
Democratic Guardrails: Is NZ Safe From Authoritarianism?
Article – RNZ
Other nations are experiencing the erosion of democratic norms – even authoritarianism. Is our constitution strong enough to withstand it?
, Editor: The House
Benevolent democracy is not guaranteed. Nations can easily backslide down 'Despot Boulevard', eroding rights and freedoms, the rule of law or democracy itself.
The easy slide towards authoritarianism seems to have been particularly strong recently. Freedom House rankings between 2005 and 2021 show more countries have declined than have improved, every year but one. Sometimes, twice as many.
It's worrying to watch. It made me wonder what constitutional safeguards are there in our own democratic system to act as guardrails against governments stumbling off the democracy high road.
For help in answering the question I wandered across the street from Parliament to Wellington's law school (within Te Herenga Waka-Victoria University of Wellington), to meet one of New Zealand's foremost constitutional scholars, Professor Dean Knight. You can listen to highlights from this interview at the link, or read below for examples of some of New Zealand's democratic guardrails.
Our small 'c' constitution
New Zealand does have a constitution, it's just not all in one place.
'We're an odd country with an unwritten constitution,' Knight says. 'We don't have that sort of MasterTech supreme constitution that regulates executive power very explicitly. We have what we might call a customary constitution, a multitext constitution. Our rules and expectations are littered all over the place – some of them written down in legislation, some of them written down in other important documents, some of them arise from just the practice – an expectation about exercising power in a proper way.'
'I guess the distinctive thing about New Zealand is a lot of the checks and balances and controls on executive power in our system are political in character, rather than legal and involving courts. So we position ourselves in a slightly different way than some other jurisdictions.'
I drew Knight's attention to one aspect of the constitution, lying on a desk where we were chatting – the current edition of the Cabinet Manual.
'We're very proud of it in New Zealand. It's something we've actually exported to the United Kingdom, who borrowed the idea of it from us. And what we have in that Cabinet Manual is essentially a collection of the existing constitutional conventions about how executive government, you know – ministers and the prime minister and departments, will exercise their power and run the state.'
Like many of the guardrails listed below, the Cabinet Manual is an example of something that is not nailed down, but evolves.
Responsible government, collective responsibility and playing it safe
Most checks on executive power flow from New Zealand's system of 'responsible government' – where the executive is a subset of the legislature, and the legislature can replace the executive or prime minister at will.
'The Parliament, the House, expresses its confidence in the collective of ministers as a whole. So there's an interlocking sort of relationship-confidence between those ministers. Decision-making in New Zealand, under the Cabinet system, is done collectively around the Cabinet table.'
Those layers mean that not only the prime minister or cabinet must be convinced of a policy, but a majority of their parliamentary party must agree as well.
'Everybody's concerned to maintain the confidence of their colleagues and the confidence of the House of Representatives and ultimately the people. That confidence… can evaporate, and so that conditions or causes a degree of restraint [against] the prime minister or ministers, acting to excess.'
Responsible government in practice – facing the Opposition
Donald Trump never has to stand in Congress and answer probing questions from the opposition. In New Zealand having to do so is a direct practical outcome of 'responsible government'. Question Time is not often allowed to function well, and many ministers avoid answering questions, but it is still a guardrail.
'Question Time is a crucial time for opposition members to hold the executive government to account. I know it feels like political theatre, but it actually has a really important role in the system.'
'The first obligation of accountability is to render account, and that's what happens – to explain what's going on in government, what's gone right, what's gone wrong, what's going to be fixing it. So that requirement to render account, whether it's Question Time, whether it's select committees through Scrutiny Weeks, or other things like that, it has a civilising effect on the exercise of power.'
MMP and negotiated majorities
Parliamentary democracies come with a significant potential weakness in guarding against autocracy; the group that supplies the executive has an automatic majority in the legislature. Under New Zealand's earlier First Past the Post (FPP) electoral system, that majority was usually held by a single party.
Our current proportional representation electoral system (MMP) has provided a new guardrail by typically requiring executive power to be negotiated between multiple political parties.
