logo
A professor at Harvard was studying ALS. He lost his funding after the federal freeze

A professor at Harvard was studying ALS. He lost his funding after the federal freeze

Yahoo16-04-2025

A laureate professor working on early diagnosis of ALS, or Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, is one of several Harvard University researchers who have received stop-work orders after the Trump administration froze more than $2.2 billion in funding over the university's refusal to bow to policy demands.
David Walt, a professor at Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's Hospital said he received an email Tuesday from the Department of Health and Human Services that funding for a grant to research ALS was being immediately canceled.
'This cancellation will cost lives,' Walt told CNN's Richard Quest.
Walt's project focused on early diagnosis and treatment options for ALS, also known as Lou Gehrig's Disease, a motor neuron disease that causes paralysis and affects roughly 30,000 people in the US. His grant was worth upwards of $300,000 per year, according to the student-run newspaper Harvard Crimson.
The project's cancellation follows the Trump administration's announcement on Monday that it would freeze $2.2 billion in multi-year grants and $60 million in multi-year contract value at Harvard, after the school refused to comply with demands to eliminate its diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) programs, ban masks at campus protests, and ensure merit-based hiring practices, among other measures.
Harvard President Alan M. Garber said the university would not 'surrender its independence or its constitutional rights' by accepting the agreement, which the White House framed as an effort to curb antisemitism on college campuses.
Like many universities, Harvard receives funding from the US government for research and innovation. Federal funding is Harvard's largest source of support for research, contributing 58% of total sponsored revenue during the 2024 fiscal year, according to the University.
The Trump administration has taken aim at universities and colleges across the US by ending or demanding new conditions for research grants, deporting international students, and cutting overall federal support for scientific research. Harvard is among the first elite universities to directly reject the White House's demands, though other schools have lent their support to Harvard after it made its position public.
The fallout at the Ivy League school has been swift – and the consequences will be enormous, scientists have warned.
'This is going to have devastating consequences on innovation, education and the economy for years to come,' Walt said. 'The US, in my opinion, is ceding our science and technology leadership to China and to other countries.'
Just months ago, Walt was named laureate for the National Medal of Technology and Innovation, the highest honor in his field bestowed by the US president. Beyond the ALS work, Walt's lab works on the early detection of neurodegenerative diseases, cancer, and other infectious diseases, to help discover new drugs which can potentially lead to cures.
'If we can even solve any one of these problems, it will benefit many, many patients,' he said. 'To take that opportunity away from me and other dedicated researchers, in my opinion, is a travesty.'
The White House doubled down Tuesday, threatening to revoke Harvard's tax-exempt status and emphasizing President Donald Trump 'wanted to see Harvard to apologize' for 'the egregious antisemitism that took place on their college campus against Jewish American students.'
It is not yet clear how many programs in total will be affected by the funding freeze – but early reports suggest millions of dollars in funding for life-saving medical research have already been slashed.
Among the affected projects, Professor Donald E. Ingber has received two stop-work orders on contracts for the Center for the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, which develops vaccines, drugs, therapies and diagnostic tools for public health emergencies, his assistant told CNN. One of the terminated contracts is worth over $15 million, according to the Crimson.
Sarah Fortune, a professor at Harvard's School of Public Health, received a stop-work order for her tuberculosis research, according to a source at the school with knowledge of the information. The research is part of a $60 million National Institutes of Health contract involving Harvard and other universities across the US, the source said.
On Friday, before the funding freeze was announced, a group of Harvard professors sued the Trump administration to block a review of nearly $9 billion in federal funds to Harvard.
The suit, filed by the Harvard chapter of the American Association of University Professors, along with the national organization, warned the White House's actions have 'already caused severe and irreparable harm by halting academic research and inquiry at Harvard, including areas that have no relation whatsoever to charges of antisemitism or other civil rights violations.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Watch: 'Grey's Anatomy' alum Eric Dane details struggle with ALS
Watch: 'Grey's Anatomy' alum Eric Dane details struggle with ALS

