logo
Bougainville Independence Talks Underway At Military Camp Near Christchurch

Bougainville Independence Talks Underway At Military Camp Near Christchurch

Scoop18 hours ago

Article – RNZ
In 2019, 97.7 percent of Bougainvilleans voted for independence. RNZ Pacific
Bougainville independence talks have started just outside of Christchurch, in New Zealand's South Island, between the governments of Papua New Guinea and Bougainville.
In 2019, 97.7 percent of Bougainvilleans voted for independence. The referendum, though mandated by the 2001 Peace Agreement, was not binding.
Both governments are now debating the rules by which the results of a referendum on independence are tabled in parliament.
The discussions at Christchurch's Burnham Military Camp focus on finalising the process to bring the referendum results before PNG's Parliament.
Papua New Guinea Prime Minister James Marape called Burnham the spiritual home of the Bougainville peace process.
The military camp hosted pivotal talks in 1997 that helped end the Bougainville civil war.
Marape said the Era Kone Convenant committed both governments to present the referendum before PNG's parliament in 2025.
Bougainville has stated that it expects to be independent by 1 September 2027.
It has established a Constitution Commission and included it within the region's autonomous parliament.
The Christchurch meetings are closed to the media.
New Zealand's Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade refused to share with RNZ Pacific a list of who will be attending the meeting.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Reserve Bank reveals why Adrian Orr suddenly quit
Reserve Bank reveals why Adrian Orr suddenly quit

Otago Daily Times

timean hour ago

  • Otago Daily Times

Reserve Bank reveals why Adrian Orr suddenly quit

Adrian Orr, left, resigned as Reserve Bank governor in March this year, and Finance Minister Nicola Willis. Photo: RNZ The Reserve Bank has revealed a dispute over funding was behind Adrian Orr's abrupt resignation as governor. A raft of documents - released by New Zealand's central bank under the Official Information Act - reveal an "impasse" as Orr argued that Finance Minister Nicola Willis was not providing enough funding for the next five years. In an accompanying statement, an RBNZ spokesperson said it became clear in late February this year that the board - chaired by Neil Quigley - was willing to agree to a "considerably" smaller sum that Orr thought was needed. "This caused distress to Mr Orr and the impasse risked damaging necessary working relationships, and led to Mr Orr's personal decision that he had achieved all he could as Governor of the Reserve Bank and could not continue in that role with sufficiently less funding than he thought was viable for the organisation." Both sides engaged lawyers to negotiate an exit agreement, resulting in an immediate departure and "special leave". On March 5, the Reserve Bank revealed Orr's sudden resignation, with three years still to run in his five-year term. At the time, Quigley said it was for "personal reasons" but would not be drawn on any details. He had served as governor for a total of seven years. Orr had been expected to open a conference on March 6 with his resignation to be announced the following week, but that plan was nixed after Orr raised concerns that people were already aware of his intentions. Curiously, an email from Orr - shortly after midday on March 5 - indicated at that stage he intended to still attend the conference. "I will proudly open the conference tomorrow morning, noting I am there to discuss today's news. I am proud to have worked with and for you all, and I know you will succeed ahead." Orr ultimately did not attend or speak at the conference, nor did he take questions from media. The bank's statement also addressed speculation that the debate around banks' capital-holding was behind the resignation, saying the documents do not indicate those discussions were significant to Orr's decision.

Why Reserve Bank governor suddenly quit
Why Reserve Bank governor suddenly quit

Otago Daily Times

timean hour ago

  • Otago Daily Times

Why Reserve Bank governor suddenly quit

Adrian Orr, left, resigned as Reserve Bank governor in March this year, and Finance Minister Nicola Willis. Photo: RNZ The Reserve Bank has revealed a dispute over funding was behind Adrian Orr's abrupt resignation as governor. A raft of documents - released by New Zealand's central bank under the Official Information Act - reveal an "impasse" as Orr argued that Finance Minister Nicola Willis was not providing enough funding for the next five years. In an accompanying statement, an RBNZ spokesperson said it became clear in late February this year that the board - chaired by Neil Quigley - was willing to agree to a "considerably" smaller sum that Orr thought was needed. "This caused distress to Mr Orr and the impasse risked damaging necessary working relationships, and led to Mr Orr's personal decision that he had achieved all he could as Governor of the Reserve Bank and could not continue in that role with sufficiently less funding than he thought was viable for the organisation." Both sides engaged lawyers to negotiate an exit agreement, resulting in an immediate departure and "special leave". On March 5, the Reserve Bank revealed Orr's sudden resignation, with three years still to run in his five-year term. At the time, Quigley said it was for "personal reasons" but would not be drawn on any details. He had served as governor for a total of seven years. Orr had been expected to open a conference on March 6 with his resignation to be announced the following week, but that plan was nixed after Orr raised concerns that people were already aware of his intentions. The bank's statement also addressed speculation that the debate around banks' capital-holding was behind the resignation, saying the documents do not indicate those discussions were significant to Orr's decision.

