logo
Who's afraid of  James Joyce? Elevator Repair Service takes a tour of ‘Ulysses'

Who's afraid of James Joyce? Elevator Repair Service takes a tour of ‘Ulysses'

'Ulysses' may not be James Joyce's most difficult novel. That distinction would have to go to 'Finnegans Wake,' a book that has been described as unreadable even by its most fervent admirers. But 'Ulysses,' the modernist novel that changed the course of 20th century literature, is notoriously demanding.
The book bested me when I first gave it a go in my student days. I expected to sprint through 'Ulysses' in a couple of weeks but found myself running uphill in a race I feared might never end. I finally did make it to the finish line, panting and red-faced. But I knew Joyce and I would have to have another rendezvous when I wasn't in such a rush to check a canonical box.
It took more than 35 years for that reunion to happen. The book came back on my radar because Elevator Repair Service, the offbeat New York performance troupe best known for 'Gatz,' a marathon rendering of F. Scott Fitzgerald's 'The Great Gatsby,' was coming to town with its stage version of 'Ulysses.' (The production, presented by Center for the Art of Performance, had a brief run last weekend at UCLA Little Theater.)
But something else was drawing me back to Joyce, a need to breathe purer air. I could spend my free time doomscrolling, or I could challenge myself to a higher pleasure.
This time around I imposed no deadline. I would read 'Ulysses' for the sheer pleasure of reading. It didn't take long to be reminded that pleasure isn't necessarily pain-free. I struggled past the roadblocks, cursing at what I took to be Joyce's willful obscurity as I consulted Terence Killeen's 'Ulysses Unbound,' a user-friendly reader's guide, as well as myriad online resources, including Google Translate to contend with the polyglot author's staggering range.
I extemporized a program of reading a chapter on my own and then listening to it via the excellent RTÉ recordings of 'Ulysses' (available as a podcast) that bring to life the novel's symphony of voices. The exhilaration I came to experience entailed a fair amount of exasperation. The exertion that was required seemed to belong to a pre-internet age.
Joyce, allergic to exposition, plunges the reader into sink-or-swim situations. The architecture of the book follows the plan of Homer's 'Odyssey.' Leopold Bloom is the unlikely modern-day Ulysses (Odysseus' Latin name), a newspaper ad salesman with an adulterous wife who is making his circuitous way home to see what remains after his tactical daylong absence. Stephen Dedalus, Joyce's alter ego from 'A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man,' is thrust into the role of Telemachus, Odysseus' son, recast as a lofty aesthete grieving the death of his mother while keeping his distance from his overbearing, dissolute father.
Into this complex scheme, Joyce incorporates all sorts of radical literary experiments. The most important of these is the stream of consciousness technique that's developed in ways that had never been attempted before. Joyce tunes into the inner musings of his characters as easily as he samples the collective consciousness, past and present. The novel, Edmund Wilson writes in his super-lucid chapter on Joyce in 'Axel's Castle,' moves from the ripest naturalism, awash in bodily secretions and pungent smells, to the most feverish symbolism, where dream logic liquefies objective reality.
What I derived from the novel in my late 50s is not what I took away in my 20s. I was amused at what I had underlined as an overeager student, always on the lookout for the explanatory phrase. But I'm sure in time my latest markings in the book, like photos of an old hairstyle, will also elicit an eye roll. A literary work as dense as 'Ulysses' can't help but serve as a mirror of one's mental life.
My experience of this ERS production is unique to the moment of my encounter. Had I not just cohabited with 'Ulysses' for the last month, I no doubt would have spent the intermission reading chapter summaries on my phone to get a deeper understanding of the story.
I was relieved that this version of 'Ulysses' wasn't an eight-hour affair like 'Gatz,' which offered the complete text of 'The Great Gatsby.' (Joyce's novel would take at least 24 hours to read aloud, or all of Bloomsday, the annual celebration of the author.) The novel's 18 chapters are served cafeteria-style, a little from this section, a little from that, to provide an overview of the main action.
The focus is on Bloom's wanderings through Dublin on June 16, 1904, the day his wife, Molly, a noted singer, begins an affair with a professional colleague named Blazes Boylan. Subsidiary but no less integral is Stephen's crisscrossing path through the city. When these displaced, grief-laden men lingeringly intersect late in the novel, nothing really changes in terms of the plot but everything changes in terms of the book's spiritual design.
In the intimate confines of Macgowan Hall's Little Theater, seven actors took their seats at conference tables lined up for what looked like a panel discussion. An institutional clock kept track of the fictional time of day. Scott Shepherd, an ERS mainstay who was not only part of the ensemble but also co-directed with John Collins and served as dramaturg, introduced the proceedings in an impishly folksy manner reminiscent of the Stage Manager in Thornton Wilder's 'Our Town.'
