logo
Retail engagement has evolved – time for your strategy to catch up

Retail engagement has evolved – time for your strategy to catch up

Independent4 days ago

Marigold is a Business Reporter client
To grow customer lifetime value, today's retailers must master AI-powered, data-driven engagement across every channel.
You're a retail or e-commerce marketer focused on what really matters: growing customer lifetime value (LTV). You know that keeping customers engaged is the only way to earn repeat purchases, increase order values and turn one-time buyers into advocates. And you know that AI tools such as predictive product recommendations or audience optimisation can accelerate those goals. But here's the challenge: none of it works if your engagement strategy is stuck in the past.
Today's shoppers move fluidly between channels, from app to inbox to store and back again. They expect every interaction to be relevant, respectful and informed by what you already know about them. That means your marketing can't just be cross-channel in theory. It has to be unified in practice.
Here are three key plays every forward-thinking retailer should have in their playbook, powered by real consumer data and practical, AI-enabled strategies to help you modernise your engagement and grow LTV in 2025 and beyond.
Play #1: Unified data = unified experiences
Insight from the Consumer Trends Index: Nearly one-quarter (24 per cent) of consumers say that a consistent digital experience across a brand's website and mobile app is more important than price when making a purchase decision.
Shoppers expect your brand to know them, whether they click through from an email, tap on a mobile app or walk into a store. But that level of consistency is impossible without connected systems. When your data lives in silos, your customer experience does too.
The Consumer Trends Index shows how varied channel preferences really are. Email continues to lead, with 54 per cent of consumers making a purchase through that channel in the past year. But dig into the age data, and the picture shifts: 57 per cent of 25- to 34-year-olds made a purchase from a social media post. The takeaway? Channel preferences differ by audience.
This means it's not enough to just show up across channels. You have to connect them to each individual's preferences. Unified data lets you build real-time profiles and deliver experiences that feel seamless and personal, not disjointed or repetitive. That's the foundation of modern engagement and long-term growth.
Key to success: Break down your data silos. Align your teams and tools to deliver one connected experience, no matter where the customer appears.
Play #2: Earn trust through privacy-first personalisation
Insight from the Consumer Trends Index: 73 per cent of consumers react positively to product recommendations based on past purchases, but 53 per cent find ads based on third-party cookies invasive. This highlights a preference for personalisation based on data that naturally exists within the brand relationship, such as purchase history or interactions on owned channels.
Privacy isn't just a compliance checkbox. It should be part of your brand experience. Customers want transparency, control and relevance. When brands design with privacy in mind and personalise based on data, it makes sense for them to earn trust and engagement.
With the decline of third-party cookies and stricter regulations, zero- and first-party data are becoming the most reliable, privacy-safe sources of insight. These data types, whether shared intentionally by the customer or captured through direct interaction, help marketers create personalised experiences that feel helpful, not intrusive.
Used responsibly, this data creates a virtuous cycle: transparency builds trust, trust encourages sharing and more data leads to more relevant experiences.
Key to success: Put privacy at the heart of your personalisation strategy. Be transparent, earn trust and turn every data point into a better customer experience.
Insight from the Consumer Trends Index: 79 per cent of consumers say they are likely to engage with personalised emails tailored to their interests.
AI is transforming how marketers connect with customers, making every touchpoint smarter and more effective. Predictive modelling helps forecast outcomes such as purchase intent or churn risk, allowing teams to trigger personalised journeys, update segments or adjust spend with greater confidence.
It also powers better timing and content decisions. Send-time and subject-line optimisation ensure messages arrive when they're most likely to be opened. At the same time, personalisation engines dynamically surface the right content or product across channels based on behaviour and affinity.
Done well, it's the digital version of your best in-store associate: present, helpful and never intrusive.
Key to success: Use AI to enhance, not replace, the human element. Let technology power the timing, while your brand voice delivers the message.
The future of retail engagement is smarter, not more complex. It's not rocket science, but it does require diligence. You need to do the groundwork and connect your data. Only then can you deliver the meaningful engagement that today's customers expect. That includes personalising with purpose, respecting privacy at every touchpoint and using AI to act with precision.
When you connect the dots behind the scenes, you create seamless, relevant experiences that deepen relationships and grow long-term value.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Major fashion brand with over 200 stores to close city centre branch in just HOURS
Major fashion brand with over 200 stores to close city centre branch in just HOURS

