logo
Operation Herof 2.0: Baloch rebels launch 7 coordinated strikes in Pakistan

Operation Herof 2.0: Baloch rebels launch 7 coordinated strikes in Pakistan

India Today14-05-2025

The Baloch Liberation Army (BLA) has claimed responsibility for seven coordinated attacks across several districts in Pakistan. The rebel group stated that these attacks were part of a campaign named 'Operation Herof 2.0', which involved a total of 78 operations conducted at 58 locations.In a statement issued by BLA spokesperson Jeeyand Baloch, the group called the operations as a continuation of their resistance aimed to end what they describe as the "occupation" of Balochistan by Pakistan.advertisementAccording to the statement, BLA fighters reportedly took control of the highway at Ornach Cross in the Khuzdar district for over two hours on Saturday night. During this time, they carried out vehicle checks and intercepted vehicles with natural resources from the region.
"Baloch Liberation Army freedom fighters maintained control of the highway at Ornach Cross in the Khuzdar area for over 2 hours. During the blockade snap checks continued, while 2 vehicles involved in looting Baloch national resources were targeted," the statement said.The group further claimed to have captured a Levies Force checkpost in the area and set it on fire.advertisementOn Sunday night, the group said it attacked a military post in Nokabad, Panjgur, using automatic weapons and rocket launchers."BLA freedom fighters targeted a post of occupying Pakistani army at Nokabad in Panjgur on Sunday night. Fighters attacked occupying army with automatic weapons, while rocket launchers and several shells using grenade launchers were fired at enemy army. The attack lasted more than 25 minutes during which at least 2 occupying army personnel were eliminated and 5 were injured," Jeeyand Baloch stated.While the rebel group also claimed that they seized surveillance cameras set up by the army in the Paroom Jain area.In Kalat's Garap area, the BLA said its fighters targeted a Bomb Disposal Squad using a remote-controlled improvised explosive device (IED) while they were engaged in a clearance operation."In the attack 2 enemy personnel were eliminated," the spokesperson said.FOUR INTELLIGENCE AGENTS 'NEUTRALIZED'The BLA also claimed it had captured and killed four men who were allegedly working as undercover agents for Pakistani intelligence agencies."Freedom fighters neutralized 4 agents of Pakistani intelligence agencies in the Galangor area of Noshki. These included Moin s/o Ghulam Mustafa, resident of Pakpattan; Huzaifa s/o Muhammad Latif, resident of Pakpattan: Imran Ali s/o Maqsood Ahmed and Irfan Ali s/o Maqsood Ahmed, resident of Raheem Yar Khan," the statement said.advertisementThe group claimed these individuals were first arrested on May 9 at a checkpoint in the Ahmedwal area and later confessed that they worked as informants.OPERATION TO CONTINUE UNTIL 'LIBERATION'?The BLA also reported carrying out smaller-scale attacks in the towns of Sibi and Kachi. In Sibi, they claimed to have hurled a hand grenade at an army post near the railway station. In seperate operation in Mathri, Kachi, they launched an armed attack, injuring at least three soldiers."These attacks are a continuation of BLA's ongoing resistance strategy, 'Operation Herof,' against the occupying state," said the spokesperson."Baloch Liberation Army makes it clear that such operations will continue until national liberation is achieved," he added.So far, there has been no independent confirmation of BLA's claims, and no official word from the Pakistani army on these events at the time of this report.BALOCH REBELS HIT 51 LOCATIONS IN PAKISTANOn May 12, the group claimed that it had carried out a large-scale coordinated offensive against Pakistani military positions.According to BLA spokesperson Jeeyand Baloch, "During the height of India-Pakistan military escalation earlier this week, Baloch Liberation Army (BLA) opened another front for the Pakistani military as it carried out 71 coordinated attacks, which went on for many hours, at more than 51 locations across the occupied Balochistan."advertisementEarlier, under Operation Herof, the Baloch Liberation Army (BLA) reportedly claimed responsibility for killing 102 Pakistani soldiers.ALSO READ: 'Ready to attack': Baloch rebels hit 51 locations in Pakistan as tensions mountMust Watch

