China's J-10 ‘Dragon' shows teeth in India-Pakistan combat debut
When countries go to war, their allies watch and learn. PHOTO: REUTERS
Even before the fog of war had begun to lift, the Chengdu Aircraft Company's stock had started to soar. Almost three decades after first taking to the skies, the Chinese plane maker's first fighter jet, the J-10 Vigorous Dragon, had finally seen combat – and survived.
By 4am on May 7, Chinese diplomats in Islamabad were at the Foreign Ministry, poring over results from the first face-off between modern Chinese warplanes, replete with missiles and radars untested in battle, and advanced Western hardware deployed by India.
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
17 minutes ago
- Straits Times
China's factory-gate deflation worst in 22 months as economic headwinds mount
Cooling factory activity highlights the impact of US tariffs on the world's largest manufacturing hub. PHOTO: AFP BEIJING - China's producer deflation deepened to its worst level in almost two years in May while consumer prices extended declines, as the economy grappled with headwinds from trade tensions and a prolonged housing downturn. Uncertainties from a tariff war with the United States and weak consumption at home have rattled sentiment and fuelled expectations of more policy stimulus to combat deflationary pressures. The producer price index fell 3.3 per cent in May from a year earlier, worse than a 2.7 per cent decline in April and the deepest contraction in 22 months, National Bureau of Statistics data showed on June 9. That compared with an estimated 3.2 per cent fall in a Reuters poll. Cooling factory activity highlights the impact of US tariffs on the world's largest manufacturing hub, dampening faster services growth as suspense lingers over the outcome of US-China trade talks set to resume in London on June 9. In a phone call on June 5, US President Donald Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping discussed trade tensions and critical minerals, leaving key issues for further negotiations. The consumer price index dipped 0.1 per cent in May from a year earlier, after falling by the same amount in April and slightly better than a Reuters poll forecast of a 0.2 per cent decline. CPI slid 0.2 per cent on a monthly basis, compared with a 0.1 per cent increase in April, and matched economists' predictions of a 0.2 per cent decline. Retail sales growth slowed last month as spending continued to lag amid job insecurity and stagnant new home prices despite a recent raft of support measures. With households cautious about spending due to income pressures, some companies have resorted to price discounts to boost sales, prompting the authorities to urge an end to the auto industry's bruising price wars. The core inflation measure, excluding volatile food and fuel prices, registered a 0.6 per cent year-on-year rise, slightly faster than a 0.5 per cent increase in April. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
18 minutes ago
- Straits Times
LA's Korean American community on edge amid immigration raids, protests
Police officers are enveloped in a cloud of smoke from tear gas while guarding a highway onramp during a protest on June 8. PHOTO: REUTERS SEOUL - US federal immigration authorities conducted a series of coordinated enforcement operations across Los Angeles on June 6, including in neighborhoods with a high concentration of Korean American-owned businesses. The move has raised concerns within the local Korean diaspora. The raids reportedly targeted areas in downtown Los Angeles' fashion district, commonly referred to as the 'Jobber Market', where several Korean American-run wholesale clothing stores are located. In a statement released the same day, the Korean American Federation of Los Angeles (Kafla) condemned the enforcement actions, describing them as 'unilateral and heavy-handed'. 'These actions by ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) disregard proper legal procedures,' the organisation said. 'We urgently call on our local elected officials to take action and provide solutions to this crisis. In addition, we will work closely with local organisations to ensure that no individuals are unjustly harmed.' 'Even individuals who struggle with English or are unable to provide identification immediately are reportedly being arrested or detained first,' the organisation added. 'This has caused significant harm and confusion, not only among Korean nationals but also among local residents.' The Kafla, founded in 1962, is a non-profit organisation that serves the Korean American community of Los Angeles. Ms Sydney Kamlager-Dove, a democrat representing California's 37th congressional district, which includes a significant Korean American population, said she was monitoring the situation closely. She specifically pointed to Korean American-owned businesses in her district. 'I am closely monitoring the ICE raids that are currently happening across Los Angeles, including at a Korean American-owned store in my district,' she wrote on social platform X. According to The Associated Press, immigration authorities arrested 44 individuals during the operation. However, as of the evening of June 6, the Korean Consulate General in Los Angeles said no Korean nationals or Korean Americans had been confirmed among those detained. THE KOREA HERALD/ ASIA NEWS NETWORK Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
33 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Does US law allow Trump to send troops to quell protests?
