logo
Ever-rising height of car bonnets a ‘clear threat' to children, report says

Ever-rising height of car bonnets a ‘clear threat' to children, report says

The Guardian2 days ago

The bonnet height of new cars in the UK and Europe is rising relentlessly, a report has found, bringing a 'clear and growing threat to public safety, especially for children'.
Higher fronts on cars significantly increase the death rate when pedestrians are struck. The analysis also found that drivers in the tallest cars could not see children as old as nine at all when they were directly in front of the vehicle.
The UK has an especially large number of the cars with the tallest bonnets. This is due to higher sales of Land Rover models which, with Jeep, are the only car brands with average bonnet heights over 100cm. The researchers accused Land Rover of 'trading on the intimidation that comes with high-fronted vehicles [and] ignoring their related dangers'.
In crashes, high-bonneted SUVs are more likely to strike the vital organs in the core of adults' bodies and the heads of children. Hitting pedestrians above their centre of gravity means they are more likely to be knocked forward and down and then be driven over. In contrast, low bonnets tend to hit pedestrians' legs, giving them a greater chance of falling on to the vehicle and being deflected to the side.
The report, by the advocacy group Transport & Environment (T&E), found that the average bonnet height of new cars sold in Europe rose from 77cm in 2010 to 84cm in 2024.
The rise matches booming sales of SUVs from 12% to 56% of all cars over the same period, with the increasing size of vehicles being described as 'carspreading' or 'autobesity'. SUVs are also 20% more polluting on average and this rise in sales is cancelling out the reduction in climate-heating CO2 due to electric vehicles and fuel efficiency improvements.
There is no legal limit to bonnet height in the UK and Europe. The researchers said a limit should be introduced for 2035 and set at about 85cm.
'A child is killed every day on our roads, yet cars are being made so large that children are invisible from the driver's seat. How is that acceptable?' said Barbara Stoll, senior director of T&E's Clean Cities campaign. 'Thankfully, more and more city leaders are pushing back against carspreading, standing up for what citizens actually want – safe, green streets without monster vehicles.'
Paris and Lyon in France, and Aachen in Germany, are among the cities that charge bigger cars more to park. In the UK, councils in Cardiff, Bristol, Oxford and Haringey in London are looking into similar measures and last week the London assembly called for limits on bonnet height.
A Jaguar Land Rover spokesperson said: 'JLR is committed to the highest safety standards and our vehicles are made with the strictest adherence to safety requirements. We continually invest in safety and advanced technology features – which, amongst other things, include pedestrian detection, 3D surround camera systems, and autonomous emergency braking (AEB).'
The T&E report said AEB can prevent some crashes but that 'a car with a good AEB system and a bonnet height between 60cm and 75cm will always be safer than a high-bonneted vehicle with the same AEB.'
The report used data from Euro NCAP, the safety rating programme for new vehicles, and sales data to assess the growth in bonnet heights. T&E also commissioned Loughborough University School of Design to test the visibility of children from high-fronted cars.
It found that a driver of a Ram TRX was unable to see children aged up to nine who were standing directly in front, while a Land Rover Defender driver could not see children aged up to four and a half.
Sign up to Down to Earth
The planet's most important stories. Get all the week's environment news - the good, the bad and the essential
after newsletter promotion
A 10cm increase in bonnet height, from 80cm to 90cm, raises the risk of death in a crash by 27% for pedestrians and cyclists according to a Belgian study involving 300,000 casualties. Children are substantially more likely to be killed as pedestrians in collisions compared to adults, the report said.
The number of cars with extremely high bonnets is 'very disproportionate' in the UK, the report found. The UK made up 15% of all new car sales in Europe in 2024, but 39% of the sales of cars with bonnets higher than 100cm. Land Rover models represented 85% of the 63,000 cars with bonnets 100cm or higher sold in the UK that year.
The report noted aggressive marketing slogans for the Land Rover Defender – 'Locked and loaded' – and 'Built to impress, known to intimidate' for RAM pickup trucks: 'The intention is clear: such companies are trading on the intimidation that comes with high-fronted vehicles, ignoring their related dangers.'
The report concluded: 'The rise in high-fronted SUVs poses a clear and growing threat to public safety, especially for children. With no benefit to society, it's time for lawmakers at all levels to act.' The European Automobile Manufacturers' Association, Jeep and RAM did not respond to a request for comment.
The surge in SUVs is also making European cars wider, a 2024 T&E report found, with half of new cars too bloated to fit into standard parking spaces.
The International Energy Agency recorded record global SUV sales in 2024 and record SUV CO2 emissions of 1bn tonnes. If SUVs were a country, they would rank as the fifth most polluting in the world, the IEA said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tottenham sue Sir Jim Ratcliffe's Ineos
Tottenham sue Sir Jim Ratcliffe's Ineos

