Supreme Court sides with family of man killed by police after he was pulled over for toll violations
The Supreme Court on Thursday allowed the family of an unarmed 24-year-old man who was killed after being pulled over for suspected toll violations to continue his case for damages, ruling that appeals courts need to more thoroughly review an officer's actions before a police shooting.
The decision marked a rare instance of the conservative high court siding with the victim of a police shooting.
Justice Elena Kagan wrote the opinion for a unanimous court.
The excessive force suit from the family of Ashtian Barnes is one of many to make its way to the high court at a time when the nation and federal courts continue to wrestle with when to hold police accountable for split-second decisions that wind up being lethal.
Roberto Felix Jr., a traffic enforcement officer in Harris County, Texas, pulled Barnes over after a camera flagged his license plate for unpaid tolls. Seconds after Felix asked Barnes to step out of his Toyota Corolla, the car instead lurched forward with Felix standing on the door sill, firing.
The question was whether courts may consider the moments leading up to the threats police face – including, in this case, Felix's decision to step into the car's open door – when they're reviewing excessive force claims or whether courts can review only the 'moment of threat' and an officer's response.
The conservative 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that it could consider only the two-second span during which Barnes' car moved forward, potentially threatening Felix's life. Barnes' family asserted the court should have also considered what happened in the preceding three seconds.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
an hour ago
- CBS News
Multiple rowhome buildings collapse after fire and explosion in Philadelphia, at least 2 people hospitalized
A fire and explosion were reported and three rowhome buildings collapsed in Philadelphia's Nicetown-Tioga neighborhood early Sunday, sending at least two people to hospitals, officials said. Philadelphia police and fire units responded to the 1900 block of West Bristol Street, near Clarissa Street, just before 5 a.m. CBS News Philadelphia cameras in the area show at least three structures that have collapsed with smoke emanating from the rubble. CBS News Philadelphia Philadelphia Fire Department executive officer Daniel McCarty said other buildings adjacent to the collapses have damage as well. A collapse zone is in place in case other collapses occur. Police said the two people taken to hospitals are elderly women – one is in critical condition and the other is in stable condition. "This will be an extensive, all-day operation for the Philadelphia Fire Department," McCarty said. The cause of the explosion is under investigation and search and rescue operations are underway. The Philadelphia Department of Licenses and Inspections is on site examining buildings. "Big bang" wakes up resident A resident on the block said she was sleeping when she heard "a big bang" and at first thought her husband fell off the edge of the bed. "And then I had to come to the window and look out, and I seen people walking up and down the street," she said. "And then I came downstairs and my door was all blown open and there was glass everywhere on my floor." Other residents from blocks away felt their houses shake. Another resident said he heard a noise that sounded like thunder. "I mean, it's like something out of a movie. The houses, you know, they're underneath. So they had to pull them out of the house," one woman said. This is a developing story and will be updated.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Fort Worth teacher, 28, loses $32K after scammers tricked him into sharing his personal banking information
After spending years saving money in the hopes of starting a family, Russell Leahy and his wife are now forced to live paycheck to paycheck. Leahy, a 28-year-old teacher from Fort Worth, Texas, recently lost $32,000 to scammers who tricked him into revealing sensitive financial information. I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 6 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast) Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan 'works every single time' to kill debt, get rich in America — and that 'anyone' can do it "It was my entire life savings," Leahy told WFAA. "I had literally never felt like the wind had been taken out of my sails before. I'd never really felt like I was going to pass out before, but it really felt like the end of the world for me." Leahy was reportedly contacted by scammers who claimed to be representatives of Chase Bank. The supposed bank reps called to inform Leahy that his account had been compromised and that he needed to protect his finances by moving the cash into a secure account. All it took were a few text messages and some counterfeit banking information in order to appear genuine. "I couldn't even believe how sophisticated it was," Leahy told WFAA. Now, the newlywed is trying to warn people about the scam that cost him everything in the hopes of preventing others from falling for the same scheme. Unfortunately for Leahy, the situation went from bad to worse when he contacted Chase Bank to report the incident. According to WFAA, the bank told Leahy that his account isn't covered by fraud protection, arguing that Leahy was the victim of a scam and not financial fraud. In making this distinction, Chase Bank returned just over $2,000 to Leahy's account, which is merely a fraction of his total loss. When WFAA contacted Chase Bank for comment, the bank offered clarification on the distinction between fraud and a scam. "Fraud on a bank account involves someone illegally accessing someone else's account and making withdrawals, transfers, or purchases without the account holder's permission," the bank stated in its emailed reply. A scam, on the other hand, is "a deceptive scheme or trick used to cheat someone out