
Damascus marks first Ramadan in decades free from Assad family rule
Damascenes are experiencing the first Holy Month of Ramadan without the al-Assad family in more than five decades. Bashar al-Assad, who took over from his father Hafez, was the last of the family to lead the country.
He was overthrown in a dramatic rebel coup, led by the Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) group, in early December.
Some restaurants and coffee shops remained open, while most were closed as observant Muslim embarked on the first day of a month of fasting and prayer.
Syria's interim Ministry of Religious Endowments reportedly ordered that all restaurants, coffee shops and street food stands be closed during the day, and barred public eating and drinking. They've also imposed penalties which include financial fines and up to three months imprisonment.
'This year, after the fall of the regime, there are many confirmations regarding the prohibition of publicly breaking the fast, with violators facing imprisonment,' says Munir Abdallah, a resident of the Syrian capital.
'This is something new, good, and respectable, meaning that the rituals of Ramadan should be fully observed in all their aspects,' he added.
Another resident hailed the measure noting that it brings back the original feeling of Ramadan. He also noted that last year, under the Assad rule, everything was open, and it didn't represent the significance of the holy month to Muslims.
'Before the fall (of Assad's regime), last Ramadan, it didn't even feel like Ramadan. You couldn't really tell. But now, it's obvious. Restaurants are closed, people aren't openly breaking their fast,' says Mohammad Kousa.
'You can see that no one is smoking, and no one is casually eating in the streets. Before, we barely felt it was Ramadan.'
There are concerns however that the Syria, under Ahmed al-Sharaa's – former HTS leader – leadership could turn the country into an Islamic state.
'Ramadan this year comes with a new flavour. This is the Ramadan of victory and liberation,' said interim Minister of Religious Affairs Hussam Haj-Hussein in a televised statement.
Al-Sharaa has previously assured world leaders after his rise to power – in an interim capacity – that he will respect Syria's many religions and sects, and not impede on anyone's personal freedoms or impose religious governance on the public.
There are fears the harsh consequences imposed on violating Ramadan traditions may lead people to abstain from eating or drinking in public out of fear of reprisal.
Most countries around the world, including Saudi Arabia, Indonesia, Syria and Kuwait began observing Ramadan on Saturday. A few other countries, including Malaysia and Japan will begin the holy month on Sunday.
Ramadan is the ninth month of the Islamic lunar calendar, and its start date traditionally depends on the sighting of the crescent moon. Muslims observing Ramadan fast from sunrise to sunset, in an act of worship, and empathising with those less fortunate.
Those fasting typically consume a pre-dawn meal known as the 'suhoor', and break their fast after sundown with a meal known as 'iftar', which in Arabic means 'breakfast'.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Euronews
2 hours ago
- Euronews
UK rejects challenge against selling military parts to Israel
Human rights groups lost their legal challenge to the British government's decision to supply Israel with parts for F-35 fighter jets and other military equipment, in a ruling handed by London's High Court on Monday. The court, which looked into the allegation that the UK selling arms to Israel through a global pool was against the law, stated that it was not up to the courts to tell the government to withdraw from the group. The case was brought by the UK-based Global Legal Action Network and a Ramallah-based human rights group Al-Haq, in conjunction with Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International and Oxfam. They argued that there was a 'clear risk' that the UK's indirect supply of essential F-35 components to Israel — which have been linked to its recent military actions, particularly in Gaza — represented a breach of domestic and international law, accusing the British government of operating through a 'deliberate loophole". However, in a 72-page ruling, two High Court judges ruled that the issue was one of national security, given that the parts were considered vital to the defence collaboration, as well as the UK's security and international peace. 'Under our constitution, that acutely sensitive and political issue is a matter for the executive, which is democratically accountable to parliament and ultimately to the electorate, not for the courts," stated Justices Stephen Males and Karen Steyn. The court said that the components were manufactured in the UK, before being sent to assembly lines in the US, Italy and Japan, which supply partners — including Israel — with jets and spare parts. Although the government suspended 30 out of 350 export licenses for equipment sent to Israel — which included licenses for helicopters and drone parts — in September 2024, licenses related to components of F-35 fighter jets were exempt from the suspension. Compared with major arms suppliers such as the US and Germany, British firms sell a relatively small amount of weapons and components to Israel. The Campaign Against Arms Trade non-profit group estimates that the UK supplies about 15% of the components in the F-35 stealth combat aircraft, including its laser targeting system.


