
US public media shutdown hits harder in Turkey – DW – 05/25/2025
President Trump's shutdown of Voice of America is particularly tough on countries like Turkey, where press freedom is decreasing. It was one of the only places to get balanced coverage of Turkish-US relations, users say.
US President Donald Trump's shutdown of US media outlet Voice of America, or VOA, has had a particularly strong impact in countries like Turkey where press freedom has long been under threat.
As a result of the Trump administration's defunding of the US government-funded international news service on March 14, the organization has effectively ceased operations. News websites in all languages have not been updated for more than two months. Broadcasts on television and radio have either stopped completely or switched to music-only programming.
Before suspending service, VOA, which was often one of the rare sources of uncensored news in countries like Turkey, broadcast in 49 languages to a weekly audience estimated at 354 million people worldwide.
Banned in Turkey
Turkey, where approximately 90% of major media outlets are government-controlled, banned access to the Turkish-language website of VOA in 2022, alongside all language versions of Deutsche Welle, or DW. Since then, VOA had been trying to reach its audience in Turkey via a "mirror" website that reproduced the content of the original platform — until Trump shuttered the broadcaster completely in mid-March.
After the arrest of popular Istanbul mayor Ekrem Imamoglu and ensuing protests, photographers, reporters, videographers, YouTubers and social media commentators were also detained Image:Media rights group Reporters Without Borders, or RSF, ranks Turkey 159th out of 180 countries in its 2025 World Press Freedom Index, citing ongoing repression of journalists. There are currently 17 journalists in prison in Turkey.
RSF Turkey representative Erol Onderoglu told DW that international media organizations like VOA, the BBC and DW have emerged as "constructive" role models in recent years, as the country's increasingly polarized press environment has seen a significant decline in quality and freedom.
The Turkish-language services of international broadcasters gained prominence as independent media in Turkey have diminished. Their newsrooms are based abroad but the language services also employ a small number of reporters within the country.
"VOA has also played an important role in opening the voice of Turkey's civil society movement and journalism community to the outside world and breaking the effects of isolation," Onderoglu said.
VOA Turkish was one of the most important sources for audiences in Turkey, especially regarding developments between Ankara and Washington.
"Whenever there was a development in the US that could put the Erdogan government in a difficult position — for instance, an allegation that could lead to sanctions on Turkey over Iran — the first website I would check was VOA's," one of VOA's Turkish audience told DW.
Many Turkish journalists face prosecution for 'insulting' or 'offending" Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan (pictured) often because they've reported on matters of public interest, rights groups say Image: Remo Casilli/REUTERS
Journalists at risk
Following Trump's decision to halt federal funding to the parent agency of VOA, most of the Washington-based news service's roughly 1,300 staffers were placed on administrative leave as a first step toward termination.
A group of VOA employees affected by the March executive order has filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration, accusing the president of executive overreach. A federal appeals court in early May blocked a ruling that had ordered the Trump administration to put VOA employees back to work.
Following the appeal court's decision on World Press Freedom Day, the Trump administration has accelerated efforts to carry out the layoffs.
Nearly 600 contractors, who received termination notices on May 15, were instructed to return their press credentials, badges and other VOA property by May 30. Some affected employees are J-1 visa holders and face imminent deportation, with only 30 days to leave the US.
VOA Director Michael Abramowitz, also one of the plaintiffs in the court case, said that many of those journalists "have escaped tyranny in their home countries to tell America's story of freedom and democracy."
On Thursday, Abramowitz noted that the May 3 decision remained in effect after the appeals court rejected a request for an en banc review — a full reconsideration by all eleven judges — and warned that the Trump administration could push for further layoffs.
Turkish reporters covering anti-Erdogan protests face trials
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
An unwanted 'voice' silenced
Speaking to DW, a Turkey-based VOA employee recalled the day the broadcaster abruptly shut down operations: "Our colleagues in Washington were asked to vacate their offices during working hours. Their badges were seized. They didn't even wait for the end of the day. News operations came to a sudden halt. We couldn't even complete the reports we were working on."
The journalist, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said that VOA stood out in a media environment increasingly under pressure from "an authoritarian regime."
"It was perceived as a threat by the ruling party, facing both access bans and smear campaigns by pro-government outlets targeting VOA staff. In that sense, it's likely that the government welcomed the shutdown of VOA," they said.
The VOA has also produced broadcasts critical of the US governments, they pointed out: "For example, when experts criticized the US in analyses of Turkish-American relations, such comments were never censored."
Investigative journalists Timur Soykan (left) and Murat Agirel were recently arrested and released but now they have been placed under judicial control measures and can't leave the country Image: ANKA
Trump's 'war' on journalism
Antoine Bernard, director of advocacy and strategic litigation at RSF, told DW that Trump's attempts to shut down VOA must be understood in the larger context of "his war on the press."
"He has targeted public media funding, launched politically motivated investigations into media he doesn't like, and banned journalists from the White House for refusing to use the exact words he wants them to use. Quite simply, he does not tolerate independent media", he said.
RSF recently warned of "an alarming deterioration in press freedom" in the US under President Trump. The organization highlighted how Trump exacerbated already difficult conditions by cutting off US financial support for state-funded broadcasters such as VOA and Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL).
Earlier this month, Trump signed yet another executive order seeking to slash funding for the US' Public Broadcasting Service, or PBS and National Public Radio, or NPR. The Trump administration also launched Federal Communications Commission investigations into major media outlets, including ABC News, CBS News, PBS and NPR.
Europeans worried over Trump's cuts to public broadcasters
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Int'l Business Times
17 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Donald Trump Not Happy With Apple CEO Tim Cook's India iPhone Production Plan
Expressing his dismay at Apple CEO Tim Cook's plan to shift some of the iPhone production operations to India, US President Donald Trump categorically emphasised that he 'doesn't want this to happen'. The main Apple iPhone production is in China and there's a good reason for this as the tech giant mass produces its popular iOS models in the Asian country because of workers' manufacturing expertise, the supply chain infrastructure's efficiency, and cheaper labour costs. However, Tim Cook is now considering other countries because of the massive tariffs imposed by the Trump administration in China. According to Mashable SE Asia, Apple is planning to shift some of its iPhone manufacturing operations to India. People familiar with the matter even claimed that the initiative is already underway. Trump disappointed after learning about Tim Cook's plan. 'I had a little problem with Tim Cook,' said the American leader via CNBC. "I said to him, 'My friend, I treated you very good. You're coming here with $500 billion, but now I hear you're building all over India,'" added Trump. With US. tariffs remaining high, it seems like Trump doesn't give Tim Cook any other choice but to rely on India as an alternative. So what does POTUS want? Donald Trump said that he wants Apple to focus its iPhone production in the U.S. During the conference, he said that they treated Tim Cook and his giant firm really well. Trump added that they didn't interfere with Apple building manufacturing plants in China. The US president argued that the administration is not interested in India since it can take care of itself. Donald Trump also argued that India is one of the nations with the highest tariffs. He further stated that India is even willing to remove all tariffs on American products. In April, the White House's trade protectionist policies revealed that the Trump administration has imposed a 26% reciprocal tariff on Indian goods. But, this was temporarily lowered until July. Instead, POTUS wants Tim Cook to start manufacturing in the U.S. Apple has been designing its iPhones and other products in the U.S. However, the actual assemblies of its devices are outsourced to various manufacturers in China and other countries. Although the tech giant also produces in the U.S., it only manufactures very few products. Originally published on IBTimes UK Donald trump Tim cook Apple


DW
20 hours ago
- DW
Middle East updates: Palestinians killed at Gaza aid site – DW – 06/01/2025
06/01/2025 June 1, 2025 More than 20 Palestinians killed at aid distribution site — reports Israel has drawn international criticism for its handling of aid delivery and distribution in the Gaza Strip Image: EYAD BABA/AFP/Getty Images Witnesses reported on Sunday that Israeli forces fired on Palestinians waiting to receive aid close to a distribution site in Gaza. At least 21 were killed and scores more injured, according to a Red Cross field hospital and numerous witnesses, cited by The Associated Press. Hamas said that in total 30 people had been killed and a dozen more injured. "There was fire from all directions, from naval warships, from tanks and drones," The Associated Press cited Amr Abu Teiba, who was in the crowd, as saying. Another eyewitness corroborated the account. The incident happened on Sunday morning as people gathered to receive food. The population of the Palestinian enclave has been starved by a monthslong Israeli blockade that sparked international outrage, even from some of Israel's closest allies. The decision by the Israeli government to allow aid into Gaza has also been mired in controversy and chaos. The UN said that the first deliveries of aid had been minimal and even then failed to reach the people in need. An Israeli and US-backed plan to send in the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) has not assuaged concerns. The aim was to avoid aid being diverted to Hamas — something the UN has said there is no evidence for — and as such, the GHF employs private security contractors, similar to mercenaries, to protect the aid distribution sites. The Foundation on Sunday said it had distributed aid "without incident," and dismissed what it referred to as "false reporting about deaths, mass injuries and chaos." Local health officials have reported that prior to Sunday, six people had been killed and several more wounded by live fire at GHF distribution sites. Large crowds rush new Gaza aid center backed by Israel, US To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video UN agencies have refused to work with the GHF, saying it violates humanitarian rules by giving Israel control over who receives aid.


Local Germany
a day ago
- Local Germany
In changing times, young Germans gun for defence sector jobs
That was a "personal turning point," said the 25-year-old studying at the prominent Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, who was spurred into becoming an armed forces reservist and now wants to work for a military equipment manufacturer. "People are beginning to understand that the Bundeswehr (the German armed forces) is now clearly focused on defending the country" and NATO, said the engineering student during a job fair organised by the institute in western Germany. He was among young Germans at the event expressing interest in the defence sector, a sharp break from the past amid growing hostility from Russia as well as concerns about US security commitments to Europe under President Donald Trump. For the first time ever this year, German arms manufacturers -- which are some of the world's biggest but had in the past kept a relatively low profile -- were among exhibitors at the fair as they hunt for staff to meet surging demand. There were some signs of unease, with Germany's biggest weapons maker Rheinmetall pulling out after a handful of students voiced anger at the presence of arms manufacturers. Still, there is a sense the long-running stigma surrounding the sector has eased since the outbreak of the Ukraine war. And the opportunities in the industry may be welcome at a time that Germany's economy is mired in a downturn. The European defence sector employs about 600,000 people and is expected to grow strongly, including in Germany where new Chancellor Friedrich Merz plans to greatly ramp up military spending. Advertisement Shifting attitudes "The political discourse we have had since 2022 has led Germans to change their way of seeing things," said Eva Brueckner, a consultant from the headhunting firm Heinrich and Coll, which helps defence companies find staff. Since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine over three years ago, candidates have expressed fewer ethical and moral concerns about defence sector jobs, she said. Another student at the fair, Nico Haenelt, was enquiring about an internship at the stand of industrial giant Thyssenkrupp's submarine-making unit. While the 19-year-old says his parents had quite a pacifist worldview, recent geopolitical upheavals have shaped his own outlook. "If the world were more peaceful, I would probably also look in other areas," said Haenelt, who studies mechatronics, which mixes elements of engineering and computer science. To attract talent, defence companies are offering perks ranging from paying for relocation costs to gym memberships, according to accounts given to AFP. Diehl, whose products include ammunition and missiles, even offers scholarships to young people to fund their studies in the hope they will subsequently apply for jobs with the company. Advertisement 'Conservative' sector With the German economy struggling, some hope the improving fortunes of the defence sector could provide a boost. There are already signs that arms makers might throw a lifeline to some troubled companies. Rheinmetall, whose profits have soared since the start of the Ukraine war, last year struck a deal to hire workers from Continental as the ailing auto supplier cuts thousands of jobs. Still, beyond the traditional reluctance of young Germans to work in the defence sector due to the country's past, there are other challenges in recruiting for the industry. "The sector is very conservative, and people who don't come from this background may have difficulty integrating," said the headhunter, Brueckner. And not all the students at the job fair were rushing to find jobs in the arms industry. Niklas, a computer science student who only gave his first name, said his priority was to find a job with "meaning", such as in the fields of health or sustainable development. As for the arms industry? "Never", he insisted.