
My niece lives in a hospital — there might be nowhere else for her to go
She has stayed in the hospital because she has nowhere to go — despite herculean efforts from her parents and the hospital. Caitlin was born with Cornelia de Lange syndrome (CdLS), a rare genetic condition, and they haven't found a facility that can handle her needs. She can't go home.
The National Institutes of Health
Get The Gavel
A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr.
Enter Email
Sign Up
CdLS causes a range of physical, medical, and mental challenges, but each case is different. Caitlin is on the severe end. Her growth is stunted: She is only 4 feet tall despite being 21 years old. She's on the autism spectrum and is nonverbal; it's estimated that her brain functioning is roughly that of a 1- or 2-year old. She has significant levels of hearing loss and visual impairment.
Advertisement
Because of a malformation of her digestive organs, she was fitted with a feeding tube when she was young. She is, as noted in her records, 'medically fragile' and has survived a host of medical issues, including septic shock, respiratory failure, and mini-strokes. Her parents have been working constantly from the moment she was born to keep her alive.
It's been more difficult than they imagined when they started this journey — not least because there are so few resources for kids and adults like Caitlin. With the Pappas Rehabilitation Hospital for Children, in Canton, slated for closure, there is about to be one fewer.
'We don't treat her any differently than anyone else'
When I first met Caitlin in 2009, I was visiting my future husband's family for the first time. He didn't tell me about her condition ahead of time. When I asked him why on the drive home, he replied, 'Caitlin's a part of our family — we don't treat her any differently than anyone else.'
Advertisement
Caitlin was 5 years old at the time but looked younger. She walked around, humming intermittently, with a musical toy held up to her ear (the better to hear the sound and experience the vibrations). Her parents, Steve and Sara Igoe, seemed stressed but cheerful, and their older daughter Lindsay sat nearby, quietly reading a book. A MassHealth personal care attendant followed Caitlin around and kept her from grabbing anything dangerous. Family members spoke to her lovingly, inquiring about what she was up to and giving her hugs when she passed by them.
Sara holds Caitlin's hand while she listens to the sounds produced by a toy.
Lane Turner/Globe Staff
She was full of personality. I could tell when she was feeling sunny or irritated. When it was the latter, she'd toss away her toy or cheekily knock something over. She was also sweet. At one point during my visit, she stopped and assessed me for a moment. Deeming my lap suitable for her purposes, she climbed into it for a momentary break.
But even then, Caitlin's parents were struggling to figure out how they would care for her as she grew. The prospect of her adulthood worried them most. In Sara's earliest conversations with the Department of Developmental Services in the 2010s, it had been made clear: There were limited spots available for adults in state-run residential facilities and group homes. For the best chance of placement, they'd need to make sure Caitlin was placed in a residential facility by the end of high school.
Advertisement
After years in her local school system, Caitlin began attending a residential program at the Perkins School for the Blind in 2016. The staff quickly recognized what her family had known for a long time: Her behaviors, including moans, grunts, and gesticulations, are her attempts to communicate. The teachers knew how to help, and Caitlin thrived. Her skills advanced, and the staff helped her parents implement an at-home communication system of pictures, objects, and basic American Sign Language.
For a time, things seemed challenging but manageable. That changed in 2022. She'd had surgery to remove some necrotic intestines a few years earlier, which led to complications, infections, more surgeries, and, eventually, a new kind of feeding tube. It suddenly became much more difficult to manage Caitlin's feeding process. Perkins didn't have the capacity to handle it, so she couldn't go back there.
Steve and Sara were desperately worried — it was back to the drawing board, with even fewer options than before. Finding a new facility took several months, even with help from DDS. In 2023, Caitlin finally began attending a school in Assonet that offered residential programs for children and adults with disabilities. They hoped she could stay there long-term.
That year, when I saw Caitlin during the holidays, she was visibly unhappy. Her parents shared that most of her progress in communicating was lost. She emitted low sounds that sounded like grunts until I realized, with a shock, that she was sobbing quietly to herself.
Just a few months later, she ended up in Boston Children's, for a stay that would last more than a year and counting.
Advertisement
Desperately searching for options
Caitlin now has almost no small intestine left, so doctors had to insert a central line to administer formula and medication. It's extremely delicate, because it needs to remain sterile at all times. But Caitlin finds it incredibly uncomfortable, so she pulls and scratches at it. When it's dislodged or dirty, it requires emergency sterilization due to the high risk of bloodstream infection. The central line dressing needs to be replaced once a week, a process to which Caitlin often reacts with aggressive agitation. It requires up to four medical professionals to complete the procedure.
Now, any illness is cause for concern. Specialists at Boston Children's have monitored her carefully, but she's still gotten pneumonia since she's been there. Despite her vulnerability to infection, staying at the hospital for the rest of her life is not a solution; a person with CdLS can live many years into adulthood.
Caitlin sits in her hospital room with her collection of sound-producing toys.
Lane Turner/Globe Staff
At-home care isn't an option, either. Her needs are too complicated. Although Caitlin's been approved for an at-home nurse, she's only eligible for 27 hours a week. And that nurse would not be able to manage her dressing changes and routine medical procedures alone. So Steve and Sara have gone searching, again, in vain, for another residential solution.
To date, they've reached out to 35 facilities, going as far as Pittsburgh to see if there's one that will accept Caitlin with her current needs. Few are able to handle a central line, and of those that are, Caitlin falls outside other criteria. For some facilities, her behaviors are too intense to manage effectively; for others, she's disqualified because she's ambulatory. She's not a great fit for a traditional nursing home because she's young, not to mention that she'd need communication and other support to thrive. But that might be her only other option anyway.
Advertisement
In late 2024, Caitlin was in the midst of an evaluation for the Pappas Rehabilitation Hospital. Caitlin's parents were hopeful; they'd heard good things. But Governor Maura Healey announced in January 2025 that the facility would be
In February, Sara heard from the Massachusetts Executive Office for Health and Human Services. They say they are working on a short- and long-term plan for placement, although there is nothing definite yet.
So, for the moment, Caitlin stays in the hospital, and she waits.
The wait
Caitlin is not alone. In early 2025, Sara reached out to the CdLS Facebook
Some recounted their own children aging out of or not qualifying for government programs or watching state-run facilities close and send their residents to private group homes. Many parents tried to care for their children at home because the facilities available to them were so low quality. (The Boston Globe
Caitlin rests in her hospital bed.
Lane Turner/Globe Staff
One parent in New England wrote, 'I feel like we're in an in-between place. The push for home- and community-based services has not caught up to the closing of institutions, leaving families with not enough supports or nothing.' Another parent added, 'They are, in my opinion, the forgotten.'
It is difficult to quantify the toll all of this has taken on Steve and Sara, on their well-being, their work, their relationship with Lindsay. They're exhausted. Of course they are.
They feel grateful, too. Not every family in this situation has the resources they do: for a patient advocate, long hospital stays, a flexible workplace. But after all of this, they vacillate between hope that a facility will materialize and fear that it never will.
'Sometimes we think to ourselves,
Let's just take her home and get her out of the hospital
. But then we worry something will happen, and she'll just end up back here," says Steve.
'The last three years have been the hardest,' adds Sara. She pauses. 'But it has really all been hard.'
Caitlin has done her part to fight, all her life, to exist among us. And her parents have fought on her behalf. It's hard to watch them and others like them fall through the cracks, and harder still to contemplate the possibility that they'll never have a reprieve.
For now, her extended family must stay at arm's length. My children ask to visit 'cousin Caitlin,' but we worry about getting her sick — so sick that she might not recover. We are all united in protecting this fierce, fragile girl.
I did manage a rare visit with Caitlin in early March. I watched the hospital staff change one of her dressings (aside from a central line, she has an additional tube for some medications). It required three medical professionals and one parent. Caitlin writhed and moaned when the nurses touched the tube lying flush with the irritated skin of her belly and as they gently wound gauze around the opening to contain leakage. Sara explained that it was often much worse, with Caitlin bucking and arching her back, tearing at her tube and trying to escape.
Stephen and Sara sit with their daughter in her hospital room.
Lane Turner/Globe Staff
When they were done, though, Caitlin was mostly back to her giggly self. She held a music toy to her face, meandered around the room stopping often to visit her parents, looked at me, and smiled. Just like old times, she spotted my lap, deemed it suitable, and plopped down onto it. I squeezed her tightly and hoped the next time I'd see her, it wouldn't be in a hospital room.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scientific American
5 hours ago
- Scientific American
Planned NIH Cuts Threaten Americans' Health, Senators Charge in Tense Hearing
U.S. senators grilled National Institutes of Health (NIH) director Jayanta Bhattacharya at a hearing on 10 June about how his professed support for science squares with unprecedented funding delays and research-grant terminations at the agency this year, as well as enormous cuts that have been proposed for its 2026 budget. What would normally be a routine hearing about government spending was anything but: hundreds of scientists and advocates for Alzheimer's disease research packed into a cramped room on Capitol Hill to denounce US President Donald Trump's 2026 budget request, which calls for cutting the NIH's budget by about 40% and collapsing its 27 institutes and centres into 8. Such a cut 'would stop critical Alzheimer's research in its tracks,' Tonya Maurer, an advocate for the Alzheimer's Association, a non-profit group based in Chicago, Illinois, told Nature at the hearing. 'We've worked too damn hard to see this happen.' On supporting science journalism If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today. Bhattacharya defended his leadership at the agency — the largest public funder of biomedical research in the world — noting that there is a 'need for reform at the NIH' and that to restore its reputation, the NIH 'cannot return to business as usual.' (The NIH has been accused by Trump and his Republican allies of funding 'woke' science and research on coronaviruses that they say could have sparked the COVID-19 pandemic.) To help fix the agency, Bhattacharya told the senators that he wants to focus on increasing reproducibility in biomedical research, upholding academic freedom and studying the cause of autism, which US health secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr has pledged to find an answer to by September. Letters of dissent The hearing comes the day after more than 300 NIH staff members sent Bhattacharya a fiery letter decrying the mass termination of jobs at the agency and its cancellation of thousands of research projects on a growing list of topics that the Trump team has said are 'politicized', including those investigating the biology of COVID-19, the health of sexual and gender minorities (LGBT+) and reasons that people might be hesitant to receive a vaccine. 'We are compelled to speak up when our leadership prioritizes political momentum over human safety and faithful stewardship of public resources,' the staff members wrote. They named their letter the 'Bethesda Declaration,' after the Maryland community and Washington DC suburb where most of the NIH is located. The title also alludes to the 'Great Barrington Declaration', an open letter that Bhattacharya co-signed in October 2020 that argued against COVID-19 lockdowns except for the most vulnerable citizens, instead allowing for children and others to be infected so that 'herd immunity' could be reached ― a proposal that numerous scientists and NIH officials called dangerous at the time. At the hearing, Patty Murray, a Democratic senator from Washington, implored Bhattacharya to 'heed their warning,' and said that she expects that 'none of them face retaliation for raising those concerns.' Bhattacharya didn't respond to this comment at the hearing but said in a statement on 9 June that the Bethesda Declaration 'has some fundamental misconceptions about the policy directions the NIH has taken in recent months,' but that 'respectful dissent in science is productive.' Gavin Yamey, a global-health researcher at Duke University in Durham, North Carolina, who signed the latest declaration, said, 'he can talk about freedom, but his own staff are decrying his censorship. How he's actually acting and what he says are not one in the same.' Taking ownership Several senators, including Tammy Baldwin, a Democrat from Wisconsin, questioned who was in charge at the NIH, given reports that billionaire Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency ordered agency employees to cut hundreds of specific grants. 'The changes in priorities, the move away from politicized science, I've made those decisions,' Bhattacharya responded. The mass terminations of awards at institutions such as Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts, 'that's joint with the administration', he said. (The Trump administration has alleged that universities such as Harvard have allowed discrimination, including antisemitism, on their campuses, and has cut or frozen research funding as a result.) The drastic 40% cut to the NIH's budget proposed for the fiscal year 2026 is not yet set in stone: the US Congress has the ultimate say over government spending, and during Trump's first presidency, when he proposed a huge cut to the biomedical agency in 2017, it instead approved a slight increase. Nevertheless, the composition of the body has changed significantly since then — far more of its members are now loyal to Trump. Comments made at the hearing by the senators weren't entirely divided down party lines. Susan Collins, a Republican from Maine who voted to confirm both Bhattacharya and RFK Jr, said she was disturbed by the budget proposal. 'It would undo years of congressional investment in the NIH,' she said.