The Sun

time2 hours ago

  • The Sun

Major fashion brand with over 200 stores to close city centre branch in just HOURS

A CITY centre branch of a major fashion outlet is set to close its doors in a matter of hours. The branch of Cos at St Ann's Square in Manchester will close as of June 8. No statement has been issued by the retailer regarding its closure. However, a sign on the shop reads: "This store is closing on June 8. "For more information, ask a member of our team or visit Cos, which is part of the H&M group, had sat among other brands like OMEGA, Christopher James, and Mappin & Webb on St Ann's Square. The branch's staff are expected to be moved to other stores, the Manchester Evening News has reported. Another H&M brand Monki also saw a store close in Manchester's Arndale recently. Cos had taken its spot on St Ann's Square where GAP had previously been in 2018. The brand, which launched in 2007, currently boasts more than 200 stores. It comes as other high street retailers struggle across the country. The owners of River Island are understood to be drawing up a radical rescue plan, according to Sky News. Final sales begin as popular clothing brand closes all stores leaving 'devastated' shoppers scrambling for alternative The chain is being forced to restructure as a result of tough trading conditions. The firm's latest accounts at Companies House warned of growing financial and operational risks. "The market for retailing of fashion clothing is fast changing with customer preferences for more diverse, convenient and speedier shopping journeys and with increasing competition especially in the digital space," it said. Why are retailers closing stores? RETAILERS have been feeling the squeeze since the pandemic, while shoppers are cutting back on spending due to the soaring cost of living crisis. High energy costs and a move to shopping online after the pandemic are also taking a toll, and many high street shops have struggled to keep going. However, additional costs have added further pain to an already struggling sector. The British Retail Consortium has predicted that the Treasury's hike to employer NICs from April will cost the retail sector £2.3billion. At the same time, the minimum wage will rise to £12.21 an hour from April, and the minimum wage for people aged 18-20 will rise to £10 an hour, an increase of £1.40. The Centre for Retail Research (CRR) has also warned that around 17,350 retail sites are expected to shut down this year. It comes on the back of a tough 2024 when 13,000 shops closed their doors for good, already a 28% increase on the previous year. Professor Joshua Bamfield, director of the CRR said: "The results for 2024 show that although the outcomes for store closures overall were not as poor as in either 2020 or 2022, they are still disconcerting, with worse set to come in 2025." It comes after almost 170,000 retail workers lost their jobs in 2024. End-of-year figures compiled by the Centre for Retail Research showed the number of job losses spiked amid the collapse of major chains such as Homebase and Ted Baker. It said its latest analysis showed that a total of 169,395 retail jobs were lost in the 2024 calendar year to date. This was up 49,990 – an increase of 41.9% – compared with 2023. It is the highest annual reading since more than 200,000 jobs were lost in 2020 in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic, which forced retailers to shut their stores during lockdowns. The centre said 38 major retailers went into administration in 2024, including household names such as Lloyds Pharmacy, Homebase, The Body Shop, Carpetright and Ted Baker. Around a third of all retail job losses in 2024, 33% or 55,914 in total, resulted from administrations. Experts have said small high street shops could face a particularly challenging 2025 because of Budget tax and wage changes. Professor Bamfield has warned of a bleak outlook for 2025, predicting that as many as 202,000 jobs could be lost in the sector. "By increasing both the costs of running stores and the costs on each consumer's household it is highly likely that we will see retail job losses eclipse the height of the pandemic in 2020." 2

Trump warns of 'consequences' for Elon after he 'disrespected the office of president'
Trump warns of 'consequences' for Elon after he 'disrespected the office of president'

Daily Mail​

time2 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Trump warns of 'consequences' for Elon after he 'disrespected the office of president'

