Dynacor was undervalued with no immediate need for capital? Issuing discounted shares for an undervalued company without pressing capital needs is not responsible. In December, the Company's shares traded at an average daily volume of 40,370 shares (~C$ 242,220 at C$ 6.00/share) - indicative of sufficient liquidity. iolite itself was able to purchase 10% of the Company primarily through open-market transactions.
Governance Concerns
Dynacor urgently needs additional perspective representation aligned with the owners of the Company on its board to protect shareholder value, ensure fair and responsible capital allocation, and drive sustainable earnings-per-share growth. This urgency is heightened by the Company's significant cash reserves, which are at risk of being mismanaged. Dynacor lacks a proven track record in M&A and international expansion, and the CEO has already hinted at further dilutive raises on the horizon.
Over the years, iolite has been a steadfast supporter of Dynacor's vision - even urging the Company to take on more risk by accelerating international expansion. Bringing Mr. Leitz onto the board would infuse the team with highly relevant expertise, a deep understanding of the business, and a true ownership perspective. As one of nine directors bound by fiduciary duties, he would offer essential insights to ensure fair capital allocation, support sustainable EPS growth, and boost corporate credibility. Appointing Mr. Leitz is in the Company's best interest.
Any reasonable leadership team and board would welcome such a major shareholder's representative to help drive a shared vision. Instead, Dynacor has chosen to ignore iolite's voice, dismiss its call for a special meeting, block a justified board seat request with false arguments, and persist in sending threatening letters. Shareholders deserve better.
iolite has repeatedly expressed its wishes to avoid legal battles and public confrontations. Regrettably, the Company has failed to take any meaningful steps toward resolving the situation. Dynacor could have - and still can - recognize the proper exercise of shareholders' rights and engage constructively with a significant shareholder to add a director to the board who can bring not only experience but also a much-needed different perspective in the best interest of the Company. The refusal to either do so or call the special meeting of shareholders does not reflect the standards directors should uphold and gives the impression that the motivation is to entrench existing directors aligned with management.
About iolite
Founded in 2011 by Robert Leitz, iolite Capital is a Switzerland-based investment manager with a focus on hidden champions: good businesses at attractive valuations. iolite serves a select circle of private and institutional clients who share the same entrepreneurial mindset, are willing to invest for the long term, and who would like to have first-hand access to a dedicated portfolio manager with substantial and meaningful skin in the game. Using a private equity approach, iolite conducts deep fundamental research, constructively engages with management, and adopts a long-term investment horizon. For more information on iolite, please visit www.iolitecapital.com.
About Robert Leitz
Robert Leitz brings 25 years of experience in finance and commodities. His expertise in international M&A and distressed debt investing equips him to contribute effectively to the Company's success. iolite holds a diverse portfolio of commodity-related investments across Australia, Canada, Switzerland, and Africa. Before founding iolite, Mr. Leitz held positions at Glencore and several financial institutions, including TPG Credit, Goldman Sachs' European Special Situations Group, and KPMG Corporate Restructuring. He holds a Master of Science in Business Administration and Economics from the University of St. Gallen (HSG), Switzerland, and completed his master's thesis under the guidance of Prof. Eli Noam at Columbia University, New York.
Information in Support of Public Broadcast Solicitation
The information contained in this news release does not and is not meant to constitute a solicitation of a proxy by iolite within the meaning of applicable corporate and securities laws. Although iolite has requisitioned a meeting (the 'Special Meeting') of the shareholders of Dynacor, there is currently no record or meeting date and shareholders are not being asked at this time to execute a proxy in favor of iolite`s nominee or any other resolutions set forth in the requisition. In connection with the Special Meeting, iolite is voluntarily providing the disclosure required under sections 9.2(4) and 9.2(6) of National Instrument 51-102 – Continuous Disclosure Obligations in accordance with corporate and securities laws applicable to public broadcast solicitations.
This news release and any solicitation made by iolite in advance of the Special Meeting is, or will be, as applicable, made by iolite and not by or on behalf of the management of Dynacor.
Shareholders of Dynacor are not being asked at this time to execute proxies in favor of iolite's nominee (in respect of the Special Meeting) or any other resolution that may be set forth in the requisition. iolite intends to make its solicitation primarily by mail, but proxies may also be solicited personally by telephone, email or other electronic means, as well as by newspaper or other media advertising or in person. In addition, iolite may solicit proxies in reliance upon the public broadcast exemption to the solicitation requirements under applicable Canadian corporate and securities laws, by way of public broadcast, including press release, speech or publication, and in any other manner permitted under applicable Canadian laws. Any members, partners, directors, officers or employees of iolite and its affiliates or other persons who solicit proxies on behalf of iolite will do so for no additional compensation. The costs incurred in the preparation and mailing of a circular in connection with the Special Meeting, and the solicitation of proxies by iolite will be borne by iolite, provided that, subject to applicable law, iolite may seek reimbursement from Dynacor of iolite's out-of-pocket expenses, including proxy solicitation expenses and legal fees, incurred in connection with a successful vote at the Special Meeting.
+41 79 227 29 08
SOURCE: iolite Capital Management AG
Copyright Business Wire 2025.
PUB: 03/06/2025 05:32 AM/DISC: 03/06/2025 05:32 AM