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

U.S. lawmaker tells Pakistan delegation to eliminate ‘vile' terror group Jaish-e-Mohammed
U.S. lawmaker tells Pakistan delegation to eliminate ‘vile' terror group Jaish-e-Mohammed

The Hindu

time21 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

U.S. lawmaker tells Pakistan delegation to eliminate ‘vile' terror group Jaish-e-Mohammed

A senior American lawmaker has told a visiting Pakistani delegation, led by Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, that the country should do "all it can' to eliminate the 'vile' terrorist group Jaish-e-Mohammed as well as ensure protection of religious minorities. The Pakistani delegation met Congressman Brad Sherman on Thursday (June 5) , timing their visit to the U.S. capital around the same time as a multi-party delegation of Indian parliamentarians led by Congress MP Shashi Tharoor is in Washington DC. The all-party delegation is briefing key interlocutors about Operation Sindoor in the wake of the Pahalgam terror attack and India's strong resolve to fight terrorism emanating from Pakistan. In a post on X, Sherman said that he 'emphasised to the Pakistani delegation the importance of combatting terrorism, and in particular, the group Jaish-e-Mohammed, who murdered my constituent Daniel Pearl in 2002'. During my discussion with the #Pakistan delegation yesterday, I raised the critical issue of water for Sindh. The Indus River is the lifeline for tens of millions of Pakistanis, and protecting that water resource is vital. I am also very concerned to hear of unrest in the city… — Congressman Brad Sherman (@BradSherman) June 6, 2025 Terrorist Omar Saeed Sheikh was convicted of orchestrating the 2002 kidnapping and murder of Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl. Mr. Sherman said Pearl's family continues to live in his district and 'Pakistan should do all it can to eliminate this vile group and combat terrorism in the region'. Mr. Bhutto also landed in the U.S. at the same time as the Tharoor-led delegation. Mr. Bhutto met UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres with his delegation as well as Security Council Ambassadors in New York, and later travelled to Washington in Pakistan's bid to internationalise the conflict with India as well as the Kashmir issue but instead got instructed to deal with terrorism emanating from its soil. The U.S. lawmaker also told the Pakistani delegation that the protection of religious minorities in Pakistan remains an important issue. "Christians, Hindus and Ahmadiyya Muslims living in Pakistan must be allowed to practice their faith and participate in the democratic system without fear of violence, persecution, discrimination, or an unequal justice system.' Sherman further urged the Pakistani delegation to relay to their government the need to free Dr Shakil Afridi, who continues to languish in prison for helping the United States kill Osama bin Laden. 'Freeing Dr Afridi represents an important step in bringing closure for victims of 9/11,' he said. Afridi is a Pakistani physician who helped the CIA run a polio vaccination programme in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province to collect DNA samples of bin Laden's family. Afridi was arrested by Pakistani authorities shortly after the American raid on bin Laden's compound in Abbottabad in May 2011. In 2012, a Pakistani court sentenced Afridi to 33 years in prison.

