Top 5 scams spreading right now
Lately, I've had way too many calls on my shows from people who have lost thousands (sometimes hundreds of thousands) to scams. These are so cleverly evil, it's like Ocean's Eleven but starring a dude with three Instagram followers and a ChatGPT subscription.
Last chance to enter to win $500 in giveaway. Enter now!
You see, we're way past scam emails from sketchy Nigerian princes. Today's scams are slick, personalized and powered by scary-good tech like AI voice cloning and deepfakes. And yep, people fall for them every single day.
Here are today's scummy front-runners, plus how to protect your cash, pride and sanity:
1. The AI voice clone
This one's horrifying because it sounds like someone you trust. Scammers grab a clip of your child's, spouse's, boss' voice from social media, podcasts or even your voicemail.
Then they call your mom, your grandpa, your partner: "Hi, it's me. I'm in big trouble. I need money. Don't tell anyone." It's not them. It's AI. And it works because it feels real.
Anthony in Los Angeles was deceived by scammers who used AI to replicate his son's voice. Believing his son was in distress, Anthony transferred $25,000 to the fraudsters.
If you get a call like this, call or text the person. Try someone they live or work with.
2. 'Your bank account's frozen'
You get a text or call from your "bank," and the number looks legit. They say your account is locked due to suspicious activity and you need to confirm your info.
Stop right there. That link? Fake. The person on the phone? Also fake.
Charles in Iowa lost over $300,000. Always open your bank's app or type the web address in yourself. Never tap the link they send.
3. Crypto investment 'friend'
This starts on Instagram, Facebook or LinkedIn. Someone friends you, chats you up, gains your trust, then casually mentions they're making a fortune in crypto.
They even offer to show you how. Suddenly you're handing over money or access to a wallet, and poof, it's gone. A couple in Georgia lost $800,000 after falling victim to a cryptocurrency scam. Just because someone's friendly doesn't mean they're honest.
Don't fall for a stranger friending you on social media. If you're lonely, volunteer somewhere.
4. Gold bar scam
You get a call from someone claiming to be with the FBI or your bank's fraud team. They say your money's at risk, and you need to withdraw it, convert it into gold bars and turn it over for "safekeeping."
A 72-year-old retiree from New Hampshire was scammed into purchasing $3.1 million worth of gold bars and turned it over to the scammer. Yes, it sounds insane, but it's happening, and people are losing everything. Come on, you know that real law enforcement doesn't operate this way.
5. Vet emergency
A neighbor's crying. Your dog's been hit by a car. They rushed your fur baby to the vet and paid the bill. You owe them $1,200. But wait ... your pup is fine, snoring on the couch.
You've been pet-shamed into Venmoing a scammer.
If any of this sounds familiar, your gut is whispering danger or you're not sure what might be happening in a situation, reach out to me. I'll help you figure out what's real and what's a scam. Better to ask than get burned. I won't judge you, I promise.
Get tech-smarter on your schedule
Award-winning host Kim Komando is your secret weapon for navigating tech.
Copyright 2025, WestStar Multimedia Entertainment. All rights reserved.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
16 minutes ago
- CBS News
Orange County animal trainer charged after at least 11 dogs died in his care
Devastated and grieving dog owners came to Orange County Superior Court on Monday to keep an animal trainer behind bars after at least 11 dogs died while in his care, according to police. Detectives began their investigation into trainer Kwong (Tony) Chun Sit, 53, and his girlfriend Tingfeng Liu, 23, after the dog's owner received a text message from the suspect on Wednesday saying that their dog had died in its sleep and had been cremated, according to the Irvine Police Department. Investigators said 12 canine deaths can be linked to Sit. One of the dog owners, Steve Kotlow, shared the shocking text message he received last week while Sit was caring for his dog. "I'm so sorry to let you know that Luna passed away peacefully during the night while resting," the text message read. "There were no signs of pain or struggle and it was truly unexpected. I am deeply saddened by this loss. Out of respect, I will offer compensation. Luna has been lovingly cremated." Sit faces multiple felony counts of animal cruelty and animal abuse for the deaths of 11 dogs. Liu faces charges as an accomplice. Both have pleaded not guilty. A judge set their bail at $550,000 and ordered the pair to have no contact with any animal. "It just hurts me so much that my dog/my brother has passed away," young dog owner Joseph Hernandez said. "I fear that if Tony is released on bail, I would be terrified, can't sleep, my whole family can't sleep because of this man." Irvine police said they recovered the ashes of one dog and found the bodies of nine more. "We're going to be able to do necropsies to determine how they died, and there are two bodies outstanding that we are currently looking for," police spokesperson Kyle Oldoerp said. Orange County prosecutor Danica Drotman said the necropsies for three of the dogs revealed their cause of death. "Three necropsies indicate that two of the dogs died from heat stroke and one of the dogs died from blunt force trauma," she said. Detectives believe Sit worked with other pet owners in Southern California, under several company names, including "Happy K9 Academy." Irvine police urged any owners whose dogs died while under Sit's care or anyone with information about the case to contact investigators at rsteen@
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Employers want to hire Gen Z workers who have knowledge of AI: ‘You were born into this shift'
