Malaysia wants Myanmar ceasefire extended amid ASEAN ban on coup leaders
Malaysia has urged for the extension and expansion of a post-earthquake ceasefire in Myanmar due to run out by the end of May, as ongoing fighting calls into question its effectiveness.
Malaysian Foreign Minister Mohamad Hasan issued the call in a meeting with fellow Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) foreign ministers in Kuala Lumpur on Sunday, a day before the leaders' summit.
The regional bloc has so far led fruitless diplomatic efforts to end Myanmar's conflict since the military staged a coup and deposed civilian leader Aung San Suu Kyi in February 2021. Myanmar's failure to implement a five-point peace deal reached in April 2021 has led ASEAN to exclude the coup leaders from attending its annual meeting.
'We call on the stakeholders in Myanmar to cease hostilities, and to extend and expand the ceasefire, to facilitate the long and difficult path towards recovery, and ease the suffering of the people of Myanmar,' Mohamad said in his opening remarks.
He proposed that the ceasefire be extended and expanded 'beyond the currently affected zones'.
Malaysia currently holds the rotating chairmanship of ASEAN.
Mohamad earlier said the bloc has to step up efforts as Myanmar's problems had spilled over borders, with a growing number of refugees fleeing to neighbouring ASEAN nations and rising trans-border crime.
Malaysia's efforts now focus on de-escalation of violence and greater access to humanitarian aid, but he said plans for political dialogue between the conflicting parties would be challenging due to a 'trust deficit'.
Senior General Min Aung Hlaing-led military government initially declared a truce in the many-sided civil war after a massive earthquake in late March killed nearly 3,800 people and left tens of thousands homeless.
The truce has been extended before, although conflict monitors say fighting has continued, including regular military government air attacks.
In April, Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim met Min Aung Hlaing in Bangkok and urged him to respect the truce.
Anwar said after the meeting that ASEAN had expressed 'concern' and wanted to slowly build consensus to ensure 'fair and free elections' – something analysts have said will be difficult, if not impossible, to achieve.
ASEAN's longstanding policy of noninterference in the domestic affairs of its member states has also hampered it from helping resolve the conflict.
The United Nations and independent conflict monitors say the military government has continued its deadly campaign of aerial bombardment despite the armistice.
In mid-May, witnesses said, a military air attack hit a school near the earthquake's epicentre in Sagaing region, killing 22 people, including 20 children.
Numerous anti-coup and ethnic armed groups have made their own pledges to pause hostilities.
However, some residents in eastern Myanmar said they have been displaced as anti-coup forces have also besieged military-held towns on a lucrative trade route towards neighbouring Thailand.
Myanmar's military government has announced plans to hold an election around the end of the year.
But the opposition 'National Unity Government' has urged the public and political parties to boycott any poll organised by the military government.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
3 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
‘You are not alone', diplomat tells Palestinians after UN vote
NewsFeed 'You are not alone', diplomat tells Palestinians after UN vote After the US again blocked a UN resolution on a ceasefire in Gaza, one diplomat said the majority support at the Security Council was a message of solidarity to the Palestinian people.
Al Jazeera
4 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Photos: Myanmar's traditional sport endangered by war and rattan shortage
Mastering control of the ever rising and falling rattan chinlone ball instils patience, a veteran of Myanmar's traditional sport says. 'Once you get into playing the game, you forget everything,' 74-year-old Win Tint says. 'You concentrate only on your touch, and you concentrate only on your style.' Chinlone, Myanmar's national game, traces its roots back centuries. Described as a fusion of sport and art, it is often accompanied by music and typically sees men and women playing in distinct ways. Teams of men form a circle, passing the ball among themselves using stylised movements of their feet, knees and heads in a game of 'keepy-uppy' with a scoring system that remains inscrutable to outsiders. Women, meanwhile, play solo in a fashion reminiscent of circus acts – kicking the ball tens of thousands of times per session while walking tightropes, spinning umbrellas and balancing on chairs placed atop beer bottles. Participation has declined in recent years with the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, followed by the 2021 military coup and subsequent civil conflict. Poverty is on the rise, and artisans face mounting challenges in sourcing materials to craft the balls. Variants of the hands-free sport, colloquially known as caneball, are played widely across Southeast Asia. In Thailand, Malaysia and Indonesia, participants use their feet and heads to send the ball over a net in the volleyball-style game 'sepak takraw'. In Laos, it is known as 'kataw' while Filipinos play 'sipa', meaning kick. In China, it is common to see people kicking weighted shuttlecocks in parks. Myanmar's version is believed to date back 1,500 years. Evidence for its longevity is seen in a French archaeologist's discovery of a replica silver chinlone ball at a pagoda built during the Pyu era, which stretched from 200 BC to 900 AD. Originally, the sport was played as a casual pastime, a form of exercise and for royal amusement. In 1953, however, the game was codified with formal rules and a scoring system, part of efforts to define Myanmar's national culture after independence from Britain. 'No one else will preserve Myanmar's traditional heritage unless the Myanmar people do it,' player Min Naing, 42, says. Despite ongoing conflict, players continue to congregate beneath motorway flyovers, around street lamps dimmed by wartime blackouts and on purpose-made chinlone courts – often open-sided metal sheds with concrete floors. 'I worry about this sport disappearing,' master chinlone ball maker Pe Thein says while labouring in a sweltering workshop in Hinthada, 110km (68 miles) northwest of Yangon. 'That's the reason we are passing it on through our handiwork.' Seated cross-legged, men shave cane into strips, curve them with a hand crank and deftly weave them into melon-sized balls with pentagonal holes before boiling them in vats of water to enhance their durability. 'We check our chinlone's quality as if we're checking diamonds or gemstones,' the 64-year-old Pe Thein says. 'As we respect the chinlone, it respects us back.' Each ball takes about two hours to produce and brings business-owner Maung Kaw $2.40. But supplies of the premium rattan he seeks from Rakhine state in western Myanmar are becoming scarce. Fierce fighting between military forces and opposition groups that now control nearly all of the state has made supplies precarious. Farmers are too frightened to venture into the jungle battlegrounds to cut cane, Maung Kaw says, which jeopardises his livelihood.