After Operation Sindoor, calculate
After Operation Sindoor, calculate

Indian Express

time28 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

After Operation Sindoor, calculate

Writing a postscript to a military engagement that is barely four weeks old may seem premature, more so since Prime Minister Narendra Modi has declared that Operation Sindoor has only been paused. It may, therefore, erupt again. Picking through the smoke-and-mirrors accounts of the four-day clash of arms, one may still reach tentative conclusions and derive some lessons for the future. The aftermath of the four-day 'war' should be read together with the observations I made post-Pahalgam on the strategic calculus driving Pakistani actions, especially the intent of the remarks made by Pakistan Army Chief Asif Munir ('Desperate steps in desperate times', IE, April 24). Irrespective of which side caused more losses to the other, Pakistan has succeeded, at least temporarily, in 're-hyphenating' itself with India in the international arena, the great leveller being its nuclear status. There were heightened external concerns following the Indian attack on Pakistan's Nur Khan base, which is reportedly located near a nuclear command and control centre. Nuclear brinkmanship, implicit or explicit, will always be present in any India-Pakistan war or threat of war. One should also be cautious in claiming to have found 'space' for conventional retaliation under the nuclear overhang. No two military events are the same. The danger of nuclear war will persist as long as atomic weapons are deployed by both sides. The so-called 'space' is notional. In a different war scenario, it may evaporate without warning. A robust Indian response to a cross-border terrorist attack, which India wants to keep limited and non-escalatory, may be interpreted (though not intended) as India acknowledging Pakistan's capacity to hit back and raise the ante. India being committed to 'non-escalatory' action suits Pakistan fine. Is it necessary to make such a declaration? Perhaps India needs to adopt its own version of 'strategic ambiguity' in relation to Pakistan on the lines of the US posture in relation to Taiwan. We should also stop making repeated assertions that the next terrorist attack will invite Indian military retaliation. We should reserve the right to choose whatever may be the most appropriate response. Why tie our hands in advance? Creating a public expectation of a military response limits the options available to a leadership. There should be a whole suite of possible options to choose from — coercive, diplomatic, economic and financial, and combinations thereof. The pursuit of deterrence may be better served by keeping the other side guessing. Operation Sindoor has made it amply clear that China will keep upgrading Pakistan's military capabilities to serve as an effective proxy against India. China was instrumental in enabling Pakistan to acquire a nuclear deterrent even before India and Pakistan became declared nuclear weapon states. But it had been coy about this. With its enhanced military and economic capabilities, it is no longer defensive about its military alliance with Pakistan. The two-front challenge, which India has always been concerned about, is already here. Our strategic calculations and defence preparedness must reflect this reality. Operation Sindoor has provided valuable insights into the technological capabilities of Chinese weapons, the effectiveness of Indian weaponry in outsmarting some Chinese systems deployed by Pakistan and the battle tactics that Pakistan has learnt from its 'iron brother'. These lessons must be internalised in our military strategy and tactics. Credibility is the indispensable asset in handling the diplomatic and domestic fallout from any such crisis. Credibility, in turn, is a function of transparency. What the CDS very sensibly said recently about losses suffered by India in the military exchanges could have been conveyed in the earlier briefings by the Ministry of External Affairs and the armed forces. The'appropriate' time for such information to be released is before the inevitable deluge of misinformation takes hold. The question also arises: Did the all-party delegations sent out to various countries to present India's case have the same brief as the CDS? India still has a lot to learn about information management. One's own learning from several years of diplomatic work is that credibility is indispensable to good diplomacy. This applies to friend and adversary alike. There are some other points to consider. US President Donald Trump's unpredictability is a reality, as is his narcissist penchant for self-adulation. There is no need to rise to the bait and keep denying his role in brokering a ceasefire. A polite refutation having been made, one should move on. The partnership with the US remains important for India's economic and technological capacity building. Indications are that this partnership remains largely intact. One may have views about the efficacy of sending all-party delegations to various countries to present India's case, but it is a surprise that no such demarche was thought necessary for our immediate subcontinental neighbours. This contradicts the Neighbourhood First Policy. Engagement and a structured dialogue must be part of India's Pakistan policy. If nothing else, such dialogue may provide useful insights into the thinking of its rulers. Reliance on coercive instruments alone has not worked so far and is unlikely to in the future. Cross-border terrorism and the status of Pakistan-occupied Kashmir should be part of the agenda, but there should be a deliberate effort to reach out to other constituencies in Pakistan beyond the military and the political and bureaucratic elites. Pakistan is not a monolithic entity and one should not paint its people with the same brush as its entrenched elites. Domestic politics will influence foreign policy but foreign policy should not become a tool to be used in domestic politics. Diplomacy is outward-oriented. Its audience is the international community, including friends and adversaries alike. Inward-oriented diplomacy, seeking validation from a domestic audience, will undermine the pursuit of national interests. Pakistan has become an issue not just in, but of, domestic politics. It has become entangled with the politics of communalism. Pakistan should be dealt with as just another state that poses a foreign policy and security challenge to India. Its identity as an Islamic state should be irrelevant. Finally, while punishing Pakistan over cross-border terrorism, should there not be accountability for the security lapses that made ordinary Indian citizens vulnerable to the violent outrage in Pahalgam? Retaliation against Pakistan must not deflect attention away from the urgent need to plug the gaps that give our adversaries the opportunity to deliver such humiliating blows against us. The writer is a former foreign secretary

