Chess: Carlsen finally achieves 2900 rating as Niemann aims to be Las Vegas party pooper
For years the world No 1, Magnus Carlsen, tried to achieve a 2900 classical rating but he always peaked 10-20 points short of the round figure. The Norwegian, 34, had a personal best of 2889, achieved in 2014. That was 33 points ahead of Garry Kasparov's highest figure and 100 ahead of Bobby Fischer. Carlsen made later attempts but could never get past the 2880s, while the numbers had an eerie similarity to the 28,000s and 29,000s at the top of Everest where George Mallory and Andrew Irvine perished in 1924.
In the new Freestyle rating list Carlsen at 2909 is nearly 100 points ahead of Hikaru Nakamura in second place, with his performance boosted by his perfect 9/9 at Grenke Karlsruhe. In contrast, the Fide world champion, Gukesh Dommaraju, ranks a lowly 26th with 2701 points.
Carlsen will hope to maintain his new rating next month when the third leg (of five) of the Freestyle $3.75m Grand Slam takes place on 16-20 July at Wynn Las Vegas. The field of 16 will include most of the usual top names but there will be particular interest in one who could turn out a party pooper.
Hans Niemann, the 22-year-old whose game with Carlsen at the 2022 Sinquefield Cup led to a $1m lawsuit, was invited to the Paris leg of the Freestyle Grand Slam but withdrew for undisclosed personal reasons. Now, having turned down the easy entrance, Niemann has got in by a much harder route, qualifying for the Las Vegas leg by winning a 16-player knockout where he defeated four top-class opponents, including the former world classical champion Ding Liren. Niemann has also shown significantly improved results in chess.com's Titled Tuesday, where, in recent weeks, his performances have matched those of Carlsen and Nakamura.
Chess in the past five years has enjoyed powerful boosts. Netflix's The Queen's Gambit and its heroine, Beth Harman, were a viewing success, the Niemann v Carlsen lawsuit was widely publicised, Carlsen's personality is popular, while the leading chess site, chess.com, has millions of blitz games played every day and lichess.org is also very successful.
As a consequence, the incomes of the top 10 or 20 grandmasters have soared from events like the St Louis organised Grand Chess Tour and the $3.75m Freestyle Grand Slam. This year, for the first time, the Esports World Cup, in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, will include chess (10-minute games without any per-move increment and a $1.5m prize pool). In 2026 Fide's $2m official world championship series will resume centre stage, as India's Gukesh defends his crown against the winner of the eight-player Candidates.
Meanwhile, back in Britain, participation remains high but financial returns do not match the stellar numbers. A new survey from chess.com reveals that its UK online membership has reached an astonishing 8.9 million players, behind only the US (43.9 million) and India (20.4 million).
This stratospheric figure is 600 times that for the membership of the English Chess Federation, which in 2023 was officially 14,567. Worse for the ECF, the £500,000 government grant for elite chess, which Rishi Sunak introduced in 2023, was axed completely as part of the Treasury's departmental cuts at the end of April 2025. One consequence of this is that the rewards for playing success in Britain do not compare with the massive amounts on offer in world events.
Next month's English Championship in Warwick (18-21 July) offers £2,000-£1,250-£750 for its top three, while the week-long British Championship in Liverpool from 31 July to 9 August has £5,000-£2,500-£1,500. The highest ever British Championship first prize was £8,000 in 2011.
Sign up to The Recap
The best of our sports journalism from the past seven days and a heads-up on the weekend's action
after newsletter promotion
There is an obvious event which could make a big difference, and ought to tempt some of the millions of UK residents who play exclusively online blitz on chess.com to try a day of over-the-board blitz chess as well.
This is the UK open blitz championship, which was launched in 2023 and is now in its third year. Full details for the tournament can be found here. The UK blitz championship uses a three minutes per game plus a two-second per move increment, which is also the most normal time control for chess.com blitz games.
The championship will have 16 one-day regional qualifying tournaments in August and September, followed by a one-day final at Leamington Spa on 22 November.
The one-day qualifiers will be in London (three events at Golders Green, Hampton, and Harrow) Belfast, Birmingham, Bristol, Cardiff, Edinburgh, Glasgow, Leeds, Liverpool, Manchester, Newcastle, Nottingham, Sheffield and Southampton. Many masters and grandmasters are expected to take part. The total prize fund will be in excess of £10,000.
To enter any of the qualifiers, click here.
