Historic Catford venue set to reopen as community hub
A historic Catford venue is set to reopen as a community hub this autumn, it has been revealed.
The former Catford Constitutional Club and original farmhouse will be unveiled as The Catford House after extensive restoration.
This initiative is spearheaded by the Greenwich Co-operative Development Agency (GCDA).
The council began working with conservation experts in 2021 to uncover the building's past as a farmhouse, clubhouse, and pub.
The venue will now be a space for the community to enjoy.
The restoration effort will see the pub and garden revived, alongside a community kitchen and smaller, flexible spaces.
Catford's oldest building, the Georgian Hall, will be opened to the public for the first time.
The GCDA, a not-for-profit organisation with more than 40 years' experience, will operate the venue.
Visualisation showing the proposed Georgian Hall (Image: Hayatsu Architects)
Having worked in the borough for the last 15 years, GCDA have found a permanent home in the heart of Catford.
Alongside drinking, the group plan to host casual social gatherings, food pop-ups, exercise classes, exhibitions, and performances at the venue.
James-J Walsh, councillor responsible for inclusive regeneration and planning, and councillor for Rushey Green ward, added: "The Catford House is a vibrant example of the Council's ambitions for Catford brought to life.
"This is regeneration with a clear social purpose, bringing together conservation, culture and community to transform Catford's almost 300-year-old building into a space shaped by, and for, local people."
Residents and groups in the area are encouraged to propose event ideas to the GCDA.
The GCDA is a London Living Wage employer and aims to support the local economy by creating jobs and sourcing from local suppliers.
Partnerships with Portobello Brewery and others will help bring their vision for The Catford House to life.
The restoration project is part of the Catford Town Centre Framework, shaped by thousands of residents and adopted by the council in 2021.
The £1.8 million refurbishment was supported by the Mayor of London's Good Growth Fund.
Earlier this year, Thomas Lane Yard, a significant housing and mixed-use regeneration scheme, was unanimously approved by the Council.
This will see an underused carpark transformed to provide more than100 new affordable homes, green public spaces, and commercial and affordable workspace.
Brenda Dacres OBE, Mayor of Lewisham, said: "This marks the start of an exciting chapter for Catford.
"This new multipurpose community venue will breathe life into this area as well as creating new local jobs, opportunities for Lewisham businesses and a boost to our cultural and creative scene."
Claire Pritchard, CEO of the GCDA, added: "GCDA has been working in Lewisham for nearly fifteen years and has always wanted a base there, a place to grow roots and connect with the community.
"Our search ended when we found the former Catford Constitutional Club, a building that holds a special place in the hearts of many.
"Imagine a place where the warmth of a classic British pub meets the soul of the community.
"We're not just pouring pints, we're creating a space where neighbours become friends, local musicians and artists find their voice, and fresh, locally sourced food fuels meaningful conversations."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US and China agree framework deal to extend trade war truce
The US and China have extended the truce in their trade war after two days of talks in London that resulted in a 'framework' deal over export restrictions on rare earths and semiconductors. Negotiations to resolve the wider tariff war triggered by Donald Trump in April will continue but the truce settles, for now, growing tension between the two economic super-powers. The talks, which broke up at about midnight UK time after more than 20 hours of discussions over two days, were led by the Treasury secretary, Scott Bessent, alongside the US commerce secretary, Howard Lutnick, and the trade representative, Jamieson Greer. Lutnick expressed optimism on Tuesday that concerns about critical or rare earth' minerals and magnets, which are vital to a range of industries including cars, electronics and defence, would be resolved as the deal was implemented. The wider dispute, triggered by Trump's decision to impose triple-digit tariffs on Chinese imports in April – since eased to a baseline 30% – has yet to be resolved with China's exports to the US plunging 35% year on year in May. Both sides had accused each other of reneging on a preliminary trade deal struck in Geneva last month to ease retaliatory tariffs, with China putting restrictions on exports of rare earths and the US continuing curbs on semiconductor exports. But the trade war has already caused damage on both sides, whatever the positioning and rhetoric. China's exports to the US plunged 35% year on year in May. The choked global supply of rare earths, which China controls, was already threatening to halt production in the automotive sector this summer on both sides of the Atlantic, with permanent magnets used in everything from windscreen wipers to doors. China's delegation was headed up by the vice-premier He Lifeng – a seasoned negotiator at the top of the Chinese government who had also led talks in Geneva. Lutnick told reporters that Tuesday's framework put 'meat on the bones' of the Geneva deal. Its implementation had faltered over China's curbs on critical mineral exports. The deal also would remove some US export restrictions that were recently put in place, Lutnick said. 