logo
The Catholic Church after Pope Francis

The Catholic Church after Pope Francis

Washington Post21-04-2025

You're reading the Prompt 2025 newsletter. Sign up to get it in your inbox.
Pope Francis died at the Vatican early Monday at age 88. Francis's 12-year papacy ushered the Catholic Church into a contemporary era: serving as first pontiff from Latin America, Francis preached a tolerance that often went against the grain of others in the church hierarchy and elevated the plight of the poor and the Global South. In the coming weeks, the College of Cardinals will begin the process of electing a new pope who could extend Francis's progressive legacy or return the church closer to its more dogmatic tradition. I'm joined by my colleagues E.J. Dionne Jr., a fellow 'cradle Catholic,' and Ramesh Ponnuru, a convert, to discuss what's next for the Catholic Church.
💬 💬 💬
Karen Tumulty Let's get started by reflecting a bit on Francis's legacy. When he was elected in 2013, expectations were that elderly Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio of Buenos Aires would be a placeholder. He was an outsider who wasn't really part of the Vatican power structure. E.J., expectations were pretty low, weren't they?
E.J. Dionne Jr. His election was certainly a surprise to many, as you say — he was not at the top of the pundits' lists — but he had reportedly given Pope Benedict a 'horse race' in the 2005 conclave, as someone put it. He was seen as an advocate of a more decentralized church and very dedicated to the marginalized. My Post column when he was elected in 2013 ran under the headline, 'Francis, a pope of the poor.' So, I had pretty high expectations, especially after he picked the name Francis!
Ramesh PonnuruSome of those same pundits pointed to his age as a sign that he would be a caretaker pope, which I never understood given modern life expectancies. But Francis pretty quickly transcended those expectations. He enjoyed a kind of honeymoon in the first years of his pontificate. As the first modern non-European pope, he was thought to symbolize a transition to a church that included millions of new brown and Black Catholics. Western progressives, meanwhile, thought he would change the church in a way they welcomed after decades in which such hopes had been doused. But especially at the beginning, there was enough ambiguity in his actions and statements that more conservative Catholics stayed open to him. This seemed like it could lead to a refreshment of the church.
Karen Tumulty So true. And when it came to doctrine, he didn't make major changes on issues such as the role of women in the church. He preached tolerance of LGBTQ+ Catholics, but did not alter the church's formal position that homosexual acts are a 'grave depravity.'
Story continues below advertisement
Advertisement
E.J. Dionne Jr.Ramesh is right about how refreshing Francis was. He sent a powerful message on Holy Thursday in 2013 when, as part of the traditional ceremony, he washed and kissed the feet not of priests but of 12 young people at a youth prison. Among them were two women and two Muslims. It told us a lot about the kind of pope he intended to be.
Ramesh PonnuruThe moment that sticks with me from those early years was Francis's embrace of Vinicio Riva, who had been disfigured by a rare medical condition. That image was a powerful witness to Christian love.
Karen TumultyAnd there was a lightness and joy to him. I loved his December op-ed about the link between faith and … humor.
E.J. Dionne Jr.Yes, he was not deadly serious all the time. I will always love the fact that, as I mentioned in my column on Monday, he will be the only pope who ever condemned 'sourpusses.' (Maybe his translator also had a sense of humor!) He spoke of 'the joy of the Gospel' and against 'theatrical severity.' Our friend and colleague, the late Mike Gerson, liked to call him a 'troublemaker.'
Karen TumultySo, what now? To be part of the Conclave (loved that movie!), a cardinal has to be younger than 80. Francis appointed 108 of the 135 cardinals who are eligible to vote. Will they continue his legacy?
Ramesh PonnuruHaving said that Francis's pontificate began in promise, I'm sorry to say that, in some respects, it ended in disappointment. He did not overcome the divisions in the church within the rich world. Rather, he troubled Catholic conservatives without making the changes that progressives wanted, creating a sense of instability rather than resolution. Hence the unfortunate ideological framing that is likely to dominate coverage of this conclave. But the demographic and geographic transition within the church has proceeded, and the church in Africa and Asia might not be preoccupied by the same issues that divide left and right here.