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

World Of Forbes: Stories Of Entrepreneurial Capitalism Across Our 49 International Editions
World Of Forbes: Stories Of Entrepreneurial Capitalism Across Our 49 International Editions

Forbes

time20 minutes ago

  • Forbes

World Of Forbes: Stories Of Entrepreneurial Capitalism Across Our 49 International Editions

Across the planet, our 49 licensed editions span six continents, 81 countries and 31 languages. They all share the same mission: celebrating entrepreneurial capitalism in all its forms. 'As a parent, one tries to convey gratitude for being alive, for effort, for virtues, honoring it with work, building something beyond oneself, not being arrogant and assuming social responsibility with community service.' Eduardo Costantini China billionaires The collective fortunes of Chinese billionaires is up 26% over 2024, despite escalating trade tensions with the U.S. ByteDance cofounder Zhang Yiming (front left) saw a more than 50% jump in his net worth to $65.5 billion, with investors optimistic about the AI potential of the tech giant's TikTok app. DeepSeek founder Liang Wenfeng (front, second from right) joined the ranks after the red-hot AI firm based in Hangzhou released its ChatGPT competitor in January. Anish Shah When Anish Shah became CEO of Mahindra Group in 2021, it was the first time someone outside the billionaire Mahindra family took the wheel since 1945, when two brothers and a third cofounder started the company in steel trading. Today, the $19 billion (revenue) Mumbai empire employs 260,000 people in 100 countries with businesses ranging from automobile manufacturing to resorts to farm equipment. Shah's next big hurdle is to maintain dominance in India's SUV and tractor market while racing into the EV future. Dean Leitersdorf Forbes Israel calls Dean Leitersdorf, 27, one of the most promising figures on its 30 Under 30 list. The computer science Ph.D., who hails from the town of Mevaseret Zion, cofounded AI startup Decart in late 2023 with Moshe Shalev and has secured $53 million in funding at a reported valuation of at least $500 million. Based in San Francisco, Decart enables organizations to develop and train big data models efficiently. It released an AI-generated video game, Oasis, which Leitersdorf says reached 1 million registered users in just three days—faster than the growth pace of OpenAI's ChatGPT. Elon Musk took notice, writing on his X platform last October, 'Wow, this is happening fast.' Leonardo Del Vecchio 'It doesn't matter how traditional or innovative a sector is; the important thing is to develop it in the Italian way,' says Leonardo Maria Del Vecchio, the 30-year-old son of late eyeglasses billionaire Leonardo Del Vecchio (d. 2022). 'I love Italy and its variety, and it is this wealth that guides my every investment choice.' Through his three-year-old family office, LMDV Capital, he has holdings in bottled water, restaurants, film production and entertainment. He's also an executive at EssilorLuxottica, which owns brands such as LensCrafters, Oakley and Ray-Ban, all of which his father acquired as founder and longtime head of Luxottica. Rolf Sorg Rolf Sorg started PM-International in 1993 and has grown it every year since. Today his $3.3 billion (revenue) Schengen-based company sells supplement pills, nutrient-rich drink blends and skin care products in nearly 100 countries. 'I've learned that success lies outside the comfort zone,' says Sorg, who is still CEO, reflecting on managing through crises and challenges like Donald Trump's recent tariffs on goods imported to the U.S. 'A building is not just infrastructure, but also the value it brings to the people who use it every day.' Ema Iftimie Demetrio Carceller Arce Demetrio Carceller Arce runs Damm, a Barcelona-based brewery that dates to 1876 and that his oilman grandfather purchased in the 1950s and passed down to his father, former billionaire Demetrio Carceller Coll (d. 2023). During three decades at the helm, Carceller Arce has prioritized expanding internationally—Damm is now in over 130 countries—while adding product categories such as soft drinks and incorporating sustainable measures like solar power generation. 'When I arrived, Damm was like a sleeping racehorse, with extraordinary potential—a local, profitable company with a century-long history,' he says. It now brings in north of $2 billion in annual revenue. Tanit Chearavanont 'Being the next tycoon makes me see myself as a big fish,' says Tanit Chearavanont, the grandson of the country's richest person, Dhanin Chearavanont, in an interview with Forbes Thailand in which he discusses the importance of next-gen leaders gaining outside experience. 'But in this generation, I see the next tycoon as a 'fast fish' that eats both big and small fish.' In his case, he's working at Bangkok-based conglomerate Charoen Pokphand Group, run by his uncle Suphachai Chearavanont. He currently leads international expansion for the group's retail arm, CP Axtra, which generated about $15 billion in 2024 revenue selling groceries and other products in nine countries. Yiğit Güocak (right) and Ali Yılmaz Former university classmates Yiğit Gürocak (right) and Ali Yılmaz created Obilet in 2012 to digitize buying bus tickets. The pair have since expanded into an online booking site for flights, hotels, car rentals and ferries. The company is headquartered in Istanbul and now operates in 50 countries, 21 languages and 33 currencies. It had attracted nearly $20 million in investments before French carpooling marketplace BlaBlaCar acquired an 80% stake in late 2024.

