Jaishankar warns Europe on terrorism, says India will advance US ties based on national interest
Amid reports of growing divergence between India and the Trump camp on key security concerns like
Pakistan-sponsored terrorism
, external affairs minister S Jaishankar on Wednesday emphasised that India's engagement with the US is driven by national interest, not personalities. Speaking during his visit to Europe, Jaishankar also issued a stern warning to European countries against downplaying terrorism, asserting that the threat will 'come back to haunt' them.
'I take the world as I find it. Our aim is to advance every relationship that serves our interests — and the US relationship is of immense importance to us. It's not about personality X or president Y,' said Jaishankar in an interview to Euractiv when asked whether India trusts Donald Trump.
His comments come amid subtle tensions with the Trump administration-in-waiting over its reported reluctance to take a strong position on Pakistan's role in cross-border terrorism, particularly after the Pahalgam terror attack that killed several Indian soldiers and triggered a military response.
Jaishankar evoked the memory of Osama bin Laden's presence in Pakistan to underscore the gravity of the threat. 'Why did he, of all people, feel safe living for years in a Pakistani military town, right next to their equivalent of West Point?' he asked. 'I want the world to understand — this isn't merely an India-Pakistan issue. It's about terrorism. And that very same terrorism will eventually come back to haunt you.'
Blunt on West's past, China ties and data security
Taking on European countries that have questioned India's ties with Russia, Jaishankar said those nations must reflect on their own historical actions. 'India has the longest-standing grievance — our borders were violated just months after independence, when Pakistan sent in invaders to Kashmir. And the countries that were most supportive of that? Western countries,' he said.
Live Events
'If those same countries — who were evasive or reticent then — now say 'let's have a great conversation about international principles', I think I'm justified in asking them to reflect on their own past,' the minister added.
On India's balancing act between economic growth and geopolitical caution, Jaishankar pointed to global trends of 'de-risking' from China. Recalling his conversations with European companies in India, he said many firms were actively choosing to diversify away from China.
'Many companies are becoming increasingly careful about where they locate their data — they'd rather place it somewhere secure and trustworthy than simply go for efficiency. Would you really want that in the hands of actors you don't feel comfortable with?' he said.
Economic Times WhatsApp channel
)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
18 minutes ago
- Time of India
China, UK trade deals with Trump pile pressure on EU
Representative AI image After London comes Beijing: US President Donald Trump announced a breakthrough in talks with China to put an end to their rapidly escalating tariff war on Wednesday night, though the details of the agreement remain unclear, and key elements are still awaiting formal approval. "Our deal with China is done, subject to final approval with President Xi [Jinping] and me," Trump wrote on his social media platform, Truth Social. "Full magnets, and any necessary rare earths, will be supplied, up front, by China. Likewise, we will provide to China what was agreed to, including Chinese students using our colleges and universities (which has always been good with me!)" One day later, the scope of the deal remains uncertain. Neither Trump nor US officials had clarified which tariffs might be lifted or what concessions were included, according to the Associated Press news agency. Negotiations appear to be ongoing. 'Liberation Day' wounds healing Two months ago, Trump announced a blanket baseline 10% tariffs on virtually all goods imported into the US, an event he dubbed "Liberation Day." Higher country-specific rates followed, with Chinese imports hit particularly hard. Beijing immediately retaliated, with sharp increases of its own, sending bilateral tariffs soaring — peaking at 145% in some cases — on a trade relationship worth $583 billion (approximately €503.5 billion) in recent negotiations have helped bring mutual tariffs down, tensions remain. As of mid-May, US tariffs on Chinese goods averaged 51%, while Chinese tariffs on US goods stood at 33%, according to the Peterson Institute for International Economics, a US think tank. The UK and the US struck a much-vaunted deal one month ago. However, tariffs on key goods remain in place, pending further implementation. Europe treads cautiously Compared to China, the EU has so far opted for a rather restrained approach, with high-level officials engaged in intensive talks. As of April, most EU exports to the US have faced 10% tariffs. Additional 25% duties on steel and aluminum, imposed in March, remain in effect. The bloc has so far avoided the higher rates slapped on EU was poised to hit back with significant countermeasures on everything from whiskey to motorcycles prepared a second package, though both have been paused as EU-US negotiations continue. Brussels is pushing for a "zero-for-zero" trade agreement, aiming to eliminate tariffs on industrial goods. So far, talks have stalled. One of Trump's key complaints is the persistent trade imbalance. In 2024, the US imported significantly more goods from the EU than it exported, with a trade deficit of $216 billion, according to official US figures. However, the EU frequently argues that the US sells far more services to the bloc than the other way round. One option the European Commission, which as the EU executive branch represents the 27 member states in negotiations, has proposed is pushing EU companies and countries to buy more natural gas from the US, a shift that is already well under way since it turned away from Russia following its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022. EU's nuclear option If all else fails for the EU and Trump resorts to 50% tariffs or even higher rates, there has been some discussion of another more radical move from the EU. "Should Europe retaliate if Trump's tariffs hit on 9 July, and how? If yes, then there seems to be general agreement that, beyond tariffs on goods, US digital services are the most likely and vulnerable target," Tobias Gehrke of the European Council on Foreign Relations posted late last month on social media platform Bluesky. Gehrke pointed to the EU's Anti-Coercion Instrument, a legal framework which empowers the EU to target services and could limit US companies' access to public procurement contracts in Europe. It came into effect in 2023, but has never been used, Time is of the essence With talks ongoing, US Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick has indicated that the bloc is at the back of the line. "I'm optimistic that we can get there with Europe," Lutnick told US broadcaster CNBC on Wednesday. "But Europe will probably be at the very, very end." On Thursday, US outlet Bloomberg reported that EU officials expect talks to extend beyond the current July 9 deadline, citing unnamed sources close to the negotiators, the pressure to wrap up a deal is enormous. "We'll get this deal done in the best way possible," an EU official told DW on the condition of anonymity. "But it's very clear that not only in the EU institutions, but also around the member states, people just don't want to go through this anymore." "In the volatile world we're in, everyone wants to have reliable trading partners, and the US just isn't that right now," the source added. In the coming days, the G7 and NATO summits in Canada and the Netherlands respectively, might have presented an opportunity for Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen to meet. However, the European Commission said on Thursday that no bilateral meetings were currently planned. "That could still change," Commission spokesperson Miriam Garcia Ferrer told reporters at a briefing in Brussels.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
20 minutes ago
- Business Standard
India moves to conserve rare earths, seeks halt to exports to Japan
India has asked state-run miner IREL to suspend a 13-year-old agreement on rare earth exports to Japan and to safeguard supplies for domestic needs, two sources familiar with the matter told Reuters, aiming to reduce India's dependence on China. IREL also wants to develop India's capacity for rare earth processing, which is dominated globally by China and has become a weapon in escalating trade wars. China has curbed its rare earth materials exports since April, pressuring automakers and high-tech manufacturers worldwide. In a recent meeting with auto and other industry executives, Indian Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal asked IREL to stop its exports of rare earths, mainly neodymium, a key material used in magnets for electric vehicle motors, one of the sources said. The Commerce Ministry, IREL and the Department of Atomic Energy, which oversees IREL, did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The sources declined to be identified because of the sensitivity of the matter. Under a 2012 government agreement, IREL supplies rare earths to Toyotsu Rare Earths India, a unit of Japanese trading house Toyota Tsusho, which processes them for export to Japan where they are used to make magnets. In 2024, Toyotsu shipped more than 1,000 metric tons of rare earth materials to Japan, commercially available customs data showed. That is one-third of the 2,900 tons mined by IREL, although Japan relies mainly on China for its rare earths supply. Toyota Tsusho and Toyotsu did not immediately respond to requests for comment. IREL has been exporting rare earths due to a lack of domestic processing capacity, but following the recent disruptions to supplies of Chinese material it wants to keep its rare earths at home and expand domestic mining and processing, a second source said, adding that IREL is awaiting statutory clearances at four mines. However, India may not immediately be able to stop supplies to Japan because they fall under a bilateral government agreement, the person said. IREL wants this to be "amicably decided and negotiated because Japan is a friendly nation", the person added. Japan's Trade Ministry said in a statement to Reuters: "We would like to refrain from answering questions about bilateral exchanges in general, not just about this matter." Expansion plans China's recent export controls on rare earth materials have rocked the global auto industry, which has warned of supply chain disruptions and production halts. China also weaponised its supplies in 2010, when it briefly stopped shipments to Japan. That prompted the Japanese to turn to India for rare earths. India has the world's fifth-largest rare earth reserves, at 6.9 million metric tons, but there is no domestic magnet production. India relies on imported magnets, mainly from China. In the fiscal year to March 2025, India imported 53,748 metric tons of rare earth magnets, government data showed. These are used in automobiles, wind turbines, medical devices and other manufactured goods. Rare earth mining is restricted to IREL, which supplies India's Atomic Energy Department with materials for nuclear power projects and defence-related applications. India lacks wide-scale technology and infrastructure to mine rare earths, and the development of any commercially viable domestic supply chain is years away, analysts said. IREL has a rare earths extraction plant in the eastern Indian state of Odisha and a refining unit in Kerala, in southern India. The miner, founded in 1950, plans to produce 450 metric tonnes of extracted neodymium in the fiscal year to March 2026 with a plan to double that by 2030, the second person said. It is also looking for a corporate partner for the production of rare earth magnets for the auto and pharmaceutical industries, the person said. India is firming up plans for incentives to companies to set up rare earth processing and magnet production facilities to meet local demand, people familiar with the matter told Reuters earlier this month.
Time of India
20 minutes ago
- Time of India
Student loan cuts ahead? Here is what the US Senate's plan could mean for college affordability
The U.S. Senate has introduced a new proposal that could dramatically reshape how students and families pay for college. As part of the higher education section of President Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act,' lawmakers aim to cap how much can be borrowed through federal student loans and reduce the number of repayment options. These changes, while slightly less aggressive than an earlier House version, still represent a significant shift in student aid policy. For undergraduates, graduate students, and parents, this could mean reassessing how to finance education or even reconsidering which schools to attend. Understanding what's in this bill is essential for students looking to make informed financial decisions about college in the coming years. Lower federal loan limits One of the most notable proposals in the Senate bill is the introduction of stricter caps on how much students can borrow. While undergraduates would still be eligible for both subsidized and unsubsidized federal loans, graduate students and parents would see a reduction in the total amount they can access. Unlike the House version, the Senate's proposal retains subsidized loans, which cover interest while the student is in school. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Switch to UnionBank Rewards Card UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo However, the overall borrowing ceiling would be lowered, especially for graduate-level education and for federal PLUS loans taken out by parents. This could limit the financial flexibility of families who rely heavily on federal aid to cover tuition and living costs. Students aiming for expensive professional degrees or relying on parent loans may now face shortfalls that were previously covered by federal borrowing. These students might have to explore private loans or consider part-time study, alternative institutions, or delayed enrollment. Risks of shifting to private lending Tighter limits on federal loans may lead more students and families to turn to private lenders to bridge the gap. Unlike federal loans, private student loans generally lack key protections such as income-driven repayment plans, deferment options, and forgiveness programs. This shift could expose students to more rigid repayment terms, variable interest rates, and fewer safety nets in times of financial hardship. Those without strong credit histories or co-signers might also struggle to secure private financing altogether. At the same time, with fewer repayment plan choices under the new bill—only two federal repayment options would remain—students would lose the flexibility offered by current systems like the SAVE plan. For many, this could increase monthly payments or extend the life of their loans. What this means for future borrowers For students planning their academic futures, this proposed legislation means careful financial planning will become even more important. Changes to borrowing limits could make some institutions less affordable or shift the balance toward more cost-conscious choices such as in-state public universities or community colleges. Students may also need to be more proactive in seeking scholarships, applying early for federal and institutional aid, and comparing total costs of attendance across different schools. Understanding the long-term impact of borrowing less—or turning to private loans—will be critical in maintaining financial stability post-graduation. Those pursuing graduate or professional education may need to adjust their timelines, explore alternative funding sources, or reconsider program choices based on the new financial realities. While the Senate version of the bill is less severe than the House's earlier draft, it still signals a major overhaul in how college is financed in the United States. Many of these proposals could still be altered during the legislative process, but the direction is clear: federal support for student borrowing is tightening. As the bill moves through Congress, students and families should stay informed and engaged. Whether you're applying for college, currently enrolled, or planning for graduate school, understanding these potential changes will be essential for making smart, sustainable choices. Is your child ready for the careers of tomorrow? Enroll now and take advantage of our early bird offer! Spaces are limited.
