Female NY shrink known as ‘Big Foot' was serial molester who asked teen victims if they liked ‘big boobs': docs
An accused rapist shrink known as 'Big Foot' was allegedly a serial molester who abused at least five victims at an upstate New York juvenile detention facility, including one as young as 15, whom she groped and asked if they liked 'big boobs,' according to two lawsuits.
Maya Hayes allegedly plied the teens in her care at the Brookwood Youth Facility near Albany with phone privileges, hair products and food, while regularly fondling them and forcing them to squeeze her breasts, four victims claimed in court papers.
One victim, who was just 15 when he arrived at Brookwood in October 2019, said Hayes, 47, confessed her reasons for going after young boys.
'Hayes said that because she was sexually frustrated at home, [she] wanted to give oral sex to residents,' the victim said in a Manhattan Federal Court lawsuit filed by three accusers. He added Hayes claimed 'it was her fantasy and it gave her a rush to give residents 'blow jobs.''
The ex-resident also accused Hayes of 'ordering' him 'to fight three or four other residents on her behalf.'
He 'was threatened by Hayes that if he did not fight other residents, [she] would have him jumped and it would affect his Parole Board reviews,' the alleged victim, who left Brookwood in June 2022, said in court papers.
'Do you like big boobs?' she allegedly asked another boy, who was 16 when he arrived at Brookwood, a secure facility for those under 21, in October 2020, before lifting her shirt to show off her chest, he said in the legal filing.
Another time Hayes was accused of asking the boy to squeeze her breasts — and then complaining that he was 'not squeezing her breasts hard enough,' he said in the litigation.
Staff knew about the abuse and allegedly joked with victims about Hayes, referring to her as 'Big Foot.'
A third victim, who was 18 during his stay at Brookwood from April to September 2021, claimed in court records Hayes gave him audio recordings 'of people having loud sex,' would show him racy YouTube videos, and forced him to touch her genitals.
Hayes allegedly told a fourth accuser, a 17-year-old from the Bronx, 'he was a handsome and pleasant young man;' 'referred to the bulge in his pants as a 'prince;'' and touched his penis with her foot under a desk in March 2020, he claimed in a Manhattan Supreme Court lawsuit.
'The scale of sexual abuse at Brookwood represents a fundamental failure of the system itself,' a lawyer for the victims, Evan Brustein, said. 'What happened to our clients is horrific, and we are committed to holding both the sexual predator and those who enabled the abuse fully accountable.'
New York State Police arrested Hayes in April on 65 counts of criminal sexual act in the third degree and rape. She pleaded not guilty, and was released. The case is pending.
Hayes denied 'all allegations' in court papers responding to the federal lawsuit, asking for the case to be paused pending the outcome of her criminal case.
Hayes did not respond to messages seeking comment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News24
8 hours ago
- News24
Fake Sassa grants ‘news' is exploding online. Here's how to spot the lies
YouTube channels and fake news websites are pumping out dozens of false stories about Sassa grants and jobs every month. These hoaxes prey on vulnerable recipients, spreading confusion, false hope or panic. Many are clearly fake, Andrew Thompson writes, but they have still managed to infiltrate public discourse and be widely shared. South Africa's social grant system is under digital siege. A flood of fake news targeting the South African Social Security Agency (Sassa) has spread across Facebook, YouTube and a network of low-quality, foreign-run websites. These stories are designed to mislead, confuse or panic grant recipients, often with the aim of generating clicks and ad revenue by preying on vulnerable beneficiaries. YouTube channels with tens of thousands of subscribers and some videos with hundreds of thousands of views have together uploaded hundreds of fake videos this year alone. They claim imminent changes to payouts, onerous new rules, or exciting bonuses. Dozens of websites posing as job boards or news sites have also published false notices about new jobs, grant amounts, pension cuts, and backlogged payments. Screengrab None of these channels have any connection to South African state institutions, yet they continue to reach large audiences and prompt real-world concern, forcing Sassa to issue repeated denials. In May, Sassa issued a media statement highlighting the extent of the problem and warning that it is 'concerned about the mushrooming and the rapid spread of fake news and disinformation targeting the Agency and its services almost daily'. It stressed that it has made no announcements about 'double grants', changes to pension rules, or automatic top-ups, which are among the most popular fake news stories that tend to gain traction. 