Miami Herald
6 hours ago
- Miami Herald
The CDC says guns are the No. 1 killer of children. Here's what's really true
With Robert F. Kennedy's Make Children Healthy Again report under attack for questionable science, imaginary research and other 'formatting errors,' as the White House calls them, Democrats are worrying about a politicized public health system selling snake oil to the American public. You don't have to look far back in time for examples of the government public health system and the private sector experts who influence it and spearhead its research efforts selling snake oil. The coronavirus pandemic was rife with them. There was the time public health officials simply made up the claim that staying 6 feet apart would help stop the spread of COVID-19. And the time top officials and scientists conspired to falsely 'debunk' concerns that the coronavirus was released from a Chinese lab. And then there were times when public health advice was politicized, like when public health officials said gathering in groups was unsafe, except if it was to protest the death of George Floyd. They're not just about COVID, either. Remember the great kerfuffle over Flint, Michigan's lead problem? The people who were telling you that Black kids were poisoned forgot to tell you that there own data showed blood lead levels of lead in 'poisoned' kids were much lower than just a decade earlier when nobody was talking about poisoned kids. This weekend, you'll be treated to another misinformation campaign that comes with the imprimatur of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the National Institutes of Health. It's time for the annual 'Gun Violence Awareness Week.' This weekend, buildings all over the country will light up orange in solidarity with those who have lost their lives in what has become a daily bloodbath we spend most of the year ignoring. Among the claims you'll be hearing is one I received from a local Kansas City backer of Moms Demand Action, a gun control group. 'Gun deaths are the number one cause of deaths of American children and adolescents,' her email said. Others say the facts are even more stark. California Gov. Gavin Newsom took out ads on social media saying, 'Guns are the number one killer of kids.' In a speech to mayors, Vice President Kamala Harris said, 'Gun violence is the leading cause of death of the children of America — leading cause of death — not car accidents, not some form of cancer — gun violence.' Facts trigger truth The facts tell a different story. Guns are not the number one killer of children at any age between 0 and 12. They never have been. Cars are the biggest killer. Who says? The CDC database called WONDER that tracks the cause of death in most U.S. deaths indexed by race, sex and age among other characteristics. For a number of kids' years of life, drowning or falls are a greater threat than guns. I asked the Kansas City activist who sent that claim to me why she was spreading such a lie. She didn't respond, but the national press person for Everytown for Gun Safety did reply, citing the CDC and the National Institute of Health as her sources. She sent links. And she's right. Here's what the CDC says: 'Taking into account all types of firearm injuries, including homicides, suicides, and unintentional injuries, firearm injuries were the leading cause of death among children and teens ages one to 19 in 2020 and 2021.' What they mean is if you lump all the dead children and teens in one pile and count how they died, for the whole gruesome pile, the No. 1 killer was guns. But that is only because guns kill so many teens — a large number of them 18- and 19-year-old adult teens. It has nothing to do with children's deaths. Elsewhere on its website, the CDC admits this difference, giving the cause of death for different groups of children as 'accidents.' Why would the CDC do something so misleading? Well, it goes back many decades in which reporting what the leading killer of children and teens was made perfect sense. The killer was the same for them all — accidents, mostly car accidents. So naturally, they reported the number all together. When guns overtook car accidents during the Biden administration, they just kept doing the same thing they had always done. Gun control groups loved it because that let them make the claim that children were dying left and right from guns. That scared concerned parents into backing their agenda and coughing up donations. The Biden administration CDC didn't seem to mind. But there's more to this story that is misleading. Remember guns are the No. 1 killer of teens, but are guns a threat to your kids? Probably not. Which teens? The CDC's WONDER(ful) database reveals that: Guns are not the number one killer of female are not the number one killer of white are not the number one killer of Hispanic are not the number one killer of Asian are not the number one killer of Native American only group for whom this claim is true is Black teens, which is statistically troubling in itself. It isn't like these facts are a shock. I found many of them in the Journal of the American Medical Association. But they do reveal the politicization of our public health experts. When I asked the author of the article, Dr. Elizabeth Wolf, about the gun control groups' claim and the fact that it wasn't actually true that children, female teens, white teens, Hispanic teens, Asian teens and Native American teens were so threatened by guns, she replied that the claim is perfectly accurate and then stopped responding to my emails. That's nuts. So if there is an annual bloodbath of gun violence in the United States, why does the slicing and dicing of dry statistics matter? If your goal is to raise campaign donations and build a national political movement to restrict gun rights, it doesn't matter. Scaring parents whose kids are not at much risk by fudging the issue works great. If your goal is to get Congress to fork over millions in research grants on the problem of gun violence, it works great to make Congress think the bullets are flying everywhere and that the blood is flowing on rural, suburban and urban congressional district streets alike. But if your goal is to actually solve the problem, well, then it really does matter just who is dying and why. Only when we face the answer to that question can we focus resources where the problem is and come up with ways to do something about it. It would be nice if the CDC made that a priority.


New York Times
17 hours ago
- New York Times
5 Keys to a Healthy Diet
Ask any reputable dietitian or nutrition scientist about how to eat healthfully, and they will probably tell you to avoid dieting. Many diets emphasize restriction, whether it's of calories, carbohydrates, fats or something else. And that's not a healthy strategy, said Alison Brown, a nutrition researcher at the National Institutes of Health. Diets like these can cause you to miss out on the range of nutrients your body requires, she said. A much better way to maintain healthy eating habits, she added, is to focus on foods that are not only nourishing, but also bring you joy. That can be challenging when nutrition fads are coming and going with seemingly increasing speed, and often conflicting advice. Is saturated fat the enemy or not? Are we all deficient in protein? Turns out, the best ways to foster healthy eating are also the simplest. Here's how. 1. Prioritize whole foods. Not all processed foods are unhealthy, but they're often stripped of beneficial nutrients like fiber and certain vitamins and minerals, Dr. Brown said. And they may contain high levels of ingredients that can be harmful to health, like added sugars and sodium. Because of this, it's best to consume foods 'as close as possible to how they exist in nature,' Dr. Brown said. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.