'We have reached a framework to implement the Geneva consensus and the call between the two presidents,' Lutnick said. 'The idea is we're going to go back and speak to President Trump and make sure he approves it. They're going to go back and speak to President Xi and make sure he approves it, and if that is approved, we will then implement the framework.' Related: China accuses Pete Hegseth of sowing division in Asia in speech 'filled with provocations' In a separate briefing, China's vice commerce minister Li Chenggang said a trade framework had been reached that would be taken back to US and Chinese leaders. There was a cautious welcome from investors and analysts. 'At least now there's a bottom line that neither side is willing to cross,' said Mark Dong, a co-founder of Minority Asset Management in Hong Kong. Deutsche Bank's note to clients on Wednesday was more sceptical. 'So while the mood music has stayed positive, investors may be wary of the pattern that emerged during the previous US-China trade talks in 2018-19, when apparently constructive in-person meetings seemed to take a step back as the negotiating teams returned to their capitals.' Lutnick said China's restrictions on exports of critical minerals and magnets to the US would be resolved as a 'fundamental' part of the framework agreement. 'Also, there were a number of measures the United States of America put on when those rare earths were not coming,' Lutnick said. 'You should expect those to come off, sort of as President Trump said, in a balanced way.' Li said: 'Our communication has been very professional, rational, in-depth and candid.' Reuters and Agence France-Presse contributed to this report Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tissue Regenix Group Full Year 2024 Earnings: US$0.012 loss per share (vs US$0.024 loss in FY 2023)
Revenue: US$28.6m (down 2.9% from FY 2023). Net loss: US$885.0k (loss narrowed by 48% from FY 2023). US$0.012 loss per share (improved from US$0.024 loss in FY 2023). We've found 21 US stocks that are forecast to pay a dividend yield of over 6% next year. See the full list for free. All figures shown in the chart above are for the trailing 12 month (TTM) period Looking ahead, revenue is forecast to grow 7.1% p.a. on average during the next 2 years, compared to a 9.1% growth forecast for the Biotechs industry in the United Kingdom. Performance of the British Biotechs industry. The company's shares are down 3.3% from a week ago. Before we wrap up, we've discovered 3 warning signs for Tissue Regenix Group that you should be aware of. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error al recuperar los datos Inicia sesión para acceder a tu cartera de valores Error al recuperar los datos Error al recuperar los datos Error al recuperar los datos Error al recuperar los datos
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The taxes Reeves could raise to pay for Labour's about-turns
Rachel Reeves faces another black hole in the public finances. This time she can blame her own MPs: the revolt by more than 120 Labour backbenchers has forced the Prime Minister to back down on his proposal to slow the growth in the benefits bill. Sir Keir Starmer's reforms were supposed to save £5bn per year. But now that he has performed another about-turn, the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) estimates the scheme will only save £2bn, thus blowing a fresh £3bn hole in the Chancellor's numbers. 'These changes more than halve the saving of the package of reforms as a whole, making the Chancellor's already difficult budget-balancing act that much harder,' says Tom Waters, at the think tank. It comes weeks after the policy reversal on winter fuel payments for pensioners, which will cost more than £1bn. To make matters worse, the economy is slowing – in part because of Labour's record-breaking tax raids – which will undermine the tax revenues on which Reeves's plans relied. Ruth Gregory, at Capital Economics, estimates the combination of higher benefits spending and lower growth will cost the Chancellor £22bn compared to the Office for Budget Responsibility's forecasts at the Spring Statement. If MPs will not allow the Government even the most modest restraint on spending, and if the Chancellor will not again rewrite her own 'iron-clad' borrowing rules, that means more tax rises are on the way in the autumn. Here are the options Reeves will be looking at. The Government's biggest revenue-raiser, income tax, raked in £310bn last year – almost precisely matching the £313bn spent on benefits. Adding a penny to the basic and higher rates of income tax would bring in just over £10bn extra per year, according to HMRC estimates. That means at least 2p would need to be added to come close to repairing Reeves's Budget. If it were not for Labour's manifesto pledge not to raise the tax, this would be an obvious place for the Chancellor to turn. But the manifesto is hardly a meaningful constraint. The vaunted