Value oceans, don't plunder them, French Polynesia leader tells AFP
French Polynesia pledged this week to create the world's largest marine protected area to safeguard its seas -- and it hopes to encourage others to lift their game.
The archipelago in the far South Pacific Ocean, an overseas territory of France, is led by Moetai Brotherson, who believes oceans should be valued, not plundered.
President Brotherson spoke with AFP about deep-sea mining, ecological stewardship, and his dream of a day where environment summits are no longer needed.
Q: How big is this new protected area?
A: "It covers our entire exclusive economic zone, approximately 5 million square kilometres (1.93 million square miles). From north to south, that's equivalent to the distance between Stockholm and Sicily, and from east to west, it's Romania to Portugal.
"All seabed exploitation, trawling and seine fishing (use of a large circular weighted net) is prohibited in our waters. And within this area, there are just over 1 million square kilometres that are high protection zones.
Q: Are these zones totally off-limits?
A: "Yes, absolutely. Even our longliners (which use baited hooks on a long line) will be prohibited in these high protection zones."
Q: What motivated the decision?
A: "We are doing it because there are other ways to exploit the ocean than plundering it, and we hope that our example will inspire other countries.
"We are not just a people of the ocean, we are the ocean. For us, it is unthinkable to destroy this space, this place that is part of our origins, our legends, our founding myths. We talk about marine protected areas, but here we call it rahui (leaving fallow), and it has existed for 3,000 years.
"There are 280,000 of us, and we are here to show the rest of the world that with a population the size of Montpellier, we can achieve great things."
Q: Do you think France should do more to protect its oceans?
A: "I am not the President of the French Republic. But yes, in absolute terms, of course France should do more.
"Today -- if we look at France's actions in relation to ocean protection -- it mainly comes from overseas territories."
Q: Deep-sea mining has been a hot topic at the UN Ocean Conference. What's your position?
A: "It's a subject that worries me. Our closest neighbour, the Cook Islands, is planning to mine polymetallic nodules in its exclusive economic zone. The machines used are a kind of combine harvester that settle on the ocean floor and destroy everything in their path.
"Underwater pollution, like the Chernobyl cloud, will not stop at the border. The plume of dust that will be released will block out the light and prevent the development of phytoplankton, which is necessary to feed the entire food chain. It is a chronicle of a disaster foretold."
Q: What needs to be done to prevent this disaster?
A: "The message to the big countries is: don't come and lecture us, because you have been destroying the planet for centuries without caring about the environment. It's rather inappropriate to come and lecture us today.
"Some of us today see no other solutions for our economic development. The responsibility of the world's major countries is to help us, the small island countries, to develop other socio-economic models based on green tourism, blue tourism and renewable energies, which do not involve exploiting sub-oceanic minerals.
"We need adequate funding and development aid."
Q: Beyond the speeches, do you think the UN Ocean Conference achieved anything?
A: "These gatherings can of course be criticised. But they are still necessary to meet decision-makers and people who have the financial means to participate in environmental preservation efforts.
"I dream of the day when it will be announced that there is no longer any need for climate or ocean summits."
aag/np/jxb

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Second man charged over shooting of Colombia presidential candidate
Colombian prosecutors on Thursday charged a second man with attempted murder over the shooting of Colombian presidential candidate Miguel Uribe at the weekend. Carlos Eduardo Mora Gonzalez stood accused of participating in the "logistics" of the attack and of driving the vehicle used to deliver the gun to the 15-year-old suspected shooter, who is already in custody. Uribe, a 39-year-old conservative senator, was shot twice in the head and once in the leg while giving a speech in a park on June 7 in western Bogota. He remains in critical condition but doctors said Wednesday he was showing signs of improvement. The attack stunned Colombia and raised fears of a return to the country's bloody past of political, cartel and paramilitary violence. The alleged shooter, who was captured near the scene by Uribe's bodyguards after himself being shot and injured in the leg, said he acted "for money, for my family." At his arraignment this week, however, he pleaded not guilty to the attack. Mora Gonzalez is accused of carrying out a "reconnaissance" mission in the working-class Fontibon neighborhood two days before the attack. Besides attempted murder, he has been charged with "using minors in the commission of crimes" and of weapons possession. He was remanded in custody. Prosecutors say that on the day of the attack he was in the car which delivered the 9mm Glock used in the attack to the gunman. A source close to the case told AFP he was the driver of the vehicle. The teen, whose identity has been withheld because of his age, got into the car and changed his clothes, according to investigators. - Family with tragic history - Uribe is a member of the Democratic Center party of former right-wing president Alvaro Uribe. The two men are not related. Miguel Uribe is the son of Diana Turbay, a famed journalist who was killed after being kidnapped by Pablo Escobar's Medellin Cartel, and grandson of Julio Cesar Turbay, who led Colombia from 1978 to 1982. The authorities believe the 15-year-old shooter was a hired gun, but it is not yet known who ordered the hit. If convicted he faces up to eight years in prison, in keeping with sentencing rules for minors. Uribe's lawyers claim that his repeated requests for increased security were ignored. Colombia is experiencing its biggest security crisis in a decade. On Tuesday, the country was rocked by a string of 24 coordinated bomb and gun attacks that killed at least seven people across the southwest, where government forces are fighting FARC dissidents. Uribe has been a strong critic of Colombia's first left-wing president, Gustavo Petro, who sought in vain to make peace with the country's various remaining armed groups. In recent months, Petro, a former left-wing guerrilla, has been accused of dialling up the political temperature by labelling his right-wing opponents "Nazis." Petro has speculated the shooting was ordered by an international "mafia" or by dissident members of the defunct FARC guerrilla group who refused a 2016 peace deal. als/das/cb/nl