Al Jazeera
5 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Trump is letting Putin win
Russian and Ukrainian delegations met in Istanbul for the second time in a month on June 2 to explore the possibility of a ceasefire. The talks lasted just over an hour and, once again, produced no meaningful progress. As with the May 16 negotiations, both sides claimed they had laid the groundwork for prisoner exchanges. But despite Ukraine's offer to hold another meeting before the end of June, a deep and unbridgeable divide remains between Kyiv and Moscow. More meetings are unlikely to change that. Russia continues to demand Kyiv's capitulation to the full list of conditions President Vladimir Putin set at the war's outset: Ukrainian neutrality, a government reshaped to suit Moscow's interests, and the surrender of the Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhia and Kherson regions. Between the two rounds of talks, Putin even raised the stakes, adding a demand for a 'buffer zone' in northern Ukraine. Kyiv, meanwhile, remains resolute. It refuses to cede any territory and maintains that a full ceasefire along all fronts is a non-negotiable precondition for serious negotiations. Still, both sides appear prepared to continue the diplomatic charade. That's because these talks are not truly about achieving peace or securing a lasting bilateral agreement. Neither side is genuinely negotiating with the other. Instead, both are using the forum to send messages to the United States – and to Donald Trump, in particular. This dynamic persists despite Trump's recent efforts to distance himself from the war he once claimed he could end within 24 hours of returning to the White House. That shift in rhetoric has been echoed by key figures in his administration. Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who just six months ago represented opposite ends of the Republican spectrum on Ukraine – with Vance nearly endorsing surrender to Putin, and Rubio among the Senate's most vocal Ukraine hawks – have both signalled that Trump's White House is no longer interested in mediating the conflict. Reflecting that disengagement, there was no high-level prenegotiation meeting between US and Ukrainian officials in Turkiye ahead of the latest talks, unlike those held in May. Yet despite Rubio's apparent reversal – likely intended to align with Trump – Ukraine still enjoys broad support in the US Senate, including from senior Republicans. A bipartisan bill aimed at codifying existing sanctions on Russia and imposing new ones – thereby limiting Trump's power to roll them back – has garnered 81 Senate co-sponsors. The bill's authors, Senators Lindsey Graham (R–South Carolina) and Richard Blumenthal (D-Connecticut), recently travelled to Kyiv to reaffirm their backing. Graham has suggested the bill could move forward in the coming weeks. Still, Ukraine knows the bill stands little chance in the House of Representatives without Trump's blessing. Despite Trump's enduring animosity towards Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, Kyiv has recently adopted a more deferential posture, particularly after their disastrous February meeting in Washington. The Ukrainian government quickly signed and ratified the so-called 'minerals deal' that Trump demanded last month. A subsequent meeting between the two leaders – held on the sidelines of Pope Francis's funeral – was notably more productive. So far, Kyiv's strategy of appeasement has yielded little change in Trump's approach. While Trump has occasionally hinted at taking a tougher stance on Putin – usually in response to particularly egregious Russian attacks on Ukrainian civilians – he consistently deflects when asked for specifics. For months, he has promised to reveal his plan for Ukraine 'in about two weeks,' a vague assurance that remains unfulfilled. A new sanctions package reportedly prepared by his own team over a month ago still sits untouched. Hoping that mounting battlefield violence or bipartisan pressure from the US Senate might force Trump to act, Kyiv presses on with negotiations. Just one day before the Istanbul talks, Russia launched a record-setting overnight assault on Ukraine, firing more than 430 missiles and drones. Ukraine responded forcefully: on June 1, it conducted a large-scale drone strike deep inside Russia, destroying dozens of military aircraft, including airborne command platforms and nuclear-capable bombers. Yet these high-profile losses have done little to shift Putin's strategy. He continues to use the negotiation process as a smokescreen, providing Trump with political cover for his inaction. Meanwhile, Russian forces are advancing, making incremental gains in northern Ukraine's Sumy region – where they hope to establish a 'buffer zone' – and pushing forward on the southwestern Donetsk front. Ultimately, Ukraine's ability to strike deep inside Russian territory, including potentially vulnerable targets like oil infrastructure, may have more bearing on the war's trajectory than any outcome from the Istanbul talks. Yet neither military escalation nor stalled diplomacy seems likely to bring a swift end to the conflict. Trump says he abhors the civilian toll of this war, even if he stops short of blaming Putin for starting it. But it is Trump's lack of strategy – his hesitation, his mixed signals, his refusal to lead – that is prolonging the conflict, escalating its brutality and compounding its risks for global stability. Trump's advisers may call it 'peace through strength,' but what we are witnessing is paralysis through posturing. Russia's delegation in Istanbul was never a step towards resolution – it was a diplomatic decoy, shielding a brutal military advance. If Trump refuses to back a serious escalation in pressure on Moscow – through expanded sanctions and renewed military aid to Kyiv – he won't just fail to end the war. He will become complicit in prolonging it. The choice before him is clear: lead with resolve, or let history record that under his watch, weakness spoke louder than peace. The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera's editorial stance.
