
Ancient Syrian Town Seeks Interfaith Peace After Long War
Inside a centuries-old monastery atop a mountain in western Syria, a priest swung an incense holder on a chain, led his flock in melodic chants and delivered a timeless sermon on the importance of loving one's neighbor.
But when the congregation gathered for coffee after the service, their current worries surfaced, about how peaceful Syria's future would be.
Would the Islamist rebels who ousted the strongman Bashar al-Assad in December ban pork and alcohol, impose modest dress on women or limit Christian worship? Would the new security forces protect Christians from attacks by Muslim extremists?
'Nothing has happened that makes you feel that things are better,' said Mirna Haddad, one of the churchgoers.
Elsewhere in the historic town of Maaloula, its Muslim minority had different concerns. Like their Christian neighbors, they had fled their homes here early in Syria's 13-year civil war. But unlike the Christians, they had been barred from returning by the Assad regime and a Christian militia it supported.
'The problem is the majority,' meaning the town's Christians, said Omar Ibrahim Omar, the leader of a new local security committee. He had come home to Maaloula only after Mr. al-Assad's fall, after being kept out for more than a decade.
'We won't let that happen again,' he said.
Maaloula, nestled between rugged outcroppings 35 miles northeast of the capital, Damascus, has long embodied Christianity's ancient roots in Syria and has served as an important piece of the country's religious mosaic. It is a rare community where locals still speak Aramaic, the language of Jesus, and it boasts a history of coexistence between the two-thirds of its population who are Christians and the other third, who are Sunni Muslims.
But the war that began in 2011 set the two communities on different paths, tearing at Maaloula's social fabric. Many of the Muslims backed the rebels who fought to topple the regime, while the Christians largely stood by Mr. al-Assad, whom they considered the protector of Syria's minorities in a Sunni-majority country.
Now, Mr. al-Assad is gone, the town is damaged and its people are struggling to figure out how they might live together once again.
'I want to live with you as brothers,' the priest, the Rev. Fadi Barkil, said in an interview as if speaking to his Muslim neighbors. 'If we keep going back to the past, it will never end.'
Christians have been living in Syria since before the Apostle Paul's conversion on the road to Damascus. Before the civil war, they made up sizable minorities in Damascus, Aleppo and other places, but their numbers have plummeted since. Christians have emigrated to Lebanon and the West to escape the violence and economic hardship that have devastated their communities.
In Maaloula, Father Barkil oversees its Greek Catholic Church and the Monastery of Saints Sergius and Bacchus, whose fourth-century sanctuary is partially hewed from a peak overlooking the town. Next to it are the remains of the Safir Hotel. Once the town's finest destination for pilgrims and tourists, it was destroyed during the war and is now deserted.
Its terrace overlooks the town, with the domes and crosses of Maaloula's many churches and the minaret of a mosque rising from amid its simple homes.
The civil war first came to Maaloula when a suicide bomber blew up the main army checkpoint protecting the town in September 2013. Nearly all of its few thousand residents — both Christians and Muslims — fled as fighting erupted, and rebels led by the Nusra Front, an affiliate of Al Qaeda, took control.
The rebels set up bases in the hotel and monastery, which allowed them to fire on government forces below. They kidnapped 13 nuns and three assistants from a Greek Orthodox convent.
The women were later released in a prisoner swap with the government, and the Syrian Army and the Lebanese militant group Hezbollah retook the town in April 2014.
Its Christians returned to find their holy sites damaged.
'When the priests came back after the war, everything was destroyed in the monastery,' Father Barkil said.
The top of its altar had been broken, and shelling had punched holes in its stone walls and in the blue dome over the sanctuary, scattering debris across the wooden pews. Many of its icons were missing, and those that remained had been defaced.
And in what Father Fadi described as a deeply symbolic blow, two giant bells had been stolen from his and another sanctuary, removing their rings from Maaloula's soundscape.
For the duration of the war, the Syrian army held the town along with a Christian militia that it armed. The Christian sites were restored, although few of the tourists who had once sustained the economy returned.
When the rebels toppled Mr. al-Assad in December, there was little rejoicing among Maaloula's Christians. The army ran off, leaving the town unprotected, and residents feared that the country's new Islamist rulers would restrict their religious freedoms.
'What do we want in Maaloula?' Father Barkil asked. 'To have a state and security, but we won't accept for the Muslims to rule us by force.'
Exacerbating their concerns is the fact that the founder of the Nusra Front, the jihadist group that attacked Maaloula in 2013, is now Syria's president, Ahmed al-Shara.
Father Barkil acknowledged that Mr. al-Shara has said that he cut ties with Al Qaeda and has vowed to serve all of Syria's people. But the priest called on the new president to reinforce this inclusive message with a visit to Maaloula.
'He can come and say in Maaloula that the Christians are important and that no one can harm them,' Father Barkil said. 'But if he never says this, what will happen to us?'
After Mr. al-Assad's fall, the new authorities sent police officers to secure the town. At the local police station, a few of these new officers — former rebels, all of them Muslims and none of them from Maaloula — were fast asleep in the middle of the day.
Elsewhere, a group of men from a newly formed security committee were crowded around a wood-burning stove, trying to keep warm. They were all Maaloula Muslims, who said that they had fled the fighting in 2013 but that the regime had barred them from coming home because it suspected them of backing the rebels.
Akram Qutayman, 58 and a member of the committee, said that residents of different faiths had lived together peacefully before the war.
'Where I live, I was surrounded by Christians,' he said. 'They would celebrate Ramadan with us, as if we were one hand.'
But he accused the local Christian militia of burning the Muslims' homes while they were away to try to keep them from returning.
'We don't have houses,' said Mr. Omar, the committee's head, also noting that the main mosque was still damaged. But he remained hopeful that the tensions would pass and the town would rebuild.
'I expect that there will be reconciliation, and we will live together again,' he said. 'We will let the past go.'
Some positive signs have emerged in recent weeks.
The two bells stolen from the churches were returned. They were cleaned, polished and rehung in their belfries during a ceremony last month, their sounds resonating over Maaloula for the first time in 13 years.
'Hanging these bells provided relief to people,' Father Barkil said. 'In the end, they are the voice of God.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


American Military News
9 minutes ago
- American Military News
New bill introduced on D-Day anniversary would ‘strengthen' US, UK partnership
A new bill introduced by a Republican congressman on the 81st anniversary of D-Day would allow the United States to share military technology with the United Kingdom. On Friday, Rep. Mark Green (R-Tenn.) announced in a press release that he had reintroduced the Special Relationship Military Improvement Act of 2025 to strengthen the country's relationship with the United Kingdom on the 81st anniversary of D-Day. 'Our nation can never forget the sacrifice of thousands of Allied soldiers who lost their lives on D-Day and the invasion of Normandy. The price they paid ensured that millions could live free from tyranny,' Green said. 'And the best way to commemorate this momentous day is to strengthen our partnership with the United Kingdom—and that's exactly what this bill does.' In Friday's press release, the Republican congressman explained that advancements in military technology currently become the 'exclusive property' of the United States when sold to the federal government under the rules established by the International Traffic in Arms Regulations. Green said that while Canada is provided exemptions under the International Traffic in Arms Regulations, the United Kingdom is not provided exemptions. READ MORE: D-Day hero receiving medals for saving 200 lives If the Special Relationship Military Improvement Act of 2025 was passed, it would implement a change to the Arms Export Control Act to allow military technology to be shared between the United States and the United Kingdom. In Friday's press release, Green said advancements in U.S. military technology 'should be available to our allies' and that sharing military technology with allies was 'common sense.' Green explained, 'The U.S. and the U.K. work together in almost every aspect to share intelligence, fight terrorism around the globe, and ensure that, through our combined military strength, the world can enjoy unprecedented peace.' In a statement to Fox News on Friday, Green said, 'On the beaches of Normandy, it was British soldiers who ran in the sand alongside Americans.' He added, 'When we were attacked on 9/11, it was the United Kingdom that sent soldiers into Afghanistan to help us destroy al-Qaeda and the Taliban that gave them safe haven.' Green emphasized that the United States will 'never forget' the friendship it shares with the United Kingdom. The Republican congressman added that sharing military technology is 'crucial' in the face of increasing threats across the globe.


The Hill
12 minutes ago
- The Hill
Illinois Republican mistakes Sikh for Muslim, calls him delivering prayer in House ‘deeply troubling'
Rep. Mary Miller (R-Ill.) said it was 'deeply disturbing' that a Sikh delivered a prayer in the House chamber on Friday — after apparently mistaking him for a Muslim man. The since-deleted post Friday morning sparked immediate bipartisan criticism. 'It's deeply troubling that a Muslim was allowed to lead prayer in the House of Representatives this morning. This should never have been allowed to happen,' Miller said in a post on X. 'America was founded as a Christian nation, and I believe our government should reflect that truth, not drift further from it. May God have mercy!' She attached a photo of the guest chaplain, who was wearing a yellow turban, leading the customary prayer that occurs every day at the opening of the House floor. But the guest chaplain was not a Muslim, but a Sikh: Giani Surinder Singh of Gurdwara South Jersey Sikh Society in Vineland, N.J. Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.), who opened the floor, had introduced the guest chaplain. Miller later edited her post on X to replace 'Muslim' with 'Sikh' before deleting the post altogether. Her office did not respond to a request for comment about the incident. The House has long welcomed guest chaplains from many types of faiths — including Muslims, with a Muslim guest chaplain notably reading from the Quran in November 2001 following the 9/11 terror attacks. Members of Congress regularly invite guest chaplains to deliver prayers Miller's post sparked bipartisan condemnation. Rep. David Valadao (R-Calif.) said on X he was 'troubled' by the post. 'Throughout the country—and in the Central Valley— Sikh-Americans are valued and respected members of our communities, yet they continue to face harassment and discrimination.' 'While yes, we are a nation rooted in Judeo-Christian values and our laws reflect that, we are also a nation that recognizes we are all God's children and whatever our differences, we can and should respect differences of faith,' added Rep. Mike Lawler (R-N.Y.) in another post commenting on Miller's post. Democrats, meanwhile, went much further in their criticism. 'Our country was founded on the Constitution – which happens to care enough about freedom of religion that it's in the very first amendment,' Rep. Veronica Escobar (D-Texas) said in a post responding to Miller. 'Not only is this racist, it dishonors the 'founding document' you referenced.' Singh, during his prayer, had called for peace. 'Almighty God …. We call you by many names, sir. But you are one. Keep your devine hand over the members of this House … Keep truth on our tongues, sir, love in our hearts, and sound judgement in our minds. Remind us, sir, of our purpose: To love and serve one another and create a more peaceful world. We ask you for blessings unto all leaders, sir, and their work for the common good. Give all who govern this land humility and courage, integrity and compassion,' Singh said. 'Help us remember that we belong to one family.' 'We ask for the almighty also to keep watch over our nation's protectors who work tirelessly day and night to ensure our safety and our freedom,' Singh also said.


