NATO summit: Trump fuels allies' doubts over his solidarity with the alliance
Donald Trump has never made a secret of how little he appreciates alliances, and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) is no exception. From the outset, on Tuesday, June 24, just hours before representatives of the 32 NATO member states gathered at a gala dinner, hosted by the king of the Netherlands in The Hague, the Dutch administrative capital, ahead of their annual summit, the United States president chilled the mood among the NATO allies.
While aboard Air Force One, the presidential plane, Trump was questioned about the US stance on the importance of the mutual defense clause in Article 5 of the NATO Treaty – which provides for allies to automatically respond in the event of one member being attacked. He replied, in his usual provocative manner: "It depends on your definition. There's numerous definitions of Article 5. You know that, right?"
Admittedly, legal experts within NATO have long debated how robust Article 5 is, but it remains one of the alliance's core values. Indeed, as the NATO allies gathered in The Hague, preparing to ratify an increase in their minimum defense spending target, taking it to 5% of GDP, up from the current 2% threshold, they were caught off guard. While they were willing to accept this demand from Trump, they expected, in return, a clear US commitment to upholding Article 5. In Brussels, this give-and-take deal was even referred to as "5 for 5."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
43 minutes ago
- Euronews
Rail Baltica could be used for defensive military purposes
After years of delays, construction on the 870-kilometre railway line through Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia is now gathering momentum. The Rail Baltica project is building one of the most modern high-speed lines in Europe. With the Russian war of aggression against Ukraine, using the new NATO-standard line for military purposes is becoming increasingly important. Europe is growing together—and so is its cross-border transport infrastructure. Nine EU main transport corridors are to be completed by 2030 according to the European Commission's plan. The Baltic states are important for connecting the North Sea to the Baltic Sea, but also for the north-south corridors to the Black Sea and the Mediterranean. In Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia, tracks still have the old Russian broad gauge. The new line will have the European standard gauge. There are also geopolitical reasons for this change of gauge. In the event of a Russian attack, Rail Baltica should be able to transport troops and heavy military equipment from west to east. But the main goal of the new line is to improve the connection between the Baltic cities and the European single market: fast travel for tourists, business people and freight. The problem? The costs have quadrupled, from six to an estimated 24 billion euros. According to the European Commission, it's too expensive. Baltic auditors have also issued a warning. According to the joint three-country audit, there is a funding gap of eleven billion euros. For the time being, there will therefore be a pared-down 'economy route', where instead of a double track throughout, it will mostly have a single track. Fewer noise barriers will be erected, the track bed will be built somewhat lower than originally planned, and branch lines will initially keep the existing broad gauge. This will save several billion euros. The European Union is funding up to 85 percent of Rail Baltica from its Connecting Europe Facility funding pot. This is the EU's budget line for promoting cross-border transport infrastructure. Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia are paying for the rest. A fierce financial battle is raging behind the scenes. At the beginning of the year, ten EU heads of government sent a letter to the EU Commission requesting more money for cross-border transport networks—and fewer requirements. This was followed just a few weeks later by a second letter along the same lines, this time signed by the heads of government of the three Baltic states. Rail Baltica was actually meant to be finished this year. But there is at least a five-year delay! Now there is talk of it being finished in 2030. What are the reasons for the slow pace and exploding costs? In background discussions, the problems of the past are clear: Things are now going better because the European Commission is putting pressure on the project. Where construction is underway, for example on Neris Bridge in Lithuania, work is progressing. In the Lithuanian capital Vilnius, I met Marius Narmontas, one of the top managers of the three-country joint venture Rail Baltica. How does he explain the several-year delays? 'Planning and designing the route took longer than expected', said Narmontas, 'because we have never had such a large project before.' A lot depends on the European Commission and how they will negotiate the next financing period', he continued. In the Latvian capital Riga, Guntis Āboltiņš-Āboliņš, director of the construction company Bererix, warned of a potential security risk: 'From a military point of view, tanks could be loaded onto the railway in Russia and be in Riga in a few hours! That's why I think we should approach this strategically.' Āboltiņš-Āboliņš believes it would be wise to quickly convert the entire rail network from Russian broad gauge to European standard gauge. Catherine Trautmann coordinates the North Sea-Baltic transport corridor for the EU. She emphasised that the main connection, 'the backbone of Rail Baltica', should be built as quickly as possible. Trautmann is optimistic: 'Rail Baltica is a project that justifies European funding. We have a meeting with the European Investment Bank in autumn, because a loan could also be a solution.' Will the trains run in 2030, yes or no? Trautmann's answer is clear: 'Yes!'