President Donald Trump warned that Elon Musk would face 'very serious consequences' if he was to start bankrolling Democratic candidates. Their relationship disintegrated earlier this week as the former allies battled it out on social media after disagreeing on Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill.' Speaking with NBC News' Kristen Welker on Saturday, Trump was asked what he would do if Musk crossed the political aisle and donated to Democrats. 'If he does, he'll have to pay the consequences for that. He'll have to pay very serious consequences if he does that', he told out the outlet. Musk, who is worth $330 billion, was a major contributor to Trump's presidential campaign - spending at least $250 million in supporting his race for the White House last year. Asked specifically if he thought his relationship with the mega-billionaire CEO of Tesla and SpaceX is over, Trump responded: 'I would assume so, yeah.' 'I'm too busy doing other things. I won an election in a landslide. I gave him a lot of breaks, long before this happened,' he said. 'I gave him breaks in my first administration, and saved his life in my first administration, I have no intention of speaking to him', Trump added. Musk already said that he would be cutting back on spending on political campaigns ahead of next year's midterm elections. The president also accused Musk of being 'disrespectful to the office of the president.' 'I think it's a very bad thing, because he's very disrespectful,' Trump said. 'You could not disrespect the office of the president.' During their spat, Musk even suggested in a since-deleted post that Trump had been named in the government files involving convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Responding to that remark, Trump said: 'That's called "old news," that's been old news, that has been talked about for years. 'Even Epstein's lawyer said I had nothing to do with it. It's old news.' The two dialed back their barbs at each other by Friday night, with both saying that they wished each other well. But by that point, the damage to their relationship looked to be done. Following the outbreak of their feud, Trump and his allies have said Musk turned on the bill because it cuts subsidies for electric vehicles. Musk has said he doesn't need them anyway. The bill is estimated to add another $3.8 trillion to the national debt, which currently stands at a whopping $36 trillion. Musk went public with his criticism in a series of posts on X, arguing that the spending would wipe out the efforts of his DOGE team. Then, on Thursday, when Trump was supposed to be hosting the new German Chancellor Friedrich Merz in the Oval Office, he was asked about Musk's recent criticism. From there the dam broke. 'Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will any more, I was surprised,' Trump told reporters. The president suggested that Musk was angry - not over the bill ballooning the deficit - but because the Trump administration has pulled back on electric vehicle mandates, which negatively impacted Tesla, and replaced a Musk-approved nominee to lead NASA, which could hinder SpaceX's government contracts. 'And you know, Elon's upset because we took the EV mandate, which was a lot of money for electric vehicles, and they're having a hard time the electric vehicles and they want us to pay billions of dollars in subsidy,' Trump said. 'I know that disturbed him.' Over the weekend, Trump pulled the nomination of Jared Isaacman to lead NASA. Isaacman worked alongside Musk at SpaceX. Reports have since emerged that the nomination of Isaacman being rescinded was in part because of the interference of Sergio Gor, the director of the Presidential Personnel Office. The New York Times had first reported that both Musk and some of those inside the White House had pinned the blame for the dust-up on Gor. Musk and Gor have had a sour relationship for months, stemming from what Axios described as Gor's 'resentment' of Musk's involvement in personnel issues. The Washington Post also reported that Gor had made it clear that he would find a way to get back at Musk, which turned out to be Isaacman's nomination. Trump had said he rescinded the nomination due to donations he had made to the Democrats over the years. Vice President JD Vance said in an interview tried to downplay the feud. He said Musk was making a 'huge mistake' going after Trump, but called him an 'emotional guy' getting frustrated. 'I hope that eventually Elon comes back into the fold. Maybe that´s not possible now because he´s gone so nuclear,' Vance said. Vance said that Musk´s DOGE, which sought to cut government spending and laid off thousands of workers, was 'really good.' He had made the comments as he spoke with comedian Theo Von, which was taped on Thursday as Musk's posts were unfurling on X. Von showed the veep Musk´s claim that Trump´s administration hasn´t released all the records related to Epstein because Trump is mentioned in them. Vance responded to that, saying, 'Absolutely not. Donald Trump didn´t do anything wrong with Jeffrey Epstein.' 'This stuff is just not helpful,' Vance said in response to another post shared by Musk calling for Trump to be impeached and replaced with Vance. 'It´s totally insane. The president is doing a good job.' Vance also defended the bill that has drawn Musk's ire, and said its central goal was not to cut spending but to extend the 2017 tax cuts approved in Trump's first term.