'In the pre-MMP days, …we did have times where we had a very dominant executive in the House of Representatives… That era is described as an 'elected dictatorship' or an 'executive paradise'. …And that's why we celebrate MMP – when it atomised that power.'
'It took us to a period of multiparty-government, where a cabinet or a prime minister couldn't automatically assume that their program would get through the House, and they had to negotiate and do better to try and ensure they can get the sort of support for different initiatives. …That sharing of power, that multi-party government brings in tensions and frictions, and slows the process down, and ideally removes excesses.
'The question we might want to ask is whether our parties have now mastered the system, such that we're returning to a time in which the Government can quite confidently just push everything through, and there isn't that contestation on a sort of a policy-by-policy basis.'
Courts and respect for the rule of law
In many countries, an early target for a wannabe dictator is the judiciary, particularly if there is a constitutional court or supreme court with power to overrule the executive or parliament. New Zealand's courts do not have that power, though they can point out where new law is contrary to the current constitution.
'Our system of parliamentary sovereignty means laws that are passed by the Parliament prevail, and nobody can disapply the product of Parliament, except in very unusual circumstances. But as a general proposition, the courts don't have the power to strike down legislation.'
Knight says governments abiding by the law is the 'first and fundamental guardrail… Law can be changed and the executive can change the legal settings if they want, but they need to change that law if they want to act differently.'
That may sound obvious, but as prime minister, Robert Muldoon tried to ignore the law – and his actions led to a constitutionally important court decision.
'Respect for the law is a fundamental, but it's also vulnerable… to political expediency. I think there's a good question to ask is – culturally, how strong is our commitment to the rule of law? Because that's what we're seeing being eroded elsewhere, and there's instances where the Trump administration has basically signalled that they don't care what the courts say.'
'But here in New Zealand, there's still a sense when the courts speak, and speak properly in terms of law, that that will be respected by our governments and adhered to.'
The public service: permanent, professional, politically neutral
In the USA, when the presidency changes so does the entire upper layer of government agency staff – as political appointments are replaced. A recently reiterated Trump executive order has deepened the allowance on those replacements by reclassifying many thousands of less senior, career public servants as political hires. This action undermines the 1883 Pendleton Act, which was passed to stop rampant political cronyism and corruption, referred to as the 'spoils system'.
Neither of these are issues in New Zealand, where government departments do not have political appointees – not even at chief executive level. Chief executives are appointed by the Public Service Commissioner.
New Zealand's professional, permanent and neutral public service is a strong democratic guardrail.
'That's really, really important in our system because it provides a stability in the system. It generates a degree of friction, because one of the key obligations of the neutral public service is to proffer free and frank advice.'
Our system includes people whose job includes saying to ministers, 'What the heck are you thinking?'
This crucial guardrail is at risk though because, Knight says, 'there is thinking that perhaps we should follow more of the US model or some of the Australian models that see politicians have a bigger say in the selection. It reduces… one of the key checks and balances that comes from that neutrality, that free and frank advice, if you're able to get people that are just heavily responsive to do your bidding.'
The Governor General: real soft power, theoretical hard power
One crucial aspect of New Zealand's constitution is that the actual power is formally vested in the sovereign, who only exercises that power on the advice of their ministers. The governor-general gets to wear the ribbons and medals but… 'they don't actually make the decisions about that power. That's done by ministers, Cabinet, who are drawn from the House of Representatives.'
Unlike in some nations, the Cabinet or prime minister cannot sign off executive orders themselves. The governor-general still has to sign all the laws, instruments and orders.
So what happens when a government has a particularly bad idea or plans to breach constitutional norms. Can the governor-general refuse to follow their advice?
Knight acknowledges 'there's a theoretical question about whether the governor-general could refuse or act differently, [but] we don't see that in practice.'
'It's a very, very strong constitutional convention, grounded in the idea of democracy – that when the prime minister and the ministers advise the governor-general to act in a particular way, they will do so. The governor-general has the ability to counsel and warn, and even say, 'I'm not convinced this is a great idea, but I'm obliged to give effect to it.'
'There is some of that soft power that lies in the governor-general.'
Knight suggests that requiring ministers to formally sit down with the governor-general and explain to them what they want to do and why, in effect to convince them, can act as a guardrail.