France 24
2 hours ago
- France 24
Trump sees 'progress' on Gaza, raising hopes for ceasefire
"I think great progress is being made on Gaza," Trump told reporters ahead of a NATO summit in the Netherlands, adding that his special envoy Steve Witkoff had told him "Gaza is very close." He linked his optimism about imminent "very good news" for the Gaza Strip to a ceasefire agreed on Tuesday between Israel and Hamas backer Iran to end their 12-day war. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has also suggested that Israel's blitz of Iran's nuclear and missile facilities, as well as its security forces linked to overseas militant groups, could help end the Gaza conflict. Netanyahu faces growing calls from opposition politicians, relatives of hostages being held in Gaza and even members of his ruling coalition to bring an end to the fighting, triggered by Palestinian militant group Hamas's October 7, 2023 attack. Key mediator Qatar announced Tuesday that it would launch a new push for a ceasefire, with Hamas on Wednesday saying talks had "intensified". "Our communications with the brother mediators in Egypt and Qatar have not stopped and have intensified in recent hours," Hamas official Taher al-Nunu told AFP. He cautioned, however, that the group had "not yet received any new proposals" to end the war. The Israeli government declined to comment on any new ceasefire talks beyond saying that efforts to return Israeli hostages in Gaza were ongoing "on the battlefield and via negotiations". 'No clear purpose' Israel sent forces into Gaza to root out Iran-linked Hamas and rescue hostages after the Hamas attack that resulted in the deaths of 1,219 people, mostly civilians, according to an AFP tally based on official figures. Israel's military campaign has killed at least 56,156 people, also mostly civilians, according to the health ministry in Hamas-run Gaza. The United Nations considers its figures reliable. The latest Israeli military losses led to rare criticism of the war effort by the leader of the ultra-Orthodox United Torah Judaism party, a partner in Netanyahu's coalition government. "I still don't understand why we are fighting there... Soldiers are getting killed all the time," lawmaker Moshe Gafni told a hearing in the Israeli parliament on Wednesday. The slain soldiers were from the Israeli combat engineering corps and were conducting a reconnaissance mission in the Khan Yunis area in southern Gaza when their vehicle was targeted with an explosive device, according to a military statement. The Hostages and Missing Families Forum, the main group representing relatives of those held in Gaza, endorsed Gafni's criticism of the war. "On this difficult morning, Gafni tells it like it is... The war in Gaza has run its course, it is being conducted with no clear purpose and no concrete plan," the group said in a statement. Of the 251 hostages seized by Palestinian militants during the Hamas attack, 49 are still held in Gaza including 27 the Israeli military says are dead. Rights groups say Gaza and its population of more than two million face famine-like conditions due to Israeli restrictions, with near-daily deaths of people queuing for food aid. - Gunfire near aid site - Gaza's civil defence agency said Wednesday that Israeli fire killed at least another 20 people, including six who were waiting for aid. Civil defence spokesman Mahmud Bassal told AFP that a crowd of aid-seekers was hit by Israeli "bullets and tank shells" in an area of central Gaza where Palestinians have gathered each night in the hope of collecting rations. Contacted by AFP, the Israeli military said it was "not aware of any incident this morning with casualties in the central Gaza Strip". The United Nations on Tuesday condemned the "weaponisation of food" in Gaza and slammed a US- and Israeli-backed foundation that has largely replaced established humanitarian organisations there. The privately run Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) was brought into the Palestinian territory at the end of May but its operations have been marred by chaotic scenes, deaths and neutrality concerns. The GHF has denied responsibility for deaths near its aid points. The Gaza health ministry says that since late May, nearly 550 people have been killed near aid centres while seeking scarce supplies. The civil defence agency said Israeli forces killed 46 people waiting for aid on Tuesday. © 2025 AFP
Euronews
2 hours ago
- Euronews
Life back to normal in Doha after Iran fires missiles at Al Udeid base
A ceasefire in the so-called "12-day war" between Iran and Israel was announced by the White House early on Tuesday morning. Just after 0700CET, US President Donald Trump announced that a ceasefire between the two countries had taken effect, saying "Please do not violate it!" in a post on Truth Social. Around an hour later, the Israeli government confirmed it had agreed to the ceasefire proposal with Iran indicating it would stop attacks if Israel did the same. Two hours after Israel agreed to the truce, the Israel Defence Forces (IDF) said it had identified missiles launched from Iran. That prompted Defence Minister Israel Katz to instruct the IDF to continue attacking Tehran, slamming the "complete violation" of the truce's terms. Iran denied it had fired any missiles after the ceasefire came into effect with the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) later saying it had struck "military and logistical centres" in Israel "in the final moments before the ceasefire was imposed on the enemy." After the apparent shaky start to the ceasefire, Trump later posted on Truth Social saying, "Both Israel and Iran wanted to stop the War, equally! It was my great honor to Destroy All Nuclear facilities & capability, and then, STOP THE WAR!" Meanwhile, in Doha it's business as usual, after Iran launched a salvo of missiles at the US air base Al Udeid in Qatar on Monday, but no rockets hit their target. It later emerged that Iran had informed both the US and Qatar of the imminent strike, meaning Qatari air defences were able to shoot down the missiles. Most people in Doha are returning to work, but with a sense of caution still in the air. The airspace has reopened and flights to and from Qatar have resumed. After that barrage, citizens and residents of the Gulf state were largely united behind the Qatari government, backing its calls for a return to diplomacy.
