DWP reveals the 700,000 people who will avoid Starmer's PIP benefits changes
Personal Independence Payment (PIP), a minister has revealed.
Currently, around 3.7 million people across England, Wales, and Northern Ireland receive PIP, a benefit designed to assist those facing challenges due to long-term physical or mental health issues.
Department of Work and Pensions (DWP) figures show that some 690,186 people aged between 65 and 79 were receiving the benefit in January.
But the government plans to tighten eligibility for PIP as part of a package aimed at getting more working-age people currently on benefits into jobs.
In a written response to fellow Labour MP Paula Barker's concerns for pensioners, pensions minister Sir Stephen Timms said: 'Our intention is that the new eligibility requirement in PIP in which people must score a minimum of four points in one daily living activity to be eligible for the daily living component, will apply to new claims and award reviews from November 2026, subject to parliamentary approval.
'In keeping with existing policy, people of state pension age are not routinely fully reviewed and will not be affected by the proposed changes.'
In another question, independent MP Apsana Begum asked the minister to expand on what would happen to people receiving end-of-life care who are on PIP.
Sir Stephen replied: 'We recognise that people nearing the end of their life are some of the most vulnerable people in society and need fast-track and unqualified support at this difficult time.
'People who claim, or are in receipt of, PIP, and are nearing the end of their life with 12 months or less to live, will continue to be able to access the enhanced rate of the daily living component of PIP. We will also maintain the existing fast-track route under the special rules for end of life and where claims are currently being cleared in two working days. This fast-track route will not be impacted by the new eligibility requirement for PIP.'
Changes to the health-related benefit formed the bulk of savings in Labour's 'Pathways to Work' green paper, with the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) projecting that anticipated changes could impact around 800,000 recipients. However, some independent experts predict the impacts could be even greater.
It came as a backbench rebellion over the proposals could spread to more than 100 MPs, some reports have suggested.
Peter Lamb, the Labour MP for Crawley, told BBC Radio 4's Westminster Hour he would be 'voting against anything which is going to restrict access to PIP further than it's currently restricted'.
Many Labour MPs across different wings of the party are 'deeply uncomfortable' with what ministers are planning, he also said.
Last week however, the work and pensions secretary insisted she will press ahead with measures to cut the welfare bill, claiming the move will address an 'economic and social crisis'.
In a speech in London, Liz Kendall said: 'We are the only economy in the G7 whose employment rate still hasn't returned to pre-pandemic levels, and spending on sickness and disability benefits in most other comparable countries is either stable or falling since the pandemic, yet ours continues to inexorably rise.
'There is nothing Labour about accepting the cost of this economic – but above all, social – crisis, paid for in people's life chances and living standards.'
Elsewhere, Reform UK leader Nigel Farage is expected this week to commit to restoring the winter fuel payment in full, as well as scrapping the two-child benefit cap if elected in the future.
The move is an attempt to outflank Labour with its traditional working-class supporters, according to Reform sources.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
16 minutes ago
- BBC News
HS2 contractors referred to taxman over supply of workers
The company building the HS2 rail line between London and Birmingham has reported one of its subcontractors to the tax authorities over possible fraud. Whistleblowers made allegations over the way pay was handled for some construction staff on the high-speed Ltd said last month it was conducting its own investigation, looking into two firms who supplied it with workers. The company has now also referred the matter to firms in question were providing workers to Balfour Beatty Vinci (BBV), a contractor for HS2. Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander is expected to raise the issue in Parliament this week. It is the latest difficulty to beset the troubled giant rail infrastructure has faced myriad challenges and spiralling costs since it was first announced in 2009. It was originally designed to boost capacity on the railways between the north and south of England but the last, Conservative, government decided to scrap the second phase of the project, which included building lines to Manchester and this year whistleblowers flagged concerns over the way some subcontracted staff were being paid. They said self-employed workers had been falsely declared as salaried staff, with "fake" payslips submitted at a higher payrate. The allegations were first published in the i newspaper in of the labour suppliers is understood to remain suspended from new contracts while inquiries HS2 spokesperson said: "We treat all whistleblower allegations seriously and are continuing to conduct our own investigation."The firm said it encouraged anyone with relevant information to report it via confidential internal Department for Transport said last month it had "a zero-tolerance attitude towards fraud, bribery, and corruption" and would ensure any claims of wrongdoing were thoroughly investigated.
The Independent
22 minutes ago
- The Independent
Watch: Reeves defends Keir Starmer's delay on grooming gangs inquiry
Rachel Reeves says Sir Keir Starmer has been focused on the 'victims' of grooming gangs and not 'grandstanding' after the prime minister committed to a national inquiry. The Chancellor made the comments on Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg. After initially dismissing calls for a public inquiry, the prime minister said he had read 'every single word' of an independent report into child sexual exploitation by Baroness Louise Casey and would accept her recommendation for the investigation.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Children's Commissioner attacks Musk for letting children view porn on X
Sir Keir Starmer's Children's Commissioner has attacked Elon Musk for allowing children to watch porn on X. Dame Rachel de Souza has called on the billionaire owner of the social media site to 'act like a father' after it was revealed that children are most likely to view pornographic content on X. Speaking in an interview series by anti-porn charity the Naked Truth Project, Dame Rachel attacked the world's richest man, encouraging him to 'think about children'. 'Look, frankly, Elon Musk, who owns X, is a father. Be [and] act like a father. Think about children,' she told the Naked Truth Project's Ian Henderson. 'Children need our protection. I want Apple, I want X, I want all the social media companies where children see these things to take it seriously. They are global companies and they should do better,' Dame Rachel said. The commissioner's 2023 study into young people and pornography revealed that 41 per cent of young people have encountered pornography on Twitter, surpassing dedicated pornography sites (37 per cent), Instagram (33 per cent) and Snapchat (32 per cent). X introduced age verification measures in 2024 but these can easily be bypassed and fail to offer real protection. The commissioner's office is carrying out work to update her study and reflect children's experiences today, to be published later in 2025. 'We want young people to be able to enjoy the internet, enjoy apps, never have to be bored again on a Sunday afternoon or not find something in a good, sensible way,' she said. 'Instead I'm still hearing heinous stories about what children are seeing on there and I find the tech companies absolutely morally culpable. They are not doing what they should.' The Government's online safety act, which followed this newspaper's campaign for a duty of care on firms to protect children, was introduced in October 2023. It requires porn companies to bar under-18s from their sites and tech giants to put in place tough age checks to prevent children accessing such content. But Dame Rachel said that she is not satisfied with social media companies' compliance with the legislation. 'The Online Safety Bill is clear. They should be protecting children,' she said. 'They know how old the children are on their sites. They've got the technology. 'They should have proper, strict age verification. 'They should be answering children's complaints. They should be taking down harmful material. 'And when I ask them why they're not, they often mumble something about resources or say 'we're doing better'. It's just not good enough. These are our children. This is the law in this country and I want to see a robust approach from government.' The Children's Commissioner is also working on the rise of deepfake and ' nudifying' apps, pointing to research that one in four girls has been shown a deepfake image of themselves, a friend or a teacher. She said that 25 per cent of girls that they had spoken to had either seen themself, a friend or a teacher on nudifying apps. 'It spreads like wildfire with the young,' she said. 'Girls are telling me they're as afraid of these apps as they are of walking home on a dark night because they are terrified of seeing themselves shown naked and passed round. 'It's illegal to make pornographic images of children. Boys who are making these images are committing an illegal act. But the apps that enable this aren't illegal yet – and they should be.'