3978: It's mate in six by 1 Rg6+! hxg6 2 Rxg6+ Kh7 3 Rg2+! Kh6 4 Qe3+! Kh5 5 Qxe5+ Kh4 6 Qg5 mate.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
36 minutes ago
- The Independent
Jake Paul vs Julio Cesar Chavez Jr betting tips, best bets & odds
Jake Paul is back in the boxing ring this weekend for the first time since he beat the 58-year-old Mike Tyson in November 2024. He was handed the victory by unanimous decision against Tyson, and on Saturday night he fights another former world champion in ex-WBC middleweight champion Julio Cesar Chavez Jr in Anaheim. The 39-year-old held the title for a year and a half from 2011 when he beat John Duddy. He defended his title five times before losing to Sergio Martinez in 2012. His last fight took place in July 2024, when he fought on the undercard of the Jake Paul vs Mike Perry fight, facing former UFC fighter Uriah Hall, winning by a unanimous decision to set up this fight. betting sites to chalk up the 55th win of his career. Paul vs Chavez Jr Betting Preview: A Long Night in Store Paul, who has made a name for himself outside of the ring as an influencer and actor, has won 11 of his 12 fights, with his only defeat coming against Tommy Fury. Fury won the February 2023 bout via a split decision, despite being knocked down in the eighth round, but Paul has bounced back well, winning his next five fights. Boxing betting sites are strongly siding with Paul to come out on top once more in a bout that fans will be hoping offers a bit more entertainment than the fight with Tyson. The 28-year-old is still struggling to be taken seriously as a boxer, with the bulk of his fights taking place against mixed martial artists or former pro boxers, many of whom were certainly not in their prime. But, a victory on Saturday may change the narrative. Enjoy 185+ fights a year on DAZN, the Global Home of Boxing Never miss a fight from top promoters. Watch on your devices anywhere, anytime. ADVERTISEMENT. If you sign up to this service we will earn commission. This revenue helps to fund journalism across The Independent. Chavez Jr certainly has the experience to win, with just six defeats from his 62 fights, and they only have one shared opponent, Anderson Silva, who beat Chavez but lost to Paul, taking both the distance. Paul vs Chavez Jr prediction 1: The fight to go the distance - 8/13 William Hill Jake Paul vs Julio Cesar Chavez Jr Best Bets: Paul to edge it Both fighters have plenty of previous experience when it comes to going the distance, with four of Paul's last six fights being decided by the judges, while Chavez Jr has gone the distance in his last three bouts. If the Mexican is to get the win, then surely he has to get in there early, after all, his opponent is 11 years his junior. If the fight goes the full 10-rounds, it's hard to see him being able to keep up with the man that both Oscar De La Hoya and Tony Bellew are tipping to win. Paul is just shy of odds-on in the boxing odds to win via decision, giving bettors a more appealing option than backing him at 2/11 in the to win market on betting apps. Please gamble responsibly When using gambling sites, be aware that sports betting can be addictive. Please take steps to remain in control of your time and budget. The same applies whether you're using new betting sites, slot sites, casino sites, casino apps, or any other gambling medium. Even the most knowledgeable punter can lose a bet, so always stick to a budget and never chase your losses. It's particularly important not to get carried away by any free bets or casino offers you might receive, both of which are available in abundance on gambling sites, but must be approached with caution. You can stay in control by making use of the responsible gambling tools offered, such as deposit limits, loss limits, self-exclusion and time-outs.
The Guardian
37 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Anna Wintour: ‘queen of fashion' steps away from American Vogue editor-in-chief role
The departure of Anna Wintour as editor-in-chief of American Vogue leaves a bigger absence in the fashion world than would be left by the departure of any designer or supermodel. For more than three decades, Wintour has held the official title of editor-in-chief of American Vogue – and an unofficial, but widely acknowledged, title of queen of fashion. At any catwalk show, the best seat in the house is automatically hers. Like Beyoncé and Madonna, she has no need of a last name; everyone refers to her simply as 'Anna', although few are bold enough to address her directly. She has been a constant, regal presence, crowned by the signature glossy bob and ever-present sunglasses. Wintour's status has been built not just on ego, but on how much she has done for fashion. She has amplified the place of fashion in culture beyond all recognition. The ambition and bravado of fashion today – from Louis Vuitton hiring the Grammy-winning musician Pharrell Williams as creative director and taking over an entire district of central Paris for his debut show, to blockbuster fashion exhibitions such as the V&A's Coco Chanel retrospective becoming fixtures on the art world calendar – owes a vast debt to the vision of Wintour. An early instigator of putting actors, pop stars and politicians on the cover of her magazine, she understood instinctively that a Vogue cover bequeathed an intangible but potent 'soft power' that celebrities craved, and that Vogue's role as gatekeeper to that power could be leveraged in Washington and in Hollywood, as well as at the fashion weeks of New York, London, Paris and Milan. The cartoonish perception of a woman who is powerful simply because she lords over a world of ditsy underlings who are petrified by her is very far from the truth. Wintour grew the fashion world into an empire, making fashion itself bigger and more powerful, and rode high by keeping hold of the reins. She is unusual in being both a glamorous A-list celebrity who wields personal star power, and a gifted behind-the-scenes operator, always on manoeuvres behind those dark glasses. In the court of Vogue, she has been both King Henry VIII and Thomas Cromwell, commanding ceremonial power while also pulling the strings behind the scenes. It is, however, entirely true that most of those