Meta faces lawsuit for training AI with pirated books
In a recent lawsuit, Meta has been accused of using pirated books to train its AI models, with CEO Mark Zuckerberg's approval. As per Ars Technica, the lawsuit filed by authors including Ta-Nehisi Coates and Sarah Silverman in a California federal court, cite internal Meta communications indicating that the company utilized the Library Genesis (LibGen) dataset—a vast online repository known for hosting pirated books—despite internal concerns about the legality of using such material.
The authors argue that Meta's actions infringe upon their copyrights and could undermine the company's position with regulators. They claim that Meta's AI models, including Llama, were trained using their works without permission, potentially harming their livelihoods. Meta has defended its practices by invoking the 'fair use' doctrine, asserting that using publicly available materials to train AI tools is legal in certain cases, such as 'using text to statistically model language and generate original expression.'
One internal message highlighted in the lawsuit quotes an employee expressing discomfort, stating, 'Torrenting from a corporate laptop doesn't feel right.'
In response to the lawsuit, U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria dismissed some claims but allowed the authors to amend their complaint to include new allegations, including those related to the removal of copyright management information. This case is part of a broader wave of legal challenges against tech companies like Meta, OpenAI, and Anthropic, where authors and creators are seeking to protect their intellectual property rights in the face of rapidly advancing AI technologies.
The outcome of this lawsuit could have significant implications for the tech industry, particularly concerning the use of copyrighted materials in AI training. It raises important questions about the balance between technological innovation and the protection of creators' rights.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Inside the Secret Meeting Where Mathematicians Struggled to Outsmart AI
On a weekend in mid-May, a clandestine mathematical conclave convened. Thirty of the world's most renowned mathematicians traveled to Berkeley, Calif., with some coming from as far away as the U.K. The group's members faced off in a showdown with a 'reasoning' chatbot that was tasked with solving problems they had devised to test its mathematical mettle. After throwing professor-level questions at the bot for two days, the researchers were stunned to discover it was capable of answering some of the world's hardest solvable problems. 'I have colleagues who literally said these models are approaching mathematical genius,' says Ken Ono, a mathematician at the University of Virginia and a leader and judge at the meeting. The chatbot in question is powered by o4-mini, a so-called reasoning large language model (LLM). It was trained by OpenAI to be capable of making highly intricate deductions. Google's equivalent, Gemini 2.5 Flash, has similar abilities. Like the LLMs that powered earlier versions of ChatGPT, o4-mini learns to predict the next word in a sequence. Compared with those earlier LLMs, however, o4-mini and its equivalents are lighter-weight, more nimble models that train on specialized datasets with stronger reinforcement from humans. The approach leads to a chatbot capable of diving much deeper into complex problems in math than traditional LLMs. To track the progress of o4-mini, OpenAI previously tasked Epoch AI, a nonprofit that benchmarks LLMs, to come up with 300 math questions whose solutions had not yet been published. Even traditional LLMs can correctly answer many complicated math questions. Yet when Epoch AI asked several such models these questions, which were dissimilar to those they had been trained on, the most successful were able to solve less than 2 percent, showing these LLMs lacked the ability to reason. But o4-mini would prove to be very different. [Sign up for Today in Science, a free daily newsletter] Epoch AI hired Elliot Glazer, who had recently finished his math Ph.D., to join the new collaboration for the benchmark, dubbed FrontierMath, in September 2024. The project collected novel questions over varying tiers of difficulty, with the first three tiers covering undergraduate-, graduate- and research-level challenges. By February 2025, Glazer found that o4-mini could solve around 20 percent of the questions. He then moved on to a fourth tier: 100 questions that would be challenging even for an academic mathematician. Only a small group of people in the world would be capable of developing such questions, let alone answering them. The mathematicians who participated had to sign a nondisclosure agreement requiring them to communicate solely via the messaging app Signal. Other forms of contact, such as traditional e-mail, could potentially be scanned by an LLM and inadvertently train it, thereby contaminating the dataset. The group made slow, steady progress in finding questions. But Glazer wanted to speed things up, so Epoch AI hosted the in-person meeting on Saturday, May 17, and Sunday, May 18. There, the participants would finalize the final batch of challenge questions. Ono split the 30 attendees into groups of six. For two days, the academics competed against themselves to devise problems that they could solve but would trip up the AI reasoning bot. Each problem the o4-mini couldn't solve would garner the mathematician who came up with it a $7,500 reward. By the end of that Saturday night, Ono was frustrated with the bot, whose unexpected mathematical prowess was foiling the group's progress. 