document also promised not to raise National Insurance contributions (NICs), but the Chancellor did just that in her first Budget. The Government argued that the manifesto promise only applied to the NICs paid directly by workers, not the much larger share paid by their employers. Income tax does not lend itself quite so easily to such a ruse, but the Chancellor could extend the Conservatives' long freeze on thresholds. A classic stealth tax, this method means that as workers receive pay rises they are pulled more quickly into higher tax brackets – even if inflation means the spending power of their pay packets is not actually growing. The freeze on thresholds, which is currently set to last until 2028, is already expected to bag the Chancellor nearly £50bn per year by the end of the decade. Extending it by another two years would bring in an extra £10bn per year, the IFS estimates. Given the sums involved and the fact that stealth raids do not affect workers in an obvious way, this is seen as a likely option. The Chancellor is unlikely to whack businesses with another raid. She has promised hostile bosses that she will not pull the same stunt on National Insurance contributions again. Andrew Bailey, the Governor of the Bank of England, has also warned that last year's tax raid is now weighing on the economy, meaning increasing the rate again could be counterproductive. But that does not mean the tax, which is set to bring in £200bn this year, has to go untouched. One option is to raise the rate paid by workers. This would breach even the revised version of the manifesto pledge, but could be framed as reversing reckless Tory tax cuts – under Jeremy Hunt, Reeves's predecessor in No 11, the rate was chopped from 12pc to 10pc and then down to 8pc. Each of those two percentage point moves cost more than £10bn, so reversing the cuts could help Reeves considerably. Increasing the rate of capital gains tax (CGT) is popular in Left-wing circles. Unfortunately, jacking up the tax paid on profits made from the sale of assets comes with a range of downsides, which can result in a higher tax rate in fact costing the Treasury revenue. A large share of CGT is paid by a very small number of people. If the higher rate means they simply decide not to sell their assets, then the tax take will plunge in short order. HMRC estimates that a one percentage point increase in the top rate ends up costing the Treasury £30m per year. A 5p increase costs £870m per year. A 10p jump loses a staggering £3.6bn per year for the public purse. As a result, increasing the rate of CGT seems unlikely. Another option ruled out in the manifesto, this levy on a large share of the things people buy is on track to bring in £200bn per year by the end of the decade. Currently charged at a rate of 20pc, increasing VAT might not be the most popular measure when households are already reeling from a cost of living crisis. None the less, it could be a tempting option when a 1p increase brings in £9.6bn per year. Alternatively, the Chancellor could slap the tax on items that are currently exempt – as she did with private school fees this year – or those that attract the reduced rate of 5pc, such as energy bills. Reeves has maintained the accounting wheeze employed by successive Conservative chancellors: freeze fuel duty year after year but pencilling in extra revenues from future increases. About half of her headroom comes from the official assumption that the tax on petrol and diesel will rise in future – yet few expect she will actually jack up the cost of driving. The fuel duty escalator has been frozen for a decade and a half, making it politically difficult to unfreeze. Most economists believe it will be kept frozen. It would be a shock to voters, but Reeves may find it an attractive revenue-raiser: reintroducing inflation-linked increases in fuel duty would raise an estimated £5bn a year. It is not just the big taxes that are on the table. Angela Rayner, the Deputy Prime Minister, wrote to Reeves with a raft of proposed tax increases ahead of the Spring Statement. Suggestions included: a higher bank surcharge, raising up to £700m from lenders; scrapping inheritance tax relief on Aim-listed shares, for anywhere between £100m and £1bn; removing the dividend allowance to bag £325m, as well as raising the tax rate on dividends; and further freezing the threshold at which high earners pay the additional rate of income tax. Raising the tax on enveloped properties, which are largely owned by companies, could raise another £200m, while closing a commercial property stamp duty loophole could net £1bn. Reinstating a lifetime allowance on pensions contributions might gain close to £800m per year. Rayner also suggested clawing back more child benefit from higher-earning households, for £600m, and tightening migrants' access to benefits. Together those measures could increase the Treasury's haul by £4.6bn or more. That would be useful, but is barely enough to cover the cost of Starmer's latest about-turns, let alone cover the other costs. The scale of spending commitments mounting up means Reeves is facing unpalatable choices when it comes to the Budget. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more. 擷取數據時發生錯誤 登入存取你的投資組合 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤
