logo
Mark Carney enters the arena

Mark Carney enters the arena

Photo byIn the end, Donald Trump decided it. On 28 April Canadians elected Mark Carney to be their next prime minister, a dramatic turnaround for his Liberal party, which only eight weeks ago seemed to be headed for a wipeout. At the time of writing it was still unclear whether the Liberals had won enough seats to form a majority government but, nevertheless, Carney will stay on as prime minister.
The Liberals astonishing rebound in the eyes of voters comes down to three factors. The first was Justin Trudeau's resignation. After a decade in power, Trudeau had become deeply unpopular with voters, falling precipitously in opinion polls and dragging his party's prospects down with him. That Liberal party members chose to replace him with Carney – a political outsider – rather than Chrystia Freeland, Trudeau's former deputy and the previous Liberal heir apparent, illustrated just how toxic Brand Trudeau had become for the party. (Trudeau also wisely stepped out of the public eye throughout the campaign.)
Then there was Carney's main opponent, Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre. Until very recently, Poilievre seemed a certain bet to become Canada's next leader. As Luke Savage wrote in the New Statesman recently, Poilievre's belligerent political style seemed like an abrupt change for Canadian politics, as the politician 'cut a straightforwardly ideological path to the top job and has maintained this right-wing posture ever since. He successfully captured much of the energy generated by the so-called Freedom Convoy. He has refused to back down on highly controversial and unpopular positions such as defunding Canada's public broadcaster, CBC, and has planted his flag firmly on the Trump-adjacent right.'
But much of Poilievre's polling success came down to his attacks on Trudeau and the former prime minister's policies, which many felt exacerbated the cost-of-living crisis. Once Trudeau stepped down – and Carney pledged to get rid of some of his most loathed tax policies – Poilievre was perhaps too slow to pivot to a different campaign tactic. Instead, he somewhat lazily kept presenting himself as the change candidate, while trying to yoke Carney to Trudeau's record, rather than presenting his own more inspiring vision as the next leader of Canada. Poilievre only released the details of his party's platform six days before the election. This was a remarkable misstep: with votes still being counted, it's already clear that the Conservatives have significantly increased their share of the national vote from previous elections. Across the country, there are still deep pockets of resentment against the Liberals. Yet Poilievre's pitch wasn't enough to unseat Carney and, at the time of writing, the Conservative leader was poised to lose his seat.
Yet the final factor in deciding the election had little to do with Canadian politics at all. As I wrote back in March, many Canadians view Trump's tariffs not just as an economic crisis, but an existential one. The US president chimed in on election day with a Truth Social post that only solidified that fear as he appeared to endorse himself as the next leader of Canada: 'Good luck to the Great people of Canada. Elect the man who has the strength and wisdom to cut your taxes in half, increase your military power, for free, to the highest level in the World, have your Car, Steel, Aluminum, Lumber, Energy, and all other businesses, QUADRUPLE in size, WITH ZERO TARIFFS OR TAXES, if Canada becomes the cherished 51st. State of the United States of America.'
Under the weight of Trump's economic and rhetorical attacks, Canadians opted for Carney – an economist and a technocrat with a lofty CV – rather than the populist who had previously embraced a Maga-of-the-North style of politics. Now it will be up to Carney to grapple with not only the threat of Donald Trump from the south, but also the deepening political divisions at home. The real fight starts now.
[See also: Canada's left is poised for a wipeout]
Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe
Related

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US and Europe trade negotiators discuss tariffs in Paris
US and Europe trade negotiators discuss tariffs in Paris