'I came up with a problem which experts in my field would recognize as an open question in number theory—a good Ph.D.-level problem,' he says. He asked o4-mini to solve the question. Over the next 10 minutes, Ono watched in stunned silence as the bot unfurled a solution in real time, showing its reasoning process along the way. The bot spent the first two minutes finding and mastering the related literature in the field. Then it wrote on the screen that it wanted to try solving a simpler 'toy' version of the question first in order to learn. A few minutes later, it wrote that it was finally prepared to solve the more difficult problem. Five minutes after that, o4-mini presented a correct but sassy solution. 'It was starting to get really cheeky,' says Ono, who is also a freelance mathematical consultant for Epoch AI. 'And at the end, it says, 'No citation necessary because the mystery number was computed by me!'' Defeated, Ono jumped onto Signal early that Sunday morning and alerted the rest of the participants. 'I was not prepared to be contending with an LLM like this,' he says, 'I've never seen that kind of reasoning before in models. That's what a scientist does. That's frightening.' Although the group did eventually succeed in finding 10 questions that stymied the bot, the researchers were astonished by how far AI had progressed in the span of one year. Ono likened it to working with a 'strong collaborator.' Yang Hui He, a mathematician at the London Institute for Mathematical Sciences and an early pioneer of using AI in math, says, 'This is what a very, very good graduate student would be doing—in fact, more.' The bot was also much faster than a professional mathematician, taking mere minutes to do what it would take such a human expert weeks or months to complete. While sparring with o4-mini was thrilling, its progress was also alarming. Ono and He express concern that the o4-mini's results might be trusted too much. 'There's proof by induction, proof by contradiction, and then proof by intimidation,' He says. 'If you say something with enough authority, people just get scared. I think o4-mini has mastered proof by intimidation; it says everything with so much confidence.' By the end of the meeting, the group started to consider what the future might look like for mathematicians. Discussions turned to the inevitable 'tier five'—questions that even the best mathematicians couldn't solve. If AI reaches that level, the role of mathematicians would undergo a sharp change. For instance, mathematicians may shift to simply posing questions and interacting with reasoning-bots to help them discover new mathematical truths, much the same as a professor does with graduate students. As such, Ono predicts that nurturing creativity in higher education will be a key in keeping mathematics going for future generations. 'I've been telling my colleagues that it's a grave mistake to say that generalized artificial intelligence will never come, [that] it's just a computer,' Ono says. 'I don't want to add to the hysteria, but in many ways these large language models are already outperforming most of our best graduate students in the world.'
Business Insider
3 hours ago
- Business Insider
How Meta Platforms' (META) Shrewd Energy Strategy Fortifies Future Earnings
Tech giant Meta Platforms (META) has entered into a 20-year power purchase agreement (PPA) with Constellation Energy's (CEG) Clinton nuclear plant in Illinois. The deal secures over 1 gigawatt of carbon-free electricity at approximately $80 per megawatt-hour (MWh), helping Meta manage long-term energy costs and mitigate exposure to an increasingly volatile electricity market. Confident Investing Starts Here: Easily unpack a company's performance with TipRanks' new KPI Data for smart investment decisions Receive undervalued, market resilient stocks right to your inbox with TipRanks' Smart Value Newsletter By locking in stable energy rates, Meta is not only insulating itself from future price swings but also ensuring a reliable power supply for its rapidly expanding data center infrastructure—critical to its AI-driven growth strategy. The recent news has put a strong bid into META stock, helping the company add almost 5% to the value of its shares over the past five days. This move reinforces Meta's position as a leading force in AI-powered social platforms and signals a strong, strategic commitment to sustainable and scalable energy solutions. Accordingly, I