logo
The recycling dos and don'ts for throwing out your vapes

The recycling dos and don'ts for throwing out your vapes

Yahoo2 days ago

The government's ban on disposable vapes has come into force across the UK, making it illegal for any retailer to sell them.
The ban applies to places such as supermarkets, corner shops and specialist vape shops, and aims to target both the waste caused by the devices, and the use of disposable vapes by young people.
Retailers who break the rules will be first hit with a £200 fine and have all the offending products seized: those who reoffend face unlimited fines or jail time.
The government has said the ban will help "call time on these nasty devices" saying the products have "blighted our streets as litter".
So, as the ban comes into force, Yahoo News takes a look at what's going on and how people can dispose of their vapes properly.
However, some vaping industry experts have warned that reusable devices are already on sale at the same price, in the same packaging, as disposables, and that vape producers are changing products to fit with the ban.
Scott Butler, Executive Director of Material Focus, which leads the Recycle Your Electricals campaign, told ITV News: "Vape producers are being infinitely creative with their products in order to avoid the forthcoming disposable vape ban.
'We might need more flexible legislation to deal with the challenges of new products with similar challenges surging onto the market."
Single-use vape are ones with a battery you cannot recharge or replace, and these are the ones affected by the ban.
Top brands include Elf Bar and Lost Mary.
Reusable vapes must have rechargeable batteries, refillable containers and removable and replaceable coils if applicable.
Data from anti-smoking charity Action on Smoking and Health found that the number of vapers who mainly use single-use devices fell from 30% in 2024 to 24% in 2025
The use of disposables among 18 to 24-year-olds vapers has already declined this year, from 52% in 2024 to 40% in 2025.
Almost five million disposable vapes were either littered or discarded very week last year, according to campaign group Material Focus.
The devices also use lithium which is required for electric car batteries, and can explode, leading to a series of fires at waste sites.
Libby Peake, senior fellow and head of resources at Green Alliance, said in a statement: 'Single use vapes should never have been allowed on the market. They've been a blight on our countryside, wasted resources needed for important uses like EV batteries and caused scores of fires at waste sites.
'They've done all this while having a lasting impact on the health of young people, creating a new generation of nicotine addicts.'
The ban does not apply to using disposable vapes, only selling them, so if you have any left there is no problem about using them.
However, the Local Government Association has warned that stockpiling single-use vapes is a fire risk, with the lithium batteries in the devices posing a potential risk to life if stored incorrectly.
That means you should not recycle vapes in household waste due to the high fire risk from the devices.
Instead, there are recycling centres around Britain which can deal with single-use vapes.
They are often taken apart by hand to deal with the batteries in the devices, which can also leak harmful chemicals.
To find one near you, visit Recycle Your Electricals, enter your postcode, and type 'vape' in the box.
Recycle Your Electricals can also help you find places to recycle used vape pods and other vaping waste, as well as recycling broken vapes.
Household waste sites will also have bins for devices.
All household waste and recycling centres have bins for electricals and batteries. If you can remove the battery, recycle it separately. If you can't, recycle the whole vaping kit with your electrical recycling," Recycle Your Electricals says.
Read more
This is what vaping does to your body
Eight lesser-known vaping health risks as non-smoker users rise

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

A new survey highlights the risks of using your phone on the toilet
A new survey highlights the risks of using your phone on the toilet

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

A new survey highlights the risks of using your phone on the toilet

Life's busy, so I understand why it can be tempting to scroll on your phone while you're already, ahem, occupied in the bathroom. But that might be a bad idea. Here's why. Scrolling news on your phone while on the toilet? Totally common. But a small new survey suggests that people who use their phones on the toilet have a 46% higher risk of hemorrhoids. All that sitting can put too much pressure on the rectum, leading to those (often painful) swollen blood vessels that send nearly 4 million Americans to their doctors or emergency rooms each year. Not fun. Doctors recommend spending no more than three to 10 minutes on the toilet, which is hard to do if you're watching TikToks or texting. Instead, make your bathroom a no-phone zone and keep your visits short — your tush will thank you for it. [ScienceAlert] What do you spend the most time doing on your phone? Let me know! About One Small Thing: One Small Thing is a daily health newsletter from Yahoo News.

Expat's supermarket find in China reveals quiet Aussie win: 'It's everywhere'
Expat's supermarket find in China reveals quiet Aussie win: 'It's everywhere'

Yahoo

time12 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Expat's supermarket find in China reveals quiet Aussie win: 'It's everywhere'