Karen TumultyThat's right! This Conclave is going to look like none we have seen before. More global; less White. And yet — still no women. Foot-washing is great symbolism, but it is not empowering.
E.J. Dionne Jr.The enormous demographic change in the College of Cardinals that began before Francis but that he hugely accelerated is very important. As Father Tom Reese wrote in America magazine last fall: 'For the first time in history, a majority of the cardinals at the next conclave will be from outside of Europe, quite a change from the conclave that elected Pius XII in 1939, which was 89 percent European. More than half (56%) of the cardinals at that conclave were Italian.'
E.J. Dionne Jr. If punditry is always hard at Conclaves, it's especially difficult this time because many of the new cardinals in a far more global college have never met. In the past, the large role played by Italian prelates in the Vatican made them the power brokers. It is by no means clear who the power brokers will be this time — other than the Holy Spirit, of course.
E.J. Dionne Jr.Thanks to the 'Conclave' movie, lots of people now know who the 'camerlengo' is, the man (played by John Lithgow in the film) who runs things, including the Conclave itself. Americans will be interested that the camerlengo this time, Cardinal Kevin Farrell, was born in Ireland but served as a priest and bishop for many years in the Washington Archdiocese and in Dallas.
Ramesh PonnuruThe church in the United States and elsewhere remains badly scarred by the abuse scandal and the stubborn refusal of too many bishops to take it sufficiently seriously. (I speak as someone received into the church by Cardinal Theodore McCarrick, which I suppose demonstrates that the sacraments are valid no matter how disgraceful the man who administers them.) Among the high hopes for Pope Francis that did not come about was that he would clean house. His patronage of the Rev. Marko Rupnik, an abuser of nuns, stung every Catholic who thought that the princes of the church had learned something about this grave evil. The next pope, let us pray, will do better.
E.J. Dionne Jr.Francis moved in a better direction on the issues around the scandal over time, but it remains a very serious problem. And the steps on empowering women were real but far from what should happen.
Story continues below advertisement
Advertisement
Karen TumultySo, let's close with this question: What is the first big thing that the new guy will have to do — other than picking his name — that will signal the course on which he plans to take his papacy? (Speaking of names, there was once a Pope Hilarius.)
Ramesh PonnuruA crucial early decision for the next pope has very little to do with any culture-war issues. It is whether he will stand with the persecuted church, especially in China, or continue to seek accommodations with authorities who respect neither religious liberty nor the dignity of the human person.
E.J. Dionne Jr.I suspect that the non-European and non-North American cardinals will be broadly Francis-sympathizers on issues related to poverty, social justice and the climate. But the divisions around the role of women and LGBTQ+ issues cut across the regional divides. The dividing lines might be over whether to press forward with the progressive side of Francis's pontificate, to consolidate, or to roll back. One of the first two seems to me more probable.
E.J. Dionne Jr.You never want to take a job after someone who has left such a big mark. The comparisons almost always hurt the new person. It will be very hard to find anyone like Francis. I hope for someone who continues Francis's mission on behalf of the poor, the migrants, the marginalized and the planet. And while it makes some uncomfortable, I hope he leaves the tough debates we are having open. Francis did not create the divisions in the Church. He let the debates go forward. They need to play themselves out among the faithful and not just in the leadership.
Karen TumultyThat sounds like a good place to leave this. We will have so much to watch. Thanks so much for joining us today.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Fact Check: James Mattis' statement allegedly condemning Trump's actions during 2025 LA protests published 5 years earlier
Fact Check: James Mattis' statement allegedly condemning Trump's actions during 2025 LA protests published 5 years earlier