Glasgow Times

time11 minutes ago

  • Glasgow Times

US and Europe trade negotiators discuss tariffs in Paris

The European Union's top trade negotiator, Maros Sefcovic, met on Wednesday with his American counterpart, US trade representative Jamieson Greer, on the sidelines of a meeting of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 'We're advancing in the right direction at pace,' Mr Sefcovic said at a news conference. He said ongoing technical meetings between EU and US negotiators in Washington would be soon followed by a video conference between himself and Mr Greer to then 'assess the progress and charter the way forward'. Brussels and Washington are unlikely to reach a substantive trade agreement in Paris. The issues dividing them are too difficult to resolve quickly. US President Donald Trump regularly criticises America's persistent trade deficit with the European Union, which was a record 161 billion dollars (£119 billion)last year, according to the US Commerce Department. Mr Trump blames the gap between what the US sells and what it buys from Europe on unfair trade practices and often singles out for criticism the EU's 10% tax on imported cars. America's was 2.5% until Mr Trump raised it to 25% in April. The EU has argued its purchases of US services, especially in the technology sector, all but overcome the deficit. After the Trump administration's surprise tariffs last week on steel rattled global markets and complicated the ongoing, wider tariff negotiations between Brussels and Washington, the EU on Monday said it is preparing 'countermeasures' against the US. The EU has offered the US a 'zero for zero' deal in which both sides end tariffs on industrial goods, including cars. Mr Trump has rejected that idea, but EU officials say it is still on the table. US trade representative Jamieson Greer (Mark Schiefelbein/AP) The EU could buy more liquefied natural gas and defence items from the US, and lower duties on cars, but it is not likely to budge on calls to scrap the value added tax, which is akin to a sales tax, or open up the EU to American beef. 'We still have a few weeks to have this discussion and negotiation,' French trade minister Laurent Saint-Martin said in Paris on Wednesday ahead of the OECD meeting. 'If the discussion and negotiation do not succeed, Europe is capable of having countermeasures on American products and services as well.' Greta Peisch, who was general counsel for the US trade representative in the Biden administration, said the zero-for-zero proposal could provide a way to make progress if the Trump administration 'is looking for a reason not to impose tariffs on the EU'. But Ms Peisch, now a partner at the Wiley Rein law firm, added: 'How motivated is the US to come to a deal with the EU?' Mr Trump, after all, has longstanding grievances and complaints about EU trade practices. One target of his ire is the value-added tax. Mr Trump and his advisers consider VATs unfair protectionism because they are levied on US products. But VATs are set at a national level, not by the EU, and apply to domestic and imported products alike, so they have not traditionally been considered a trade barrier. There is little chance governments will overhaul their tax systems to appease Mr Trump. Likewise, the Europeans are likely to balk at US demands to scrap food and safety regulations that Washington views as trade barriers. These include bans on hormone-raised beef, chlorinated chicken and genetically modified foods. 'When you start talking about chickens or GMOs or automobile safety standards, you're talking about the ways countries choose to regulate their economies,' Ms Peisch said. 'We think that's protectionist. They think it's keeping their citizens healthy … It's been a sore point for 60 years.'

Trump says Putin told him Russia will respond to Ukrainian attack on airfields
Trump says Putin told him Russia will respond to Ukrainian attack on airfields

Leader Live

time26 minutes ago

  • Leader Live

Trump says Putin told him Russia will respond to Ukrainian attack on airfields

The US president said in a social media post that 'it was a good conversation, but not a conversation that will lead to immediate peace.' The call that lasted for an hour and 15 minutes was Mr Trump's first known with Mr Putin since May 19. Mr Trump said he and Mr Putin also discussed Iran's nuclear programme. Ukraine's Security Service gave more details on Wednesday about its weekend drone strike on Russian air bases, which it claimed destroyed or damaged 41 Russian aircraft, including strategic bombers. The agency claimed the planes struck included A-50, Tu-95, Tu-22, Tu-160, An-12, and Il-78 aircraft, adding that artificial intelligence helped guide the drones thousands of kilometres from Ukraine. It also said it set off an explosion on Tuesday on the seabed beneath the Kerch Bridge, a vital transport link between Russia and illegally annexed Crimea, claiming it caused damage to the structure. But Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said on Wednesday that there was no damage. Russia's Defence Ministry said on Wednesday that its troops have taken control of another village in Ukraine's northern Sumy region, on the border with Russia. Mr Putin announced on May 22 that Russian troops aim to create a buffer zone that might help prevent Ukrainian cross-border attacks. Since then, Russia's Ministry of Defence claims its forces have taken control of nine Sumy villages. Mr Trump says part of his call with Mr Putin was focused on Iran and 'the fact that time is running out on Iran's decision pertaining to nuclear weapons, which must be made quickly!' Mr Trump said in a post on his social media site that he told Russia's president 'that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon and, on this, I believe that we were in agreement'. He said Mr Putin suggested 'that he will participate in the discussions with Iran' and could perhaps 'be helpful in getting this brought to a rapid conclusion'. Mr Trump previously boasted that a major announcement on Iran was coming – but none has materialised. He suggested in his latest post that Iran has been slow-walking their decision 'and we will need a definitive answer in a very short period of time!'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store