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
UN summit to end with boost for ocean conservation
A summit on the state of global oceans concludes Friday with nations having tested the waters on deep-sea mining and making strides towards protecting unpoliced reaches of the high seas. But the UN Ocean Conference is set to fall short on major new financial pledges for poorer island nations, and many delegates are also disappointed that fossil fuels dropped off the agenda. France welcomed more than 60 world leaders to the southern city of Nice along with thousands of scientists, business leaders and marine conservationists for the five-day event. It was just the third time nations had come together for the oceans at the UN level, and it was the largest gathering of its kind so far. Many nations, including Colombia, Greece and Samoa, took the opportunity to unveil plans to create vast new marine parks and protected areas. Others announced restrictions on bottom trawling, a destructive fishing method captured in grisly detail in a David Attenborough documentary that went viral ahead of the summit. But marine groups praised efforts to ratify a landmark pact to protect marine life in the 60 percent of oceans that lie outside national waters. France had hoped at Nice to secure the 60 ratifications necessary to bring the high seas treaty into force. By Thursday evening, 51 nations had ratified the agreement in what Rebecca Hubbard from the High Seas Alliance described as a "major milestone for ocean action". "While we celebrate this incredible progress, we urge all remaining nations to ratify without delay," she added. - Mining and money - The conference sought to rally global action on marine protection as countries tussle over global rules for plastic pollution and seabed exploration. More than 90 ministers issued a symbolic statement at Nice reaffirming their support for the strongest possible plastics treaty to be negotiated when the talks resume in August. It also provided an opportunity to defend the role of science and rules-based oversight of common resources, most notably the unknown depths of the oceans. Alarmed at US President Donald Trump's unilateral push to fast-track deep-sea mining, leaders called for strict global rules to govern the ocean floor to stop a damaging race for critical minerals. The International Seabed Authority meets in July to negotiate these rules. "There has been a hardening of tone following the decision of the USA," Francois Chartier of Greenpeace told AFP. But at Nice, very few countries added their name to a global call for a moratorium on seabed mining. "It's a disappointment," said Chartier. New financial commitments from rich governments were also missing, a key demand of small-island nations confronting sea-level rises, overfishing and marine pollution. The summit will produce a joint political statement at its close on Friday that critics say is weak and without any reference to fossil fuels -- the key driver of ocean warming. OceanCare, a marine conservation organisation, said the summit "must not produce another well-meaning declaration". "The science is clear. The path is clear. What is missing is genuine political commitment and implementation." aag-np/jj/sco
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Judge orders Trump to return control of National Guard to California
A judge has ordered Donald Trump to return control of the California National Guard to the state, saying the president's decision to deploy them to protest-hit Los Angeles over Governor Gavin Newsom's objections was "illegal." "His actions were illegal ... He must therefore return control of the California National Guard to the Governor of the State of California forthwith," US District Judge Charles Breyer wrote of the president in the ruling, seen by AFP. However, he paused the order until 12 pm local time (1900 GMT) Friday -- and the White House almost immediately launched an appeal that could make it all the way to the Supreme Court. "Donald Trump will be relieved of his command at noon tomorrow," Newsom said in televised comments after the ruling was issued. "He is not a monarch, he is not a king, and he should stop acting like one," the 57-year-old Democrat said. Trump's decision to federalize the National Guard -- a reserve force -- and deploy them in California over the objection of the state governor was one not taken by a US president since 1965. The Republican has argued he did so because protests in Los Angeles against immigration raids ordered by his administration had gotten out of control, and the city was "burning." But Newsom and local law enforcement have stated repeatedly that there was no need for the deployment, and the protests have been mostly peaceful and contained to a few city blocks -- albeit tarnished by some spectacular violence, including the torching of several cars. Critics have accused Trump -- who also deployed 700 active Marines to the sprawling city -- of exaggerating the crisis and exceeding his authority to conduct a power grab. Breyer's 36-page opinion said the violence fell "far short" of the "rebellion" Trump described to justify calling in the guardsmen. There was "no evidence of organized, as apart from sporadic or impromptu, violence" during the protests, which first broke out in Los Angeles on Friday, he said. "Nor is there evidence that any of the violent protesters were attempting to overthrow the government as a whole; the evidence is overwhelming that protesters gathered to protest a single issue -- the immigration raids." Breyer also wrote that he was "troubled" by the implication that "protest against the federal government, a core civil liberty protected by the First Amendment, can justify a finding of rebellion." There was no immediate reaction from the White House to the ruling. bur-st/sla