'It's not a high bar, because we know the practice over decades and decades and decades is the governor-general [has always agreed]. But that scintilla of doubt [that the governor-general could refuse], at least in a theoretical sense, might have some effective conditioning power. It may mean that prime ministers or ministers don't offer up advice that would be very egregious and extreme and things like that.'
Knight believes that separation of formal versus substantive powers is a useful guardrail – it 'in some ways conditions and constrains the use of power against its excesses.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NZ Herald
4 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Public media such as RNZ are not actually about audience ratings
Public media like RNZ serve a civic role beyond audience figures. Photo / 123rf THE FACTS Vaughn Davis' recent column about a 55-year-old Pākehā man called Keith who has never heard of RNZ is misguided. While I agree that meeting such a person is remarkable, Davis has extrapolated meanings from it that do not bear scrutiny. He claims that 'a chunk' of Keith's tax


Scoop
13 hours ago
- Scoop
Tuvalu Calls For Sea Level Rise Treaty At UN Oceans Conference
Article – RNZ 'Tuvalu calls for the development of an international treaty on sea level rise, to enshrine the legal rights of affected states and people.' RNZ Pacific Tuvalu prime minister Feleti Teo has called for an international treaty on sea level rise at the UN Oceans Conference in France. Speaking to delegates in Nice, Teo said the ocean is critical to his country's economy, culture and survival. He said he supports the UN Secretary-General's call for all nations to deliver on the 1.5 degrees Celsius promise in order to halt the rate of sea level rise. 'In that regard, Tuvalu calls for the development of an international treaty on sea level rise, to enshrine the legal rights of affected states and people, including the principles of statehood continuity and the permanency of maritime boundary,' he said. 'For Tuvalu, building the resilience and adaptability of our coastlines against the impact of sea level rise is our top adaptation program.' Solomon Islands prime minister Jeremiah Manele used his speech to condemn the pursuit of deep sea mining in the Pacific. Addressing delegates in Nice, Manele said his country has placed a moratorium on deep sea prospecting and mining. He said the world's oceans face three planetary crises: biodiversity loss, pollution and climate change. 'Despite this, some are pursuing deep sea mining with minimal regard for scientific understanding, environmental risks and global consensus,' he said. He said the UN Sustainable Development Goal 14 – to conserve and sustainably use oceans, seas and marine resources – is off track and underfunded. 'We must move beyond rhetoric to concrete actions that matches the scale and urgency to address today's crisis. 'We must also reform our global ocean governance architecture and shift from harmful exploitation to sustainable use of the ocean.' Papua New Guinea's Prime Minister James Marape said his national government does not support deep sea mining due to potentially devastating environmental consequences. However, his stance on the issue is opposite to the one the governor of his country's New Island Province has taken. Governor Walter Schnaubelt recently issued a statement backing Niu Solwara, the company planning to launch the controversial Solwara 1 seabed mining project in the Bismarck Sea by late 2027. Governor Schnaubelt said the new mining techniques employed by Niu Solwara are environmentally safe. Meanwhile, Palau's president Surangel Whipps Jr said financing is key to ensure a sustainable ocean economy that works for the planet. He said the mechanism must include grants for science and governance, patient capital for community-led enterprises, sustainable revenue mechanisms for marine protected areas, and robust local financial systems supporting nature-positive businesses. French Polynesia's president, Moetai Brotherson, spoke of his administration's plan to establish a network of highly protected marine areas (MPAs). This was met with applause. 'Why do we do it? We do it because we are not just looking at the ocean; we are not just seeing it at some place that we can fish. We are part of the ocean, and the ocean is part of us.'


