logo
Take two Van Goghs daily: the growing popularity of museum prescriptions

Take two Van Goghs daily: the growing popularity of museum prescriptions

The Guardian31-03-2025

It was about six years ago that Nathalie Bondil heard of doctors prescribing outside the boundaries of traditional medicine, scribbling out orders to walk, cycle or swim, or sending their patients into nature.
As she made her way through the halls of Montreal Museum of Fine Arts, however, she was certain that its collection of Inuit art or paintings by Claude Monet or Camille Pissarro, could also be just what the doctor ordered.
'The museum is such a special place; it's an escape from our stressful, daily life,' said Bondil, who at the time was the museum's general director. 'And art is something that is interesting to the brain.'
Her resolve gave rise to a pilot programme billed as a world first – in which thousands of doctors in Montreal were given free passes to prescribe to patients in the hopes of alleviating everything from depression and anxiety to diabetes and high blood pressure.
Years after the pandemic sharpened issues around mental health, the practice has boomed, with doctors prescribing visits to museums from Montpellier to Massachusetts as a complement to more traditional treatments.
This year doctors in the Swiss town of Neuchâtel became the latest to start handing out passes to their patients to peruse either museums or the city's botanical gardens.
It's a shift from 2018 when the Montreal museum announced the idea, said Bondil. At the time, calls came pouring in from media around the world. 'We were really surprised. It was such a simple idea.' But there was seemingly little enthusiasm from other cultural institutions to take up the idea. 'People thought it was an interesting idea, but there was nothing more.'
The pilot project in Montreal was, in some ways, a natural follow-up to a trend already playing out in the UK where some doctors were embracing 'social prescriptions' that advised patients to take part in sports or social activities. 'But this is different,' she said, describing museum prescriptions as the fruit of a formal agreement between at least one museum and healthcare institutions.
Research has since backed the idea, suggesting that spending time in museums can reduce stress and loneliness, improve mood and boost mental health.
For many healthcare providers, the prescriptions are a tool to tackle issues that they had no way to address before, said Tasha Golden, an adjunct faculty member at the University of Florida's Center for Arts in Medicine. 'For example, imagine a provider whose patient is profoundly lonely, and it's leading to depression. What's a typical provider able to do about loneliness?'
The often carefully curated spaces of museums are well-equipped to fill this void, she noted. 'Research tells us that simply being in these types of aesthetic environments can positively shift how we feel, think and behave,' Golden said. 'We also know that museums can provide opportunities for social interaction, which can reduce loneliness and isolation.'
And then there are the objects – whether art installations or antique cars – that are on display. 'Of course, exhibited items themselves – and the process of placing attention on specific pieces or collections – can elicit interest, curiosity, wonder, learning, mindfulness, which can all be beneficial for mental health.'
The growing popularity of museum prescriptions, she said, 'reflects a growing recognition that humans evolved to make and share art and stories, histories and cultures', and how this evolution has helped humans to survive. Ultimately, what's on offer to visitors is a glimpse of the bigger picture. 'It's part of how we make meaning of our lives, bear witness to our lives, expand and develop our lives, process and share our lives.'
However, Golden, who recently evaluated a Massachusetts pilot programme that included prescribing museums, said that it wasn't a one-size-fits-all solution.
A small number of people described the experience as negative; some opted not to visit a museum due to concerns they would not feel comfortable or welcome, while others were left reeling after they were sent to museums that excluded or denied their history or culture.
Their experiences reinforced the need for any prescriptions to be highly personalised, she said. 'You wouldn't want to recommend a car museum to someone who'd strongly prefer to see paintings, and you wouldn't want to prescribe a museum visit to someone who'd strongly prefer a different type of cultural experience,' said Golden.
About 400 prescriptions were issued to the Montreal Museum of Fine Arts from 2018 to its pandemic-induced halt in 2020. The museum said in a statement that it was currently developing a new version of the programme that would focus on group activities rather than self-guided tours.
Pointing to the lingering aftershocks of the pandemic, Bondil, who is now a director at the Institut du Monde Arabe in Paris, said she had little doubt of the growing need for doctors to hand out these sorts of prescriptions. 'We're in a moment where people are experiencing a lot of anxiety,' she said. 'So I do think that museums and art can help us more than ever.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'I moved from Switzerland to London twice - here are 5 things it gets right'
'I moved from Switzerland to London twice - here are 5 things it gets right'

Daily Mirror

time4 days ago

  • Daily Mirror

'I moved from Switzerland to London twice - here are 5 things it gets right'