States sue to block the sale of genetic data collected by DNA testing company 23andMe
States sue to block the sale of genetic data collected by DNA testing company 23andMe

Los Angeles Times

time40 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

States sue to block the sale of genetic data collected by DNA testing company 23andMe

Dozens of states have filed a joint lawsuit against the bankrupt DNA-testing company 23andMe to block the company's sale of its customers' genetic data without explicit consent. The suit, filed this week in U.S. Bankruptcy Court in the Eastern District of Missouri, comes months after 23andMe began a court-supervised sale process of its assets. The South San Francisco-based venture was once valued at $6 billion and has collected DNA samples from more than 15 million customers. The company's bankruptcy has raised questions over privacy standards for genetic data, which experts say is uniquely sensitive, immutable and irreplaceable if stolen. Twenty-seven states and the District of Columbia filed the lawsuit, arguing that 23andMe customers have an inherent right to their own genetic information. 'This isn't just data — it's your DNA,' said Oregon Atty. Gen. Dan Rayfield in a statement. 'It's personal, permanent, and deeply private. People did not submit their personal data to 23andMe thinking their genetic blueprint would later be sold off to the highest bidder.' 23andMe announced in May that it would be sold to New York-based drug maker Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, which had agreed to comply with 23andMe's existing privacy policy. However, a competing offer from nonprofit TTAM Research Institute led the bankruptcy judge to reopen the auction last week. TTAM is run by 23andMe co-founder Anne Wojcicki, who has made several failed attempts to take the company private. In a statement, a 23andMe spokesperson said the lawsuit's claims 'are without merit' and that the sale of genetic data does not violate privacy regulations. 'Customers will continue to have the same rights and protections in the hands of the winning bidder,' the spokesperson said. 23andMe customers have the right to delete their genetic information from the company's database at any time, as outlined in the Genetic Information Privacy Act and the California Consumer Privacy Act. During a testimony in Washington earlier this week, 23andMe interim Chief Executive Joseph Selsavage said that 1.9 million customers have requested their data be deleted since the company's bankruptcy filing in March. Sara Geoghegan, senior counsel at the Electronic Privacy Information Center, said that 23andMe's privacy policy was subject to change and not adequate to protect customers' data. In an interview in March, she stressed the sensitivity of genetic data. 'I would be very concerned if I had given a swab to 23andMe,' she said. 'There is little we can do to control what happens to it.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store