The most valuable skill an employee can have in the digital age is… the ability to ask AI? Titans of the tech industry have taken to social media and other public speaking engagements to reassure Gen-Z, the newest members of the workforce, that AI won't be detrimental to job availability — in fact, it might be able to aid in their employment. 'AI is changing everything, faster than most institutions, companies or curriculums can keep pace with. But no, that doesn't mean your education or potential is obsolete. It means we have to think differently about what growth and opportunity look like,' wrote LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman in a recent post on the platform. 'You were born into this shift. You're native to these tools in a way that older generations aren't. Lean into it. Teach others.' 'You don't have to become an engineer to use AI powerfully,' Hoffman advised. 'Think about how to apply it creatively, how to solve real problems with it, how to collaborate with it. One of your first reactions to any challenge should be 'How can I use AI to help me here?'' Hoffman isn't the only one at his level who is optimistic about AI's influence on the workforce — other high-level tech execs offered similar thoughts about the future landscape of the job market. Amazon CEO Andy Jassy shared that the implementation of generative AI will likely 'reduce' the company's corporate workforce. AI 'should change the way our work is done,' wrote Jassy in a memo distributed to employees and posted publicly. 'Those who embrace this change, become conversant in AI, help us build and improve our AI capabilities internally and deliver for customers, will be well-positioned to have high impact and help us reinvent the company,' he added. Overall, the message coming from industry leaders is that being adaptive and willing to incorporate AI into current professional practices is the real key to being well-positioned for the future job market — but this idea is being obscured under encouraging niceties that are fed to Gen-Z. 'Whilst they may be at an advantage with their AI skills more so than previous generations, they will still need the practical, world-wise experience to flush out any AI inconsistencies and errors that older workers will possess,' Keith Arundale, a visiting fellow at the UK's Henley Business School, told Newsweek. 'Comfort without mastery can backfire. Gen Z's early exposure is an advantage, but it isn't a golden ticket,' agreed Fabian Stephany, assistant professor for AI and Work at the University of Oxford, in an interview with Newsweek. Despite the positive packaging that this potential employment crisis tends to be wrapped up in, some top tech figures remain skeptical. Automation and increased usage of AI by large companies is 'going to happen in a small amount of time — as little as a couple of years or less,' Dario Amodei, CEO of AI company Anthropic, told Axios. 'We, as the producers of this technology, have a duty and an obligation to be honest about what is coming. I don't think this is on people's radar,' Amodei continued. In reality, Gen-Z isn't necessarily better equipped to handle the demands of modern-day jobs just because of a generational familiarity with AI. They still need soft skills and the social abilities to properly navigate dilemmas that professional environments often pose — employers and industry leaders just tend to leave that part out.
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Losing Our Voice: The Human Cost of AI-Driven Language
Losing Our Voice: The Human Cost of AI-Driven Language originally appeared on L.A. Mag. Not only is AI influencing our written communication, but it is also altering our verbal interactions. The Max Planck Institute for Human Development in Berlin has conducted research on the impact of ChatGPT on human speech by analyzing 280,000 academic YouTube videos. Since the release of ChatGPT in 2022, certain words have become more prevalent in everyday vocabulary, with terms such as 'delve,' 'meticulous,' 'realm,' and 'adept' being used 51% more frequently. Researchers at the Max Planck Institute for Human Development confirmed that ChatGPT favors these words to a greater extent than humans, as seen in a previous study comparing human- to AI-edited texts. The word 'delve' has proven to be a front runner in determining how speakers 'internalize this virtual vocabulary into daily communication,' according to Hiromu Yakura, the study's lead author and a are unaware of the shift in their language, but what's more concerning is how we sound. Despite research being primarily focused on vocabulary, there are suspicions that AI is beginning to shape our tone, with people speaking with more structure and less emotional expression. AI, a tool that seemingly improves our grammatical and structured communication, creates a divide in our collaborative communication through the suspicion it arouses. Mor Naaman, professor of Information Science at Cornell Tech has outlined three levels of human detachment caused by the adoption of virtual vocabulary. The first level is the loss of authenticity and vulnerability in our speech that proves our availability as human beings. The second level involves lessened attention and effort in our communication, relating to our level of care. The final level consists of our ability to show our real selves: our humor, our competence, or our regret. Naaman uses an example of texting someone, 'I'm sorry you're upset' versus 'Hey, sorry I freaked at dinner, I probably shouldn't have skipped therapy this week.' The distinction between a structured apology versus a personal explanation makes all the difference between ChatGPT and a real human being. We are losing the autonomy of our speech and the trust in our communication with others, and soon, we may lose agency over our thinking. 'Instead of articulating our own thoughts, we articulate whatever AI helps us to articulate…we become more persuaded,' Naaman says. Ultimately, our personhood is at stake. ChatGPT creates stereotypes about communities and what 'correct' English is. But, instead of adopting a homogeneous vocabulary and a 'correct' method of communication, we must self-regulate and celebrate the imperfections that build trust and make us human. This story was originally reported by L.A. Mag on Jun 23, 2025, where it first appeared.