Scoop
13 hours ago
- Scoop
Macron Talks New Caledonia At Pacific-France Summit
Article – RNZ Macron dedicated a significant part of his address to the situation in New Caledonia. , Correspondent French Pacific Desk French president Emmanuel Macron chaired a Pacific-France summit on Tuesday, in the margins of the UN Ocean Conference (UNOC) held in Nice. In his opening speech, the French head of state touched on several aspects of France's cooperation in the Pacific region, including in terms of environment, defence and geostrategy. €2 million Euros for Pacific Forum's Resilient Facility Pledging to maintain France's diplomacy 'in very close connection with our common interests in the Pacific', including the recent opening of a new Embassy in Apia, Samoa, Macron acknowledged the 'central' role played by the Pacific Islands Forum, which will receive about €2 million Euros as a contribution to the Pacific Resilient Facility fund for the region. He also mentioned the opening of a project to introduce new air links connecting French Polynesia, the Cook Islands, Fiji, Tonga and Samoa. He also touched on France-Pacific cooperation at 'strategic and military' levels, through a recently-created 'Pacific Academy' and regular joint regional exercises in order to foster 'common credibility to protect our zones and fight against illegal fishing'. High on the agenda were key issues such as climate change and its adverse effects on Pacific Island states on human lives and biodiversity, natural disasters affecting the region, breaches of sovereignty and security resulting from illegal fishing, and trans-regional crime, especially the rising problem of drug trafficking. In terms of regional maritime security and fight against criminality, especially illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (IUU), France, but also Australia and New Zealand Navys are regularly contributing to patrols in the Pacific Islands Forum's Fisheries Agency (FFA) member states' exclusive economic zones (EEZs). Significant part dedicated to New Caledonia Macron dedicated a significant part of his address to the situation in New Caledonia, one year after the deadly riots that broke out in May 2024 (causing 14 deaths and and estimated €2.2 billion Euros in damages). He told Pacific leaders he was aware of Pacific concerns about 'the events that destabilized New Caledonia a year ago '. 'I want to tell you here… The French state has respected its commitments made decades ago by organizing in recent years three referendums with United Nations observers which were validated and noted. 'But a year ago, violence broke out, triggered by several factors… which we took very seriously.' Macron said since then, France has unlocked 'more than €3 billion Euros' for New Caledonia's economic reconstruction. 'And we have spared no effort with the government, in particular the Minister of State [Minister for Overseas Manuel Valls] to restore dialogue between all parties.' Since February Valls has managed to bring all of New Caledonia's political camps around the same table, something that had not happened since 2022. But the proposal he put on the table in early May, during a behind-closed-doors 'conclave', drew ire from parties in favour of New Caledonia remaining a part of France. They objected, saying Valls' project failed to take into account that the three recent referendums had expressed a rejection of independence and that the Minister's 'sovereignty with France' offer (including transfer of key powers from France to New Caledonia, a dual Kanaky-France citizenship and an international standing) was tantamount to some form of independence which they strongly objected to. A 'new project' on the table in July? On discussions about a resumption of talks to find a bipartisan and comprehensive agreement on the French Pacific territory's future political status, Macron also confirmed that he will 'hold a summit in Paris in the coming weeks to bring together all stakeholders again and manage to come up with a new project'. Macron said after holding three referendums between 2018 and 2021 on New Caledonia's sovereignty, he was not in favour of holding yet another one. 'I must say I honestly believe Pacific, Oceanian or Melanesian cultures are more based on consultation and circularity, not really suited for referendums …whereby you're supposed to express a clearcut yes or no.' We won't make the same mistakes again 'We will not make the same mistakes again in the future,' Macron told Pacific islands leaders, including those from the three French Pacific territories of New Caledonia, French Polynesia and Wallis and Futuna. He said building a political solution for New Caledonia was still work in progress 'with a lot of humility, together'. And in this process, he told regional leaders 'we welcome your advice' and 'recommendations'. He mentioned and thanked Pacific Islands Forum leaders for a fact-finding mission that travelled to New Caledonia in late 2024 and gave rise to 'very productive exchanges'. 'We will do all we can to succeed and I am confident we'll do it with respect for everyone and for all (New) Caledonians, for peace, unity and stability in the region. 'But we are trying to hold this dialogue while respecting the various opinions and the principles of democracy.' During the same Pacific-France summit, Macron also held talks with leaders from Papua New Guinea, Palau, Samoa, Tonga, Fiji, Marshall Islands, Kiribati, the Federated States of Micronesia, Solomon Islands and Vanuatu. The Pacific Islands Forum delegation was headed by its secretary-general Baron Waqa.