logo
‘Facts matter:' Lester Holt ends ‘NBC Nightly News' tenure

‘Facts matter:' Lester Holt ends ‘NBC Nightly News' tenure

The Hilla day ago

Lester Holt hosted his last 'NBC Nightly News' show on Friday after a 14 year tenure as its anchor. The highly decorated reporter bid viewers a farewell by reminding them of their core values that guide the team's coverage.
'I'm so grateful for your trust around here,. Facts matter, words matter, journalism matters, and you matter,' Holt said.
'Over the last decade, we have shared some dark and harrowing days and nights of our country, the pandemic, mass shootings, natural disasters, each testing our resilience and our compassion. That's why I often like to leave you with something to smile about, moments that reassure and connect us,' he added.
Holt announced he would step down in February after covering Trump throughout his first administration and earning praise for his ability to fact-check the leader in real time. He moderated the first presidential debate of 2016, covered January 6th riots and traveled to Israel to provide insight on Hamas' 2023 attack on Israel while anchoring NBC's 'Dateline.'
In 2018, a Hollywood Reporter poll found that Holt was the most trusted television news personality in America.
'I will miss the team that puts it all together, my dear friends and my colleagues. But for now, I just want to say thank you to my incredibly supportive and patient family and all of you,' Holt said during his last show.
Tom Llamas will succeed Holt as host and concurrently serve as the 'NBC Nightly News' managing editor.
'I wish Tom great success,' Holt said Friday.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

IDF says it's investigating attack near Rafah aid distribution point
IDF says it's investigating attack near Rafah aid distribution point

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

IDF says it's investigating attack near Rafah aid distribution point

The alleged Israeli attack on a Gaza aid distribution point killed at least 31 people, according to Palestinian and Hamas-affiliated media. The IDF on Sunday said that it was unaware of injuries caused by military gunfire within the humanitarian distribution zone, after news of an alleged Israeli attack in the area killed at least 31, according to Palestinian and Hamas-affiliated media. The IDF later said that the matter is being reviewed. The attack was reportedly carried out near the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation's (GHF) distribution center in Rafah in southern Gaza. On Thursday, the GHF opened its thirdfood distribution center, located in central Gaza. Two other food centers previously opened near Rafah in deep southern Gaza, and one more is still due to open in Khan Yunis in mid-southern Gaza. Yonah Jeremy Bob contributed to this report. This is a developing story.

More Than 20 Killed Near Aid Distribution Site in Gaza, Palestinian Health Officials Say
More Than 20 Killed Near Aid Distribution Site in Gaza, Palestinian Health Officials Say

New York Times

timean hour ago

  • New York Times

More Than 20 Killed Near Aid Distribution Site in Gaza, Palestinian Health Officials Say

More than 20 people were killed in southern Gaza on Sunday near an American-Israeli aid distribution site, according to Palestinian health officials, as hungry Palestinians gathered en masse hoping to receive some food from the facility. It was not immediately clear who had opened fire in the southern Gaza city of Rafah. The Palestine Red Crescent Society said its paramedics had evacuated at least 23 killed and 23 wounded from the area, all with gunshot wounds. The Israeli military said it was not aware of any injuries caused by Israeli fire 'within the humanitarian aid site,' but did not immediately rule out shooting nearby. Hamas accused Israeli forces of attacking people who had gathered to seek food. The New York Times could not verify the circumstances of the attack. Over the past week, Israel has launched a contentious plan to overhaul aid distribution in Gaza. Israeli officials say the new system run mainly by American contractors of four sites in southern Gaza would prevent Hamas from seizing the food, fuel and other goods, but aid agencies have criticized the initiative. Huge crowds of Gazans have headed for the new aid sites, hoping to receive a box of food supplies. While some days have gone relatively smoothly, there have also been chaotic scenes, including one instance in which Israeli forces fired what they described as warning shots. The United Nations and other major humanitarian relief groups have boycotted the sites, accusing Israel of wielding aid as part of its military strategy. U.N. officials said there was little evidence that Hamas systematically diverted relief. Critics in Israel have warned the effort could be the first step toward establishing formal Israeli rule over Gaza. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Clarence Page: Hey, men, Democrats want your votes. They really do.
Clarence Page: Hey, men, Democrats want your votes. They really do.