He explained that the text would be fast-forwarded regularly. When this happened, the sound of a screeching tape catapulted the company to another passage in the book. Joyce's words rang out mellifluously at the start of the production, but as the main characters emerged from the reading, some of the musicality of the writing was lost.
ERS doesn't traffic in emotional realism or literal re-creation. The company's aesthetic mode is wayward, oblique, loose and jocular. In 'Gatz,' the novel's narrative texture was conveyed through zany approximation — the troupe finding Fitzgerald not by effacing itself but by embracing its eccentric difference.
The same eventually happened here, but I had to resign myself to what was missing.
What I find irresistible about 'Ulysses' is the clarity with which the interior lives of Stephen and Bloom come into view. Amid all the rhetorical puzzles and literary pyrotechnics, these characters reveal to us their longings and insecurities, their preoccupations and rationalizations, their alienation and sociability — in short, their souls or, as Bloom more scientifically defines this mystical human substance, 'gray matter.'
Hamlet-figures dressed in inky black, they are both processing loss. Bloom, whose day's journey takes him to the funeral of a friend, is still mourning his son, Rudy, who died shortly after birth. Stephen, called back from Paris as his mother was dying, is tormented a year later by his refusal to pray over her as she entreated him to do.
Estranged in different ways — Bloom as a Jew (with a wife with a loose reputation) and Stephen as a freethinking young artist in Catholic Ireland — they have complementary needs. Bloom to love and to pass on some of what he has learned, Stephen to become secure and stable enough to realize his enormous potential.
On stage, Stephen (Christopher-Rashee Stevenson), wearing the suit jacket and short trousers of a schoolboy prince of Denmark, was a strangely recessive presence. Stevenson seemed to deliberately deflect attention from Stephen's words, mumbling lines as though they were the character's private property and not meant to be spoken aloud. (A defensible literary interpretation but a theatrically deadening one.) Stevenson actually created a more vivid impression in his brief appearance as Bloom's cat.
Vin Knight was more dynamic as Bloom, the adaptation's clear protagonist. Costume designer Enver Chakartash dressed the character, described at one point in the book as a 'new womanly man,' in a mourning jacket and complicated skirt, with green socks adding a fey accent to the gender-fluid ensemble. Knight found the gravity of the pragmatic, rational Bloom while preserving his essential nimbleness.
The surrogate father-son flirtation between Stephen and Bloom accumulated power more through the staging than through acting. Scenically, the narrative built as it proceeded. The conference tables were imaginatively reconfigured by the design collective dots for the surreal brothel scene, and the lighting of Marika Kent made wild magic without disrupting the minimalist scheme.
The production was somewhat more adept in telling than showing. (Stephanie Weeks, Dee Beasnael and Kate Benson, in addition to playing numerous supporting characters, helped keep the narration smoothly on track.)
I wish everyone had Shepherd's command of the company's house style. His cameos as Blazes Boylan, jitterbugging across the stage with the self-satisfied air of a country rake, were not just enlivening but renewing, capturing the character in a new idiom.
Maggie Hoffman delivered Molly's stream of erotic consciousness that ends the novel with just the right touch of unabashed earthiness. If I hadn't recently listened to the brilliant rendition of Pegg Monahan in the RTÉ Broadcast, I might not have missed the ferocious Irish lilt that animates the animal lusts and petty grievances of Joyce's character.
I should confess that I turned to the novel as an escape from my disgust with our political situation. But politics runs through the book. Ireland is under brutal colonial rule, and partisan conflict is as inescapable as religious strife.
But Stephen and Bloom don't want to be dominated by ideology. Stephen resists having his intellectual freedom ensnared by patriotic sanctimony: 'Let my country die for me,' he drunkenly tells a British soldier.
Bloom contends that 'Force, hatred, history, all that' are 'not life for men and women, insult and hatred.' It's the opposite of these things 'that is really life,' by which he means 'love.'
Joyce gives us this insight in a book that understands that it's no more possible to dismiss politics than it is to do away with the demands of the body. We exist in concentric realms, and our multifarious lives can only be lived. The same is true for art. There are things I wanted from this stage production that I didn't get. But there were unexpected rewards, and my view of 'Ulysses' expanded.
We must make room on the bed of life and say, as Molly does in the book's last word: 'Yes.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

