
Why I was disappointed by John Swinney's Kneecap intervention
It was the worst kind of 'gotcha' journalism and Swinney should be too savvy to fall for it. The idea that politicians should have a say in the line-up of a music festival is laughable, and unhealthy for a democracy.
We've been here before. Music, particularly hip-hop, has often served as a useful distraction device for the worst of our politicians. I'm not quite old enough to remember Streets Of Sorrow by The Pogues being banned, but I am old enough to remember the Guildford Four being released as innocent men, showing the song to have been entirely true.
I also remember Cop Killer by Body Count. It was a song about, well, killing cops, written to be controversial and succeeding.
US Republicans and Democrats fought over who was more outraged, urging ridiculous sanctions on any shops which dared to stock the CD.
The CEO of Time-Warner, the record company in question, begged people to consider the socio-political context around the song, calling it an 'anguished cry' from a suffering community.
Cop Killer was a response to the brutal racist beating of Rodney King by Los Angeles police and to long decades of discrimination and abuse of African-Americans by police forces around the United States.
Neither Body Count nor Kneecap are issuing instructions, they are protesting. Kneecap are protesting against the Tories, who have been in government for the majority of their lives. The United Nations reports that the last Tory government literally starved a quarter-of-a-million of its own people to death with its vicious benefits reforms targeted at the most vulnerable in our society.
If Kneecap are guilty of anything beyond bad taste, it's that they've given some of the worst politicians this country has ever suffered an opportunity to cast themselves in a more sympathetic light, for a week or so at least. Directing the public gaze away from their vile decisions and at some convenient rappers is about as good as it gets for the spiralling Tories right now. Kneecap took the Tory government to court over a decision by Kemi Badenoch to deny them public funding because of their beliefs about a united Ireland. Their lawyers described the case as 'a penalty kick with no goalie'.
The Government ended up handing close to £20,000 to a trio of West Belfast hoods and Badenoch, then a government minister, had her prejudices put on public display. There is perhaps an element of revenge at play here.
As with the Cop Killer controversy, we are surely required to look a little deeper. Why do the Tories elicit such responses? Why do people actively hate them, rather than just disagree with them? Is it because their decisions in government lead to the 'systematic immiseration of millions' according to the UN; disproportionately women and children, many of whom died?
We should remember David Clapson, who died because he was so heavily sanctioned he couldn't afford electricity. The insulin in his inoperable fridge spoiled, and he died from untreated diabetes.
Four years later another diabetic, Amy Driver, died after being sanctioned for missing an appointment at the JobCentre.
I could go on as there is an endless list of vulnerable people who have suffered and died as a result of inhumane policy decisions made by Tory MPs.
Arguably, they aren't entitled to demand civility from Kneecap, or anyone else, and they definitely are not entitled to drape themselves in a cloak of victimhood and demand our sympathy.
David McDonald
Clarkston via Belfast
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scottish Sun
28 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
Trump insists riots would have ‘completely obliterated' LA without National Guard and demands Dems say ‘THANK YOU'
A lawmaker warned the chaos is the 'tip of the iceberg' LA DESTRUCTION Trump insists riots would have 'completely obliterated' LA without National Guard and demands Dems say 'THANK YOU' DONALD Trump has doubled down on his decision to send the National Guard to Los Angeles after days of unrest in the city. The president said California Governor Gavin Newsom should be thanking him for deploying the troops to protests downtown against federal immigration raids. 8 A protester jumps over a burning car with his bike in Los Angeles on Sunday Credit: The Mega Agency 8 Masked rioters wave a Mexican flag while standing on top of a burning self-driving car in Los Angeles Credit: Getty 8 LAPD officers shoot rubber bullets at protesters as they march through the streets on horseback Credit: Getty 8 A burning Waymo taxi near the Metropolitan Detention Center of downtown Los Angeles Credit: Getty However, Newsom was furious with Trump's decision to send federal service members without his permission and slammed the move as "illegal" and "immoral," as he plans to bring a lawsuit against the Trump administration over it. Newsom and Mayor Karen Bass, both Democrats, insist that the peaceful protests turned into riots on Sunday night only in response to the National Guard showing up. But Trump said on Monday the city would be "completely obliterated" if he hadn't mobilized the Guard. "We made a great decision in sending the National Guard to deal with the violent, instigated riots in California. If we had not done so, Los Angeles would have been completely obliterated," he wrote on Truth Social. "The very