As a Swiss girl, there are a few things I enjoy in London more Last July, I moved from Geneva, Switzerland to London for the second time in my life. The first time around, I was studying for my Master's Degree and working my first subsequent 'big girl' job. I promptly left the UK amid the Covid-19 pandemic, moving back to my Swiss village, uncertain of where the world was going. Four years later, I moved back to London, this time as an experienced journalist. ‌ Some may be inclined to believe that the Swiss quality of life is superior to the one experienced in England (other people's words, not mine). But, I'm here to debunk this myth, with some of my top favourite things about living in London. ‌ The NHS I know that these are loaded three-letters, but hear me out. The NHS definitely has its ups and downs, but it is free. I can't stress enough how much of a financial burden healthcare in Switzerland is. The healthcare system in Switzerland is private and based on mandatory insurances that cost a minimum £350 monthly, which covers the bare minimum. Being able to not think daily about how to manage my expenses encompassing my health, has definitely been a huge relief. And while I know waiting time for certain services can be frustrating, my experience with the NHS has been fair, receiving appointments rather quickly. LGBTQIA+ safe spaces Another loaded set of letters, this one close to my heart. While I can't speak for the whole country, I can vouch for London being a queer-friendly city. From its massive Pride events to its numerous spaces curated for the LGBTQIA+ community, I really like how the capital city allows opportunities for queer people to thrive. Coming from a country that just legalised same-sex marriage, it has been refreshing to live in a place where it's not such a struggle to find peers within the community, and places that caters to my specific interests. ‌ Many cities with LGBTQIA+ spaces often focus primarily on gay men, but in London, I've discovered inclusive spaces that truly cater to everyone. For example, I was able to continue training boxing at a club run by queer individuals. There's also an exciting wave of young, talented queer artists emerging in London, creating an atmosphere where breaking away from heteronormative expectations is totally ok. While sexual-orientation-based discrimination exists, I would say that London is genuinely safe to be openly queer. Acceptance and multidiversity I often share with those around me how much I appreciate that I could be on the tube and sit between a woman wearing a hijab on one side and another in a mini skirt on the other. London is so diverse that acceptance of others has just become second nature. ‌ It's also not uncommon to encounter an artist in full drag or a fabulous goth in the TFLs. And no one bats an eye. Moreover, I appreciate the celebrations of all religious holidays displayed in most public spaces in London. The city just feels like a harmonious mix of people from all cultural backgrounds. Dog friendly I'm planning to adopt a dog soon, and as a dog lover, I'm confident in my decision, especially since London is such a dog-friendly city. While I'm used to restrictions and disapproving glances elsewhere, in London, people either enjoy the company of dogs or simply don't mind at all. ‌ It's always a delight to spot a friendly pup hopping onto the tube or Overground, and it never seems to cause any trouble. Many pubs are dog-friendly, and the city boasts plenty of spacious parks, including dedicated dog parks. Direct flights to everywhere I mentioned Switzerland as my home country, but I'm a first generation Swiss, with parents from different countries. As a result, it's always been a struggle to visit my family, which is spread across Europe. Nevertheless, London's airports are hubs that offer direct flights to nearly every country and cities in the continent. If you're a third culture kid, you just know how much of a relief this is. Moreover, you can easily find cheap flights to pretty much anywhere, as London is a hub for most low-cost airlines.

L'Oréal eyes Medik8 for one billion euros
L'Oréal eyes Medik8 for one billion euros

Fashion United

time4 days ago

  • Fashion United

L'Oréal eyes Medik8 for one billion euros

French beauty giant L'Oréal is reportedly poised to acquire cosmetics brand Medik8 for one billion euros, the Financial Times reported on Wednesday. Specialising in 'anti-ageing' skincare, Medik8 would sit within L'Oréal's dermatological beauty section alongside brands like La Roche-Posay and Vichy, which saw its revenue increase by 3.5 percent in the first quarter, to 2.1 billion euros. L'Oréal acquired Australian luxury cosmetics brand Aesop in 2023, then valued at 2.5 billion dollars. The French group, which owns brands Garnier, Maybelline and L'Oréal Paris, concluded partnerships the following year with Italian luxury group Prada around the Miu Miu brand and by increasing its stake in the Swiss laboratory Galderma. Medik8's main shareholder since 2021 has been the investment fund Inflexion, which supported the British brand in the launch of a new research centre and in its development in the US, according to its website. Founded in 2009 by Briton Elliot Isaacs, Medik8 has over 300 employees and boasts a 'made in the UK' product range. This article was translated to English using an AI tool. FashionUnited uses AI language tools to speed up translating (news) articles and proofread the translations to improve the end result. This saves our human journalists time they can spend doing research and writing original articles. Articles translated with the help of AI are checked and edited by a human desk editor prior to going online. If you have questions or comments about this process email us at info@

How Not To Die (Too Soon) by Devi Sridhar review: 'a manifesto of sorts'
How Not To Die (Too Soon) by Devi Sridhar review: 'a manifesto of sorts'