A Black reimagining of ‘The Great Gatsby' spotlights a hidden L.A. history
A Black reimagining of ‘The Great Gatsby' spotlights a hidden L.A. history

Los Angeles Times

time3 days ago

  • Los Angeles Times

A Black reimagining of ‘The Great Gatsby' spotlights a hidden L.A. history

In 2022, Kyra Davis Lurie heard a story on KCRW's 'Curbed Los Angeles' about the residents of South L.A.'s West Adams Heights, nicknamed Sugar Hill after a community of wealthy Black Harlemites. Learning about the sumptuous soirees Academy Award-winning actor Hattie McDaniel hosted in her Sugar Hill mansion, Lurie realized there was a hidden Black history waiting for her to unearth. But how she created the enthralling historical novel 'The Great Mann' is a story that owes as much to Lurie's ability to reinvent herself as it does to F. Scott Fitzgerald's 'The Great Gatsby,' the iconic 20th century critique of the American dream, which provided a touchstone for the novel. Lurie, 52, grew up in Santa Cruz, far from the neighborhood where McDaniel, Louise Beavers, Ethel Waters and other striving Black actors and business pioneers depicted in 'The Great Mann' lived. While she visited family regularly in L.A., Lurie stayed up north, where she penned the light-hearted 2005 book 'Sex, Murder and a Double Latte.' She quickly followed it with two more mysteries. Encouraged by her success, Lurie struck out for L.A. to pursue her dream of getting into a TV writers room. The 2007 writers' strike deferred that goal, so Lurie pivoted to write three erotic novels which, she reveals, were 'critiques of capitalism wrapped in a romance novel.' By the time she heard about Sugar Hill and its famous inhabitants, Lurie was ready to take on a more nuanced challenge. But many literary agents weren't receptive to her change of genre. 'It was as if Marlon James had gone from writing comic books to 'A [Brief] History of Seven Killings,'' she says, name-checking the famous Jamaican writer and his Man Booker Prize-winning novel. But as Lurie continued researching the neighborhood and its history, she knew she had to tell its story, even if using 'The Great Gatsby' as her North Star proved problematic. 'I'm a huge Fitzgerald fan,' Lurie says, 'even though there was a line in that book that always bothered me.' She's referring to Nick Carraway's reference to 'two bucks and a girl' upon seeing three wealthy Black people passing by in a white-chauffeured limousine. 'While it was probably used to get a laugh in 1925, it was demeaning,' Lurie says of the scene. 'In the wake of the Red Summer of 1919 [when a record number of race riots and lynchings of Black Americans occurred in the U.S.] and the destruction of Black Wall Street in the 1921 Tulsa Race Riot, Fitzgerald's language says a lot about America's cultural climate at the time.' Was it subversive to use Fitzerald's most famous novel to frame the story of a vibrant Black enclave whose prosperity rivaled that of Jay Gatsby and his ilk? Absolutely, Lurie says, adding, 'Through a Black reimagining of 'The Great Gatsby,' I tried to marry a family's story with a little-known part of L.A. history.' The family story is told through the lens of Charlie Trammell III, a World War II veteran emotionally scarred by the violence he witnessed on the battlefield and at home in Jim Crow Virginia. Charlie arrives in L.A. looking for a fresh start and to reconnect with his cousin Margie, with whom he shares pivotal childhood experiences. But Margie, who now goes by the more exotic Marguerite, has shaken off the past and married