France 24
5 hours ago
- France 24
NGO loses bid to block UK export of military equipment to Israel
Israel has used the jets to devastating effect in its bombardment of Gaza. Both sides have been accused of atrocities during a conflict that has killed tens of thousands -- the vast majority of them Palestinian civilians, according to figures the United Nations deems reliable. The UK government suspended some export licences for military equipment after concluding there was a risk Israel could be breaching international humanitarian law but made an exemption for some parts for Lockheed Martin F-35 stealth jets. In its claim to the High Court, rights group Al-Haq called for a judicial review, saying the "carve out" was unlawful and alleging the government had misunderstood the applicable rules of international law. It was supported by Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, Oxfam and others in its case. Judges Stephen Males and Karen Steyn said they "reject all" of the grounds for challenging the government's decision. The case was not about "whether the UK should supply arms or other military equipment to Israel", said the judges. Rather, the case was concerned with "whether it is open to the court to rule that the UK must withdraw from a specific multilateral defence collaboration" because of the prospect that some UK manufactured components may be used by Israel in the Gaza war in actions that could break international humanitarian law. "Under our constitution that acutely sensitive and political issue is a matter for the executive, which is democratically accountable to parliament, and ultimately to the electorate, not for the courts," said the judges. "Once the true nature of the issue is identified, it is clear that the claim must fail. Accordingly, permission to bring a judicial review claim is refused," they added. Shawan Jabarin, General Director of Al-Haq said in a statement issued to AFP: "By exposing serious government failings in facilitating international crimes against Palestinians through its arms exports, civil society and human rights organisations have achieved a crucial breakthrough. "We will continue to persevere in the UK and beyond until governments are held accountable. Israel's impunity is challenged and justice for the Palestinian people is realised," he added. 'Loophole' The UK contributes components to an international defence programme that produces and maintains the F-35s. Defence Secretary John Healey argued a suspension would impact the "whole F-35 programme" and have a "profound impact on international peace and security". Lawyers for Al-Haq said the government had known there was a "clear risk" Israel would use the jet parts to commit violations of international law. But government lawyer James Eadie said the court was not placed to rule on the legality of Israel's actions, and that attempting to do so could have a "potentially deleterious" effect on "foreign relations with a friendly state, namely Israel". In September 2024, the new Labour government announced it was suspending around 30 of 350 export licences following a review of Israel's compliance with international humanitarian law. But the partial ban did not cover British-made F-35 parts, which include refuelling probes, laser targeting systems, tyres and ejector seats, according to Oxfam. Healey has previously said suspending F-35 licences would "undermine US confidence in the UK and NATO" but lawyers for Al-Haq have described the exemption as a "loophole". UK-based NGO Campaign Against Arms Trade has said that licencing figures showed the government had made a "shocking increase in military exports to Israel" in the months after its September 2024 announcement of partial suspensions. It said the figures showed the UK approved £127.6 million ($170 million) in military equipment to Israel in single-issue licences from October to December 2024, saying this was more than for the period from 2020 to 2023 combined. Most of the licences were for military radars, components and software, as well as targeting equipment, according to the NGO, which was involved in the case against the government. Israel launched war on Gaza after an attack by militants from Palestinian group Hamas on October 7, 2023, which resulted in the deaths of 1,219 people, mostly civilians, according to an AFP tally based on Israeli official figures. Israel's retaliatory campaign has killed at least 56,500 people in Gaza, an occupied Palestinian territory, most of them civilians, according to the territory's health ministry. The UN considers these figures to be reliable.


France 24
5 hours ago
- France 24
Israel eyes peace accords with Syria, Lebanon
With Syria under a new leadership after the fall of longtime ruler Bashar al-Assad and Lebanon's Iran-backed Hezbollah movement weakened, Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar told journalists his government wanted more normalisation agreements with Arab countries. "Israel is interested in expanding the Abraham Accords circle of peace and normalisation," Saar said of the US-brokered deals that Israel signed in 2020 with the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain and Morocco. "We have an interest in adding countries -- Syria and Lebanon, our neighbours -- to the circle of peace and normalisation while safeguarding Israel's essential and security interests," Saar told a news conference in Jerusalem alongside his Austrian counterpart Beate Meinl-Reisinger. Control of the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights has long been a source of tension between Israel and Syria, which are technically still at war. Saar insisted that the strategic plateau, which Israel seized in 1967 and later annexed in a move not recognised by the United Nations, "will remain part of the State of Israel" under any future peace agreement. Following Assad's overthrow in December, Israel moved forces into the UN-patrolled demilitarised zone in the Golan, and has carried out hundreds of strikes against military targets in Syria. In Lebanon, the clout of militant group Hezbollah has diminished after it had emerged bruised from a conflict with Israel last year, fuelled by Israel's war against Hamas in Gaza. Israel, however, has kept up strikes against Hezbollah despite a November ceasefire. There was no immediate response from Lebanese or Syrian officials to Saar's remarks. The latest push for peace comes after as 12-day war between Israel and Iran which ended last week, and as pressure rose on the Israeli government to end its offensive in the Gaza Strip, prompted by Hamas's deadly attack in October 2023. On Sunday, a senior US diplomat in the region said the Iran-Israel ceasefire could pave the way for a new Middle East. "What just happened between Israel and Iran is an opportunity for all of us to say: 'Time out. Let's create a new road'," said Tom Barrack, the US ambassador to Turkey who is also a special envoy to Syria. © 2025 AFP