Attorney General compares Reform and Tories' policy to actions of Nazi Germany
The Attorney General has drawn comparisons between calls for the UK to disregard international court rulings and the actions of Nazi Germany.
Speaking in London on Thursday, Lord Richard Hermer KC criticised the notion that the UK could breach international obligations, branding it a "radical departure from the UK's constitutional tradition".
In a speech to the Royal United Services Institute (Rusi) thinktank, Lord Hermer highlighted the historical context of dismissing international law, noting that similar arguments were made in Germany during the early 1930s. He said that the claims that international law can be "put aside" were made in the early 1930s in Germany.
Lord Hermer voiced concerns over what he sees as a growing sentiment within the UK, including within the Palace of Westminster, to abandon international legal constraints in favour of "raw power".
He cautioned against this approach, stating: "This is not a new song."
"The claim that international law is fine as far as it goes, but can be put aside when conditions change, is a claim that was made in the early 1930s by 'realist' jurists in Germany, most notably Carl Schmitt, whose central thesis was in essence the claim that state power is all that counts, not law."
Lord Hermer also said that because of what happened 'in 1933, far-sighted individuals rebuilt and transformed the institutions of international law'. That is the year that Adolf Hitler became German chancellor.
Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch has stopped short of calling for the UK to leave the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), as other Conservative figures have advocated.
However, she suggested the UK would have to leave the convention if it stops the country from doing 'what is right'.
Reform UK leader Nigel Farage has said he would get rid of the ECHR, and told ITV in April that 'we have to get back the ability to decide, can we really control our borders'.
In his same speech to Rusi on Thursday, the Attorney General said 'we must not stagnate in our approach to international rules' and that officials should 'look to apply and adapt existing obligations to address new situations'.
'We must be ready to reform where necessary,' he added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
10 minutes ago
- The Independent
Starmer in race against time to stop Trump's shock 50% steel tariffs hitting UK
The UK faces a race against time to prevent Donald Trump 's swingeing new 50 per cent tariffs on steel hitting an already beleaguered critical industry. The US president sent shockwaves through the global economy when he announced on Friday that he would raise the tariffs from 25 per cent to 'further secure' the industry. 'We're going to bring it from 25 percent to 50 percent, the tariffs on steel into the United States of America, which will even further secure the steel industry in the United States. Nobody is going to get around that,' Trump told steel workers on a visit to a Pennsylvania plant. He later confirmed on his Truth Social platform that the change would be 'effective Wednesday, June 4'. A UK-US trade deal unveiled with much fanfare earlier this month should have exempted Britain from steel tariffs – but it has yet to be implemented. Ministers now face a scramble to ensure the agreement with the US is in place before Wednesday. The government is urgently seeking clarification from the US on what the latest announcement means for the UK, the Independent understands. Business secretary Jonathan Reynolds is also set to meet his US counterpart Jamieson Greer in a bid to secure an agreed timeline to lift the tariffs. But the face-to-face talks, after an OECD trade ministers summit in Paris, are thought to be scheduled for Wednesday, raising the prospect of an eleventh-hour showdown. Earlier this month President Trump hailed the trade agreement with the UK as a 'great deal for both countries', while the prime minister said the move would 'boost British businesses and save thousands of British jobs' and deliver on his promises to protect carmakers and save the UK's steel industry. Under its terms, levies on steel and aluminium were to be reduced to zero. However, a general 10 per cent tariff for other goods would remain and Britain agreed to scrap its tariff on ethanol coming into the UK from the US. But the Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch said the UK had been 'shafted' as she contrasted the amount UK business would have to pay with their costs before President Trump came to power. Last month MPs were forced to hold an unusual Saturday sitting to approve emergency plans to save British Steel 's Scunthorpe blast furnaces by taking control away from its Chinese owners. Although the new law stopped short of nationalisation, the government conceded it was "likely" British Steel would have to be taken into public ownership as Sir Keir warned the UK's economic and national security was "on the line". At the time, he said his government was 'turning the page on a decade of decline, where our manufacturing heartlands were hollowed out by the previous government. Our industry is the pride of our history - and I want it to be our future too." On Trump's new 50 per cent steel tariff announcement, a government spokesperson said: 'The UK was the first country to secure a trade deal with the US earlier this month and we remain committed to protecting British business and jobs across key sectors, including steel. 'We are engaging with the US on the implications of the latest tariff announcement and to provide clarity for industry.'