Terrance Lewis, a vice president at Golden State Mutual Life Insurance Co. The Lewises live with their son in Sugar Hill, along with McDaniel, Beavers and Norman O. Houston, the real-life co-founder and president of Golden State Mutual. Soon Charlie is swept into the world of L.A.'s wealthy Black elite, a mix of real Angelenos like John and Vada Somerville, pioneering Black dentists and founders of Central Avenue's famed Dunbar Hotel; singers-actors Waters and Lena Horne; and fictional characters including James Mann, the mysterious Black businessman recently arrived in Sugar Hill who hosts lavish parties unlike anything Charlie's ever seen: 'The air is flavored with flowery perfumes and earthy cigars. All around me diamonds glitter from brown earlobes, gold watches flash against brown wrists. The only things white are the walls.' Mann befriends Charlie, treating the recently discharged veteran to his first hand-tailored suit and fine wine, but soon embroils him in his quest to reunite with Marguerite, the love of his life since the two met some 10 years before when they both lived in the South. Like Fitzgerald's classic juxtaposition of West Egg and East Egg in 'Gatsby,' 'The Great Mann' is about new money versus old — interlopers like Mann and the entertainers versus businesspeople like Houston and the Somervilles. But Lurie 'tried not to invent flaws' in her historical figures by doing her homework, sourcing accounts in Black newspapers, biographies and even letters between Houston and NAACP leader Walter White to depict these frictions. 'The Great Mann' is also about people reinventing themselves amid the realities and contradictions of the time. Like Black actors who played maids but employed Black 'help' in real life. Or the controversy over the stereotypically demeaning roles Black actors depicted. Chief among them was Delilah Johnson, the subservient Black maid portrayed by Beavers in the 1934 film 'Imitation of Life.' It's a debate that's introduced in 'The Great Mann' when Marguerite and Terrance tell Charlie that Beavers' home, where he will be staying and which is much grander than theirs, is paid for 'with Black shame.' Also addressed in the novel are touchier subjects like White's advocacy for the lighter-skinned Horne to get roles over her darker-skinned colleagues like McDaniel or Beavers. But the engine that fires up the plot of 'The Great Mann,' and which sets it apart from 'Gatsby,' is the battle Black creatives and business owners faced to hold onto their properties. A clause placed in thousands of L.A. property deeds in 1902 restricted housing covenants at the time West Adams Heights and many other L.A. County communities were developed, prohibiting homes from being sold to anyone 'other than the white or Caucasian race.' But some white sellers sold property to Black buyers anyway, who then had to fight white groups — like the West Adams Heights Improvement Assn. — to prevent eviction from their own homes. To say how Sugar Hill's Black residents fared in court would spoil the enjoyment of this suspenseful tale, which has put Lurie on a new path in writing historical fiction. She has another project percolating, but for now, she's just grateful to have found her niche. 'It's been a journey,' she says of the twists and turns of her writing life, 'but writing about historical Black lives feels like home to me, what I was meant to do.' Lurie will be discussing 'The Great Mann' at Vroman's Bookstore at 7 p.m. June 10; Diesel, a Bookstore at 6:30 p.m. June 11; and Chevalier's Books at 6:30 p.m. June 19.