An expat living in China has revealed a major shift in supermarket stock after making an unexpected Aussie find. Canadian expat Emily recently discovered American beef has been replaced with Australian beef in Chinese grocery stores on the back of mammoth tariffs imposed by US President Donald Trump earlier this year. It's the second time in recent weeks that residents in China have noticed American beef is no longer available, with the Australian product replacing it. Emily, who lives in Guangzhou, China, with her family, told Yahoo News Aussie beef is now "everywhere". Experts believe Australia now has a major "advantage" in the billion-dollar beef export industry, with Australia achieving a record-breaking $13.9 billion in sales in 2024–25, a 12 per cent increase from the previous record set the year prior. Emily explained she's noticed a "huge shrink" in American products in recent months after the Trump administration stunned the entire world by announcing reciprocal tariffs on just about every country on April 2, a day he called "Liberation Day". Among the hardest hit countries was China, which had a 145 per cent tariff imposed on its exports, which was countered with a 125 per cent tariff on US imports. It followed China not renewing the registration of hundreds of US beef facilities and America's $2.5 billion beef trade soon came to a grinding halt, with Australia seemingly stepping in to fill the void. While a temporary trade truce between the two economic powerhouses was struck in May at a meeting in Geneva, with the US lowering its tariff to 30 per cent and China dropping theirs to 10 per cent for three months, many consumers have seemingly continued to opt for Aussie beef. "Products like Australian beef are everywhere," Emily explained. When she filmed the supermarket video, which was viewed by millions across the world in May, she said she did a "thorough search" for US products. "I confirmed there is nothing from the US in my local supermarket," she said. 🚘 Photos shows major shift in EV race as BYD looks to topple Tesla 🥩 Expat's Aussie find in Chinese supermarket highlights major global shift ✈️ Young Aussie's 18-hour nightmare in Chinese airport after passport vanishes The fallout of the trade wars between the economic powerhouses has exposed an "advantage" for Australia in the beef market. Many viewers of Emily's video shared that they'd much rather eat Australian meat than any from the United States. Professor Vinh Thai, a leading analyst of global logistics and supply chain management, told Yahoo News that Australia has much to gain from the current tariff situation, despite an initial "setback" of a 10 per cent tariff on Australian beef exported to the US. He believes that the reduction in Australian beef exports to the US can be offset by finding alternative markets such as China and Europe. "Consumer belief is very important," he explained, adding that Australia will always be considered a high-quality product. "That is our advantage," he said. "Australian beef will still be considered as a top-quality and good reputation product compared to that from the US," he said. Emily echoed this opinion, explaining that in China, "Australian food is always associated with higher safety standards therefore Australian beef now has a better reputation than American beef as the "cleaner" meat," she said. "Now with President Trump's trade war and tariffs, Chinese people are more likely to choose Australian products over American products because of political reasons," she added. "I think this is also a situation in many countries, especially the ones that were targeted by Trump's tariff, such as Canada." She believes China hasn't been as impacted by the tariffs as the United States. "China's diversified economy and domestic market have provided significant buffers against the effects of these tariffs," she said. "I sincerely hope Australia and China can maintain and strengthen their mutually beneficial trade relationship. Both countries have so much to gain from continued economic cooperation." Do you have a story tip? Email: newsroomau@ You can also follow us on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Twitter and YouTube.

Should Afrikaners be accepted over other refugees? What Americans said in a poll
Should Afrikaners be accepted over other refugees? What Americans said in a poll

Miami Herald

timea day ago

  • Miami Herald

Should Afrikaners be accepted over other refugees? What Americans said in a poll

Most Americans take issue with the U.S. government's policy on Afrikaner refugees, according to new polling. A YouGov/Yahoo News survey found that, while a plurality of Americans are open to welcoming Afrikaners — white South Africans descended from European settlers — there is widespread opposition to prioritizing them over all others. The poll comes after President Donald Trump's administration accepted 59 Afrikaner refugees into the U.S. in early May — claiming they were discriminated against at home — while the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program has remained suspended. It also comes after Trump met with South African President Cyril Ramaphosa in the White House on May 21, during which he said Afrikaners were victims of genocide — a claim that has been widely disputed by experts. Views on refugees generally The poll — which sampled 1,560 U.S. adults May 22-27 — began by asking respondents for their general views on refugees, who typically flee their home country due to violence or persecution. A majority, 61%, said they approve of the U.S. accepting refugees from other nations, while 19% said they disapproved. With that said, a plurality, 43%, said they think the U.S. has welcomed too many refugees in recent years. Twenty-three percent said it accepted the right amount, and 13% said it didn't take in enough. In recent years, the U.S. has admitted between 11,000 and 60,000 refugees, according to data from Statista. Views on Afrikaners When it came specifically to accepting Afrikaners, Americans were divided. The survey posed the following question: 'Afrikaners are the descendants of white Europeans who came to South Africa centuries ago and later created its system of apartheid. Today, South Africa is more than 80% Black and some Afrikaners say they are being denied jobs and targeted with violence because they are white. Do you think the U.S. should accept Afrikaners as refugees?' A slim plurality, 36%, said yes, while 31% said no and 32% said they were not sure. A plurality, 47%, also said Afrikaners are about as deserving of refugee status as people from other countries. Twenty-four percent said they were less deserving, and 10% said they were more deserving. Views on singling out Afrikaners When respondents were informed that Afrikaners were being prioritized over other refugees, views became more negative. In late January, Trump issued an executive order that suspended the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program, which indefinitely paused the arrival of refugees, except 'on a case-by-case basis.' A plurality of respondents, 42%, said they disapproved of this decision, while 38% said they approved of it, and 20% were not sure. Further, 52% said the U.S. should not accept Afrikaners — who were fast-tracked — 'before resuming acceptance of refugees from other countries.' A much smaller share, 22%, agreed with this policy, while 26% said they were not sure. 'White genocide' claim The poll — which has a margin of error of 3.2 percentage points — also asked respondents whether they believed Afrikaners were victims of 'white genocide.' A plurality, 40%, said they were not, while 26% said they were and 34% said they were not sure. During his Oval Office meeting with Ramaphosa, Trump showed videos and news articles alleging large-scale killings of white farmers, claiming 'a genocide' is 'taking place that you people don't want to write about.' Ramaphosa disagreed with this claim, responding, 'if there was Afrikaner farmer genocide, I can bet you these three gentlemen would not be here,' referencing white individuals on his team, including his minister of agriculture. Multiple organizations — including news outlets and nonprofits — have debunked Trump's claims of a genocide. Fact-checking by Reuters found that some of the images Trump shared with Ramaphosa were not from South Africa but came from unrelated conflicts, including in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. 'The idea of a 'white genocide' taking place in South Africa is completely false,' Gareth Newham, the head of Justice and Violence Prevention at the Institute for Security Studies, told PBS News. 'If there was any evidence of either a genocide or targeted violence taking place against any group based on their ethnicity,' he added, 'we would be amongst the first to raise (the) alarm and provide the evidence to the world.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store