Yahoo

time44 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Fact Check: James Mattis' statement allegedly condemning Trump's actions during 2025 LA protests published 5 years earlier

Claim: Former U.S. Secretary of Defense James Mattis wrote a statement titled 'In Union There Is Strength' in which he condemned President Donald Trump's actions regarding the 2025 immigration protests in Los Angeles. Rating: What's True: Mattis truly authored such a statement. However... What's False: He didn't write it in 2025, nor did it have to do with immigration protests. Mattis wrote it five years earlier in response to Trump's actions during the George Floyd protests of June 2020. A rumor that circulated online in June 2025 claimed former U.S. Secretary of Defense James Mattis, a retired four-star Marine Corps general, released a statement condemning President Donald Trump for his actions during ongoing immigration protests in Los Angeles. The statement, titled "In Union There Is Strength," began, "I have watched this week's unfolding events, angry and appalled." It praised protesters for uniting and "unifying," and expressed opposition to Trump's call for deploying military force against people exercising their right to make their voices heard. For example, on June 10, the manager of a Facebook page posted (archived), "Former Defense Secretary and retired Marine Corps General James Mattis has released a statement about Trump's military coup." The post, displaying the statement and a photo of Mattis, received over 103,000 reactions and 59,000 shares in less than 24 hours. Other (archived) users (archived) copied and pasted similar text alongside pictures of Mattis on (archived) Bluesky, Facebook (archived), Instagram (archived), Reddit (archived), Threads (archived) and X (archived). Snopes readers also emailed to ask about the matter, for example, with one person inquiring, "Is the recent statement from General Mattis about unifying true or false?" (Feminist News/Facebook) Mattis truly authored the statement that condemned Trump's response to protesters, but he published it in June 2020 — not June 2025 — and was referring to Trump's actions regarding protests over the death of George Floyd. Floyd, a Black man, died on May 25, 2020, while in the custody of white police officers in Minneapolis. At the time, Trump threatened to deploy military force to combat violent protests if state and local officials declined to make use of active-duty troops. One particularly striking moment concerned the use of tear gas and flash-bangs against a largely peaceful gathering in Washington, after which Trump walked from the White House to St. John's Church, where he held up a Bible and posed for photos. Some (archived) users (archived) who posted in 2025 acknowledged Mattis' statement was five years old but argued it still applied to the more recent events, namely the Trump administration's deployment of more than 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines to provide security at immigration protests and operations in Los Angeles. California Gov. Gavin Newsom and L.A. Mayor Karen Bass both opposed the federal intervention. As of this writing, The Associated Press reported the usage of about 2,000 of the National Guard troops in L.A., while Marines resided at a nearby base. Snopes contacted Mattis by email to ask if he wished to comment on the immigration protests in L.A., and whether he believed his June 2020 statement was relevant to the events taking place in June 2025. We will update this story if we learn more. The Atlantic (archived), The New York Times (archived) and NPR (archived) host the full text of Mattis' "In Union There Is Strength." His statement from June 2020 reads: IN UNION THERE IS STRENGTH I have watched this week's unfolding events, angry and appalled. The words "Equal Justice Under Law" are carved in the pediment of the United States Supreme Court. This is precisely what protesters are rightly demanding. It is a wholesome and unifying demand — one that all of us should be able to get behind. We must not be distracted by a small number of lawbreakers. The protests are defined by tens of thousands of people of conscience who are insisting that we live up to our values — our values as people and our values as a nation. When I joined the military, some 50 years ago, I swore an oath to support and defend the Constitution. Never did I dream that troops taking that same oath would be ordered under any circumstance to violate the Constitutional rights of their fellow citizens — much less to provide a bizarre photo op for the elected commander-in-chief, with military leadership standing alongside. We must reject any thinking of our cities as a "battlespace" that our uniformed military is called upon to "dominate." At home, we should use our military only when requested to do so, on very rare occasions, by state governors. Militarizing our response, as we witnessed in Washington, D.C., sets up a conflict — a false conflict — between the military and civilian society. It erodes the moral ground that ensures a trusted bond between men and women in uniform and the society they are sworn to protect, and of which they themselves are a part. Keeping public order rests with civilian state and local leaders who best understand their communities and are answerable to them. James Madison wrote in Federalist 14 that "America united with a handful of troops, or without a single soldier, exhibits a more forbidding posture to foreign ambition than America disunited, with a hundred thousand veterans ready for combat." We do not need to militarize our response to protests. We need to unite around a common purpose. And it starts by guaranteeing that all of us are equal before the law. Instructions given by the military departments to our troops before the Normandy invasion reminded soldiers that "The Nazi slogan for destroying us ... was 'Divide and Conquer.' Our American answer is 'In Union there is Strength.'" We must summon that unity to surmount this crisis — confident that we are better than our politics. Donald Trump is the first president in my lifetime who does not try to unite the American people — does not even pretend to try. Instead he tries to divide us. We are witnessing the consequences of three years of this deliberate effort. We are witnessing the consequences of three years without mature leadership. We can unite without him, drawing on the strengths inherent in our civil society. This will not be easy, as the past few days have shown, but we owe it to our fellow citizens; to past generations that bled to defend our promise; and to our children. We can come through this trying time stronger, and with a renewed sense of purpose and respect for one another. The pandemic has shown us that it is not only our troops who are willing to offer the ultimate sacrifice for the safety of the community. Americans in hospitals, grocery stores, post offices, and elsewhere have put their lives on the line in order to serve their fellow citizens and their country. We know that we are better than the abuse of executive authority that we witnessed in Lafayette Square. We must reject and hold accountable those in office who would make a mockery of our Constitution. At the same time, we must remember Lincoln's "better angels," and listen to them, as we work to unite. Only by adopting a new path — which means, in truth, returning to the original path of our founding ideals — will we again be a country admired and respected at home and abroad. For further reading, Snopes reported the facts about Trump's deployment of military force for the June 2025 LA protests. Baldor, Lolita C., and Tara Copp. "Hegseth Defends Use of Troops to Protect Immigration Raids in Los Angeles." The Associated Press, 11 June 2025, Blood, Michael R. "California Governor Says 'democracy Is under Assault' by Trump as Feds Intervene in LA Protests." The Associated Press, 11 June 2025, Colvin, Jill, and Darlene Superville. "Tear Gas, Threats for Protesters before Trump Visits Church." The Associated Press, 2 June 2020, Gjelten, Tom. "Peaceful Protesters Tear-Gassed To Clear Way For Trump Church Photo-Op." NPR, 1 June 2020. NPR, Goldberg, Jeffrey. "James Mattis Denounces President Trump, Describes Him as a Threat to the Constitution." The Atlantic, 3 June 2020, Izzo, Jack. "Marjorie Taylor Greene Latest Public Figure to Falsely Claim George Floyd Died of a Drug Overdose." Snopes, 17 May 2025, LaMagdeleine, Izz Scott. "20 Rumors Involving George Floyd to Mark 5th Anniversary of Murder." Snopes, 25 May 2025, Mattis, James. In Union There Is Strength. The New York Times, NPR Staff. "READ: The Full Statement From Jim Mattis." NPR, 4 June 2020. NPR, Ray, Michael. "James Mattis | Facts, Biography, & Secretary of Defense | Britannica." Britannica, Seligman, Lara. "In Crisis Mode, Trump Again Leans on the Military." Politico, 1 June 2020,