Atlantic
26 minutes ago
- Atlantic
This Gaza Relief Effort Was Doomed to Fail
The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation is presiding over an unmitigated disaster, and everything about the U.S.- and Israel-backed group's failure was entirely predictable. After lifting a blockade on relief supplies to the Gaza Strip, Israeli authorities tapped GHF, which is barely months old, as the principal aid-delivery system for starving Palestinian residents. Since its operations began last week, dozens of civilians have been killed by gunfire while seeking to access the food-distribution centers. At least twice this week, GHF suspended its relief efforts in an attempt to improve security. Whatever you think of Israel's conduct during its war against Hamas in Gaza, you should understand that its delivery system for aid was doomed to fail. Israeli authorities and GHF had no realistic plan for what the logistics industry calls 'the last mile'—the process of getting goods from a distribution center to the customer, so to speak. GHF was founded in February and is already on its second leader, a Trump-supporting evangelical Christian public-relations executive. Among the firms that Israel engaged to provide security for distribution sites in southern Gaza is Safe Reach Solutions, a firm led by a former CIA official and staffed by former U.S. military and security contractors that was formed only in January. GHF and SRS are both mysterious, controversial entities whose financial backing is unclear. The organization has defended its work, claiming in a statement yesterday that 'almost 8.5 million meals have been delivered so far—without incident.' GHF also said it is still scaling up. 'Our top priority remains protecting the safety and dignity of those receiving aid,' the statement continued, 'especially as we continue to serve as the only reliable provider of humanitarian assistance to the people of Gaza.' It's true that established aid agencies that have previously worked in Gaza's difficult conditions are not involved in the current effort. Israel cut ties with the UN Relief and Works Agency amid allegations that some of its staff had been involved with the October 7, 2023, terror attack by Hamas; the UN's World Food Program continues to work there but depleted all of its resources in late April. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has clashed with the International Committee of the Red Cross, which lost two of its personnel in an Israeli bombing in May. (The group's leader has called conditions in Gaza 'worse than hell.') World Central Kitchen, which lost seven people in an Israeli strike in Gaza in 2024, closed its soup kitchen in April because it could not deliver food there. With relief agencies either sidelined or unable to deliver resources because of Israel's blockade, Netanyahu then chose, with American backing, the new GHF. But its first leader resigned after a few weeks, citing a lack of 'humanitarian principles' in the Gaza relief effort. Julie Beck: It should not be controversial to plead for Gaza's children Perhaps to help solve logistical questions—and perhaps to add reputational gloss to its efforts—GHF hired the Boston Consulting Group. But after violence broke out, that company withdrew from the contract. Later that same day, GHF appointed its new executive chairman, Johnnie Moore, who insisted that his agency was 'demonstrating that it is possible to move vast quantities of food to people who need it most.' In all cases, an organization delivering goods must optimize distribution routes that align with the community it's delivering to. Israel's lack of trust for experienced relief groups doesn't justify ignoring what those operations learned about moving supplies. Many distribution systems rely on what are known as micro-fulfillment centers—local warehouses, delivery hubs, temporary facilities—to provide goods closer to where the community is. This is why, a few years ago, the COVID-vaccine-distribution efforts that drew so heavily on local doctors and pharmacies were prioritized over larger-scale efforts. Employing many small distribution sites promotes flexibility; the system can adapt to changes in demand. The GHF has provided only four distribution centers, presumably for security reasons, in all of Gaza, down from the 400 that the UN once managed; many Palestinians must now walk hours to have any hope of picking up a food package. No rational system of distribution, under any circumstances, would work this way. GHF increased the security risk by having fewer, not more, distribution sites. The organization also seemed unprepared when tens of thousands of people converged on those sites. Forgive the comparison, but American retail stores planning for Black Friday sales have come to understand—in some cases because of past tragedies at a ' crush point '—the need for information systems that collect data on where the demand is coming from and that help organizations meet that demand quickly. Surely Israel could have anticipated the sheer desperation of Gaza's Palestinians after it cut off relief efforts for months. Especially in hard circumstances, how the last mile will work must be clearly explained to those on the receiving end. In large-scale logistics efforts, the mechanics of how delivery will occur—who needs the information, when they need it, and through which communications channels it will be delivered—are all integral parts of the process. Whole systems of real-time tracking, delivery windows, and notifications are there for Israel to use, even against what it perceives as a hostile population. But information about food availability has been scarce by all accounts. Al Jazeera reported that some announcements last Sunday came from speakers mounted on military drones. The shortage of information led to a rush to the limited number of distribution sites. Business analogies only go so far. An aid site is not a Costco. Palestinian civilians are not retail customers. But perhaps if the Israeli government and its newly chosen relief entity had thought through any of the logistical matters that preoccupy established companies and experienced aid agencies alike, many more Palestinians would be receiving the food aid they badly need, faster and more safely.