Gory details of Elon Musk's 'rugby tackle' of Scott Bessent spill out as White House leaks escalate
Gory details of Elon Musk's 'rugby tackle' of Scott Bessent spill out as White House leaks escalate

Daily Mail​

time3 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Gory details of Elon Musk's 'rugby tackle' of Scott Bessent spill out as White House leaks escalate

New details surrounding a White House brawl between Elon Musk and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent have spilled out into the open - with one insider saying the Tesla CEO rammed his shoulder into Bessent's ribcage 'like a rugby player.' The Daily Mail was the first to report on the heated confrontation between Bessent and Musk, who's since been iced out of Donald Trump 's inner circle after their public blow-up this week. Former Chief Strategist Steve Bannon revealed that there was more to the mid-April tussle, insisting that both men ended up landing blows. They lost their patience with one another following a tense meeting in the Oval Office in which Trump snubbed Musk and instead took Bessent's advice on whom to name as acting IRS Commissioner, Bannon said. When Bessent and Musk exited the Oval Office, they began hurling insults at one another in the hallway. But it was Bessent who struck Musk where it hurts. According to Bannon, Bessent dared to say that the billionaire's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) was a failure, since Musk didn't root out the $1 trillion in wasteful and fraudulent federal spending he promised he would. 'Scott said, "You're a fraud. You're a total fraud,"' Bannon said. That's when Musk body-checked Bessent, who hit the world's richest man right back, according to Bannon. Bessent's comment about Musk failing to deliver DOGE cuts at the magnitude he promised got the Tesla CEO to strike Bessent, who hit back, according to Steve Bannon Multiple people stepped in to break up the fight as the two men were getting close to the office of then-National Security Advisor Mike Waltz. Musk was then escorted out of the West Wing. Bannon previously told the Daily Mail that Trump sided with Bessent '100 percent.' Still, Trump wasn't particularly happy that the fight took place, according to Bannon. 'President Trump heard about it and said, "This is too much,'' Bannon said. Details about the Bessent-Musk clash only build upon speculation that Trump has long been drifting away from his former 'first buddy,' who donated $288 million to his 2024 campaign. They also reinforce the fact that leakers inside the White House are laser-focused on Musk. Sources close to the billionaire blew the whistle on his poor relationship with Susie Wiles, Trump's no-nonsense chief of staff. He treated Wiles like a 'secretary,' a source told the Daily Mail in April, despite her proven track record of success leading Trump's winning 2024 campaign. And in early March, there was wide-scale reporting on an Oval Office blowup between Musk and Secretary of State Marco Rubio. This was in the early days of the DOGE-inspired layoffs, and according to The New York Times, Musk berated Rubio for not firing anyone at the State Department. Rubio reportedly asked whether the 1,500 State Department officials who took early retirement buyouts counted as layoffs. Then he 'sarcastically' questioned if Musk wanted him to rehire them so he could fire them again, The Times reported. Most recently, Musk's alleged drug use was laid bare by insiders who spoke to The New York Times. Musk was reportedly taking ketamine so frequently that it was affecting his bladder function. The bombshell report also claimed he took ecstasy, psychedelic mushrooms and traveled with a daily pill box that contained about 20 different drugs, including Adderall. While all these disagreements played out behind the scenes, things between Musk and Trump seemed copacetic. In March, when Tesla stock was tanking and people began fire-bombing the electric vehicles all over the country, Trump brought Tesla to the South Lawn of the White House. One of the harshest barbs in the Trump-Musk feud came when Musk accused the president of being in the Epstein files As recently as May 30, Trump was praising Musk for his DOGE efforts during a press conference in the Oval Office, even presenting him a golden key to the White House. The era of good feelings would only last a few days more. On Tuesday afternoon, he posted on X about his unflinching hate for the 'Big Beautiful Bill,' Trump's landmark budget and tax cut bill. 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination,' Musk wrote. 'Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.' In response, Trump said he was 'very surprised' and 'very disappointed' about Musk's unabashed criticism. On Thursday, Trump threatened to cut off federal loans and subsidies to Musk's companies, which have received some $38 billion in government money over the last two decades. Trump doubled down on this idea Friday, telling reporters aboard Air Force One: ''I would certainly think about it, but it has to be fair.' He also told reporters that he wished the billionaire 'well,' to which Musk replied in a post on X saying: 'Likewise.' Musk then responded to the clip of Trump talking about canceling his grants, saying: 'Fair enough.' Musk has sought to soften his tone, recently deleting his post on X saying that Trump was in the Epstein files. On Saturday, Trump did a phone interview with NBC's Kristen Welker and said he had no desire to mend his relationship with Musk. He also said he didn't plan to speak with Musk anytime soon. 'I'm too busy doing other things,' Trump said. 'I have no intention of speaking to him.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store