UPI

timean hour ago

  • UPI

Watch: 'Grey's Anatomy' alum Eric Dane details struggle with ALS

1 of 5 | Eric Dane opened up about his ALS diagnosis in a new interview with Diane Sawyer that aired Monday. File Photo by Jim Ruymen/UPI | License Photo June 16 (UPI) -- Grey's Anatomy alum Eric Dane is opening up about the struggles he has faced since his ALS diagnosis. Dane, an actor known for playing Dr. Mark Sloan, aka "McSteamy," on Grey's Anatomy and Cal Jacobs on Euphoria, spoke with Diane Sawyer about his health challenges in an interview for ABC News that aired Monday. "I started experiencing some weakness in my right hand and I didn't really think anything of it at the time. I thought maybe I'd been texting too much or my hand was fatigued, but a few weeks later I noticed it had gotten a little worse," Dane, 52, recalled. He went to hand specialists and neurologists over several months before he was given the diagnosis, which he shared publicly in April. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a neurodegenerative disorder also known as Lou Gehrig's disease. Dane reported his left arm is still functioning, but said his right arm is not. He suspects he has a few more months before losing movement in his left hand, and said he is worried about losing the use of his legs. ALS is an incurable disease that affects the nerves in the brain and spinal cord, causing muscle paralysis over time. "I don't think this is the end of my story. I just don't feel like in my heart I don't feel like this is the end of me," Dane said. Dane and his \wife, actress Rebecca Gayheart, share daughters Billie and Georgia. The couple had filed for divorce in 2018, but vacated that petition earlier this year. "We have managed to become better friends and better parents, and she is probably my biggest champion; my most stalwart supporter," Dane said of Gayheart. "And I lean on her."

Putting on my ‘health tech wet blanket' hat because contactless blood pressure isn't really a thing yet.
Putting on my ‘health tech wet blanket' hat because contactless blood pressure isn't really a thing yet.

The Verge

timean hour ago

  • The Verge

Putting on my ‘health tech wet blanket' hat because contactless blood pressure isn't really a thing yet.

It's been brought to my attention that the Trump Mobile Telehealth Information site seemingly claims contactless blood pressure are things you can get through its third-party Doctegrity services. This is a health tech red flag. While the other metrics mentioned are generally possible through a camera, contactless blood pressure is an emerging technology that hasn't been widely adopted. Most blood pressure tech still requires calibration with a cuff. I'm more inclined to think this is a marketing copy snafu.

‘Have we no shame?' Federal judge declares NIH grant terminations ‘void and illegal.'
‘Have we no shame?' Federal judge declares NIH grant terminations ‘void and illegal.'

Boston Globe

timean hour ago

  • Boston Globe

‘Have we no shame?' Federal judge declares NIH grant terminations ‘void and illegal.'

A group of public health experts and labor unions Advertisement The lawsuit alleges that the NIH broke from its usual science-based review process and launched a 'reckless and illegal purge' to stamp out research on topics and populations that it no longer favored. It alleges that the Trump administration disregarded congressional mandates to fund health disparities research, and violated federal administrative process law by failing to provide scientific reasoning behind the cuts. Advertisement The suit was filed in US District Court in Boston by the ACLU of Massachusetts, the National ACLU, Protect Democracy, and the Center for Science in the Public Interest. The plaintiffs are individual researchers, Ibis Reproductive Health and International Union, United Automobile, and the Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (UAW). Researchers affected by the cuts include those studying Alzheimer's disease, pregnancy health disparities and HIV prevention, among other topics. 'Today's decision is an important step in protecting public health and allowing critical research to continue. Research that helps us understand and treat serious diseases should be based on science, not politics,' said Brittany Charlton, an associate professor at Harvard Medical School and a plaintiff in the case. 'This ruling rightly allows important studies that were unfairly stopped to move forward again.' At Monday's hearing, Young appeared to support researchers opposed to the cuts, expressing confusion and frustration over the criteria the government was using to terminate grants. He pointed to a series of Trump administration directives that made claims that, he argued, did not appear supported or explained. Young said the language in the directives was sometimes so vague that he couldn't determine whether they were based on science. Advertisement 'This court finds and rules that the explanations [from the Trump administration for the grant terminations] are bereft of reasoning virtually in their entirety,' Young said. 'These edicts are nothing more than conclusory, unsupported by factual development.' Young also took issue with Trump administration statements asserting that funding of DEI-related research projects support 'unlawful discrimination.' 'Where's the support for that? Any support? Any rational explanation?' Young asked the attorney for the Department of Justice. 'I see no evidence of that. Point me to ... any particular grant or group of grants being used to support unlawful discrimination on the basis of race. From what I can see, it's the reverse.' Chris Serres can be reached at

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store