of their money or other valuable assets,' which is what happened to Leahy. Chase Bank's response likely isn't what Leahy wanted to hear, but that hasn't stopped him from sharing his story in order to prevent others from making the same mistakes. "I'd rather I be the sacrificial lamb for the rest of these people and maybe save other people's money from being stolen," he said. "I'm really hoping to look ahead and move on with my life and not have to start over from scratch." Read more: You don't have to be a millionaire to gain access to . In fact, you can get started with as little as $10 — here's how Unfortunately, Leahy's heartbreaking story is not unique. The "phishing" scam, which is what Leahy fell for, is one of the most common scams in today's digital world. Phishing works by tricking a victim into revealing sensitive information over the phone, by email or by text message. Email used to be the most popular method for conducting phishing scams, but scammers have since expanded their practice to include phone calls, texts and social media. Phishing conducted over the phone is also known as "vishing." While it's difficult to pinpoint just how many people are victimized by phishing scams every year, 323,972 internet users throughout the world reported to authorities that they had fallen for a phishing scam in 2021, according to AAG IT Services. To avoid falling for scams such as this, it's imperative for people to be informed and alert in order to spot potential threats. Here are some practical steps you can take to protect yourself from becoming a victim: Don't rely on your caller ID, as scammers may spoof the phone number of your bank or another institution that you're affiliated with in order to gain your trust. Never share your account information with anyone who may request it. Your bank will never call or email you asking for this information. Protect your accounts with multi-factor authentication. If a scammer were to gain access to your username and password, multi-factor authentication would make it tougher for the scammer to log into your account. Ignore transaction requests through calls, texts or emails that you didn't initiate yourself. When in doubt, call your bank — or whatever institution the potential scammers may claim to represent — directly in order to verify any concerns that were shared with you. This tiny hot Costco item has skyrocketed 74% in price in under 2 years — but now the retail giant is restricting purchases. Here's how to buy the coveted asset in bulk Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you? Stay in the know. Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise sent straight to your inbox every week for free. This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
11 Million Critical Vulnerabilities Exposed — Act Now
New research reveals 11 million critical vulnerabilities are exposed to the public internet. While security vulnerabilities are an integral part of the world of technology, some are more critical than others. The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Defense Agency, part of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, has warned time and time again about the dangers of vulnerabilities to organizations. Yet that message does not appear to be getting through if the staggering numbers revealed in a new technology sector risk report are anything to go by: more than 11 million critical vulnerabilities in tech sector environments are currently exposed to the public internet. 11.4 Million Critical Vulnerabilities Are Currently Exposed To The Public Internet Two recent warnings from the Federal Bureau of Investigation should be burned into the psyche of anyone and everyone who has any influence when it comes to the security of technology environments. The first, from earlier in June this year, involved a skyrocketing number of victims of the Play ransomware group. The primary infection vector was reported as being unpatched critical vulnerabilities: CVE-2025-29824, iCVE-2022-41040, CVE-2022-41082, CVE-2020-12812 and CVE-2018-13379 if you want to go and check that your organization isn't open to these specific attacks. The second, a joint advisory with CISA, warning that unsophisticated hackers are a real danger, including those exploiting vulnerabilities that should already have been patched but have not. The 2025 Risk Radar Report from Trust SpiderLabs has now confirmed the real extent of this danger to the technology sector. The researchers revealed that a total of more than 11.4 million critical vulnerabilities are exposed to the public internet within the technology sector. That's a staggering and truly frightening number. 'Services are often publicly exposed for a good reason,' Trust SpiderLabs said, 'that is to allow the public to visit your website, and to receive email from people outside your organization.' However, oftentimes services are exposed by mistake, usually as a result of a configuration error. Combine this with the number of critical vulnerabilities that have yet to be patched by the organizations concerned, and Houston, we have a problem. The report analyzed those vulnerabilities within the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog for 2024 and 2025, and discovered that nine of the top ten were web server vulnerabilities that coincided with the top exposed service in the tech industry. The single KEV vulnerability that was not web-based is BlueKeep, a critical vulnerability in the Remote Desktop Protocol, commonly used by hackers for lateral movement within networks. 'With that service exposed to the public internet,' the report stated, 'it could be used to establish an initial foothold.' If it's not yet clear, here's what you should do: take an inventory of all currently open services running outside the network perimeter and conduct an immediate access audit. 'It's also essential to prioritize patching for any publicly exposed systems,' Trustwave SpiderLabs said, in order to mitigate the risk from unpatched critical vulnerabilities.