Telegraph

time21 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Tottenham sue Sir Jim Ratcliffe's Ineos

Tottenham Hotspur have taken High Court legal action against Sir Jim Ratcliffe's Ineos. In a commercial listing under 'general commercial contracts and arrangements', Tottenham have lodged a claim against Ineos Automotive Limited, which is a subsidiary of the multinational Ineos company that co-owns Manchester United. Spurs and Ineos had announced a multi-million pound five-year deal in December 2022 to promote the Ineos Grenadier car as the club's 'official 4x4 vehicle partner'. However, talks have been ongoing since at least February over Ineos withdrawing two years before the expiry of the deal. Those negotiations appear to have failed to find an agreement, with the Tottenham claim lodged on June 12, less than a month after they beat Manchester United in the Europa League final to secure a place in the Champions League. Spurs and Ineos have been in partnership since 2020, when the petrochemicals company was named as the club's 'official hand sanitiser supplier' during the pandemic. Ineos, however, have been cutting ties with a number of leading sports organisations in recent months, notably Sir Ben Ainslie's sailing team and the All Blacks rugby union team. Telegraph Sport revealed in February that New Zealand Rugby was also taking legal action against Ineos for an alleged breach of contract after a six-year deal to 2027 ended early, although an agreement has since been reached. Ineos has said that it is being forced into cost-cutting by Europe's 'extreme' green carbon taxes and has issued warnings over what it called the 'deindustrialisation' of the continent. Ratcliffe also blamed energy prices and carbon taxes earlier this year for forcing the closure of Ineos's synthetic ethanol plant at Grangemouth in Scotland, resulting in the loss of 80 direct roles and an estimated 500 indirect jobs. Significant financial measures have already been introduced at Manchester United since Ratcliffe bought a 27.7 per cent minority stake in December 2023, including increased ticket prices and the loss of hundreds of staff. Upon the announcement of the Grenadier deal in 2022, Spurs had said: 'Our partnership with Ineos Grenadier represents the coming together of an innovative British brand with an iconic London football club – both of whom are committed to pushing boundaries and daring to do things differently, while staying true to authentic values and traditions.' In a statement, Ineos told Telegraph Sport that it had exercised 'a contractual right to terminate' its partnership with Tottenham last December. 'Ineos Automotive has been a partner of Tottenham Hotspur since 2022, taking on a partnership agreement that Ineos Group had in place with the club since 2020,' said a spokesperson. 'Like any business, we have to be diligent in how we operate and where we invest marketing budgets. It's completely normal for partnerships to be reviewed on a regular basis, and we've decided that the partnership wasn't working out for us. We have the right to terminate the partnership.'

The 100-year saga of one man's attempt to pay off the national debt
The 100-year saga of one man's attempt to pay off the national debt