Kim Kardashian, Demi Lovato, Eva Longoria and More Speak Out Against Trump's LA ICE Raids: ‘Those Are Not Criminals'
Kim Kardashian, Demi Lovato, Eva Longoria and More Speak Out Against Trump's LA ICE Raids: ‘Those Are Not Criminals'

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Kim Kardashian, Demi Lovato, Eva Longoria and More Speak Out Against Trump's LA ICE Raids: ‘Those Are Not Criminals'

Celebrities are making themselves known as vocal opponents of the ongoing ICE immigration raids as demonstrations continue in Los Angeles. 'There are ruthless attacks that are creating fear and chaos in our communities in the name of law and order,' rapper Doechii said while accepting her BET Award at the show Monday. 'Trump is using military forces to stop a protest, and I want y'all to consider what kind of government it appears to be when every time we exercise our democratic right to protest, the military is deployed against us. What type of government is that people are being swept up and torn from their families?' She continued: 'And I feel it's my responsibility to use this moment to speak up for all oppressed people, for Black people, for Latino people, for trans people, for the people in Gaza. We all deserve to live in hope and not in fear and I hope we stand together, my brothers and my sisters against hate and we protest against it.' Elsewhere, celebs like Kim Kardashian, Demi Lovato, John Leguizamo and more also spoke out on social media. 'What's happening in Los Angeles and across the country is heartbreaking.' Lovato wrote. 'Immigrants are a vital part of our community and the fabric of our country. While I feel powerless, I stand with those living in fear and hope that these resources can help in some way. Let's please continue to show up for one another and support our neighbors.' Eva Longoria called the raids 'inhumane' and 'un-American' in a video posted to her Instagram. 'We all can agree, nobody wants criminals in our country, nobody wants rapists, nobody wants drug dealers, nobody wants bad actors in our country- that's not what's happening,' Longoria said. 'These roundups are happening in birthday parties, in elementary school graduations, Home Depot. Those are not criminals. I hope that everyone has more compassion for this issue and realizes we have industries dependent on immigrant labor.' Kardashian posted similar thoughts to her Instagram Stories. 'When we're told that ICE exists to keep our country safe and remove violent criminals- great,' she said. 'But when we witness innocent, hardworking people being ripped from their families in inhumane ways, we have to speak up. We have to do what's right.' She added: 'Growing up in LA, I've seen how deeply immigrants are woven into the fabric of this city. They are our neighbors, friends, classmates, coworkers, and family. No matter where you fall politically, it's clear that our communities thrive because of the contributions of immigrants. We can't turn a blind eye when fear and injustice keep people from living their lives freely and safely. There HAS to be a BETTER way.' Leguizamo posted a video encouraging the protestors to keep at it as the raids drew on. 'Your protests are beautiful,' the actor said. 'Protesting is as American as apple pie. But Trump wants to create a situation. He wants to be able to call on the Insurrection Act. He wants to create martial law so he can take over every government in every city and every state, so don't give him that,' the actor pleaded to his followers. 'Don't give him what he wants. I mean, he's trampling on all our democratic values of due process, of listening to courts and the judiciary. Just stay calm, stay peaceful. Don't let don't give him what he wants.' The raids began late last week and sparked protesting over the weekend. President Trump mobilized 2,000 members of the National Guard to quell the gatherings – without consulting Governor Gavin Newsom – and then added an additional 700 marines to the mix on Monday. The protesting reached the point that LA Mayor Karen Bass placed a curfew downtown beginning Tuesday night. The post Kim Kardashian, Demi Lovato, Eva Longoria and More Speak Out Against Trump's LA ICE Raids: 'Those Are Not Criminals' appeared first on TheWrap.