around her are intimidated by her. Her operational mode resembles that of a military commander: decisions are made swiftly, and she does not suffer fools gladly. In public, her emotional tone hovers around a cool courtesy, dipping to frosty lows if displeased by unpunctuality or incompetence. This is a persona that Wintour – who in private is devoted to her family, is a tennis superfan, a passionate supporter of the arts and a witty and phenomenally well-read conversationalist – has crafted carefully. Her image was enshrined in 2006 by the cinema release of The Devil Wears Prada, in which Meryl Streep played Miranda Priestly, a New York fashion editor. It was based on a book by a former assistant of Wintour's, and the starring role was widely assumed to be modelled on her. The imperious 'Nuclear Wintour' persona has served her well. In 2012, it was widely rumoured that Wintour, a heavyweight fundraiser for Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, was in the running to be appointed the US ambassador in London. The rumour turned out to be unfounded, but the degree of gossip mill traction for the idea of a magazine journalist being appointed to a high-powered position in international diplomacy is testament to the gravitas and prestige of Wintour's reputation. Wintour was born into journalism. Her father, Charles Wintour, was editor of the London Evening Standard for much of her childhood. She began her career in her birth city before moving to New York in her 20s, recrossing the Atlantic to become editor of British Vogue in 1985. That job was only a staging post for the highly ambitious Wintour, who achieved her goal of editing American Vogue three years later. Her keenly developed instinct for which way the wind was blowing was evident from the start: when the printers received the image for her first cover, they called the Vogue office concerned that there had been a mistake. The photo featured the model Michaela Bercu in faded blue denim – the first time jeans had appeared on the cover of Vogue. The post-dress-code informality that was to transform the fashion industry in the last decades of the 20th century was already being hinted at. Sign up to Fashion Statement Style, with substance: what's really trending this week, a roundup of the best fashion journalism and your wardrobe dilemmas solved after newsletter promotion It is a stretch to imagine Wintour, whose daily regime as editor began with rising at 4.30am to play an hour's tennis before a 6am blowdry, fading into gentle retirement. Her daughter, Bee, who works in the theatre world, once said that the lesson her mother was most keen to instil in her children was a work ethic. Bee recalled how, as a high school student attending a Vogue gala, she asked the guest sitting next to her to test her on Latin American history, as she had a test at school the next morning. But there is more to Wintour than the ice queen image. Her devotion to tennis is such that she would even play hooky from New York fashion week when shows clashed with the US Open tournament, taking a seat courtside instead. The timing – halfway through the menswear fashion shows – left fashion puzzled, but make more sense from a tennis fan's perspective. With Jack Draper poised to fill the gap in British tennis left by Andy Murray, and a simmering rivalry between Carlos Alcaraz and Jannik Sinner, her departure is Vogue's loss but SW19's gain.
Telegraph
38 minutes ago
- Telegraph
This devastating play is one of the cultural events of the year
Seven years ago, an unknown young director called Lynette Linton made her name overnight at the Donmar Warehouse with a blistering production of Sweat, a work by double Pulitzer Prize-winning American playwright Lynn Nottage. Now Linton, firmly established as one of the shining stars in the directorial firmament, returns to the scene of her triumph for a revival of Intimate Apparel – Nottage's exquisite 2003 play about a black seamstress in 1905 New York. It is another devastatingly fine production, headed by a remarkable leading performance from Samira Wiley, known to global television viewers for The Handmaid's Tale. Wiley plays Esther, a skilled and trusted maker of 'intimate apparel for ladies', who dreams of opening her own beauty parlour for black women. She lives in a 'rooming house' and is adequately content with her lot yet, at the age of 35, longs for a little romance. A mutual acquaintance leads her to start exchanging letters with one George Armstrong (Kadiff Kirwan), a Barbadian man working on the Panama Canal and George's increasingly affectionate replies to her are projected in swirling italics on the theatre's back wall. The one problem with this epistolary exchange is that Esther can neither read nor write. Fortunately, two people are particularly keen to assist with the correspondence: Esther's no-nonsense prostitute friend Mayme (Faith Omole) and her wealthy client Mrs Van Buren (Claudia Jolly). The very personal nature of Esther's work means that class and race boundaries are collapsed; one of the beautifully crafted play's many narrative strands involves tales of this rich white woman's increasingly unhappy marriage being recounted obliquely during a series of lingerie fittings. George is not the only man on Esther's radar. There is also Mr Marks (Alex Waldmann), a Jewish fabric merchant whom she visits regularly on business. There is an unmistakable frisson between this gentle pair, a flirtation via fabric, and if they cannot touch one another, they can certainly caress the Japanese silks that they both so admire. Rarely has someone brushing a hair from someone else's jacket been so exquisitely sexy. Wiley superbly suggests the emotions bubbling within Esther: pride in her work and stoic decency, as well as an overriding desire to, at last, wear her own intimate apparel to seduce the man she desires. The character is convinced that she is plain, yet when she believes that she has at last found love, her face radiates the pure beauty of happiness. All six cast members are pitch-perfect and Linton proves once more why she is so highly regarded in a production that marks a magnificent conclusion to Tim Sheader's high-achieving first season as artistic director of this boutique gem of a venue.