Telegraph

time21 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

The 100-year saga of one man's attempt to pay off the national debt

Gaspard Farrer may be just a footnote in history, but he will be remembered fondly by Rachel Reeves. A £585m fortune held by the wealthy banker, who died aged 85 almost 100 years ago, has finally been donated to the public purse after a seven-year legal battle. Mr Farrer, a former partner at the now-defunct Barings Bank, is thought to have left £500,000 in 1927 as a gift to the nation in response to the UK's huge national debt after the First World War. But rules stipulated that the so-called National Fund, established in 1927, could only be made available when it was enough to pay off the national debt in full. It means that for years, the fortune has been locked away from successive governments. However, a 2022 High Court ruling ordered the funds to be released – a decision upheld after the fund's trustees lodged an appeal. They were finally paid to the Debt Management Office (DMO) in the financial year ending in April, according to a Freedom of Information request seen by The Telegraph. The DMO offers a little-known scheme that allows taxpayers to voluntarily contribute to paying off the national debt. Last year, donations reached a record £585,112,933 – almost entirely due to the payment of the 1927 National Fund. It was one of 16 donations – three of which were left in wills and 13 were one-off payments. In the nine years prior, just £175,000 per year on average has been donated to the scheme. The legal wrangling for Mr Farrer's money began under Theresa May's government which successfully used a niche legal argument to prise open the savings pot. The bid to tap into the pot used cy-près jurisdiction – meaning 'as near as possible' – which is applied primarily to charitable trusts whose original purpose became impossible to fulfil. The funds were being looked after by Zedra Fiduciary Services who acted as the defendant in the case. The Telegraph contacted representatives for Zedra for comment. The cash is now on the Exchequer's balance sheet, but will make just a 0.02pc dent in Britain's £2.7 trillion national debt, which has grown to the same size as the entire economy. The funds were originally set aside as a £500,000 investment in assets, including gilts, by a donor who remained anonymous for decades. After the government of the day lodged its legal bid to obtain the money in 2018, Mr Farrer's identity was at last revealed. The fund quietly grew in value for years until its transfer to the Treasury was revealed in a request made to the DMO by accountancy firm RSM. The documents confirmed it had received Mr Farrer's fortune. Chris Etherington, partner at RSM, said: 'It is generosity of a level that the Chancellor could not have expected. It could provide some inspiration as to how additional revenues could be generated for the Exchequer.' 'No prospect of the fund ever paying off national debt' When Mr Farrer's donation was first made, Sir Winston Churchill said the money was 'inspired by clear-sighted patriotism and makes a practical contribution towards the ultimate – though yet distant – extinction of the public debt.' But doubts have grown over the years that the money would ever actually fulfil its original purpose. John Glenn, a former culture minister, said in response to a parliamentary question in 2018 that 'there is no realistic prospect of the fund ever amounting to a sum sufficient to pay off the whole of the national debt'. Mr Farrer's donation was held in the form of a charitable trust and was on paper one of the most well-endowed of its kind in the country. John Picton, a reader in law at the University of Manchester, said using the fund to pay off national debt would be a 'missed opportunity' to donate to more worthy causes. He added: 'It's a missed opportunity because the fund could have been kept in charity. I think it's unimaginative, personally.' Mr Picton suggested the money could go towards a charitable fund for the Armed Forces, or to support the work of the country's museums and art galleries. He said: 'In Gaspard Farrer's time, the national debt was associated with war debt and paying it off had a patriotic motivation and that's long lost.' 'But now the national debt, rather than having patriotic sentiments attached to it, is just a large number we all live with and grows throughout time. It's unthinkable now that people would want to voluntarily pay to reduce it.' Mr Farrer's only other surviving legacy is his 11,438 square foot mansion in Kent. He commissioned the legendary architect Sir Edwin Lutyens to design the property, which was built in 1911. The eight bedroom house was recently placed on the market for £3.5m.

Did late-season slide hinder Forest's recruitment?
Did late-season slide hinder Forest's recruitment?

BBC News

time24 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Did late-season slide hinder Forest's recruitment?

When I look at Nottingham Forest and the market that they were in at the beginning of this past season compared with the market they are potentially in now, I still think it would be the same whether they had qualified for the Champions League, Europa League or Conference they got into Europe's top-tier competition, I don't think they would have been able to attract anyone more high you could say it has hindered them as they may have to sell more high-profile players to fund signings, but from the perspective of players in the market, I don't think it is massively I think about player attraction, I feel, for example, if Newcastle ended up in the Europa League instead of the Champions League, they would have probably been able to draw a higher-profile player than Forest could have done if they had got in the Champions with Chelsea, if they didn't get that Champions League place, they still would have been able to draw a higher-profile player than Forest just because of the club and how much time has been spent in those European spots in recent the attraction would have been there of Champions League football, but I don't believe the market would be any different to what they would have looked at had they finished first to Williams was speaking to BBC Sport's Nicola Pearson

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store