am reaffirming my bullish stance on META stock on the back of the CEG joint venture. Rising Power Demand Forces Meta Into Strategic Deal Meta's decision comes at a critical juncture, as U.S. power demand is rising significantly for the first time in decades, primarily driven by the explosive growth of data centers supporting AI, cloud computing, and automation. Utilities have already warned that electricity generation capacity may not scale quickly enough to meet this accelerating demand. PJM, the nation's largest grid operator, has projected potential capacity shortfalls as early as 2030, citing plant retirements outpacing new development. This growing supply-demand imbalance has already introduced volatility in energy markets. In 2022, wholesale power prices averaged roughly $80 per megawatt-hour (MWh) for the first time in over a decade, primarily due to surging natural gas prices that heavily influence market rates. While prices eased in 2023, the macro trends—especially from increasing compute intensity—suggest a renewed upward trajectory starting in 2025. For Meta, whose operations are becoming increasingly energy-intensive, this volatility carries real risk. The company's electricity usage jumped more than 30% last year, reaching approximately 15 terawatt-hours, exposing it to significant cost fluctuations. By securing a long-term nuclear PPA, Meta is effectively insulating itself from future price shocks—stabilizing its operating margins and providing greater long-term predictability for profitability. Meta's Nuclear Energy Strategy to Commence in 2027 Starting in 2027 and continuing through 2047, Meta will purchase the full output—1,121 megawatts—of electricity generated by Constellation's Clinton Power Station. As a 24/7/365 baseload source, nuclear energy plays a critical role in supporting intermittent renewables like solar and wind. Urvi Parekh, Meta's Head of Global Energy, underscored the strategic importance of the deal, stating that 'securing clean, reliable energy is necessary to continue advancing our AI ambitions.' While financial terms were not publicly disclosed, analysts estimate the agreement is priced near $80 per megawatt-hour. Meta secured advantageous terms by helping extend the life of an existing nuclear facility. The deal effectively replaces Illinois' expiring zero-carbon credit subsidies in 2027, allowing the Clinton reactor to remain operational without additional ratepayer support. In return, Meta locks in a long-term, carbon-free power supply—shielded from fuel price volatility and future grid constraints. Constellation's CEO praised the agreement as a forward-thinking private-sector model, highlighting Meta's recognition of the strategic value in maintaining the nation's nuclear infrastructure. Meta's decision to secure a stable, long-term energy supply offers a clear strategic advantage—particularly as Big Tech intensifies efforts to lock in reliable power sources to support rapidly expanding, energy-intensive AI workloads. Microsoft, for instance, has signed a 20-year power purchase agreement (PPA) tied to the planned restart of the Three Mile Island facility, reportedly at a mid-range but competitive price of approximately $110 per megawatt-hour. Meanwhile, Google is backing small modular reactor (SMR) technology through its investment in Kairos Power, aiming to integrate nuclear energy into its operations by 2030, alongside broader commitments to renewables. Amazon Web Services is also expanding into the nuclear space, supporting advanced reactor startup X-energy to potentially power future AWS data centers in high-demand regions, such as Virginia and the Pacific Northwest. What is the Price Target for Meta Platforms? On Wall Street, Meta stock has a consensus Strong Buy rating, based on 41 Buys, three Holds, and one Sell rating attained over the past three months. The average META stock price target is $697.55, indicating ~2% upside potential over the next 12 months. However, the high estimate is $918, and my own target is about $800. This means a potential 15% return over the next 12 months or nearly a 30% return if the high estimate is met. Meta Wins by Being Strategic on Energy Meta's nuclear power agreement delivers clear strategic advantages in terms of energy reliability and cost certainty. By effectively hedging against future energy price volatility, the company mitigates a key operational risk and reinforces its ability to maintain stable profit margins over time. This long-term visibility into energy costs not only enhances financial resilience but also ensures a secure energy supply to support the company's expanding AI infrastructure. Additionally, Meta's direct investment in carbon-free energy aligns with the values of environmentally conscious and ESG-focused investors, likely bolstering long-term sentiment around the stock. In essence, this move transforms a historically volatile cost center into a strategic asset—positioning Meta for decades of consistent energy management and sustained profitability amid an increasingly dynamic tech and power landscape.