The Independent
10 minutes ago
- The Independent
ITV presenters' futures unclear amid channel budget cuts
ITV is shortening Lorraine Kelly 's show by half and reallocating those 30 minutes to Good Morning Britain as part of a cost-cutting drive, starting January 2026. Lorraine Kelly's breakfast programme will air from 9.30am until 10am for 30 weeks instead of its usual 9-10am slot, while Good Morning Britain will run from 6am until 9.30am instead of 6am to 9am. Loose Women panellist Nadia Sawalha expressed fear for her job, noting that Loose Women stars are self-employed and on new contracts each time. Sawalha also highlighted that hundreds of behind-the-scenes staff at ITV are facing redundancy, causing shock and fear among her friends and colleagues who have worked there for decades. Lorraine Kelly reportedly rejected an initial proposal to merge her show with Good Morning Britain, leading to the reshuffle weeks later, and she may leave when her year-long contract ends.
The Independent
10 minutes ago
- The Independent
Robert Jenrick's TfL stunt reminds us how simple politics can be
Many people have been resistant to Robert Jenrick 's ambition. Rishi Sunak, his former ally, failed to restore him to the cabinet. Conservative Party members failed to elect him leader last year, preferring the more authentic and distinctive Kemi Badenoch. The look on his face as he congratulated his opponent on her victory in that election was a warning and a promise. I will not rest until I have reversed this result, it said. And he has been running ever since, as Keir Starmer joked at Prime Minister's Questions after Jenrick completed the London marathon in 4 hours 40 minutes. His video on Thursday, in which he intercepted fare-dodgers on the London Underground – 'Do you want to go back and pay like everybody else?' – was the high point of his campaign so far. It was an instant classic of the art of the political stunt: simple, effective and watched by millions. Personally, I thought he overdid the 'country is going to the dogs' element. I think London is the best city in the world and the Tube network is great but it does annoy me to see people take advantage of lax enforcement, tailgating or pushing through the barriers to travel without paying. He struck a chord. He identified himself and his party with the message: the law-abiding majority shouldn't pay for a rule-breaking minority. None of the attempts by his political opponents to counter his stunt were successful. He was a hypocrite, it was claimed, hounding the poor and desperate when he was forced four years ago to repay £122 in expenses for a car journey between his constituency and London because he took the train and claimed for both. That didn't work because IPSA, the independent body that runs MPs' expenses, accepted that it was a mistake; and Jenrick did, in effect, 'go back and pay like everybody else'. The more feeble criticism was that Jenrick didn't have permission to film in the Underground station – not that it should matter, but in fact Transport for London appears to require permission only for 'filming any commercial or promotional content on the TfL network'. The rules don't specify whether 'promotional' includes promoting the career of a restless politician. Jenrick's opponents would be better employed asking why his stunt was so successful. Sadiq Khan, the mayor of London, should be kicking himself for not having thought of it himself. Jenrick is good at this stuff. A previous social media video he made on the Chagos deal was a well-executed documentary that went into some detail about the history of the islands. Not strictly his subject as shadow justice secretary, but again an effective communication that made life a bit harder for the Labour government – which has still been unable to justify the treaty in terms that the median voter can understand. Labour is generally bad at this stuff. Ten years ago this month, in the closing days of the 2015 election campaign, Ed Miliband unveiled Labour's pledges carved on a tablet of stone in a Hastings car park. My description of it is still quoted on Wikipedia: 'The most absurd, ugly, embarrassing, childish, silly, patronising, idiotic, insane, ridiculous gimmick I have ever seen.' The Conservatives have had their misfires too. No one can really explain why William Hague's ride on a water slide at Flambards theme park in Cornwall didn't work, but it didn't, so the baseball cap with 'Hague' written on it became a symbol of his inauthenticity. George Osborne tells the story of when he tried to dramatise a policy to get rid of red tape by lighting a bonfire of actual regulations on the beach outside the Tories' annual conference – only to be prevented by the local council's rules banning fires on the beach. Boris Johnson, on the other hand, was a walking perma-stunt who managed to turn glitches into gold, as when he was stuck on a zip wire holding two union jacks. Like conservative populists the world over – the word 'populist' means 'more popular than liberals think they should be' – Johnson could drive a 'Get Brexit Done' digger through a wall of polystyrene bricks and not look ridiculous. Donald Trump could do something as simple as frying chips in McDonald's and serving drive-through customers, or driving a rubbish truck, and dominate a whole news cycle. And Javier Milei of Argentina had his chainsaw. In Britain, though, Jenrick's only rival is Ed Davey, whose low-content election campaign, featuring him bungee-jumping or falling into water, was highly efficient in converting votes into parliamentary seats. Most of the Tory former cabinet ministers that I speak to expect Jenrick to succeed in his campaign to depose Badenoch eventually, and they think that Jenrick will do a deal with Nigel Farage. They may be right about the first part, although I think they are wrong about the second part: I cannot see what is in it for Farage. A political party cannot survive by stunts alone, but it might help the Tories a bit, at the margins, to have an unconventional communicator such as Jenrick in charge. Such is the depth of the party's crisis that it might even be worth the ridicule that will be attracted by changing leader yet again.