'Furthermore, reports have been spreading like wildfire that Sassa has announced 'New Rules Could Affect Your Pension' from 10 June. The report has even gone further and announced various dates for different provinces. This is not an official announcement from Sassa,' the cautionary statement reads. How fake Sassa grant news spreads: volume, panic, and false hope The wave of Sassa disinformation in 2025 has followed two broad patterns, regardless of the medium or the outlet disseminating it, and the content is broadly split into two themes: fake job adverts and fake grant updates. The job advertisements regularly go viral. They claim that well-paid government positions requiring no experience are available and often direct users to deceptive forms or clickbait sites that mine data. These regularly appear as images on fake government letterheads that circulate widely on platforms like Facebook, WhatsApp and X. SASSA The fake grant updates employ a more familiar disinformation approach with a different motive. These mostly AI-generated false news articles report on increased or double payments, pension rule changes, or Sassa 'deadlines' that risk non-payment of grants. All are presented without basis, and often spill over from clearly fake websites into public discourse. Fake news websites and YouTube accounts repeatedly publish variations of similar videos and articles, many of which use text-to-speech tools and AI-generated thumbnails to appear convincing. The tone ranges from panic ('rules changing next week!') to false reassurance ('you can still claim your R7 000 today'). Most rely on sheer volume, hoping that one story or job advert will catch on and spread - as many already have. News24's Disinformation Desk has counted hundreds of fake news articles about Sassa currently online, and although many fade into obscurity, an increasing number are breaking through requiring official responses. Screengrab For now, the motive of these platforms appears to be financial gain. Most of the videos are hosted on monetised channels, and the websites link to Google Adwords accounts. If these get enough traction from panicked recipients, they will generate some revenue for the owners. Yet ironically, much of the vitality of this material reveals itself on platforms like WhatsApp without direct links to the source, which do not generate the website owners income but have the same impact on grant recipients. The majority of the Sassa disinformation that gains mainstream traction appears not to have an overt political motive or agenda, yet. Instead, it is riding on the wave of attention afforded by this vulnerable target market, many of whom are understandably deceived by the deluge. Rapid-fire Sassa debunks from the last few months alone News24's Disinformation Desk has identified hundreds of fake news stories and videos targeting Sassa recipients published in the last few months alone. Here are the most prominent examples, with their themes often emulated across other fake news sites: A viral post linking to a website called All Provinces Jobs claimed that 'South African government jobs 2025' were open for applications. The link leads to a fraudulent website not affiliated with any government department. Similar posts appeared on Facebook pages falsely advertising hiring opportunities through Sassa, often featuring job titles and closing dates to lend false credibility and create a sense of urgency. YouTube channels 'SASSA Benefits Updates' and 'Stimulus Sam' have released several dozen videos each about grant payments in South Africa, including that increased Sassa payments would be made in June 2025. The videos utilise text-to-speech narration featuring a vaguely South African accent and footage that is clearly created with generative AI. Both channels are entirely fake. A report hosted on the fake news website Debtcol Council claimed that 'new rules could affect your pension' from 10 June. Sassa has confirmed that this is also false. Another story on that website claimed application backlogs had been cleared, while yet another suggested a new top-up payment was in progress. All are fabricated. A website called Prabh Honda published a story about Sassa grant suspensions, which is entirely baseless and without truth. A piece on Rise Up WV, a website responsible for several prominent fake news items, stated that grant beneficiaries needed to reapply for doubled payments due to 'SASSA system updates'. There is no basis for this in any of Sassa's official communications. Why it matters - and how to protect yourself or family members Many of the intended recipients of these grants are older, economically vulnerable, and may not be experienced with digital literacy or fact-checking online. The combination of desperation and trust in anything that looks official makes this a fertile ground for exploitation via disinformation. These false reports don't just casually mislead - comments beneath even palpably false news items and videos indicate the confusion and desperation many experience about this topic. This fake news also distracts Sassa, which is already stretched in the payment grants, by forcing them to correct disinformation. To stay safe, advise family members of the following: Check only official Sassa channels: Information is reliably published on and Sassa's verified X and Facebook pages. Do not trust any information sent via WhatsApp or Facebook Messenger. Sassa does not communicate important information via forwarded messages. Never enter personal information into a form on a website claiming to offer Sassa job opportunities. Ignore YouTube channels with videos claiming to be the Department of Social Development or Sassa. Sassa's official YouTube page is not used to share news about grants. When in doubt, don't share: spreading false information, even with good intentions, can cause unnecessary panic.
