
Elon Musk says Trump's ‘big, beautiful' tax and spending Bill is a ‘disgusting abomination'
Elon Musk
, the billionaire tech entrepreneur, has opened a new rift with
Donald Trump
by denouncing the
US
president's tax and spending Bill as a 'disgusting abomination'.
Mr Musk's online outburst could embolden fiscally conservative
Republican
senators – some of whom have already spoken out – to defy Mr Trump as they continue crucial negotiations on Capitol Hill over the so-called 'one big, beautiful Bill'.
'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it any more,' Mr Musk wrote on his X social media platform on Tuesday. 'This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending Bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.'
Mr Musk, who had
previously voiced criticism of the proposed legislation
, quipping that it could be big or beautiful but not both, added on X: 'It will massively increase the already gigantic budget deficit to $2.5 trillion (!!!) and burden America citizens with crushingly unsustainable debt.'
READ MORE
He continued: 'Congress is making America bankrupt.'
A top donor to Mr Trump during last year's US presidential election campaign,
Mr Musk departed the White House last week
after steering its so-called 'department of government efficiency' (Doge) with the stated mission of slashing fraud and abuse within federal departments. He has argued that the Republican Bill will undermine Doge's work and drive the US further into debt.
On Tuesday, Mr Musk drew immediate support from Thomas Massie, one of only two Republicans who last month voted against the Bill in the House of Representatives. 'He's right,' Mr Massie responded on X.
But there was a rebuke from Mike Johnson, the House speaker, who said he had spoken with Mr Musk by phone on Monday for more than 20 minutes, making the case that the Bill achieved campaign promises while making permanent massive tax and spending cuts.
Mr Johnson told reporters: 'With all due respect, my friend Elon is terribly wrong about the One Big Beautiful Bill. It's a very important first start. Elon is missing it … I just deeply regret he's made this mistake.'
[
Elon Musk wanted to 'move fast and break things' in Washington. The main thing he broke was his reputation
Opens in new window
]
John Thune, the Republican majority leader in the US Senate, was more diplomatic, saying: 'So we have a difference of opinion. He's entitled to that opinion. We're going to proceed full speed ahead.'
Having narrowly passed the House of Representatives, the Bill is now under consideration in the senate, which is aiming to pass a revised version by July 4th. Some Republican fiscal conservatives, such as senators Ron Johnson and Rand Paul, share Mr Musk's concerns about the need for significant spending cuts.
Mr Johnson told CNN: 'We have enough [holdouts] to stop the process until the president gets serious about spending reduction and reducing the deficit.'
Mr Trump has previously dismissed Republican dissenters as 'grandstanders' and urged them to get on-board. His influence proved decisive in quelling a potential rebellion in the house. On Monday he wrote on his Truth Social platform: 'So many false statements are being made about 'THE ONE, BIG, BEAUTIFUL BILL'.'
The White House acknowledged Mr Musk's stance but said it has not changed its position on the Bill. Press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters: 'Look, the president already knows where Elon Musk stood on this Bill. It doesn't change the president's opinion: this is one big, beautiful Bill and he is sticking to it.'
The Bill extends Mr Trump's 2017 tax cuts and includes new spending for border security and the military. Republicans aimed to offset these costs with cuts to programmes such as Medicaid, food stamps and green-energy tax credits.
Projections from the Congressional Budget Office and independent analysts indicate that the Bill would add between $2.3 trillion and $5 trillion to the deficit over the next 10 years. White House officials contend that the economic growth generated by tax cuts will offset the increased spending.
Russ Vought, director of the office of management and budget, told CNN: 'This Bill doesn't increase the deficit or hurt the debt. In fact, it lowers it by $1.4 trillion.'
But Democrats have warned that the budget would raise the cost of healthcare for millions of people, and cause millions to lose coverage, to pay for tax cuts for billionaires. A new analysis by Yale University and the University of Pennsylvania found that it could lead to more than 51,000 preventable deaths.
Chuck Schumer, the senate minority leader, said in a floor speech on Tuesday: 'Donald Trump and his so-called 'big, beautiful Bill' is ugly to its very core. Behind the smoke and mirrors lies a cruel and draconian truth: tax breaks for the ultra-wealthy paid for by gutting healthcare for millions of Americans.'
Later, responding to Mr Musk's intervention, Mr Schumer commented on X: 'I didn't think it was imaginable but … I AGREE WITH ELON MUSK.'
Bernie Sanders, an independent senator from Vermont, added in a post: 'Musk is right: this Bill IS a 'disgusting abomination'. We shouldn't give $664 billion in tax breaks to the 1 per cent. We shouldn't throw 13.7 million people off of Medicaid. We shouldn't cut $290 billion from programmes to feed the hungry. Let's defeat this disgusting abomination.' – Guardian
'My Irish friends are awesome' says Elon Musk – who are they?
Listen |
27:30
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