Members of the California National Guard stand guard, as a demonstration against federal immigration sweeps takes place in Los Angeles on June 8. PHOTO: REUTERS Does US law allow Trump to send troops to quell protests? US President Donald Trump has deployed National Guard troops to California after two days of protests by hundreds of demonstrators against immigration raids, saying that the protests interfered with federal law enforcement and framing them as a possible 'form of rebellion' against the authority of the US government. California Governor Gavin Newsom on June 8 said he had formally requested that the Trump administration rescind "its unlawful deployment of troops in Los Angeles County" and return them to his command. What laws did Mr Trump cite to justify the move? Mr Trump cited Title 10 of the US Code, a federal law that outlines the role of the US Armed Forces, in his June 7 order to call members of the California National Guard into federal service. A provision of Title 10 - Section 12406 - allows the president to deploy National Guard units into federal service if the US is invaded, there is a 'rebellion or danger of rebellion' or the president is 'unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States.' What are National Guard troops allowed to do under the law cited in Mr Trump's order? An 1878 law, the Posse Comitatus Act, generally forbids the US military, including the National Guard, from taking part in civilian law enforcement. Section 12406 does not override that prohibition, but it allows the troops to protect federal agents who are carrying out law enforcement activity and to protect federal property. For example, National Guard troops cannot arrest protesters, but they could protect US Immigration and Customs Enforcement who are carrying out arrests. What are the implications for freedom of speech? The First Amendment of the US Constitution guarantees the right to assembly, freedom of speech and the press. Experts have said that Mr Trump's decision to have US troops respond to protests is an ominous sign for how far the president is willing to go to repress political speech and activity that he disagrees with or that criticises his administration's policies. Is Mr Trump's move susceptible to legal challenges? Four legal experts from both left- and right-leaning advocacy organisations have cast doubt on Mr Trump's use of Title 10 in response to immigration protests calling it inflammatory and reckless, especially without the support of California's Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom, who has said Mr Trump's actions would only escalate tensions. The protests in California do not rise to the level of 'rebellion' and do not prevent the federal government from executing the laws of the US, experts said. Title 10 also says "orders for these purposes shall be issued through the governors of the States," but legal experts said that language might not be an obstacle. Legislative history suggests that those words were likely meant to reflect the norms of how National Guard troops are typically deployed, rather than giving a governor the option to not comply with a president's decision to deploy troops. Could California sue to challenge Mr Trump's move? California could file a lawsuit, arguing that deployment of National Guard troops was not justified by Title 10 because there was no 'rebellion' or threat to law enforcement. A lawsuit might take months to resolve, and the outcome would be uncertain. Because the protests may be over before a lawsuit is resolved, the decision to sue might be more of a political question than a legal one, experts said. What other laws could Mr Trump invoke to direct the National Guard or other US military troops? Mr Trump could take a more far-reaching step by invoking the Insurrection Act of 1792, which would allow troops to directly participate in civilian law enforcement, for which there is little recent precedent. Casting protests as an 'insurrection' that requires the deployment of troops against US citizens would be riskier legal territory, one legal expert said, in part because mostly peaceful protests and minor incidents aren't the sort of thing that the Insurrection Act were designed to address. The Insurrection Act has been used by past presidents to deploy troops within the US in response to crises like the 1794 Whiskey Rebellion and the rise of the Ku Klux Klan in the immediate aftermath of the American Civil War. The law was last invoked by President George H.W. Bush in 1992, when the governor of California requested military aid to suppress unrest in Los Angeles following the Rodney King trial. But, the last time a president deployed the National Guard in a state without a request from that state's governor was 1965, when President Lyndon Johnson sent troops to protect civil rights demonstrators in Montgomery, Alabama. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