Operation Sindoor: 6 Pak Jets Downed, Bahawalpur & Muridke Pegged On Apr 23, Say Sources
Operation Sindoor: 6 Pak Jets Downed, Bahawalpur & Muridke Pegged On Apr 23, Say Sources

News18

time38 minutes ago

  • News18

Operation Sindoor: 6 Pak Jets Downed, Bahawalpur & Muridke Pegged On Apr 23, Say Sources

Last Updated: Top defence sources also said it was false that India came under pressure from the US or Donald Trump to enter a ceasefire with Pakistan on May 10 India downed at least six Pakistani jets as well as a military transport aircraft during Operation Sindoor, top defence sources have told CNN-News18. The terrorist headquarters of Bahawalpur and Muridke in Pakistan were chosen as the prime targets by the Narendra Modi government on April 23, a day after the Pahalgam terrorist strike, they added. Top defence sources also said it was false that India came under pressure from the US or Donald Trump to enter a ceasefire with Pakistan on May 10. 'The fact is that Trump and PM Modi never spoke. Even when JD Vance called, the PM was very firm and did not yield," these sources said. The Congress and Rahul Gandhi have been targeting the Prime Minister, asking why he had allegedly 'surrendered to US pressure". The sources said, 'Rahul Gandhi is being immature in targeting PM Modi on this count, and it will backfire on the Congress when Parliament begins." The Planning The sources said Muridke and Bahawalpur were proposed as the prime targets for India's strike at the long meeting that defence minister Rajnath Singh chaired with the three service chiefs, the chief of defence staff (CDS) General Anil Chauhan, and national security adviser (NSA) Ajit Doval on the morning of April 23, a day after the Pahalgam strike. The service chiefs had said at this meeting that they were fully prepared for the counterstrike. These options were laid out at the cabinet committee of security (CCS) meeting chaired by PM Modi on the evening of April 23. The PM had cut short his Saudi Arabia trip to return to India that day. Multiple dates were considered for the strike, and the time was decided to be between 12.30 am and 2 am. It was ensured that cameras must be able to capture the destruction caused at the targets even at night in the dark, top defence sources said. It was a conscious decision not to cross the international border or the Line of Control (LoC) for the strike, as India now had the capability to hit anywhere in Pakistan without crossing the border, the sources said. This ensured the safety of Indian pilots, learning from the Abhinandan Varthaman case during the Balakot strike in 2019. The Losses India ultimately struck multiple terrorist headquarters in Pakistan and PoK on the morning of May 7 between 1.05 and 1.30 am within 22 minutes. The CDS has recently admitted that India did suffer some combat losses in terms of jets in the initial stage of this operation due to 'tactical mistakes" but rubbished Pakistan's count of six Indian jets downed. Top defence sources said the government is inquiring into the reasons for these 'tactical mistakes" that led to a few Indian planes being downed. 'But all Indian pilots returned safe," the sources said. India, however, has confirmed inputs that over six Pakistani jets were downed in Indian strikes in the early hours of May 7 and May 10, alongside a C-130J military transport aircraft of the Pakistani army. Top defence sources said these include F-16 and JF-17 fighter jets of the Pakistani air force and a Pakistani SAAB-2000 AWACS. The Indian Navy did not enter the actual combat but was ready to go, the sources added. They said Pakistan feared that the Indian Navy could attack the Karachi Port, and this may have led it to wave the white flag. Advertisement top videos View All The emergency powers for procurement granted to the three service chiefs by the defence minister after the Galwan clash on the LAC in 2020 had played a significant role in the strong preparation of the forces for a war-like situation during Operation Sindoor, the sources said. Sources also pointed out that the multi-party delegations had been a good success, and opposition members included in the teams were decided by top ministers who spoke to their party heads. Salman Khurshid, Shashi Tharoor, Asaduddin Owaisi, and Kanimozhi were deliberate choices that sent a strong message abroad as well as domestically, the sources said. About the Author Aman Sharma Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from politics to crime and society. Stay informed with the latest India news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated! tags : donald trump Operation Sindoor Pahalgam pakistan terror Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: June 07, 2025, 07:00 IST News india Operation Sindoor: 6 Pak Jets Downed, Bahawalpur & Muridke Pegged On Apr 23, Say Sources | Exclusive

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store