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
Harvey Weinstein case judge denies mistrial bid after juror says he's bullied in deliberations
NEW YORK — A Manhattan judge in Harvey Weinstein's rape and sexual assault retrial denied his motion for a mistrial Friday after a juror said he was being bullied and berated by other members of the panel. Jurors ended the day without a verdict and are scheduled back in Manhattan Supreme Court Monday morning. Weinstein's lawyers said the treatment of the juror was enough to shut down the six-week trial, but the judge urged the members to keep on deliberating. Just before a lunch break on the second day of deliberations, a 25-year old juror asked Judge Curtis Farber if he could be dismissed from the highly watched trial because he believed the process was not 'fair and just.' The juror told Farber that he was being shunned for having opposing views from other members of the jury. The juror also said he heard other jurors discussing the case on the elevator and outside the courthouse. He described the tension with jurors as 'playground stuff.' 'Is someone being bullied? Is someone being made fun of? Is someone being threatened?' Weinstein lawyer Arthur Aidala said in court. 'There is some degree of taint going on.' Aidala praised the juror for having the 'courage' to come forward. But Farber said that the discussions the juror described did not rise to the level of misconduct, but were typical, heated deliberations by a jury. 'It may be that his youth makes him particularly uncomfortable,' Farber said. The fallen movie mogul and Miramax studio co-founder is accused of raping aspiring actress Jessica Mann in 2013 and assaulting two other women in 2002 and 2006. More than 80 women, including actresses Mira Sorvino and Ashley Judd, have accused Weinstein of sexual assault, harassment or other misconduct. He faces up to 25 years in prison for two counts of criminal sexual acts and up to four years for one count of rape. A Manhattan jury convicted Weinstein, 73, of rape and sexual assault charges in 2020 at the height of the #MeToo movement. But a state appeals court threw out the conviction in 2024, citing errors by the trial judge. Weinstein is already serving a 16-year prison sentence after a California jury found him guilty of rape in December 2022. Weinstein has denied all the charges against him. He has said any sexual encounters have been consensual. 'I have regrets that I put my family through this, that I put my wife through this, and I acted immorally,' Weinstein said in a telephone interview with FOX 5's 'Good Day New York' on Friday. 'I put so many friends through this and hurt people that were close to me by actions that were stupid, you know what I mean? But never illegal, never criminal, never anything.' _____
New York Post
14 hours ago
- New York Post
‘Playground' drama in jury room threatens to derail Harvey Weinstein's NY sex crimes retrial
'Playground' drama threatened to tank Harvey Weinstein's sex crimes retrial on Friday — when one juror asked off the case after claiming childish antics had made deliberations 'unfair and unjust.' Juror No. 7, described as a 25-year-old 'computer kid,' told the judge he'd heard other members of the panel gossiping about one of their own in an elevator at Manhattan Supreme Court after deliberations Thursday. 4 AP Advertisement 'The experience I've had in the day-and-a-half here, in good conscience, I don't think this is fair and just,' the juror told the court Friday morning when he was brought to the witness box to explain why he wanted to be dismissed. He described the chaotic scene behind closed doors as 'playground stuff,' with some on the panel of seven women and five men ignoring fellow jurors as they weighed the charges against Weinstein. 'There's a bit of shunning happening,' the young man said — before pleading for Judge Curtis Farber to dismiss him from the case. Advertisement Farber told the juror that there was no backing out, reminding him he 'took an oath' of service and that the trial would 'fall apart' if he left now. One of the 12 jurors was excused on Thursday after complaining of illness, and replaced with an alternate. The remaining three alternate panelists were then dismissed, meaning there would be no one to step in for Juror 7 if he was let off. Weinstein, 73, sat in his wheelchair and stared ahead without any visible reaction during the judge's questioning of the juror. When the court reconvened after the lunch break, Weinstein's attorney, Arthur Aidala, asked for a mistrial claiming that the judge should have questioned the juror further and asked more in-depth queries to get to the bottom of the elevator beef and the drama inside the jury room. Advertisement 4 Weinstein's attorney Arthur Aidala moved for a mistrial after a juror complained about 'playground' drama inside the deliberation room. Michael Nagle 'He looked at me right in the eyes and said, 'What's going on in there is not fair and unjust!'' the attorney said theatrically, launching into a 10-minute monologue as the judge quietly flicked through papers. Aidala described the juror as a '25-year-old kid who lives with his grandmother who is a computer kid' — and who had the 'guts' to go to the court with his concerns, which should not be minimized. 'He looked at me right in the eyes and said, 'What's going on in there is not fair and unjust!'' Aidala railed. Advertisement Prosecutors said Weinstein's attorneys were 'grasping for straws' in their latest attempt at a mistrial, the sixteenth such bid Aidala has made so far in the case. The judge didn't even blink before he quickly shot down the bid to derail the trial. 'Nothing in his statement stated that the tensions in the jury room were abnormal tensions during deliberations,' Farber shot back at Aidala. 4 Polish model Kaja Sokola said that Harvey Weinstein molested her when she was 16. Steven Hirsch The jury began deliberating at 11:30 a.m. Thursday morning after hearing five weeks of testimony from three accusers — former TV production assistant Miriam 'Mimi' Haley, Polish model Kaja Sokola and former actress Jessica Mann — who all said that Weinstein had raped them. The panelists, so far during their deliberations, have asked for readbacks of testimony from two victims about the alleged sexual attacks. Weinstein's attorneys claim that the former Miramax boss is the 'poster boy' of cancel culture and that his relationships with the alleged victims were 'transactional,' consensual sexual encounters. Manhattan Assistant District Attorney Nicole Blumberg said during closing arguments that Weinstein — accused of sexual conduct by more than 80 women — wielded his 'power and influence' to rape the three accusers. Advertisement 4 Weinstein's attorneys' attempt of a mistrial has been denied more than a dozen times at trial. AP Weinstein, who maintains his innocence, was originally found guilty at trial in 2020 of criminal sex act and rape and given a 23-year prison sentence — but New York's highest court tossed the conviction last year. If convicted at the retrial, Weinstein would face up to 25 years in prison on two counts of first-degree criminal sexual act, and four years in prison on third-degree rape. The Hollywood creep was separately convicted in California of raping an Italian model at a film festival in 2013, where he is currently serving a 16-year prison term. He has appealed that conviction.
