Inside Putin's lavish apartment: Paintings, home church and grand white piano
All eyes are currently on Vladimir Putin's residence, as the Russian President has finally given the public a glimpse of what's inside through the eyes and cameras of Russian journalist Zarubin. Putin spoke to the cameras, welcoming Zarubin inside his abode, with large gold-framed mirrors, gold chandeliers, and exotic-looking plants in the background.
Putin's home defines elegance and striking beauty if the glimpses of the apartment are closely observed. The Russian President also admitted that his residence is not far away from the Kremlin, his Presidential headquarters. The snippets of this interview between Putin and Zarubin surfaced online, while a full version of it is slated to be released this Sunday.
The first thing that catches the attention is the elegant portrait of Russian Emperor Alexander III is placed prominently on a table. Then comes a white grand piano situated right by the window. When asked if he gets time to play it, Putin sadly responded saying that he rarely gets time. If these were not all, the apartment boasts a library with a special wooden touch, two luxurious bedrooms, and even a small 'home church'.
ALSO READ | Golden Retriever's special mission goes viral, keeps bringing bunnies home
This apartment has been a witness to negotiation talks with China's Xi Jinping back in 2023, when the President invited the Chinese Premier to his apartment. Putin had even stated after the negotiation talks in 2023, that the two leaders sat by the fireplace in his apartment and gradually discussed about things over tea.
This is just one of Putin's many homes where he has undertaken architectural projects. Only last year, he reportedly revamped his billion-dollar palace, getting rid of the existing gold ornaments and decorations. He then replaced them with traditional materials and imagery, according to a Daily Mail UK report from 2024.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
38 minutes ago
- Mint
The US and China Are Talking Again. Don't Call It a Reset
Trade negotiations between the US and China in London mark a cautious step toward easing tensions, but not a new beginning. It's a short-term strategy to avoid further deterioration — a fragile truce that could be reversed at any moment. At the core is a deeper issue: National security. Both sides now view trade through that lens, and handshakes won't fix it. Washington must recognize that Beijing seeks respect and won't accept a one-sided, long-term deal. China, for its part, needs to understand that it won't be business as usual — and that the US will expect more concessions and market access to the world's second-largest economy. The alternative is continued hostility, which will make for a more chaotic global trade environment, and a more dangerous world. The London climbdown is positive, but precarious. Rapprochement has turned into recrimination before. After the initial euphoria of a trade-war ceasefire agreed in Geneva in May, both sides accused the other of reneging on a deal to temporarily lower tariffs that had climbed well above 100%. Now negotiators say they've reached an agreement in principle on a framework to deescalate trade tensions, based on the consensus forged in Geneva. Delegations from both sides will take the proposal back to their respective leaders, following nearly 20 hours of talks over two days. 'Once the presidents approve it, we will then seek to implement it,' US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said. The full details of the accord weren't immediately available, but US officials said they 'absolutely expect' that issues around shipments of rare earth minerals and magnets will be resolved. There are no winners or losers coming out of this, notes Steve Okun, founder and chief executive officer of AC Advisors. The fundamental questions are much larger than any round of talks. 'The Trump administration needs to decide whether it views Beijing as a strategic competitor, or an existential threat,' he told me. 'Washington can take the economic hit from a trade war, but politically, Xi Jinping can suffer the hit for longer than Trump can. So one side has economic leverage, and the other political leverage — that's a standstill, for now.' The Chinese president is biding his time, despite a sluggish economy. In the most recent sign of how the trade war is hurting, exports rose less than expected last month. The worst drop in US-bound shipments since February 2020 — the outbreak of the pandemic — counteracted strong demand from elsewhere. Still, sales to other markets are providing much-needed support for an economy stuck in deflation and struggling with weak domestic demand. Beijing is sticking to its narrative that this trade war is Washington's problem, and that China is being unfairly targeted. A recent Xinhua commentary warned that America's security-focused view of economic issues risks undermining global cooperation. There is a pathway to peaceful coexistence, but compromises are required, notes Ryan Hass of the Brookings Institution. To break through with Xi, Trump will need to acknowledge that both countries are major powers. Neither can dictate terms to the other. Both would be hurt by high tariffs on each other's goods — but on their own, they're not enough to force capitulation. The US public has no appetite for a broader conflict with Beijing. Disapproval of China's behavior may be high, but the top priority is still to avoid war. Americans are clear in their desire to manage competition without that escalating into open conflict. For that to happen, Washington must recognize that Beijing craves respect. The US would be wise to pay heed to the Chinese concept of mianzi or 'face' — Xi will only agree to a long-term deal that he can pitch at home and abroad as a win. Beijing has taken lessons from Trump's first trade war, and judged that agreement to be one-sided in favor of Washington. It