'Great Gatsby' and 'Scarlet Letter' are on Civic Theatre's new season
'Great Gatsby' and 'Scarlet Letter' are on Civic Theatre's new season

Indianapolis Star

time3 days ago

  • Indianapolis Star

'Great Gatsby' and 'Scarlet Letter' are on Civic Theatre's new season

Classic literature and drama form the backbone of Booth Tarkington Civic Theatre's new season. Kicking off the season in October is "Something Rotten" — a musical comedy that plays on connections to William Shakespeare's work and even makes the iconic playwright himself a cause of action. In early 2026, the theater, which is a resident company at Carmel's Allied Solutions Center for the Performing Arts, will perform stage adaptations of "The Great Gatsby" and "The Scarlet Letter." Beloved classics "A Christmas Story" and "Fiddler on the Roof" will round out the season. Subscriptions are on sale now via or by contacting the Allied Solutions Center for the Performing Arts box office at 317-843-3800 or tickets@ Single tickets will go on sale July 24. All shows take place in the Tarkington theater unless otherwise noted. Here's the Civic Theatre season lineup. Oct. 3-18 In this musical comedy set in 1590, brothers Nick and Nigel Bottom are struggling to write a hit play and finding it impossible to compete with a famed playwright known as "The Bard." After a soothsayer predicts that theater's future combines singing, drama and dancing, the duo begins to write the first-ever musical. Summer plans: 100+ free live concerts around central Indiana in 2025 Dec. 5-27 Growing up in fictional Hohman, Indiana, in the 1940s, 9-year-old Ralphie Parker exhausts all possible avenues to obtain his dream Christmas gift: an official Red Ryder carbine-action 200-shot Range Model air rifle. Feb. 6-21, 2026 in the Studio Theater Long Island newcomer Nick Carraway chronicles the story of Jay Gatsby, a self-made millionaire who pursues the love of his life, the already-married Daisy Buchanan, against the decadent backdrop of Jazz Age New York. The IndianapoLIST newsletter has the best shows, art and eats — and the stories behind them March 13-28, 2026 in the Studio Theater In this reimagining of the classic novel, Hester Prynne raises her daughter in a Massachusetts Bay society where women are punished for asserting independence and colonists deal with violence, superstition and repression that will wind their way into the soon-to-be-formed America. April 24-May 9, 2026 In the small village of Anatevka, a milkman's family deals with the clash between tradition and changing times as they face antisemitism in Czarist Russia.

George R.R. Martin Slams Hollywood Screenwriters For Changing Source Material and "Making it Their Own" — GeekTyrant
George R.R. Martin Slams Hollywood Screenwriters For Changing Source Material and "Making it Their Own" — GeekTyrant

Geek Tyrant

time5 days ago

  • Geek Tyrant

George R.R. Martin Slams Hollywood Screenwriters For Changing Source Material and "Making it Their Own" — GeekTyrant

If there's one thing George R.R. Martin doesn't have time for, beside writing The WInds of Winter , it's screenwriters rewriting the very stories that made them want to adapt the work in the first place. During a recent event with fellow fantasy author Joe Abercrombie, Martin opened up about what really frustrates him about the adaptation process, saying: 'Television and film are ultimately collaborative. You always have the director and the actors and of course the studio will have executives, they will give notes and all that, and you have to deal with all that, which some people do better than others.' But then he cut to the core of his rant. 'The hard part about collaborating is not so much them, but, I find – speaking only for myself here, not for Joe – is dealing with the other writers. 'They're adapting your book or your story, and they hire someone else to do it, and there's a phrase that they empower this writer to – okay, take The Great Gatsby, but make it your own. And I don't want anyone to make The Great Gatsby their own.' This must've been weighing on Martin's mind for a while. He went on to say: 'I think I may be a minority in this case here that other people don't mind that and all, but I don't think in most of the cases where a Hollywood screenwriter makes something their own that they improve it. I think [in] the majority of cases it's the opposite.' Martin's comments aren't coming out of nowhere. He's previously voiced concerns about HBO's House of the Dragon deviating from his book Fire & Blood , at one point posting on his Blog: 'There are larger and more toxic butterflies to come, if House of the Dragon goes ahead with some of the changes being contemplated for seasons 3 and 4…' It's a familiar tension: writers who create intricate, layered worlds often see those worlds or stories reshaped and rewritten when they enter the Hollywood mashine. Adaptation is one thing, but turning someone else's work into a sandbox for your own ideas isn't collaboration? Martin isn't a fan. You can catch Martin's full remarks in the event video, starting at the 35:19 mark below.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store