The Washington Post has a new Opinion editor four months after Bezos touted ‘significant shift'
The Washington Post has a new Opinion editor four months after Bezos touted ‘significant shift'

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

The Washington Post has a new Opinion editor four months after Bezos touted ‘significant shift'

The Washington Post on Wednesday announced it has a new Opinion editor. The move comes four months after it announced a 'significant shift' to the Opinion page and the departure of its embattled section chief. Adam O'Neal, who currently serves as The Economist's Washington correspondent, will take over as the Post's top Opinion editor, the outlet announced in an X post that includes an introductory video from O'Neal. 'We're also going to be stalwart advocates of free markets and personal liberties. We'll be unapologetically patriotic, too,' O'Neal said in the video. 'Our philosophy will be rooted in fundamental optimism about the future of this country.' The Opinion section won't 'lecture' readers about ideologies or 'demand you think certain ways about policy,' O'Neal said. The stance falls in line with the vision articulated four months prior by the Post's owner, billionaire Amazon founder Jeff Bezos. Bezos also mentioned free markets and personal liberties when describing the section's new mandate, which drew backlash from some staffers — including from Marty Baron, the Post's revered former executive editor under whom the outlet won 11 Pulitzer Prizes — and praise from some conservatives. 'We are going to be writing every day in support and defense of two pillars: personal liberties and free markets,' Bezos wrote in a February X post. 'We'll cover other topics too of course, but viewpoints opposing those pillars will be left to be published by others.' As part of the February announcement, Bezos noted that David Shipley, O'Neal's predecessor, had been offered the opportunity to continue leading the section under the new directive but that Shipley had 'decided to step away.' Shipley's departure from the Post followed four months of mounting criticism from Post staffers and readers. The storied newspaper drew criticism for its eleventh-hour choice not to endorse then-Vice President Kamala Harris' presidential bid, which led to several editorial board members resigning and more than 200,000 subscribers canceling their digital subscriptions. Shipley also decided not to run a cartoon satirizing the relationship between Bezos and US President Donald Trump from Ann Telnaes, leading to the Pulitzer Prize-winning cartoonist's resignation. Since Shipley's departure, deputy Opinion editor Mary Duenwald has served as interim section chief. No start date has been announced for O'Neal. In a Wednesday email to staffers obtained by CNN, Will Lewis, the Post's chief executive and publisher, noted that O'Neal 'recognizes the importance of ensuring our opinion coverage is relevant, accessible, and consequential for readers who feel underserved.' 'His appointment is about more than just filling a role; it is about connecting our editorial voice to the real concerns and conversations happening across America,' Lewis said. In the email, Lewis similarly championed Bezos' mandate for the Opinion section: He said its new direction is not 'aligned to any political party' but instead presents 'an opportunity for our Opinion section to share the best of American values.' O'Neal's hiring comes just over two weeks after the Post offered voluntary buyouts to Opinion staffers, the Post's video and copy desks and any news employees who have been at the paper for 10 years or more. The buyout offers run through the end of July.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store