Scotsman

time6 days ago

  • Scotsman

How Not To Die (Too Soon) by Devi Sridhar review: 'a manifesto of sorts'

Sign up to our Arts and Culture newsletter, get the latest news and reviews from our specialist arts writers Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Here's the quick answer to the question posed in the title of this book by Devi Sridhar, Professor and Chair of Global Health at the University of Edinburgh and advisor to the Scottish and UK Governments, as well as the World Health Organisation, UNICEF and UNESCO: be the kind of person who buys hardback books and has £22 of disposable income (≈24% of the weekly Job Seeker's Allowance). That is not supposed to be flippant, as one of the insistent points in Sridhar's work is the connection between poverty and ill-health. Professor Devi Sridhar The subtitle makes clear another two aspects: 'The Lies We've Been Sold and The Policies That Can Save Us'. Whenever there is a health problem, there are quacks, mountebanks and charlatans. It's unsurprising that in Delhi, for example, there are expensive air-purifiers for sale. But hats off to Moritz Krähenmann, selling eight litre cans of Swiss Alpine air for £17.60 – we breathe, Sridhar notes, six litres a minute. The second part is trickier. Although there are aspects of our lives that we can control, and which have tangible health benefits, others are beyond the capability of the individual. Good luck solving carcinogenic car fumes, 100˚F summers or rivers full of excrement and chemical run-off on your own. (For the record, climate change is not one of the emergencies Sridhar covers). Politics and the bogey-man word 'regulation' are, unfortunately, the answers sometimes. The title may have a slight after-tang of self-help, but the book itself is more concerned with state-level intervention. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The chapters cover what Sridhar calls a 'collective endeavour' to increase life expectancy; although the caveat here is on the quality not the duration of life. The first three chapters, uncontentiously enough, cover taking regular exercise, eating a balanced diet and either not taking up or giving up smoking. Then comes a chapter broadly on mental health. This chapter is more sketchy. It limits itself to anxiety disorders – 'struggling' seems as apt a word as any. There is one flash of really smart writing, when Sridhar having discussed the accusation that 'Sustainable Development Goals' in mental health are 'senseless, dreamy and garbled' writes the criteria were 'mostly vague, largely immeasurable, somewhat attainable, and definitely relevant'. Although one section is headed 'It's hard to get depression taken seriously' it's hard to take seriously when she quotes 'even the darkest night will end and the sun will rise' – it might be Victor Hugo, but it sounds like Hallmark. The next sections are more obviously public: gun control, road traffic accidents, water and air pollution; and an appropriate closure on untimely deaths caused by failures of health systems themselves. I was surprised – given Sridhar is based in Scotland – that neither alcohol nor narcotics were given special treatment, especially since minimum pricing and the recent experiment with safe drug consumption facilities. In the governmental rather than individual, it seems strange to omit warfare: as we see increasingly, it is not just cluster bombs and land mines that significantly reduce life expectancy in conflict zones but the deliberate use of food blockades, targeting of medical facilities and 'kettling' populations. Sometimes the book reads like various articles stitched together (there is a curious point in the nicotine chapter where she cites that the cheapest packet of cigarettes in the UK was £8.82 – in 2017. Would it have been too much trouble to put in that the average is now £16.60? It is at its best when it might have been subtitled 'Things Are More Complicated Than You Think'. For example, a whole book might have been done on Thailand and Sweden: Thailand has the world's worst road deaths, but managed to clamp down with sufficient rigour to have minimal Covid deaths. Sweden has strict 'Vision Zero' road safety but was laissez-faire (or cavalier, take your pick) about liberties during the pandemic, with many more deaths. Sridhar ends with a manifesto of sorts. Change is possible (for the better, I should add), it happens when there is consensus (see the difference between smoking bans and ultra low-emission zone), we can all learn from other countries, even when what we learn is that risks balance out, and the 'private sector is valuable… while it's sometimes the solution, its also sometimes part of the problem', which is gold-star fence sitting. She also has five 'asks' of government: make fresh food cheaper, provide alternatives to cars, privatise water companies, and invest in preventative medicine. I'd like to know quite how this gels with the private sector's role. One other recommendation seems to me plain wrong: 'provide local access to lay therapists, which takes mental health provision out of medical clinics'. Although I very much agree with Suzanne O'Sullivan on over-diagnosis, the benefits of therapy and non-material causes for genuine and painful material harms, the idea of outsourcing something so significant to unregistered amateurs seems ill-considered. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The plethora of contemporary references – Khloé Kardashian, Andy Murray, Catherine Princess of Wales, Feargal Sharkey – bolsters the sense this is in part a laudable exercise in recycling comment pieces. No doubt it will also strengthen the public engagement section for Edinburgh University in the next round of the Higher Education Research Excellence Framework.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store