Business Insider
3 hours ago
- Business Insider
CEG, OKLO, and SMR Get Set to Power the AI Boom via Nuclear Energy
The nuclear energy sector is experiencing a resurgence unseen in decades, driven largely by its potential to power the burgeoning AI revolution. Major technology companies such as Meta (META), Microsoft (MSFT), and Alphabet (GOOGL) are competing to secure reliable energy sources for their expanding data centers, and nuclear power's clean, consistent output has positioned it as a key player in this race. Confident Investing Starts Here: Leading this revival are three companies—Constellation Energy (CEG), Oklo (OKLO), and NuScale Power (SMR) —each bringing a distinct approach to the nuclear landscape. Over the past year, all three have outperformed the market, capturing investor attention amid rising energy demand. Constellation Energy (NASDAQ:CEG) | The Nuclear Titan Locking in Tech Giants Constellation Energy is the 800-pound gorilla of U.S. nuclear power, and it's just landed a deal that's got everyone's attention. Just two days ago, CEG signed a 20-year power purchase agreement with Meta to deliver 1.1 gigawatts from its Clinton Clean Energy Center in Illinois, starting in 2027. This isn't an ordinary contract, but rather a lifeline for a plant that was on the verge of closure when its zero-emissions credits expire. The deal, which also boosts Clinton's output by 30 megawatts, underscores CEG's ability to secure tech giants. Microsoft is already on board with a Three Mile Island restart. What makes CEG a one-of-a-kind destination for tech titans is its scale. With 94 reactors across the U.S., they're a one-stop shop for tech companies chasing net-zero goals while powering AI workloads. Their shift away from co-located data center plans to grid-connected projects, as noted in last month's update, indicates they're adapting to regulatory hurdles, such as FERC's rejection of expanded co-location deals. Moreover, the Meta deal demonstrates that CEG can pivot and still secure massive contracts. Sure, their stock's run-up makes it a bit daunting to be bullish on today, but with AI data centers projected to eat up 9% of U.S. electricity by 2030, CEG's infrastructure could be a cash cow in waiting. Is Constellation Energy Stock a Good Buy? Currently, most analysts are bullish on CEG stock. The stock features a Moderate Buy consensus rating based on eight Buy and five Hold ratings assigned in the past three months. No analyst rates the stock a sell. CEG's average stock price target of $319.45 implies ~10% upside over the next twelve months, despite shares having already rallied 30% year-to-date. Oklo (NYSE:OKLO) | The Startup with a Nuclear Vision Oklo, the newest entrant in the nuclear energy space and backed by OpenAI's Sam Altman, is focused on small modular reactors (SMRs)—compact, flexible power plants ideally suited for data centers. The company's stock has surged 440% over the past year, fueled by high-profile agreements such as its December deal with Switch to supply 12 gigawatts through 2044. Additionally, a recent memorandum with Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power to advance their 75-megawatt Aurora Powerhouse fast reactor has further accelerated momentum. While Oklo remains pre-revenue and is currently investing heavily in technology development, with commercial operations still several years away, its 'power-as-a-service' model—where the company builds, owns, and operates reactors—could revolutionize how data centers secure reliable power without significant upfront costs. Recent executive orders easing nuclear regulations have also provided a regulatory boost. However, significant risks remain, including ongoing R&D challenges and the high costs of scaling production. For investors who believe SMRs are key to powering the AI revolution, Oklo's long-term vision holds considerable promise. Is OKLO Stock a Good Buy? On Wall Street, Oklo stock carries a Moderate Buy consensus rating based on six Buy and three Hold ratings. No analyst rates the stock a sell. Oklo's average stock price target of $54.40 implies about 15% upside potential over the next twelve months. NuScale Power (NYSE:SMR) | The SMR Pioneer with a Head Start NuScale Power holds a distinct advantage as the first U.S. company to secure Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) approval for its small modular reactor (SMR) design—the 77-megawatt VOYGR module. But the company isn't resting on this milestone; it is rapidly advancing a 2-gigawatt agreement with Standard Power to supply data centers in Pennsylvania and Ohio. Despite posting losses as it invests in expanding its supply chain, NuScale's Q1 report revealed an impressive 857% year-over-year revenue increase. The recent Meta-Constellation Energy deal also boosted NuScale's stock, signaling strong market confidence in its role in nuclear's resurgence. What distinguishes NuScale from its competitors is its pragmatic approach. Its light-water reactor technology is more established and less experimental than Oklo's fast reactors, making it a safer candidate for near-term deployment. However, supply chain constraints and complex project coordination remain significant challenges that could delay progress. Still, with tech giants like Google and Amazon entering SMR agreements, NuScale's first-mover advantage positions it well to meet growing energy demands. Its factory-built, modular design aligns perfectly with data centers' requirements for scalable, reliable power. Is NuScale Power a Good Stock to Buy? NuScale Power is currently covered by eight Wall Street analysts, who generally hold a bullish outlook. The stock carries a Moderate Buy consensus rating, reflecting five Buy ratings, two Holds, and one Sell over the past three months. However, SMR's average price target of $27.42 suggests approximately 12% downside potential over the next twelve months. Why Nuclear Energy Is the Smart Bet for AI's Future The resurgence of the nuclear sector is no coincidence, as the soaring energy demands of AI are reshaping the industry landscape. Constellation Energy (CEG) brings scale, Oklo (OKLO) leads with innovation, and NuScale Power (SMR) holds a regulatory advantage. Each faces its own challenges—CEG's stock trades at a premium valuation, Oklo is still managing significant cash burn, and NuScale navigates operational risks. Nevertheless, the potential upside is substantial. With tech giants committing to multi-gigawatt agreements and nuclear capacity projected to quadruple by 2050, these companies are at the forefront of a transformative energy revolution and merit close attention.