Chicago Tribune

timean hour ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Clarence Page: Hey, men, Democrats want your votes. They really do.

Where are the Democrats? What are they doing about the damage President Donald Trump is doing to … everything? I hear that a lot from my liberal friends these days, ever since Trump swept the battleground states six months ago and proceeded to dismantle government as we Americans used to know it. With the fury of a man who is trying to make up for the time he lost on the sidelines after losing to Democrat Joe Biden, Trump has been rolling out radical changes almost daily that seem to be aimed at retribution — one of his favorite words — more than decent governance. In the face of the onslaught, Democrats sound about as depressed as the party's approval ratings — 27% in a recent NBC News poll. That's the party's lowest positive rating in the network's polling data since 1990. Only 7% say their support is 'very positive.' Throwing more salt into their wounds is the simmering discontent among the party's core constituencies, upon whom the party has come to count for decades: young people, Black voters and Latinos, in particular. Trump made notable gains with these voters, a trend that — unlike 2016 — included Trump's winning the popular vote for the first time. Self-identified Democratic voters say by a 2-to-1 margin in the NBC poll that they would rather see their party 'hold the line on their positions, even if it leads to gridlock,' instead of looking for areas of compromise to, as the old Capitol Hill saying goes, get things done. As a self-described moderate liberal, I'm dismayed but not surprised by that angst-driven reaction. Trump's slash-and-burn approach to reform — on issues as varied as immigration enforcement to Medicaid to Veterans Affairs and COVID-19 shots, just for starters, will take a strong pushback just to land somewhere near the ever-elusive sensible center. Where are the Dems now? Of particular interest this time around, the party is trying to woo young men — diligently. The harsh Democratic reality includes downward long-term trends for Democrats while Republicans have been gaining ground in recent decades, particularly among noncollege graduates. Working-class voters have been turning away from the Democrats, long viewed as the party for working families but increasingly perceived as the party of college-educated 'elites.' Which leads us to the most significant new moves by the Dems' donor class and strategists: a $20 million 'strategic plan' called 'Speaking with American Men,' or SAM for short. That's right, guys. Like an old Uncle Sam poster, today's Democrats want you! Perhaps more than ever. The decline of men and concomitant rise of women in Democratic voting ranks has been observed for decades and is not expected to change drastically soon. Democratic pollsters are advising the party leaders to avoid taking the wrong lessons from the 2026 midterms, when many of them hope President Trump's excesses will backfire in favor of the Dems. That's wise. Trump's successes, including his victory last year, have tended to be larger than expected after the Democrats underestimated his popularity. As Anat Shenker-Osorio, a Democratic consultant told The New York Times, 'Voters are hungry for people to actually stand up for them — or get caught trying.' In other words, she said, 'The party is doing a lot of naval-gazing and not enough full-belly aching.' I, too, have heard that lament, particularly from Democrats in cities like Chicago who remember an era when the party seemed less concerned with trying to sound polite and more concerned with delivering the goods to its constituents. That's especially important at times like these when funding cuts for research, veterans and health care, among other issues, can mean life and death for them. Scott Galloway, a marketing professor at NYU and a prominent commentator, has gained a measure of fame for his speeches and research on the feeling of abandonment by the Dems that has been a major turnoff for the audience of the so-called 'Manosphere' of male podcasting. He argues that the party's focus on other demographics, like women voters, is important, but has fed a feeling of neglect and abandonment among young men. This development caught little attention in the era before podcasting. But today's electorate, like the news, is not what it used to be. Democrats will have to keep up with changing times before the party's candidates are overwhelmed by them.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store