incompetent 'Governor,' Gavin Newscum, and 'Mayor,' Karen Bass, should be saying, 'THANK YOU, PRESIDENT TRUMP, YOU ARE SO WONDERFUL. WE WOULD BE NOTHING WITHOUT YOU, SIR.'" He continued, "Instead, they choose to lie to the People of California and America by saying that we weren't needed, and that these are 'peaceful protests.'" Rioters looted shops, set self-driving Waymo cars on fire, and blocked off the 101 Freeway on Sunday night after the National Guard was deployed. Cops used tear gas, flash-bang explosives and pepper balls to push back the protesters, even shooting a TV reporter with rubber bullets live on air at the terrifying scene. Newsom has asked Trump to withdraw the troops and threatened to sue the Trump administration after the president authorized 2,000 troops to storm the city. This is the first time in decades that a state's National Guard has been activated without the governor's permission, which Newsom called a "serious breach of state sovereignty." On Truth Social, Trump called for anyone hiding their identities behind masks to be arrested immediately. He added, "Order will be restored, the Illegals will be expelled, and Los Angeles will be set free." Now, 500 Marines are waiting in a "prepared to deploy" status at a base that sits about 142 miles east of Los Angeles. The city is bracing for more violent clashes on Monday as Trump's new travel ban comes into effect, furthering his crackdown on immigration. More than 100 people were arrested in ICE raids last week as agents targeted the city of Paramount, which has a predominantly Latino population in Los Angeles. LAPD chiefs have now voiced concerns over the use of deadly weapons by the rioters. Trump vowed to support law enforcement in the protests and said he will make sure his administration "sends whatever we need to make sure there's law and order." 8 LAPD Metropolitan Division officers clash with demonstrators Credit: Getty 8 Dozens of self-driving cars were set on fire by rioters Credit: Getty 8 Police officers take cover under an overpass on Highway 101 in downtown Los Angeles as activists lob rocks and fireworks at their vehicles Credit: Getty 8 Read our Los Angeles protests blog for the latest updates...


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
BREAKING NEWS Trump threatens to arrest Gavin Newsom and calls LA rioters 'insurrectionists'
President Donald Trump said he would support arresting California Gov. Gavin Newsom and called the rioters in Los Angeles 'insurrectionists.' 'I would do it,' the president said when asked about Newsom daring his administration to arrest him. 'I like Gavin Newsom, he's a nice guy but he's grossly incompetent, everybody knows it,' the president added. Trump had even harsher words for the demonstrators. 'The people that are causing problems are professional agitators and insurrectionists,' he told reporters on the South Lawn of the White House. 'They're bad people. They should be in jail.' Riots broke out in the mostly Latino section of Los Angeles after a series of arrests by border partrol agents. Trump nationalized California's National Guard to respond to the situation. Newsom responded the city would sue. 'This is exactly what Donald Trump wanted,' Newsom said on social media. 'He flamed the fires and illegally acted to federalize the National Guard.' 'We're suing him.' Earlier the California governor, a Democrat, challenged Tom Homan to put him in jail as he blamed the Trump administration for inciting the riots that have brought Los Angeles to its knees.


The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Five councillors in court over health and safety matter
Scottish Tory councillor James Adams, who represents Kilmarnock West and Crosshouse, will appear alongside them. It is understood the charges relate to their capacity as trustees of the Kilmarnock Leisure Centre Trust, and not as councillors. Ms Maitland has represented Kilmarnock South since 2017, and serves as the member with responsibility for health and social care, while Mr Linton, who represents Kilmarnock and Crosshouse, was elected in 1999 and holds responsibility for resources and economy. Ms Leitch represents the Ballochmyle ward, which covers Auchinleck, Catrine, Cronberry, Logan, Lugar, Mauchline, Muirkirk and Sorn. Mr Douglas represents Kilmarnock East and Hurlford. All five councillors will appear at Kilmarnock Sheriff Court on Thursday June 12 on a pleading diet. In a statement provided to The Herald, East Ayrshire Council said: 'East Ayrshire Council can confirm that Claire Leitch, Iain Linton, Clare Maitland and Barry Douglas are four of the six trustees of the Kilmarnock Leisure Centre Trust, which provided leisure facilities at the Galleon Leisure Centre in Kilmarnock." The council later confirmed Mr Adams, who is also a trustee, will also appear. The spokeswoman added: 'The case is due to call in court as a pleading diet later this week in relation to a health and safety matter, which involves them in their capacity as trustees rather than as councillors. 'As this is a live matter that has not yet called in court, the council would confirm that out of respect and deference to the court process, it would not be appropriate to comment further at this stage.' Police Scotland and the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service did not respond to request for comment.