RTÉ News
3 hours ago
- RTÉ News
What powers is Donald Trump using to send troops to Los Angeles?
US President Donald Trump has invoked emergency powers to deploy US National Guard troops and active-duty marines to Los Angeles to quell protests against federal immigration raids. Here, we take a look at what powers Mr Trump is using to send these troops to LA. Is it legal? Mr Trump relied on a seldom-used law known as Title 10 to send an initial 2,000 National Guard troops to Los Angeles. He has since ordered another 2,000 Guard members and 700 marines to the Californian city. National Guard troops are normally mobilised by a state governor and used domestically to respond to natural disasters such as floods or wildfires. Mr Trump, exceptionally, sent the troops to Los Angeles against the wishes of California's Democratic governor, Gavin Newsom. The last time a president defied a state governor to deploy the Guard was in 1965, when president Lyndon B. Johnson sent troops to Alabama to protect civil rights protestors. Title 10 permits National Guard federalisation in times of "a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the government of the United States" but does not give the troops the powers to perform domestic law enforcement duties. The troops deployed to Los Angeles have been used so far only to provide security around federal buildings in the second-largest US city. Mr Newsom has accused Mr Trump of exceeding his authority by deploying the troops without his green light and has filed suit in federal court seeking to have the deployment declared unlawful. Insurrection Act Mr Trump would need to invoke the rarely-used Insurrection Act of 1807 to allow troops to expand their current role in Los Angeles, according to legal analysts. The Insurrection Act gives a president the authority to deploy the military domestically to perform law enforcement duties such as conducting searches and making arrests. The Insurrection Act was most recently invoked by president George H.W. Bush at the request of the then California governor to help put down riots in Los Angeles in 1992, that followed the acquittal of police officers involved in the beating of a Black motorist, Rodney King. It was used by president Johnson in 1968 to quell riots that broke out in the nation's capital and other cities following the assassination of civil rights leader, Martin Luther King Jr. Posse Comitatus Using the military domestically to conduct law enforcement activities is normally barred by another law, the 1878 Posse Comitatus Act. The Insurrection Act lets a president sidestep the Posse Comitatus Act to suppress "armed rebellion" or "domestic violence" and use the armed forces "as he considers necessary" to enforce the law. William Banks, a professor emeritus of law at Syracuse University, said the Insurrection Act and waiving of Posse Comitatus has been infrequent because of a long US history of "leaving law enforcement to civilians". "To sum up the conditions where (the Insurrection Act) may be used, it's for when all hell breaks loose," said Mr Banks, co-author of the book: Soldiers on the Home Front: The Domestic Role of the American Military. "When state and local officials are unable to control civil affairs without federal involvement, the federal government may intervene," he said. "It's normally been requested by the state officials, and the president simply agrees and decides to send a federal force," he said. Mr Newsom has said repeatedly that there was no need for the deployment of the National Guard and marines and that the Los Angeles Police Department was fully capable of handling the unrest.

The Journal
12 hours ago
- The Journal
World Bank sharply downgrades forecast for global economic growth
US PRESIDENT DONALD Trump's trade wars are expected to slash economic growth this year in America and around the world, the World Bank forecast. Citing 'a substantial rise in trade barriers' but without mentioning Trump by name, the 189-country lender predicted that the US economy – the world's largest – would grow half as fast (1.4%) this year as it did in 2024 (2.8%). That marks a downgrade from the 2.3% US growth it had forecast back for 2025 back in January. Advertisement The bank also lopped 0.4 percentage points off its forecast for global growth this year. It now expects the world economy to expand just 2.3% in 2025, down from 2.8% in 2024. In a forward to the latest version of the twice-yearly Global Economic Prospects report, World Bank chief economist Indermit Gill wrote that the global economy has missed its chance for the 'soft landing' – slowing enough to tame inflation without generating serious pain – it appeared headed for just six months ago. 'The world economy today is once more running into turbulence,' Gill wrote. 'Without a swift course correction, the harm to living standards could be deep.'


Irish Examiner
14 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
World Bank sharply downgrades forecast for global economic growth to 2.3%
US President Donald Trump's trade wars are expected to slash economic growth this year in America and around the world, the World Bank forecast. Citing 'a substantial rise in trade barriers' but without mentioning Mr Trump by name, the 189-country lender predicted that the US economy – the world's largest – would grow half as fast (1.4%) this year as it did in 2024 (2.8%). That marks a downgrade from the 2.3% US growth it had forecast back for 2025 back in January. The bank also lopped 0.4 percentage points off its forecast for global growth this year. It now expects the world economy to expand just 2.3% in 2025, down from 2.8% in 2024. In a forward to the latest version of the twice-yearly Global Economic Prospects report, World Bank chief economist Indermit Gill wrote that the global economy has missed its chance for the 'soft landing' – slowing enough to tame inflation without generating serious pain – it appeared headed for just six months ago. 'The world economy today is once more running into turbulence,' Mr Gill wrote. 'Without a swift course correction, the harm to living standards could be deep.'