New Zealand sanctions top Israeli ministers
New Zealand sanctions top Israeli ministers

Otago Daily Times

time6 hours ago

  • Otago Daily Times

New Zealand sanctions top Israeli ministers

New Zealand has banned two extremist Israeli politicians from travelling to the country because of comments about the war in Gaza that Foreign Minister Winston Peters says "actively undermine peace and security". New Zealand joins Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom and Norway in imposing the sanctions on Israel's Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich and National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir. Peters said they were targeted towards two individuals, rather than the Israeli government. "Our action today is not against the Israeli people, who suffered immeasurably on October 7 [2023] and who have continued to suffer through Hamas' ongoing refusal to release all hostages. Nor is it designed to sanction the wider Israeli government." The ministers were "using their leadership positions to actively undermine peace and security and remove prospects for a two-state solution", Peters said. "Ministers Smotrich and Ben-Gvir have severely and deliberately undermined that by personally advocating for the annexation of Palestinian land and the expansion of illegal settlements, while inciting violence and forced displacement." The sanctions were consistent with New Zealand's approach to other foreign policy issues, he said. "New Zealand has also targeted travel bans on politicians and military leaders advocating violence or undermining democracy in other countries in the past, including Russia, Belarus and Myanmar." New Zealand has been a long-standing supporter of a two-state solution, Peters said, which the international community was also overwhelmingly in favour of. "New Zealand's consistent and historic position has been that Israeli settlements in the occupied Palestinian territories are a violation of international law. Settlements and associated violence undermine the prospects for a viable two-state solution. "The crisis in Gaza has made returning to a meaningful political process all the more urgent. New Zealand will continue to advocate for an end to the current conflict and an urgent restart of the Middle East Peace Process." Israel's foreign minister Gideon Saar said the move was "outrageous" and the government would hold a special meeting early next week to decide how to respond to the "unacceptable decision". His comments were made while attending the inauguration of a new Israeli settlement on Palestinian land. Peters is in Europe for the sixth Pacific-France Summit hosted by French President Emmanuel Macron in Nice. 'You have to take actions' University of Otago international relations professor Robert Patman told RNZ's Morning Report programme today it was a "calibrated fulfilment of the promise to follow up actions if Israel did not desist" from expanding its military operations in Palestinian territory. "In May, the UK and France and Canada had demanded that Israel stop expanding its military operations in Gaza and allow emergency aid, humanitarian aid into Gaza. "It should be recalled that in early March, Israel, unilaterally cut off all humanitarian aid to Gaza and something like more than a million Palestinians now face starvation. And so this statement was made in May by those three countries, two of whom are members of the Five Eyes." New Zealand is also a member of the Five Eyes intelligence alliance, as are the United States and Australia. Patman also noted that the International Court of Justice last year said Israel's occupation of Palestinian territory - not just in Gaza, but also the West Bank - was illegal. New Zealand supported that recommendation. "New Zealand's position has been… that there must be a two-state solution to the conflict between the Palestinians and the Israelis. Now the problem is that [Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin] Netanyahu and his ministers adamantly opposed the two-state solution." The growing condemnation around the world of Israel's response to the 7 October atrocities was a result of the United States' "lack of will to try to make Israel comply with international law", Patman suggested. "I think the other liberal democracies are now beginning to react to that because they realise that Netanyahu, the Netanyahu government, has no intention of having a two-state solution. "Iin fact, it seems to be in the process of weaponising food distribution in Gaza… They set up, with the United States, something called the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, which seems to be part of a strategy to gradually evict Palestinians from Gaza. "Netanyahu's government doesn't make any bones about this. He wants to extend control over Gaza and… annex the West Bank [which] would completely rule out a two-state solution." Rather than just symbolic, Patman said European nations' sanctioning of Israeli ministers could have a real impact. "About 34 percent of Israel's trade is with members of the European Union, and if this stance taken by these five countries is replicated elsewhere and spreads, not just to these two ministers but to the Netanyahu government, then we could be looking at a different situation. "Verbal appeals to Israel to comply with international law have not worked. So, you know, if you believe in a two-state solution, then you have to take actions to try to bring it about." - Additional reporting by Reuters

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store