
From simulation to spirituality
Before we begin, let's acknowledge that the question, Is this life a simulation? Or, more simply, Is this life real? Is one that has echoed through human history. Philosophers, scientists, religious thinkers, and mystics have all wrestled with it. Today, advances in technology and digital spaces have given this question a fresh urgency. The development of virtual and augmented reality, artificial intelligence, and the rise of immersive digital worlds suggest that what once seemed purely theoretical may be closer to reality than we imagined.
A universe within a universe?
The idea that our reality is a simulation isn't new, but it has gained mainstream attention through figures like philosopher Nick Bostrom and technologist Elon Musk. Bostrom's Simulation Hypothesis proposes that if advanced civilizations are capable of running detailed simulations of conscious beings, then the probability that we are inside one of these simulations is far higher than the probability that we exist in a 'base reality'.
This idea finds analogies in contemporary digital landscapes. Virtual reality, once the realm of science fiction, is now integrated into daily life. Video game graphics have evolved to the point where digital environments are nearly indistinguishable from reality. If we can create worlds with physics and avatars that appear real, what prevents an intelligence far beyond ours from having done the same with us?
Imagine a digital world where the characters—endowed with artificial intelligence—eventually develop the ability to create their own simulated worlds. This cascading effect raises the intriguing possibility that we ourselves could be part of such a system. Some physicists argue that the mathematical nature of our universe and the presence of seemingly arbitrary physical laws may hint at the underlying code of a simulated existence.
Ancient wisdom and modern theories
Long before digital technology, thinkers attempted to describe similar ideas using different frameworks. Plato's Allegory of the Cave presents the idea of prisoners trapped in a cave, seeing only the shadows of reality cast on the wall before them. Their understanding of the world is fundamentally incomplete, just as ours might be if we are living in a simulation.
Ray Kurzweil, a futurist and AI pioneer, has echoed similar sentiments, suggesting that our universe may have been designed by a "superintelligence" from another reality. Rizwan Virk, an MIT author and entrepreneur, discusses the world as a vast digital simulation, with each of us as player-controlled characters.
But perhaps the most fascinating connection comes from religion. Many faith traditions describe reality as impermanent, a test, or an illusion. Hinduism's concept of Maya refers to the illusory nature of the world, suggesting that true reality lies beyond what we perceive. The Quran states, 'We shall show them Our signs on the far horizons and in themselves, until it becomes clear to them that this is the Truth' (41:53). The Bible also speaks of a world beyond what we see, where divine forces influence existence.
A Divine Architect
If the Simulation Hypothesis is correct, then by its very logic, there must be an Architect—an intelligence responsible for the creation and maintenance of this simulated world. This closely mirrors the concept of God found in religious traditions. The idea that an omnipotent, omniscient being governs our reality aligns with the notion of a programmed, rule-bound universe where cause and effect are meticulously managed.
Religious texts often describe figures performing acts that seem to transcend physical laws. The Bible tells of Jesus walking on water, and the Quran speaks of Prophet Muhammad splitting the moon. If our world operates under a coded structure, could miracles be evidence of entities with access to higher layers of this system, capable of rewriting the rules?
Free will, destiny, and the "game"
The paradox of free will and predestination has long puzzled theologians and philosophers alike. If we are living in a simulation, do we have true autonomy, or are our choices preordained? Perhaps both are true. A video game character has the freedom to act within the confines of their programmed reality. Similarly, humans may operate within predetermined parameters while still making meaningful choices.
Religious perspectives suggest that while we are in this world, we are simultaneously connected to another reality—the soul's realm. Some interpretations of Islamic theology, for example, propose that we exist simultaneously in multiple dimensions, with God being beyond time and space. The simulation theory similarly suggests that our existence may be multi-layered, with a higher reality guiding our perceived experience.
What it means for us
Does the idea that our world is a simulation diminish its significance? Not at all. As the beloved Harry Potter quote from J.K. Rowling's series reminds us: "Of course it's happening inside your head, Harry, but why on earth should that mean that it is not real?" The nature of our reality does not define its importance. Whether a test, a game, or an illusion, life remains meaningful because of the experiences we have and the connections we form.
Religious traditions encourage us to live with purpose, seeking truth and striving for virtue regardless of the nature of our reality. If anything, the possibility that our world is a designed system reinforces the idea that life is not random—it has a Creator, an Architect, and a purpose.
The Simulation Hypothesis doesn't necessarily replace religious beliefs; rather, it offers a modern framework that, intriguingly, aligns with ancient wisdom. As science and technology advance, the boundaries between theology, philosophy, and physics continue to blur. Perhaps, in our search for answers, we are merely discovering the codes written into our reality all along.
Abubakar Lala is a freelance contributor
All facts and information are the sole responsibility of the author

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Express Tribune
3 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Pakistan & AI
The recent Human Development Report published by the UNDP presents a stark reminder of Pakistan's precarious position in the global digital and economic order. Ranked among the 26 countries with the lowest Human Development Index, Pakistan is at a critical inflexion point - one where the decisions made today will determine whether it advances with the rest of the world or is left further behind. The theme of this year's report focuses on AI and its vast potential to accelerate human development. While many nations have begun leveraging AI to enhance economic productivity, improve governance and reform public service delivery, Pakistan's digital ecosystem remains largely unchanged. This is despite the country being home to one of the largest freelancing communities globally and a promising, youthful tech workforce. Unfortunately, as the report highlights, Pakistan has not capitalised on its digital potential. Digital inequalities, shaped by broader socioeconomic divides, continue to restrict access to education, infrastructure and opportunity. These gaps are not only limiting individual potential but are also constraining national progress. Meanwhile, the global race to dominate AI is accelerating rapidly. In a striking display of strategic diplomacy and economic ambition, US President Donald Trump recently visited the Middle East, accompanied by top executives from major American tech companies, such as Elon Musk, OpenAI's Sam Altman, Nvidia's Jensen Huang and Palantir's Alex Karp. During high-level meetings with leaders from Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Qatar, these tech leaders negotiated and finalised transformative AI investment deals worth billions of dollars. One of the most notable outcomes was a $500 billion agreement between OpenAI and the government of Abu Dhabi. The deal is set to create one of the world's largest AI hubs in the UAE, covering 25 sq-km and requiring energy equivalent to five nuclear reactors. With this, the UAE positions itself as the regional epicentre for AI development, while Saudi Arabia and Qatar are also securing similar strategic partnerships with US tech giants. These developments are not distant diplomatic footnotes; they carry direct consequences for Pakistan. For decades, Pakistan's economy has relied heavily on exporting labour - both low-skilled workers and highly-trained professionals - to the Gulf. The remittances they send home form a substantial pillar of the country's forex reserves. However, as Gulf countries pivot toward AI-driven automation to replace manual, repetitive and even complex cognitive tasks, the demand for foreign labour is likely to decrease dramatically. According to experts, roles such as cashiers, truck drivers and clerical workers are among the first to be automated. Even software developers and specialists in fields like radiology and pathology may eventually be displaced by machines capable of performing such tasks faster and more accurately. With nearly 42% of Pakistan's workforce engaged in jobs vulnerable to automation, the risks are not hypothetical; they are imminent. Compounding the challenge is Pakistan's internal digital divide. The UNDP reports that half of the country's population still lacks access to smartphones, computers and reliable internet connectivity. This means millions are not only excluded from the digital economy but are also unprepared for the transformations it will bring. Without urgent intervention, this divide could become a chasm, further marginalising vulnerable groups and reinforcing systemic inequalities. While Pakistan has made some progress with initiatives like the National AI Policy 2024, policy documents alone cannot drive change. What is required is a coordinated, long-term national strategy focused on three key priorities: expanding digital infrastructure and access; investing in digital skills and education; and preparing public institutions to manage and regulate AI development effectively and equitably. The AI revolution presents an opportunity, but a profound challenge too. If Pakistan fails to act with vision and urgency, it risks being economically and strategically sidelined in a world where AI is rapidly becoming the defining force of progress.


Express Tribune
3 days ago
- Express Tribune
US Supreme Court grants DOGE access to sensitive social security data
The U.S. Supreme Court building is seen the morning before justices are expected to issue opinions in pending cases, in Washington, U.S., June 14, 2024. Photo:REUTERS Listen to article The US Supreme Court granted on Friday the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), a key player in President Donald Trump's drive to slash the federal workforce, broad access to personal information on millions of Americans in Social Security Administration data systems while a legal challenge plays out. On the request of the Justice Department, the judiciary had put on hold Maryland-based US District Judge Ellen Hollander's order that had largely blocked DOGE's access to "personally identifiable information" in data such as medical and financial records while litigation proceeds in a lower court. Hollander found that allowing DOGE unfettered access likely would violate a federal privacy law. The top court's brief, unsigned order did not provide a rationale for siding with DOGE. BREAKING: The Supreme Court grants DOGE affiliates access to Social Security Administration records. Justices Kagan, Sotomayor, and Jackson would deny the request. — SCOTUSblog (@SCOTUSblog) June 6, 2025 The court has a 6-3 conservative majority. Its three liberal justices dissented from the order. Liberal Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, in a dissent that was joined by fellow liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor, criticized the court's majority for granting DOGE "unfettered data access" despite the administration's "failure to show any need or any interest in complying with existing privacy safeguards." In a separate order on Friday, the Supreme Court extended its block on judicial orders requiring DOGE to turn over records to a government watchdog group that sought details on the entity established by US President Donald Trump and billionaire Elon Musk. DOGE swept through federal agencies as part of the Republican president's effort, spearheaded by Musk, to eliminate federal jobs, downsize and reshape the US government and root out what they see as wasteful spending. Musk formally ended his government work on May 30. Two labor unions and an advocacy group filed suits to prevent DOGE from accessing sensitive data at the Social Security Administration (SSA), including social security numbers, bank account data, tax information, earnings history and immigration records. The agency is a major provider of government benefits, sending checks each month to more than 70 million recipients including retirees and disabled Americans. Democracy Forward, a liberal legal group that represented the plaintiffs, said Friday's order would put millions of Americans' data at risk. "Elon Musk may have left Washington DC, but his impact continues to harm millions of people," the group said in a statement. "We will continue to use every legal tool at our disposal to keep unelected bureaucrats from misusing the public's most sensitive data as this case moves forward." In their lawsuit, the plaintiffs argued that SSA had been "ransacked" and that DOGE members had been installed without proper vetting or training. They demanded access to some of the agency's most sensitive data systems. Hollander in an April 17 ruling found that DOGE had failed to explain why its stated mission required "unprecedented, unfettered access to virtually SSA's entire data systems". "For some 90 years, SSA has been guided by the foundational principle of an expectation of privacy with respect to its records," Hollander wrote. "This case exposes a wide fissure in the foundation." Hollander issued a preliminary injunction that prohibited DOGE staffers and anyone working with them from accessing data containing personal information, with only narrow exceptions. The judge's ruling did allow DOGE affiliates to access data that had been stripped of private information as long as those seeking access had gone through the proper training and passed background checks. Hollander also ordered DOGE affiliates to "disgorge and delete" any personal information already in their possession. The Richmond, Virginia-based 4th US Circuit Court of Appeals in a 9-6 vote declined on April 30 to pause Hollander's block on DOGE's unlimited access to Social Security Administration records. Justice department lawyers in their Supreme Court filing characterized Hollander's order as judicial overreach. "The district court is forcing the executive branch to stop employees charged with modernizing government information systems from accessing the data in those systems because, in the court's judgment, those employees do not 'need' such access," they wrote. The six dissenting judges wrote that the case should have been treated the same as one in which 4th Circuit panel ruled 2-1 to allow DOGE to access data at the US Treasury and Education Departments and the Office of Personnel Management. In a concurring opinion, seven judges who ruled against DOGE wrote that the case involving Social Security data was "substantially stronger" with "vastly greater stakes," citing "detailed and profoundly sensitive Social Security records," such as family court and school records of children, mental health treatment records and credit card information.


Business Recorder
4 days ago
- Business Recorder
SpaceX will not decommission Dragon, Musk says
Billionaire Elon Musk said on Thursday that his rocket company SpaceX will not decommission its Dragon spacecraft just hours after stating that the company would begin decommissioning amid his escalating feud with US President Donald Trump. 'Concerns' delay Starlink service launch