won't make that mistake again. China doesn't always like reciprocating face, but officials would be wise to give some to Trump, too. His tariffs have been outlandish, but his supporters also demand that he show strength, not concession. Beijing should be able to understand what happens when politicians need to cater to public pressure. Neither side has the upper hand to make the other come away an obvious loser. At the most, the London talks might have achieved just enough to help shape the future on a less-hostile basis. That in itself is progress — but it would be a mistake to call this moment a reset. More From Bloomberg Opinion: This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners. Karishma Vaswani is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asia politics with a special focus on China. Previously, she was the BBC's lead Asia presenter and worked for the BBC across Asia and South Asia for two decades. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Trade breakthrough: US, China agree on 'framework' to ease trade tensions; 'we feel positive'
The United States and China have agreed on a framework to move forward on trade, marking a potential turning point in the prolonged 'trade war' between the two nations. The announcement came after two days of talks at London's Lancaster House. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now 'We have reached a framework to implement the Geneva consensus,' said US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick. While the plan still requires approval from both presidents, Lutnick expressed confidence that issues such as rare earth exports would be resolved. 'Once the presidents approve it, we will then seek to implement it,' he said. US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said the US was moving 'as quickly as we can,' adding: 'We feel positive about engaging with the Chinese.' 'I think the talks are going really, really well,' Lutnick told reporters during the discussions, which lasted nearly 20 hours. 'Everybody's got their head down working closely.' Talks resumed in London after President Donald Trump and President Xi Jinping spoke by phone last week, attempting to put relations back on track. Trump said he wants to 'open up China' to US products, warning, 'If we don't open up China, maybe we won't do anything.' China's lead negotiator Li Chenggang confirmed both sides would now consult their respective leaders.
India.com
3 hours ago
- India.com
Putin Strikes Back – But Has Ukraine Already Broken The Kremlin's Spine?
New Delhi: Three years of war. Endless airstrikes. Then came June 1. Dozens of drones, hidden in trucks, deep inside Russia. Then, all at once, they moved. Airbases targeted. Bombers hit. At least 12 wiped out. Ukraine called it Operation 'Spiderweb'. A win for Kyiv. A message to Moscow. The game had changed. Then came the warning. Putin told US President Donald Trump, 'We will have to respond.' On June 5 night, missiles and drones rained down on Kyiv. It was brutal. It was loud. But not new. After three years of war, Ukraine had seen this before. Olha, 67, stayed up all night. Kyiv resident. No stranger to explosions. She told CNN, 'If this is retaliation, we will see more like it. Monthly. Maybe more.' But many now wonder – is this all Putin can do? Experts say he is boxed in. The bigger response means admitting the strike hurt. That Ukraine outmaneuvered him. That is not how the Kremlin plays. Even in public meetings, Putin's ministers talked about bridge collapses. Not a word on 'Spiderweb'. Foreign Minister Lavrov mentioned 'criminal provocations'. Nothing else. No spotlight on Ukraine's drone operation. No sign of bombers lost. Just silence. Russia watchers call it a strategy. 'Putin wants this to disappear. A major response would expose the damage. That is not the image the Kremlin wants,' CNN quotes Kateryna Stepanenko from the Institute for the Study of War as saying. But what if Putin wanted to retaliate? He is already firing more drones than ever. On May 31, Russia launched 472 drones. A record. Then 479 on June 1. Another record. 'How would we even know if Putin escalated? They are already hitting malls and apartments. What is left?' ' asked William Alberque from the Stimson Center. Some pro-war bloggers had ideas. Nuclear threats. New missiles. One suggested the Oreshnik – rarely used. But experts doubt it would work. According to Mark Galeotti, a Russia analyst, 'It is not a precision weapon. It will not reach deep bunkers. If Putin uses it, it has to count.' Galeotti thinks Ukraine's spy agency, the SBU, could be a target. But it will not be easy. 'He is burned through most of his escalation tools. That limits what he can do next,' Galeotti said. Still, the strikes may not be over. Russia's Ministry of Defense said it hit an airfield in Rivne on Sunday. Ukraine's air force confirmed the attack and called it 'one of the biggest ever'. Air defenses held up. But not enough. 'You cannot shoot down everything,' said air force rep Yuriy Ihnat. So what now? On the headlines, Ukraine's winning. On the ground, it is tougher. Russia's pushing north. Near Sumy. Just 12 miles from the city. Now claiming moves into central Ukraine, too. 'Putin may accept pain at home. All for a slow, steady push forward,' Galeotti told CNN. Is 'Spiderweb' a one-off? Or the first of many? It took 18 months to plan. What else is cooking? Alberque asks the same thing – 'How many other drone ops are halfway there?' Two days after the bombing raid, Ukraine tried again, targeting the Kerch bridge. It was not destroyed. But the message was clear. Ukraine can hit back. And that may force Putin's hand. 'If these strikes keep humiliating the Kremlin. Putin will feel pressure to hit harder, not just more often, but differently,' said Alberque. Strongman politics. That's Putin's brand. 'He needs to look like a wartime leader. Not someone getting outplayed by drones,' Alberque told the channel.
